1, Wakefield 1998 Paper Fraud
I am concerned that the title of the article implies that the lancet was committing fraud, when they were actually duped into publishing Wakefield's paper. I don't recall any consensus to put "lancet" in the title. Tornado chaser (talk) 15:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-03T15:33:00.000Z","author":"Tornado chaser","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tornado_chaser-2019-02-03T15:33:00.000Z-Title","replies":["c-JzG-2019-02-03T17:01:00.000Z-Tornado_chaser-2019-02-03T15:33:00.000Z"]}}-->
Also, as you read this article https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/ it is clear that Lancet was slow in retracting (12 years) and only published a small short paragraph --Akrasia25 (talk) 12:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-04T12:18:00.000Z","author":"Akrasia25","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Akrasia25-2019-02-04T12:18:00.000Z-Title","replies":["c-Tornado_chaser-2019-02-04T14:34:00.000Z-Akrasia25-2019-02-04T12:18:00.000Z"]}}-->
@PeterNSteinmetz: Firstly, I'd like to THANK YOU for what appears to be a GREAT (and well researched it appears) addition to this article! Thank you for building this!!!
One thing we have to be careful about in Wikipedia is not including Original Research WP:OR.
The paragraphs in the "Other types of fraud" sections: while well explained and accurate as far as my knowledge of criminal and civil fraud; the OPINIONS of whether Wakefield could be held accountable under those laws is not referenced. Are these your opinions, or do we have a source for these paragraphs? Thanks ---Avatar317(talk) 06:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-01-12T06:52:00.000Z","author":"Avatar317","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Avatar317-2020-01-12T06:52:00.000Z-\"Other_types_of_fraud\"_section_seems_to_be_mostly_Original_Research,_I'm_not_sur","replies":["c-PeterNSteinmetz-2020-01-12T20:05:00.000Z-Avatar317-2020-01-12T06:52:00.000Z"]}}-->
If Wikipedia had been available around the sixth century BC, it would have reported the view that the Earth is flat as a fact without qualification. It would have also reported the views of Eratosthenes (who correctly determined the Earth's circumference in 240 BC) either as controversial or a fringe view. Similarly if available in Galileo's time, it would have reported the view that the Sun goes round the Earth as a fact, and if Galileo had been a Vicipaedia editor, his view would have been rejected as "originale investigationis".
I have prepared the first archive page and placed a link to the draft sub-page in the box. Editors may find this study of primary sources to be interesting. -- BullRangifer (talk) 22:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-01-14T22:40:00.000Z","author":"BullRangifer","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BullRangifer-2020-01-14T22:40:00.000Z-\"Other_types_of_fraud\"_section_seems_to_be_mostly_Original_Research,_I'm_not_sur","replies":["c-Dallas66-2020-01-16T19:13:00.000Z-BullRangifer-2020-01-14T22:40:00.000Z","c-Dallas66-2020-01-15T01:24:00.000Z-BullRangifer-2020-01-14T22:40:00.000Z","c-Dallas66-2020-11-09T22:57:00.000Z-BullRangifer-2020-01-14T22:40:00.000Z","c-PeterNSteinmetz-2020-11-10T00:46:00.000Z-BullRangifer-2020-01-14T22:40:00.000Z"]}}-->
As you can see, I have tried to sort this page out, but I have not changed the content, apart from removals of repetitions which seem to be inherited from a past effort to split this topic from the general MMR-autism thing. I have also made a few small adjustments based mostly on facts in the Deer book, and added a quote from the British medical journal editorial. I am fairly confident that nothing has been lost. If you think you may have found something, please check for the same point in different words, as this had lots of repetitions. The main thing is that hopefully it is now in a logical order. Dreamwoven (talk) 12:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC) It may help to read the article first so as to check it all makes sense, so as to get an idea of the reordering, before checking the edits. Dreamwoven (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-05-09T12:12:00.000Z","author":"Dreamwoven","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dreamwoven-2021-05-09T12:12:00.000Z-General_cleanup","replies":[]}}-->
Overall, my impression this is a good restructuring and clearer. PeterNSteinmetz (talk) 03:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-05-13T03:07:00.000Z","author":"PeterNSteinmetz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PeterNSteinmetz-2021-05-13T03:07:00.000Z-General_cleanup","replies":[]}}-->
