User talk:5 albert square/Archive 19

This is an archive of past discussions with User:5 albert square. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi. On 22 Feb you blocked User:Kahn and Averill (block log entry). I had reported this one at UAA but the block log entry also mentions uw-spamublock. Is this person allowed to create a new account and edit with it, or is that socking? Because User:Morriskahn (not pinging) is doing just that, spamming for the same book publisher (contributions here). Please could you act or advise? Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Stfg:, no they are definitely not allowed to just create a new account. If they are the same person they have to put an unblock request on the talk page of the blocked account and convince an administrator that they know what they did was wrong and explain what type of contributions they would like to make. An uninvolved administrator would then make the decision if they can be unblocked. If you think that they're the same user, I would suggest raising an sockpuppet investigation, an uninvolved administrator can then check this.--5 albert square (talk) 22:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Done. Many thanks. --Stfg (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi :) First of all, let me say I think you've been doing some great work and don't want to take anything away from that. However, you recently reverted some of my edits citing WP:SOAPS, making the comment 'read it' in your summary. I can assure you I have read this policy, including an archived discussion on this subject, and don't believe my edits went against it in any way.

This policy states that distant and/or unimportant relatives should not be included. It says nothing about whether a relative played a particular 'role' to someone - yet you reverted my inclusion of Ian Beale as Phil Mitchell's stepson on the basis that 'he never played a stepfather role to Ian' citing this policy as your justification. With all due respect, you cannot cite something as a breach in policy if it isn't in the policy in the first place.

Deciding whether someone played the 'role' of a step-parent is very much open to opinion and conjecture. What is fact is that Phil was married to Ian's mother and was therefore his stepfather. I think you would have great difficulty arguing that Ian is an 'unimportant' relative too. Their feud, which has regularly generated storylines for nearly 20 years, came about entirely because of Phil and Kathy's marriage and how both men perceived the other's treatment of her. Phil and Ben have an additional family connection through Ben, a regular character for nearly nine years now on and off. Phil is also aware that Kathy is still alive - this is likely to be a major storyline later this year. To remove Ian from a list of Phil's relatives whilst leaving in Clive Mitchell - a one-episode character from 2002 - is absurd. Is he really more important just because Phil wasn't involved in Ian's upbringing? On the basis of whether someone 'played that role' you'd have to remove Nadia from the list of Phil's wives - it was a marriage of convenience and they never lived together; easy to argue she never played the role of wife.

Similarly, you reverted my addition of Nick Cotton as Jim Branning's stepson on the basis that 'they never shared a scene', again citing WP:SOAPS. Apart from the fact that this isn't true - they shared several scenes during Nick's 2000 - 2001 stint - there is nothing in WP:SOAPS stating characters have to have shared a scene. Although John Bardon is dead Jim is still alive, albeit off-screen, and Nick has been living with Dot until very recently. He is a major part of Dot's life and therefore a significant relative of Jim's.

On your third revert - removing Karen Wicks from the list of Pat Butcher's grandchildren - I can see why you did that. After all, Karen was never actually featured in the show. However, I would argue that a grandchild is a close and important relative; David lived with Pat for three years on the show, so it seems logical to list his children under Pat's relatives. I would look at it from the point of whether there is a compelling reason NOT to include Karen. Yes, Pat never met her, but discovering you had a grandchild who died before you could ever meet them would be a big thing for anyone. (I speak from experience as the same thing happened to my grandmother.)

