User talk:Cap2201

Hi Cap2201! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

Hello, Cap2201. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Anthony Esposito (musician), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cap2201, Many thanks for posting the disclosure on your user page. According to the guidelines for paid editing, there are several steps required in addition to the notice on your user page. 1) place a Template:Paid tag on your user page or user talk page for every individual article and/or client, 2) place a tag Template:Connected contributor (paid) on the talk page of every article you have created or edited, disclosing your client. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Your should do this for all articles you have edited in the past, of which I assume Anthony Esposito (musician) is one. I have taken the liberty to place a blank tag which you just need to fill in. If you have any questions, please let me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 15:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jake, I've added the tag to the talk page on Anthony Esposito (musician). Please let me know if there's any other steps that I need to take for the page. Thank you for all your help!--Cap2201 (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have added the additional tag required for your user page. You can use this as template for further such disclosures. At this point the community would very much welcome a statement confirming if the Anthony Esposito article was your only paid/conflicted edit or not. If there are further such edits, they will require disclosure. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding Jake's question above; many editors will want to have a definitive statement from Cap2201 concerning which (if any) articles they created for pay.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, Sincerest apologies for the long delay. The only pages that I received payment to create were for Srikant Chellappa and Joanne Wilson. I'm happy to update the pages with all the necessary disclosures and information. The rest of my contributions were either page creations or page edits for artists and works that I personally admire. I'm very sorry for all the confusion and uncertainty. Please accept my apologies again!Cap2201 (talk) 04:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)cap2201[reply]

I have moved Anthony Esposito (musician) to Draft:Anthony Esposito (musician) in light of your recent disclosure, as per WP:PAID and WP:COI articles created for pay must be sent through AfC.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cap2201, thank you for being cooperative with Jake Brockman (talk) earlier and for disclosing you paid editing at Draft:Anthony Esposito (musician), but I (and many other editors, to be sure) would like to know if you have created or edited any other articles for pay. If you have, these articles must be disclosed on your user page per WP:PAID.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion regarding your account is underway at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Cap2201's_paid_contributions. I highly recommend you participate given the nature of the discussion.--SamHolt6 (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of this discussion, all of your articles have been moved to the draftspace for quarantine and tagged for *possibly* containing undisclosed paid editing.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey everyone,

     Sincerest apologies for the long delay. The only pages that I received payment to create were for Srikant Chellappa and Joanne Wilson. I'm happy to update the pages with all the necessary disclosures and information. The rest of my contributions were either page creations or page edits for artists and works that I personally admire. I'm very sorry for all the confusion and uncertainty. Please accept my apologies again! Cap2201 (talk) 04:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC) cap2201[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe her neutrally. It is written from the viewpoint of what she and her companies say about herself rather than what third parties say about her, which is the basis of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joanne Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joanne Wilson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JC7V7DC5768 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The bizjournal piece is routine coverage (they were doing profiles of similar people in the series) and the other piece isn't independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joanne Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joanne Wilson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JC7V-talk 17:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The recent citation additions to the article do not meet WP:SIGCOV as they are all 1) either based around primary information or 2) only make trivial or in-passing reference to the subject. This is pertinent as no text was actually added since the last submission. Furthermore, 3 of the 4 Forbes articles cited were written by Forbes contributors, and thus may not meet WP:SIGCOV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joanne Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joanne Wilson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Srikant Chellappa (director) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Srikant Chellappa (director), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Dylan Beynon, 2018.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS received}}, indicating that a statement of permission had been received by permissions-enwikimedia.org, but that this email was insufficient in some way

This could be due to any of several issues:

1. The OTRS agent might have asked for further information to validate the ticket, but no follow-up reply was received (this is the most common reason).
2. The license submitted might not have provided an acceptable free content license. (Statements of permission that allow only usage on Wikipedia or only non-commercial usage are NOT sufficient.)
3. The person who submitted the statement of permission might not be the copyright holder or might not have been able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the OTRS agent that they own the copyright.

Due to privacy reasons, we cannot comment on Wikipedia with the exact reason that the ticket could not be processed.

• If YOU submitted the ticket to the permissions address, please search your email for a reply with the ticket ID - a reply was sent some time ago requesting more information or further actions needed to confirm permission. Please reply to that message.

• If the copyright holder (not you) submitted the ticket, then that person received a response (which may have been some time ago). Please ask them to follow up.

If another message is sent to [email protected] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-enwikimedia.org that resolves the problem, please let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 12:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Sam Sax (poet).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Anthony Esposito (musician).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asymmetry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kai Carlson-Wee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matt Kivel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joanne Wilson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthony Esposito (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cap2201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Esposito".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]