So there seems to have been a press scandal involving a person named Chris Malyszewicz at some point in the UK. Unfortunately the Bad Science article has no sources or even the year when this happened, the MRSA article doesn't mention the scandal at all, and Malyszewicz is otherwise unknown to Wikipedia. Mentioning "the MRSA hoax" without any explanation or source invites the interpretation that Goldacre thinks MRSA itself is a hoax. I haven't read his book and can't say if he does. Clarification needed.--2A02:8071:81C4:9A00:1CBB:E933:73FA:4344 (talk) 04:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-04T04:43:00.000Z","author":"2A02:8071:81C4:9A00:1CBB:E933:73FA:4344","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2A02:8071:81C4:9A00:1CBB:E933:73FA:4344-2021-06-04T04:43:00.000Z-\"the_MRSA_hoax\"?","replies":[]}}-->
Tried to eliminate some of the passages that repeat the same points, but my wikipedia skills are not entirely up to it. I think one of the main confusions is the mixing together of the MMR vaccine general issues with this fraud. If I get time I will try to see how much of the MMR controversy paragraphs are covered with the references in the MMR controversy page. If it's all there it might be useful to shorten that here.SallyStAustell (talk) 15:53, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-06T15:53:00.000Z","author":"SallyStAustell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SallyStAustell-2021-08-06T15:53:00.000Z-Still_confusing","replies":[]}}-->
"There is no biological plausibility for vaccines to cause autism as autism is not an immune mediated disease.[1]
I deleted this peculiar sentence above for several reasons. The reference is an opinion/review article, not proof of the statement (the cited reference doesn't say there is no biological plausibility on these grounds, but only argues a case regarding immunity); this wikipage is about the lancet fraud, not whether MMR causes autism, which is a different wikipage; also autism is not a "disease." The editor might want to transfer this idea to the MMR/autism page, but I don't think it belongs on this page, which is about the lancet report and what followed. Dreamwoven (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-09-15T17:57:00.000Z","author":"Dreamwoven","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dreamwoven-2021-09-15T17:57:00.000Z-Autism_comments","replies":[]}}-->
References
offit
Throws the reader and adds no value or meaning to keep repeating 'fraudulent' 'false' and so on in the introduction, and the paper does not claim a causative link was found - only that it appeared to have been found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sledgehamming (talk • contribs) 16:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Also, it is clear he's deregistered and discredited because it says the paper was withdrawn and he lost his license.Sledgehamming (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-28T16:07:00.000Z","author":"Sledgehamming","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sledgehamming-2022-06-28T16:07:00.000Z-Introduction_clean-up","replies":["c-SunDawn-2022-06-28T16:17:00.000Z-Sledgehamming-2022-06-28T16:07:00.000Z","c-BBQboffin-20221120064200-Sledgehamming-2022-06-28T16:07:00.000Z"]}}-->
This article needs to stay close to a dispassionate, factual, style. Adding angry emotional denunciations, repeating over and over 'fraud,' 'fraudulent,' 'nonexistent,' 'discredited and deregistered' 'the fraud centered... on a fraudulent' etc etc is v counter-productive and achieves the opposite of what's intended. Various editors have noted this. Sledgehamming (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230514091100","author":"Sledgehamming","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sledgehamming-20230514091100-Danger_of_ranting","replies":["c-Hob_Gadling-20230514092200-Sledgehamming-20230514091100"]}}-->
Various editors have noted
Sledgehamming, it's hard to emphasize Wakefield's "fraud" too much as that's what RS do. There is universal acceptance that he is one of the greatest medical frauds in history. Wakefield's supposed "link" between MMR and autism works like this: These children were not a properly selected group for any legitimate study. Lawyers for a group of parents who wanted to blame someone for their child's autism worked with Wakefield to discredit the MMR vaccine and make a lot of money. It also would then enable him to market a vaccine he was developing as a replacement, with an unfathomable profit for himself. He would have become a billionaire.