As I say, I absolutely don't want to take anything away from the good work you're doing, or to criticise the policy. (For example, if we were to list Bert and Ernie Moon as Pat's step-great-great-nephews things really would be going too far.) I just want to make sure the policy is applied correctly and not by broad interpretation. Smurfmeister (talk) 12:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I must admit I forgot that Jim and Nick shared a scene together. It's been so many years ago. However I don't remember Jim or Phil behaving like stepfather figures to Nick or Ian. That's why I reverted your edits--5 albert square (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I have unblocked him since he was using his real name, which is never a violation of the username policy, even if he was promoting himself (which he has agreed not to do in the future, and I like his proposal for what he will edit). When blocking such users in the future, just do it for spam or COI and not the username. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: I didn't block for the username. I blocked just for promotional edits. Looking at the templates, we only have spamublock and softerblock and the latter is for a username so that's why I didn't use it. They're not spamming so I couldn't choose that one. I chose the best one I could find--5 albert square (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I've had that problem too. You can pick "block" and go from there but a lot of times people don't want to do it manually. The thing to remember is that the block-page dropdown list only chooses the template for what the editor sees when they try to edit ... you can always put the template for what you really mean to say on their talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I'll personalise it more next time :)--5 albert square (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

	Academy Award
	5 albert square, I won't reedit EastEnders characters anymore, I was just pretending to let people know that characters from the past are coming back, so those guys can stay in the Past characters section That's it from me Yours sincerely TheSimpsonsStuff P.S. I have pizza for you. TheSimpsonsStuff (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Good as that's vandalism--5 albert square (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

No, it's not! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSimpsonsStuff (talk • contribs) 16:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

As you're a wonderful admin user, and you joined way back, I wanted to ask you can you block this anomoys user, he keeps editing these pages that are incorrect. Would you please block him. Thank You Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 06:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Who?--5 albert square (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm curious why the above user in these edits faked the addition of a Good Friend Award to his own talk page as though it came from User:OnlyOneRaider. As we can see from the edit history at Kris's talk page OnlyOneRaider never added it. The user also refactored the warning from @Lightsout: in the same batch by removing the info icon. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi my names Leon I can't do an actual reference to a website as in from out of this weeks magazine for the east enders characters — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drleonnorman (talk • contribs) 11:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

If you can't reference it then please do not add it. All additions to the EastEnders articles must be reliably referenced so the edits can be verified. Please take time to read our policies.--5 albert square (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi i have noticed you previously disallowed anyone editing with an IP address due to vandalism on this article Wikipedia:WikiProject EastEnders/List of residences in EastEnders. Can you please reinforce this as vandalism is taking place again. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 14:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, there isn't enough recent vandalism to warrant protection. I will keep an eye on the page, if it goes up to the level of vandalism that I disabled editing for last time, I won't hesitate to do it again! --5 albert square (talk) 20:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

I didn't add it someone else did, anyway why are you peeking through the history on my page, anyway Davey2010, added that to my page.

Happy Editing Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - Eh I haven't added any award to your page ?.... I've never gave a "Good friend award" to anyone and don't plan too anytime soon. –Davey2010^Talk 22:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Totally confused.com here. Kris, @Davey2010: didn't add the Good Friend award to your page, you did! I'm just totally confused as to why you did, it obviously wasn't given to you as Mr Hill has never edited your talk page--5 albert square (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Not really understanding the whole concept of giving yourself an award under someone elses name ? ... Makes no sense at all.... –Davey2010^Talk 23:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The user has been apprised that talk page comments go on the bottom of talk pages, and they seem to be deliberately ignoring this [1][2][3][4]. This, coupled with the fabricated Good Friend award, the inaccurate explanations, the bizarre notes on AmaryllisGardener's talk page and on Amaury's talk page might tend to suggest someone editing in bad faith, perhaps with a little flair for trolling. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

He's been trying to merge every "Criticism of..." article into that article, even when the "Criticism of..." article is longer than the main one. As the last admin to block him, could you look at this? Origamite^ⓣⓒ 21:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello 5 Albert square, allow me to clarify a few things. I'm not actually trying to merge all "Criticism of" articles. some articles make a lot of sense to have criticism for example "Film criticism" or "Literary criticism". Makes total sense. I am only proposing mergers for articles that have divisions based on POV. for example Criticism of Windows is just Windows but with a different POV. In the name of NPOV I am not moving or merging any content I am just starting the process and recommending merges on a few articles. if you have any questions I'm happy to answer them. Bryce Carmony (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

