User talk:Clockworkv

clockworkv== March 2020 == Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to KRON-TV, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at literally every article you've edited today. Your edits are disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Please stop adding random tags to articles. This is disruptive and an abuse of Twinkle. I strongly suggest you stop using Twinkle until you have much more experience; Twinkle is not meant to be used to drop random tags on articles. —valereee (talk) 14:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What article do you think is the best article of all of the others? put in you answers bellow this sentence with your username and article with a link to said article. Clockworkv (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —valereee (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clockworkv. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hello, Clockworkv. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

IF a fly had no wings, would it be a walk? if there is nothing faster than light, how the heck did the dark get there first? If video games cause violence, how come movies don't? Would broken glass be called glasses? Why are is there no HALF life 3? WHERE IS THE EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM BONUS VIDEO??? WHY DO I KEEP TYPING RANDOM GARBAGE IN THE SEARCH BOX?? WHY DO PEOPLE KEEPING COPYING AND PASTING THINGS FROM FANDOM ONTO THE WIKIMEDIA WEBSITES!!!

WHY IS WIKIPEDIA HATED BY TEACHERS IF THE WEBSITES HAS MORE INFORMATION ON IT SO THAT WE KNOW IT IS A VALUABLE SOURCE!!! WHY DO I KEEP TYPING IN ALL CAPS!!! oh right, i forgot this was publicFOSTU.! WOWOWOWOWOOWOWOWOWOWOWOOWIOUTRTULIYRFTDSIG.

Please read WP:ENGVAR before making any more edits like this. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LAS. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of rogue security software, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —valereee (talk) 20:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clockworkv! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Quick question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clockworkv! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Another IMPORTANT question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clockworkv! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hi again, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ohnoitsjamie Would creating a sock account admittedly just as a troll other editors count as disruptive editing? Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=hello, sorry if you were mad, but I have no intention on trolling people. it was just a little joke and the account would not be used at all under any circumstances. also i have received many times that i was not editing very well. I just wanted to help out as much as possible and did not mean to cause any trouble at all. please forgive me for what i have done as I am deeply sorry. Clockworkv (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC) ~~~~}}.[reply]

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that everyone is doing alright out there. I know that things can be stressful out there with the COVID-19 pandemic. but we can stop this if we work together. here are some kittens for all of yous. kittens for everyone!

Cheers! Clockworkv (talk) 12:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please just tell me how to make the edits in the sandbox so i can make better edits. I had to get mine removed 3 times because I can not get the thing moved correctly. Also, how do you guys get those special comment signings because I would LOVE to know how the do it. Thanks! Clockworkv (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

what is the point of deleting an article if people who know what it is could help out. that would discourage the others who made the article to not do as much as they wanted because they may have worked on it very hard. so unless it is an vandal article, or it absolutely has to go, please do not delete it ok? thank you! clockworkv