This template is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SamJohnston-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-HTML5_as_RIA?-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-SamJohnston-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z-HTML5_as_RIA?"],"text":"HTML5 as RIA?","linkableTitle":"HTML5 as RIA?"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SamJohnston-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-HTML5_as_RIA?-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-SamJohnston-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z-HTML5_as_RIA?"],"text":"HTML5 as RIA?","linkableTitle":"HTML5 as RIA?"}-->
I think the claim that HTML5 is a RIA is controversial and as such it should not be included in this template without some reliable sources to that effect. If you define rich internet application to include HTML/JS/CSS apps then you've included essentially the entire Internet, thus making the term useless. -- samjinout01:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z","author":"SamJohnston","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SamJohnston-2011-08-07T01:59:00.000Z-HTML5_as_RIA?","replies":[],"displayName":"samj"}}-->