OK, I will keep an eye on this to make sure it doesn't go pointy :)--5 albert square (talk) 22:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks 5, I'm not looking for trouble I'm just trying to help out. have a good weekend.Bryce Carmony (talk) 00:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, that works. Thanks. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 04:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Well, he's starting to get POINTy again. Read this first, where he says:

so you're going to say that the subject of "Criticism of Liberalism" is "criticism" so if I were to go to Criticism of Liberalism and add Main article: Criticism you would support that? since the main article is criticism, libertarianism is just the adjective and not the subject.

and then look at this this edit. He's making the point that a "criticism of X" article is actually about criticism rather than X, so he's putting in a main article link to Criticism. Sheer bad behaviour, no other explanation for it. andy (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

• In case he reverts it before you've had a chance to see it, you might like to be aware of this personal attack on you. andy (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

• I'm going to step back now but keep watching-I think that'll settle things down a bit. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 01:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I asked Andy what the topic of that article was. he told me it was criticism, not libertarianism. It's hard to tell what he wants, he says" the subject is criticism not libertarianism" but if you mark the main article "criticism" he says " it's libertarianism not criticism". I'm not being pointy, and I don't think I've disrupted anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryce Carmony (talk • contribs) 12:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi--just telling you that I mentioned you at AN/I here in a section about Bryce Carmony. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 04:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hey 5as, could you take a look at the ANI I'm in, I'm trying to act in good faith, to apologize for any offense, but few people seem to be interested in discussing NPOV, or accepting my apologies, any feedback you can provide would be appreciated. I don't see why wikipedia has to be so hostile, when someone say " we can change Originally Written to Written" and it escalates to a 30 day ban, to me that seems hostile. when proposing a handful of mergers about an important topic, the same hostile person proposes a 6 month ban. I don't feel like I'm being uncivil towards anyone here, I just don't like the hostility. Bryce Carmony (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bryce, if you're redacting all merger proposals then that will be good as it should work in your favour :)--5 albert square (talk) 01:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 07:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Nope, as her stint on EastEnders has come to an end the article is now ok.--5 albert square (talk) 02:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

How about this one? --George Ho (talk) 07:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Er, no thank you. I've just checked her and with the exception of one or two editors this article has calmed down a lot recently.--5 albert square (talk) 02:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Afc decline. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

.

I've reblocked for legal threat making, and added that he's a sock of User:IanBeale as well. Peridon (talk) 13:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation :)--5 albert square (talk) 13:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

I've just found out who Ian Beale is, so this one mightn't be a sock of U:IB - but they were both rude... Still, there's two things certain. The name 'Ian Beale' rang a bell in connection with disruptive editing, which is why I looked up User:IanBeale - I don't watch TV or read the lower end tabloids, which is why I didn't make a connection to Eastenders. Peridon (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

I took a look after I saw someone revert Ian Beale's page. The name looked like that a vandal might use. Took one look at some of their contributions and decided that they were definitely not here to build an encyclopaedia.--5 albert square (talk) 19:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Los Angeles City Attorney. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

He's back, POINTy as ever. I've just given him a 4im warning here which you might care to read. Cheers. Andyjsmith (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

First off let me say that 1 - I assume good faith in andy, and I don't know what he is upset about. I have voted for either deleting an article that is a poor article and doesn't serve the user ( the people we are here to serv ) or have it be a redirect. this is known as Approval voting. where everyone gets a single vote and can vote for as many things as they want 1 time. if you insist on having an article Google and censorship and someone links Censorship of Google Search to that article, you can't call that "pointy" that's just using links the way links are used to connect articles that are connected. How does that make the article weaker? when I added a link to 2014 China censorship of Google services at Google and censorship that was to compliment the link there ( one of only two ) Internet censorship in China. I have proposed that a single article is bad. an article that serves as a glorified redirect and is not up to the caliber of what Wikipedia readers deserve. If you think those articles shouldn't be linked together feel free to say so, start a discussion in the talk page ( something you never seem to do instead you just try to have a closed door discussion with an admin and avoid consensus and good faith ). I asked you if you thought this article was good enough for our users and you refuse to answer that. I edit for the users, who do you edit for? Bryce Carmony (talk) 09:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

