User talk:CardinalDan/archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:CardinalDan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kosuke Saito, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://vjarmy.com/wiki/index.php/Kosuke_Saito. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Ariel♥Gold 21:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring the page on sydney fc. Can you add user:kewisgud for block? --Ankithreya! 12:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

It's already done. CardinalDan (talk) 12:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

You are very welcome. Any time. Tiptoety (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		In recognition of your excellent anti-vandalism efforts in general, and for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, I award you this barnstar. Keep up your excellent work! :-) Lradrama 20:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

"Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chicken McNuggets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 12:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)"

I see that you accused me of vandalism, reported someone else's vandalism as mine, and earned your gold star for doing so. Check the history, CardinalDan. I've removed somebody else's vandalism, I did not create it. Some other person, I suppose is an attempt to be witty, had written that "Black meat" is the opposite of "white meat," I changed this reference to "dark meat." I also removed a parenthetical remark which refered to someone as "not straight." If either of these is vandalism or in unconstructive edit, please let me know how, because I don't see it.

• My bad, it's my fault. I was in a rush and I guess I made a mistake. I'll take down the vandalism warning. CardinalDan (talk) 00:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted the article, but I did not see where the criteria you listed was a good fit. You listed CSD G11 (spam), I think you might have meant CSD G1. JERRY ^talk _contribs 05:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Eatcacti (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome. CardinalDan (talk) 21:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Wow, I don't know what you did, but you seem to have built up quite the fan club tonight. But not the good kind, unfortunately. Uh.. good luck with that. Eatcacti (talk) 08:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Just reverting vandalism, and I seem to have hit a nerve of a particular vandal. It's funny to see how much the guy has vandalized my pages. He/she/it has given me a good laugh tonight. CardinalDan (talk) 08:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Just thinking it might be time to get your user page semi-protected for a few hours. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 08:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

That would be a good idea.... and thanks for your help with the vandal. CardinalDan (talk) 08:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Had more than my share on my page in my time. :O) Do you want me to go to WP:RFPP?FlowerpotmaN·(t) 08:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, I made a request, but I'm not sure I did it correctly. CardinalDan (talk) 08:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I've protected the user page infinite for now as you mentioned no expiry, feel free to ask me or any other admin if you want it unprotected. For the next time, you should add your request at the top of the list, otherwise it could be likely overlooked or at least delayed dealt with. Happy editing & don't let the vandals discourage you :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 09:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I think I'll leave it protected for now, but thanks for your help. And the vandals, although they can be discouraging, can be good for an occasional laugh. CardinalDan (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Deja vu again. Thanks for the revert. Anyway, this is definitely my last late noght for a while. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome. And good luck to you. CardinalDan (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

last late noght. Err, think that should have been "night". See, it IS late. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Right. Well, get some rest. And thanks for all your help, especially with the vandal(s). CardinalDan (talk) 03:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

This is RyanMcCloud.

Why did you yell at me for saying Nintendo is great? I'm just stating a fact. What is wrong with you? I did not vandalize anything!

It was unencyclopedic. It's one thing to be a fan of Nintendo, it's another to put your POV into an article. Now please stop. CardinalDan (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I apologize.

From RyanMcCloud —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanMcCloud (talk • contribs) 19:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

RyanMcCloud (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm sorry!

RyanMcCloud (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For excellent vandal whacking, and for defending the wiki. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, force of habit. ^_^ CardinalDan (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Nah no need to apologize, I welcome the competition! ;) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, it's just me. I had some bad experiences with spambots and vandals on another wiki, so reverting vandalism has become second nature to me. CardinalDan (talk) 18:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I support that Barnstar acknowledgment. Thanks for saving me, Dan! :) --Dan Leveille^TALK 07:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. CardinalDan (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

You violated 3rr! I hope you are aware. RuneWiki⁷⁷⁷ 22:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• This was due to reverting a vandal's attempts to alter a page. CardinalDan (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I know. But, you reported him for vandalism after final warning. Technically, he didn't vandalize. I couldn't consider reverting your own page vandalism. And he never recieved a final warning. {{subst:uw-vand4}} is not a final warning. Strangly enough, this is. {{subst:uw-vand4im}} Not much of a difference. RuneWiki⁷⁷⁷ 22:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

(e/c)A user is allowed to blank their own talk page per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and Wikipedia:User page. At the very least, it showed they received their warnings. Woody (talk) 22:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

{{uw-vand4}} is considered a final warning, or last warning. {{uw-vand4im}} is an "only warning" template which can be used in extreme cases of vandalism or as a warning for multiple (and I mean multiple) acts of disruptive edits. Spebi 22:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Understood. CardinalDan (talk) 22:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. We learn by our mistakes, just don't do it again! Woody (talk) 23:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Guess I was too zealous. CardinalDan (talk) 23:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi CardinalDan and thank you for your report to AIV. However, I must inform you that, since users are permitted to remove warnings from their talk pages, and the user hasn't done anything else since the final warning, no further action has been taken. Happy editing, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 22:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, CardinalDan. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. β^_command 02:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Dont' bother with warning them. Simply immediately report them to AIV, as they're IP hopping. Thanks for helping out. Cheers =) --slakr^\ talk / 05:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Got it. BTW, seems that he/she/it/they hate advanced math theory. CardinalDan (talk) 05:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Nah, they just don't like wikipedia :P --slakr^\ talk / 05:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, that too... But it seems that they have stopped, or at the least been blocked for now. CardinalDan (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for removing vandalism from my talk page --Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 20:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Glad to be of help. CardinalDan (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The date format change was per discussion.--Dr who1975 (talk) 20:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry. CardinalDan (talk) 20:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

As per, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Master_Passion_Greed&action=history, Painjoiker is adding fictional information to the site. Please see my comment at, 02:16, 4 January 2008 78.86.2.173 (Talk) (907 bytes) (The info about it being a single is not confirmed, the album cover was part of Within Temptations latest album cover. A blatant joke with no factual information.)

The image is fake, and there is absolutely no information to back up his claims whatsoever. Instead, I urge that action be taken against the user "Painjoiker".

The reversion of the edit that I made was a misunderstaning.--67.62.103.180 (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

oh wait... you already knew that.--67.62.103.180 (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:CardinalDan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.