Two-dimensional pattern matchingIn computer science, two-dimensional pattern matching is the problem of locating occurrences of a two-dimensional matrix of characters ("the pattern") in a bigger two-dimensional matrix ("the picture", or, in analogy with string searching, "the text").[1] The naïve solutionAssume given a pattern and a text , where . The simplest approach is to compare P against every sub-array of size in T. This algorithm has a worst-case time of . It is usually assume that , whence this can be written as . An automaton-based solutionWe shall illustrate a more efficient solution (due essentially to Bird 1977) by means of an example. Suppose we have the following pattern and text abaab aba baaab P = bab T = abaab aba babab ababa We first construct a Aho-Corasick automaton to search a linear text for occurrences of the columns of P. As a biproduct we obtain an identifier for every column, so that two identical columns get the same identifier: in our example, say the first (and third) columns are idntified by 0, and the middle column by 1. Next, we run the automaton on the columns of T, obtaining (in linear time) an indication whenever one of the columns of P appears in T: in our example this will be a 3×5 matrix C as follow (a "-" marks an absence of a match): abaab aba baaab P = bab T = abaaa C = 01--- aba babab 10--1 ababa 010-0 We now use the Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithm to search the rows of C for a pattern identical to P, i.e., 010. When we find one, we have idnetified an occurrence of P in T. Note that it is not necessary to keep all of C, or all of T, in memory; T can be read row by row, and from C one only needs to keep one row in memory---along with a row of states of the Aho-Corasick and the KMP automata. The running time of this algorithm is if one ignores the dependence on the size of the alphabet, which exists in the Aho-Corasick algorithm. Taking this into account, the complexity is where k is the size of the alphabet. More efficient solutionsThe dependence on the size of the alphabet was removed by an algorithm of Galil and Park.[2] See alsoFootnotesReferences
|