BTW I posted here before he accused me on the AfD page of lying, which unfortunately makes my point. Andyjsmith (talk) 09:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

If you say that I have voted twice that is a lie, I have only voted Once. You might be using a plurality vote, but I am using an approval vote. If you want to vote for two outcomes ( for example, if you voted Keep or redirect ) that would be a single vote. if you are going to say " you have voted twice" that is a lie. I have voted a single time for two outcomes ( to delete or redirect ) I'm not sure why you dislike approval voting It's a powerful way to give as much power to the voter as possible. If the consensus is reached to keep the article we can keep the article and try and improve it. Bryce Carmony (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Latest: There may be no need to bother with this. He messed around with the article that's the subject of the AfD, reintroducing a spurious link, so I've reported him at ARV. Let's see how it goes. Andyjsmith (talk) 10:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

I've created a discussion section in the article and if you would care to explain why you believe the link to be "spurius" I would value your feedback andy. Bryce Carmony (talk) 10:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Or maybe not: My report and a couple of others were deleted as having been outstanding for too long. Meh. Never mind, the threat made him undo his dodgy edit so that's progress of a kind. Andyjsmith (talk) 15:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@Andyjsmith: I would suggest in the future that this is raised at ANI--5 albert square (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

You're quite right. I had no intention of starting a wall of text on your talk page - I forgot that he'd join in. Andyjsmith (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

At least at ANI an uninvolved admin can get involved :)--5 albert square (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The history of the One Direction article was that it was once indefinitely semi-protected. Why can't you semi-protect? That article is one of the biggest targets of vandalism. Click here. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I've thought about this overnight now and changed my mind, I've put it back to indefinite semi-protection. The talk page will remain at protection for two weeks though.--5 albert square (talk) 06:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Please revert your full protection of the page. The page has been edited for many months by a number of established and conscientious editors. The only current dispute is a very minor one, over whether two individuals named in the article should also be named in the lede. I repeat, it is a minor - and inconsequential - disagreement between one or two editors. There are much more important matters - like this - that need to be included in the article, but until the level of protection is reduced that cannot be done. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 00:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I hope you remember me. You were of great help to me when the previous round of abusive messages from Mridul Sharma were made. The user has since attempted a comeback and was blocked for it. Now, he has issued me a warning to make "infinite" accounts to harass me. And now, he is posting these abusive messages at the pages I normally edit. Quite fed up of reverting, honestly. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 09:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I am harassing and abusing Krimuk90 because he/she meaning a hijra is calling me a she. Please tell me him to erase this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Krimuk90/Archive_13 a line where he has mentioned she to me in Kailash's answer. Then I will leave do not abuse him any more. If you block my ip then i will get a new ip because my ip address is dynamic From Mriduls.sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.144.131 (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 00:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

According to Albert Beale's Wikipedia profile a while back, Albert Beale had an aunt Dolly Beale. I'm pretty sure that she was a novel character. Sort of like her brother Kenneth Beale was. Arjoccolenty (talk) 03:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I must admit I don't remember a Dolly Beale appearing. Mind you I didn't watch EastEnders back then - too young!--5 albert square (talk) 07:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

There's no consensus to remove the home field from the Neighbours articles. It's just EE that decided against using it. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Removing years from occupations is also an EE thing. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Ah ok, sorry I had thought we had consensus at WP:SOAPS for some reason.--5 albert square (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: do we really need to mention twice in Karl Kennedy's infobox that he's a doctor? Surely we could combine doctor at the medical centre and doctor at the hospital?--5 albert square (talk) 20:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 06:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

[5] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks @NeilN:, I've now blocked and protected Jimbo's talk page as they said they were going to sock around the clock and so far they seem to have a fascination with him for some reason!--5 albert square (talk) 14:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for editing my typo on the BBC article on the ceefax section! I was in a rush and you hepled the Wikipedia community and users!

