User talk:Anewpester

Hey Újpesti, :-)

Thanks for cleaning up the Újpest disambiguation, I think it's great now. Üdv, --Hu:Totya (talk!) 10:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Twatt, Orkney has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 18:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're mistaken.--Anewpester (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't replace YOB/YOD categories wirth BD and/or Lifetime. There is no consensus for that. Please read the documentation in Template:Lifetime. Thanks. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful not to add non-existent categories to articles, as you did in this edit which added 4 non-existent categories to Category:Jewish murderers. I have already reverted your edit, so no further corrective action is required. However, I would recommend that you review any edits where you have added categories to ascertain whether you've added other non-existent categories to other articles. Any time you are not sure whether you're adding a real category it's best to check first by using the "Show Preview" button before you finalize your edit. If the newly added category shows up as a red-link that means that it doesn't exist. Cgingold (talk) 02:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are certainly correct that being Jewish is not a nationality. However, adding non-existent categories is not the solution. Categories are fundamentally different than articles, and should never be added as red-links unless you are actually going to create them. In this case, your edit compounded the problem because you also removed the only real categories, thereby leaving Category:Jewish murderers without any parents whatsoever. You are of course free to adjust the existing parent cats in some other way, in order to deal with your stated concern (which I share). Cgingold (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did leave that category -- sorry for the misstatement. Nonetheless, the fundamental issue is that you completely removed the category from the category structure for Murderers. As for the rule you're asking for, it may or may not be explicitly stated (I'd have to check to say for sure), but it is very clearly discouraged -- unlike red-links to articles. Category red-links are regularly removed as routine cleanup -- they're not left intact in hopes that some day an editor will create them. Believe me, this is not merely my personal POV. If you'd like to, you can raise this question at Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Hope that helps. Cgingold (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for Discussion page.

--William Allen Simpson (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Parents who survived their children in the Holocaust, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anewpester. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anewpester. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anewpester. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Izbica concentration camp, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Catrìona (talk) 20:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]