Tetanus toxin (TeNT) is an extremely potent neurotoxin produced by the vegetative cell of Clostridium tetani[1] in anaerobic conditions, causing tetanus. It has no known function for clostridia in the soil environment where they are normally encountered. It is also called spasmogenic toxin, tentoxilysin, tetanospasmin, or tetanus neurotoxin. The LD50 of this toxin has been measured to be approximately 2.5–3 ng/kg,[2][3] making it second only to the related botulinum toxin (LD50 2 ng/kg)[4] as the deadliest toxin in the world. However, these tests are conducted solely on mice, which may react to the toxin differently from humans and other animals.
C. tetani also produces the exotoxintetanolysin, a hemolysin, that causes destruction of tissues.[5]
The tetanus toxin protein has a molecular weight of 150 kDa. It is translated from the tetX gene as one protein which is subsequently cleaved into two parts: a 100 kDa heavy or B-chain and a 50 kDa light or A-chain. The chains are connected by a disulfide bond.
The B-chain binds to disialogangliosides (GD2 and GD1b) on the neuronal membrane and contains a translocation domain which aids the movement of the protein across that membrane and into the neuron.
Transcytosis from the axon into the inhibitory interneurons
Action
Temperature- and pH-mediated translocation of the light chain into the cytosol
Reduction of the disulfide bridge to thiols, severing the link between the light and heavy chain
Cleavage of synaptobrevin at -Gln76-Phe- bond
The first three steps outline the travel of tetanus toxin from the peripheral nervous system to where it is taken up to the CNS and has its final effect. The last three steps document the changes necessary for the final mechanism of the neurotoxin.
Transport to the CNS inhibitory interneurons begins with the B-chain mediating the neurospecific binding of TeNT to the nerve terminal membrane. It binds to GT1b polysialogangliosides, similarly to the C. botulinum neurotoxin. It also binds to another poorly characterized GPI-anchored protein receptor more specific to TeNT.[11][12] Both the ganglioside and the GPI-anchored protein are located in lipid microdomains and both are requisite for specific TeNT binding.[12] Once it is bound, the neurotoxin is then endocytosed into the nerve and begins to travel through the axon to the spinal neurons. The next step, transcytosis from the axon into the CNS inhibitory interneuron, is one of the least understood parts of TeNT action. At least two pathways are involved, one that relies on the recycling of synaptic vesicle 2 (SV2) system and one that does not.[13]
Once the vesicle is in the inhibitory interneuron, its translocation is mediated by pH and temperature, specifically a low or acidic pH in the vesicle and standard physiological temperatures.[14][15] Once the toxin has been translocated into the cytosol, chemical reduction of the disulfide bond to separate thiols occurs, mainly by the enzyme NADPH-thioredoxin reductase-thioredoxin. The light chain is then free to cleave the Gln76-Phe77 bond of synaptobrevin.[16] Cleavage of synaptobrevin affects the stability of the SNARE core by restricting it from entering the low-energy conformation, which is the target for NSF binding.[17] Synaptobrevin is an integral V-SNARE necessary for vesicle fusion to membranes. The final target of TeNT is the cleavage of synaptobrevin and, even in low doses, has the effect of interfering with exocytosis of neurotransmitters from inhibitory interneurons. The blockage of the neurotransmitters γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine is the direct cause of the physiological effects that TeNT induces. GABA inhibits motor neurons, so by blocking GABA, tetanus toxin causes violent spastic paralysis.[18] The action of the A-chain also stops the affected neurons from releasing excitatory transmitters,[19] by degrading the protein synaptobrevin 2.[20] The combined consequence is dangerous overactivity in the muscles from the smallest sensory stimuli, as the damping of motor reflexes is inhibited, leading to generalized contractions of the agonist and antagonist musculature, termed a "tetanic spasm".