Gibboboy777 (talk) 16:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2015 Newsletter March drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 38 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April blitz: The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long requests list, will run from April 19–25. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. Sign up here! May drive: The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in December 2013, January and February 2014 and all request articles, begins soon. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocking 43.224.156.79 for three months is excessive. The IP of that user will have changed before a week is over, leaving random other people to get hit by the block. Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Changed--5 albert square (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:82.214.61.50

Recent revision (that I'm aware of): Blanking the Football (word) page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_(word)&diff=657451927&oldid=657451841&diff=cur&oldid=prev I think you should block him. Sorry to put stress on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CyanoTex (talk • contribs) 09:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, 5 albert square. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

CosmicEmperor (talk) 11:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your userbox User:EvanS/Userboxes/PetCat is just a redlink. --Thnidu (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks.--5 albert square (talk) 03:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I was searching for the Allan Gray's (South African investment company) wikipedia site and I eventually came across a page that said you deleted it back in 2011. I was wondering why you did this and if it were possible to restore it. Surely people have looked for it in the last 4 or so years?

105.210.64.213 (talk) 07:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi

It doesn't matter how many people have searched for it. If it fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines then it cannot be included in the encyclopaedia.--5 albert square (talk) 20:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please note: "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations and their products are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability."

  - From the Notability Guidelines page.

I am lead to believe that you do not live in South Africa. Allan Gray is the second largest investment company in South Africa (only overtaken recently by Coronation) To say that an investment company with billions of Rands in assets that thousands of South Africans are investing has no notable effect on society is somewhat outlandish. Please help me to understand your stance on this topic by elaborating further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.210.64.213 (talk) 08:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm afraid I can't simply because I don't remember the page. As good as my memory is, you have said it was deleted 4 years ago. All I can tell you is that it would have been deleted because, at the point of deletion it failed our guidelines. Sorry.--5 albert square (talk) 09:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hey. Could you possibly delete the Phoebe Nicholson redirect (that I created), so I can move my draft over to that page? - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done and I also moved your page over.--5 albert square (talk) 03:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! I would have left the link to the draft too, but I thought you were still online, so I was gonna move it after you deleted the redirect. - JuneGloom07 Talk 11:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Freenode. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. You blocked Mriduls.sharma for personal attacks (granted Favonian more recently revoked talk page access, but you made the actual block), and 117.197.156.226 admitted to being that user with this edit to the DR/N (look near the bottom of the request). Thanks! Kharkiv07^Talk 21:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Ah yes, this guy. I've blocked the IP. Thanks for letting me know :)--5 albert square (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi - you removed a post I made noting that Peter Dean will be playing Abanazar in Aladdin at Harpenden Public Halls this December. This is definitely correct - I know because I am directing the show! Please can you reinstate my post? Thanks chrispanto

Hi, can you please provide a reliable source?--5 albert square (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Please see diary page on www.its-behind-you.com or http://eastendersspy.co.uk/2015/04/25/eastenders-stars-in-christmas-pantomimes-full-list/ ........ chrispanto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrispanto (talk • contribs) 13:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done--5 albert square (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks chrispanto — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.133.228 (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't suppose you could move Tess Bateman (Casualty) and Charlie Fairhead (Casualty) to Tess Bateman and Charlie Fairhead. I guess the editor thought disambiguation was the right way to get around redirects. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done--5 albert square (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi

I'm really sorry, I can't find our discussion on Allan Gray. Would you be so kind as to point me to where our discussion is or tell me whether the issue was resolved?105.210.65.70 (talk) 10:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, as good as my memory is, you have said it was deleted 4 years ago. All I can tell you is that it would have been deleted because, at the point of deletion it failed our guidelines. Sorry.--5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Is there no way to restore it?