There was nothing scientifically valid about this "identified association" or the candidate selection process. Wakefield, as a scientifically trained physician, knew that association does not prove causation, and that experiments should include blinding and control groups, yet he placed his own financial interests ahead of his ethical obligations. The claimed link was indeed "not a hypothesis" but a fraudulent claim that he continues to perpetuate to this day. In the beginning, he could have claimed to have misunderstood things and made mistakes, but instead he doubled down on his deception, described as an "elaborate fraud". Wakefield is listed among the Great Science Frauds. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230514155900","author":"Valjean","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Valjean-20230514155900-Danger_of_ranting","replies":[]}}-->
On 5 August 2021, User SallyStAustell edited the article to add the subsection 'Support for Wakefield'. Along with Melanie Phillips, SallyStAustell twice quotes Ben Goldacre, but takes him out of context (apparent if the linked articles are read in full):
https://www.badscience.net/2005/09/dont-dumb-me-down/
https://www.badscience.net/2008/08/the-medias-mmr-hoax/
At times tongue-in-cheek, both articles were published originally by The Guardian, 'Don't Dumb Me Down' (8 September 2005) and 'The MMR Hoax' (30 August 2008), retitled 'The Media's MMR Hoax' on Goldacre's website.
Why do I mention this? Because in 2003, Goldacre had already voiced his scepticism of any link between the MMR vaccine and autism in his article 'Never Mind the Facts' (The Guardian, 11 December 2003) https://www.theguardian.com/education/2003/dec/11/science.highereducation.
That's almost two years before SallyStAustell's first citation, and almost five years before the second. Far from being specifically supportive of Wakefield, both articles detail Goldacre's disdain for how the supposed MMR vaccine-autism link was reported in the media. The quotes referring to Wakefield are merely asides.
Goldacre has been critical also of others who still purvey this misinformation, namely Melanie Phillips, in his article 'The MMR sceptic who just doesn't understand science' (The Guardian, 2 November 2005) https://www.theguardian.com/society/2005/nov/02/health.science.
In other words, if Goldacre was already unconvinced by the paper's findings (as published by The Lancet), and if Goldacre was critical of people (non-scientists especially) who still insisted the findings were correct, how was he ever supportive of Wakefield whose findings they were?
Hence my removing Goldacre's name and his out-of-context quotes from the 'Support for Wakefield' subsection. 78.150.12.79 (talk) 17:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230916173200","author":"78.150.12.79","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-78.150.12.79-20230916173200-Ben_Goldacre's_'support'_for_Wakefield","replies":["c-82.27.240.189-20230918182100-78.150.12.79-20230916173200"]}}-->
perfectly good small case series report, but it was systematically misrepresented as being more than that
In December 2003, Goldacre had already voiced his scepticism of Wakefield's findings
a perfectly good small case series report
After making the topic a hot potato that few would touch some 40+ researchers have taken the trouble to investigate the idea of a link of some sort between autism and the gut microbiome and have come away convinced.
Andrews research may have been inadequate to draw conclusions but the correlation does seems to be there.
Multi-level analysis of the gut-brain axis shows autism spectrum disorder-associated molecular and microbial profiles Idyllic press (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240131120000","author":"Idyllic press","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Idyllic_press-20240131120000-Some_good_may_have_come_out_of_it.","replies":["c-Black_Kite-20240131183800-Idyllic_press-20240131120000"]}}-->
The article is long and poorly written, and the lede doesn't contain a proper summary of why it was determined to be 'fraud' as opposed to him simply having a conflict of interest or conducting shoddy research. No one is going to read this full article to determine what the nature of the fraud is.
Seriously, read the lede. It is almost completely devoid of content. All it says is "bad man did bad thing and got punished". If he had a conflict of interest, faked ethical consent, manipulated data, misinterpreted his results, etc. (as suggested in the "Newspaper investigation" section), that belongs in the lede. But it appears from reading the article that not all of these allegations have been substantiated (e.g., by court findings)? For example, the "Manipulation of data" subsection doesn't seem to reach a conclusion on whether he actually manipulated data or not. Since the article is also called 'autism fraud', not 'autism scandal', the lede also needs to explain how it was determined that it was intentional. (Also, why is there a "Newspaper investigation" section? Shouldn't the section be dedicated to his actual malfeasance, not to a series of newspaper articles?)