Clinical significance
The clinical manifestations of tetanus are caused when tetanus toxin blocks inhibitory impulses, by interfering with the release of neurotransmitters, including glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid. These inhibitory neurotransmitters inhibit the alpha motor neurons. With diminished inhibition, the resting firing rate of the alpha motor neuron increases, producing rigidity, unopposed muscle contraction and spasm. Characteristic features are risus sardonicus (a rigid smile), trismus (commonly known as "lock-jaw"), and opisthotonus (rigid, arched back). Seizures may occur, and the autonomic nervous system may also be affected. Tetanospasmin appears to prevent the release of neurotransmitters by selectively cleaving a component of synaptic vesicles called synaptobrevin II.[21] Loss of inhibition also affects preganglionic sympathetic neurons in the lateral gray matter of the spinal cord and produces sympathetic hyperactivity and high circulating catecholamine levels. Hypertension and tachycardia alternating with hypotension and bradycardia may develop.[22][23]
Tetanic spasms can occur in a distinctive form called opisthotonos and be sufficiently severe to fracture long bones. The shorter nerves are the first to be inhibited, which leads to the characteristic early symptoms in the face and jaw, risus sardonicus and lockjaw.
Immunity and vaccination
Due to its extreme potency, even a lethal dose of tetanospasmin may be insufficient to provoke an immune response. Naturally acquired tetanus infections thus do not usually provide immunity to subsequent infections. Immunization (which is impermanent and must be repeated periodically) instead uses the less deadly toxoid derived from the toxin, as in the tetanus vaccine and some combination vaccines (such as DTP).
Evolution
Very little has been written or researched on how and why tetanospasmin evolved in animals. The toxin is highly specific to muscular neurons in higher animals and is carried by a plasmid which implies that the host bacterium acquired the plasmid through horizontal gene transfer from another source organism as is the case of most plasmid based toxins such as shigatoxin. Although tetanospasmin is now classified as an extremely potent neurotoxin, its evolutionary origins may indicate it may have served an entirely different function in early animal life. It is routinely carried by anaerobic organisms and early life on earth was typically capable of both aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Human DNA still contains all the genes necessary for anaerobic respiration and one example is the lens cells of the human eye, which still operate in anaerobic mode.[24]
Most lower animals, and even some mammals are capable of anaerobic respiration during their hibernation phases. The spasms typically caused by this toxin mimic cardiac rhythms in skeletal muscles in most reptiles exposed to the toxin and would provide an evolutionary advantage to a hibernating reptile by keeping blood moving slowly around the organism while in hibernation mode if the organism switched to anaerobic respiration. This theory is supported by the fact that tetanus bacteria use a "pump and dump" strategy by secreting the toxin inside a plasmid membrane then exocysing the plasmid vacuole into target tissue. The toxin is not immediately released typically.[25] Higher mammals host this bacteria as a common component of intestinal gut flora and mouth bacteria without any ill effects and it only becomes a problem in anaerobic conditions.[26]
It has no currently known function in the bacterium's host environment which is soil and manure and is harmless to any competing organisms. It only affects higher animals which have neuro muscular junctions which makes its very existence a mystery to modern science.
^Munro P, Kojima H, Dupont JL, Bossu JL, Poulain B, Boquet P (November 2001). "High sensitivity of mouse neuronal cells to tetanus toxin requires a GPI-anchored protein". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 289 (2): 623–629. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6031. PMID11716521.
^ ab
Winter A, Ulrich WP, Wetterich F, Weller U, Galla HJ (June 1996). "Gangliosides in phospholipid bilayer membranes: interaction with tetanus toxin". Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 81 (1): 21–34. doi:10.1016/0009-3084(96)02529-7. PMID9450318.
^Pirazzini M, Rossetto O, Bertasio C, Bordin F, Shone CC, Binz T, et al. (January 2013). "Time course and temperature dependence of the membrane translocation of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins C and D in neurons". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 430 (1): 38–42. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.048. PMID23200837.
Lalli G, Bohnert S, Deinhardt K, Verastegui C, Schiavo G (September 2003). "The journey of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins in neurons". Trends in Microbiology. 11 (9): 431–7. doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(03)00210-5. PMID13678859.
Montecucco C (August 1986). "How do tetanus and botulinum toxins bind to neuronal membranes?". Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 11 (8): 314–317. doi:10.1016/0968-0004(86)90282-3.