105.210.64.66 (talk) 08:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

It can only be made a mainspace article once it meets our notability guidelines.--5 albert square (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

can you help me Neynaro (talk) 16:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

What do you require help with?--5 albert square (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks You! I will try and not "vandalise" again. I am so sorry.

Nothard Nothard (talk) 23:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Nothard,

No worries, like I said on ClueBot NG's page your edit is not vandalism, hence why @Materialscientist: has removed ClueBot NG's warnings and replaced them with a welcome message. As ClueBot is not a human it cannot read your edits so it works on probability, part of your edit was in CAPS so the bot has picked it up as possible vandalism due to shouting. I'm glad the bot's warnings haven't scared you off though as I noticed that you also edited one of The X Factor's many pages and that happens to be my favourite reality TV series. My favourite judge has to be Simon Cowell :)--5 albert square (talk) 00:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi 5 Albert Square,

Yes, I do really like reality TV series. I am british, so quite like the british versions! My favourite judge is Louis Walsh, he has been on the X Factor UK for every series! The US, I also quite like. Cheers

Nothard Nothard (talk) 23:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, this is Bloodinmyveins, thankyou for your message re.changes to the page, Tyger Drew-Honey. I corrected information that had been entered previously by an anonymous user which wad incorrect and also did not appeat in the referenced article. Tyger Drew-Honey himself states in TV Magazine , dated 25.4.15, an article entitled Past Lives re.24 hours in the past tv programme," I've been with Libby (Millward) for over a year" the article is not available online therefore I was unable to link it to the page. I hope this explains my actions. Thanking you, Bloodinmyveins. Bloodinmyveins (talk) 11:35, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, please read WP:RS.--5 albert square (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Please delete this edit history. It might contain vulgar and senseless words and comments. As it is similar to previous socks. C E (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

@CosmicEmperor: that is  Done. @Materialscientist: has already blocked them.--5 albert square (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete this also

and this

covert --C E (talk) 10:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Some the above edits are written in Gurumukhi script. The user Babitaarora always fights vandalism, so.C E (talk) 10:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

@CosmicEmperor: that is  Done. I've actually went right through the page history to about the 14th of April so I think I've caught everything now that's offensive. I don't speak Punjabi though so I'm having to rely on Google Translate - let me know if anything further is wrong.--5 albert square (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

edit summary

second

third edit summary They are in English. C E (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Ah missed them, thanks @CosmicEmperor:, now  Done--5 albert square (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Here: [6], [7] I'll let you know if I find anything else. –Chase (talk / contribs) 21:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done In future edits like this should really be reported to the Oversight team. I have rev del'd the edits in the meantime and sent the links to them for further suppression.--5 albert square (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, 5 albert square. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Here: [8], [9] I'll let you know if I find anything else. –Chase (talk / contribs) 21:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done In future edits like this should really be reported to the Oversight team. I have rev del'd the edits in the meantime and sent the links to them for further suppression.--5 albert square (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, 5 albert square. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Derry. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on MediaWiki talk:Tag-OneClickArchiver. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Respected Albert Sir/Maam, I am Mridul Sharma who have made another Wikipedia account because now i want to edit constructively and will not abuse or harass any user on this site. Now i will be polite towards every user. I am not evading any block or doing harassment towards Krimuk90. I just want to edit constructively and please don't block me or don't include me in any socket puppetry. Please tell Krimuk90 to stop putting me on socketpuppet investigation.I am admitting that i have made this account to edit constructively and not doing any sort of vandalism or harassment towards any user. I have also requested you through my user page that please let me edit constructively. From: Mridul Sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fitnessbuddy (talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

This featured article is showing cite error in this section when i checked last time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Celeste#Legacy_and_commemorations --C E (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done fixed by just re-adding the reference.--5 albert square (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Module talk:Main. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)