User talk:Alpha Beta Delta Lambda

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles the Arab–Israeli conflict They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Welcome to my talk page! You might be interested look at my previous account's talk page first before posting here.

A reminder that articles shouldn't be tagged with A1 and A3 within first ten minutes of article creation, as WP:A1 and WP:A3 note. (I've seen wait times as long as an hour also being used by other patrollers.) Additionally, A7 may be a better fit for articles like Bendy vs. FNaF than A1 - the infobox provides just enough context to identify the subject as a particular YouTube video, in my view. JavaHurricane 15:24, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Eze, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe: sorry but I think I have boldly moved with good reason as Eberechi Eze is very likely to be the primary topic under criterion 1. I might open a RM to move it (Eze) back. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 09:27, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe: hello? Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha Beta Delta Lambda, I disagree with your assessment. Start an RM if you wish to. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 19:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus of only two people? The so-called "consensus" is between two people who have not contributed to the page since mid-June, and also happens to be TMI (referee name and kick-off time, the latter is prone to sudden changes) and not concise. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikhouvanjou14: silent consensus existed there, seeing as you didn't provide an actual reason. Getting consensus is hard, we only have so many editors. I'm not sure if the table format is more "consise" or it is "too much information". Not to mention that it's possibly a fan POV to only include United's goals. Or the fact that most other season articles uses the new format. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Premier League fixtures are prone to date or kick-off time changes. And I don't think it is needed to have the referee's names to all pages too in regards of club season articles. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but "I don't like it" is not a good argument, even if it is phrased differently. As for KO time changes, surely you can't change the time after the game is finished? Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 08:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]