This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Film This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

I'm removing the characters from this template. They probably need their own template, or something, because this one looks really bulky right now. --Dynamite Eleven 19:12, 30 August 2005 (UTC) PS: Just to give you an idea for a possible character template, here's what I salvaged from the previous edit [1]:[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-08-30T19:12:00.000Z","author":"Dynamite XI","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dynamite_XI-2005-08-30T19:12:00.000Z-Additions_of_characters","replies":[],"displayName":"Dynamite Eleven"}}-->
{{Back to the Future characters}}

Above edit by Wack'd About Wiki at 17:56, 2 September 2005 (looks better than what I salvaged) --Dynamite Eleven 23:24, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-09-02T23:24:00.000Z","author":"Dynamite XI","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dynamite_XI-2005-09-02T23:24:00.000Z-Additions_of_characters","replies":["c-Chuq-2008-12-10T01:44:00.000Z-Dynamite_XI-2005-09-02T23:24:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Dynamite Eleven"}}-->

It looks like we've come full circle. The characters are in the main template, where IMHO they should be, and {{Back to the Future characters}} is only used in one article, McFly family, where it looks out of place due to the presence of the main template. I'll remove the characters template and nominate for deletion. -- Chuq (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-10T01:44:00.000Z","author":"Chuq","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Chuq-2008-12-10T01:44:00.000Z-Dynamite_XI-2005-09-02T23:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

"no" importance seems a bit harsh for the navigation template of a substantial cluster of articles about an important film trilogy. I've reclassed it as mid, which seems a reasonable compromise given that I personally consider it of high importance (within the context of navigation boxes, anyway). I've actually used it to navigate! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 21:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-29T21:09:00.000Z","author":"Mavarin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mavarin-2007-04-29T21:09:00.000Z-Template_importance","replies":["c-Mavarin-2007-04-29T21:10:00.000Z-Mavarin-2007-04-29T21:09:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Karen"}}-->

on the other hand, in the grand scheme of things, that's an overestimate. How about "low", then? -- Karen | Talk | contribs 21:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-29T21:10:00.000Z","author":"Mavarin","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mavarin-2007-04-29T21:10:00.000Z-Mavarin-2007-04-29T21:09:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Karen"}}-->

I've updated this template to take over for the sidebar, I hope, which takes up way too much article real estate, esp. for articles with infoboxes. I don't think the characters take up too much space, since this navbox sits at the bottom of the article anyway, and now that navboxes hide, I think it's sufficient to include everything in one template. TheHYPO (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-12-21T14:46:00.000Z","author":"TheHYPO","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheHYPO-2007-12-21T14:46:00.000Z-Update","replies":[]}}-->