The GMC subsection says: "Wakefield was found to have acted 'dishonestly and irresponsibly' and to have acted with 'callous disregard' for the children involved in his study, conducting unnecessary and invasive tests." If you're going to write an article that calls this fraud, as opposed to scandal, then the finding of the GMC that got him deregistered should be front and centre and properly explained in the lede. Why exactly did they find this?
The lede should describe the allegations, which ones have been substantiated (by GMC, etc.), which ones actually constitute fraud (i.e., intentionality) as opposed to shoddy research. A conflict of interest by itself isn't fraud, but faking ethical consent and manipulating data would be.
Bueller 007 (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240622105700","author":"Bueller 007","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bueller_007-20240622105700-Terrible_article","replies":["c-Hob_Gadling-20240622171100-Bueller_007-20240622105700"]}}-->
Would someone please punctuate this or reword it to make it unambiguous and clear?
In the event, Wakefield did not pursue his complaint, which Deer published with a statement saying he and The Sunday Times rejected it as "false and disingenuous in all material respects", and that the action had been suspended by the PCC in February 2010.[1]
Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240624025300","author":"Valjean","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Valjean-20240624025300-What_does_this_mean?","replies":["c-Valjean-20240625153800-Valjean-20240624025300"]}}-->
В Википедии есть статьи о других людях с такой фамилией, см. Молчанов; Молчанов, Алексей. Алексей Молчанов Алексей Олегович Молчанов Личная информация Пол мужской Страна Россия Специализация фридайвинг Дата рождения 6 марта 1987(1987-03-06) (36 лет) Место рождения Волгоград Наг
Pelabuhan KaliangetJenisBUMNKantorpusatJl. Pelabuhan, Kecamatan Kalianget SumenepJasaJasa KepelabuhananIndukPT. Pelabuhan Indonesia III (Persero) Pelabuhan Kalianget merupakan salah satu cabang dari PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia III (Persero) atau Pelindo III yang berada di wilayah Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Pelabuhan Kalianget merupakan pintu gerbang perekonomian Madura Timur dan merupakan pelabuhan satu-satunya yang menghubungkan wilayah daratan Sumenep dengan wilayah pulau-pulau yang ada dise…
لمعانٍ أخرى، طالع جيمس بيك (توضيح). جيمس بيك معلومات شخصية الميلاد 21 فبراير 1929 إيزلينغتون [لغات أخرى] الوفاة 6 أغسطس 1973 (44 سنة) سبب الوفاة التهاب البنكرياس مواطنة المملكة المتحدة الحياة العملية المهنة ممثل، وممثل أفلام، وممثل مسرحي،
اضغط هنا للاطلاع على كيفية قراءة التصنيف قنطيون أفريقي موندياني حالة الحفظ أنواع غير مهددة أو خطر انقراض ضعيف جدا[1] المرتبة التصنيفية نوع[2] التصنيف العلمي النطاق: حقيقيات النوى المملكة: نباتات العويلم: النباتات الجنينية غير مصنف: حقيقيات الأوراق غير مصنف…
Trial by Fire Виконавець Інгві МальмстінДата випуску 12 жовтня 1989Жанр Неокласичний метал[1], важкий метал і хардрокТривалість 3990 секундаМова англійськаЛейбл Polydor Records і Polydor RecordsПродюсер Інгві Мальмстін Trial by Fire — концертний альбом шведського музиканта Інгві …
2003 film Where Is Madame Catherine?Directed byMarc RechaWritten byMarc RechaNadine LamariMireia VidalProduced byLuis MiñarroStarringDominique MarcasCinematographyHelene louvartEdited byErnest BlasiRelease date 5 September 2003 (2003-09-05) Running time130 minutesCountries France Spain LanguagesFrenchCatalan Where Is Madame Catherine? (Catalan: Les mans buides, Spanish: Las manos vacías, French: Les mains vides) is a 2003 French-Spanish comedy film directed by Marc Recha. It was…
テンセント・ホールディングス騰訊控股有限公司 本社種類 株式会社市場情報 SEHK: 700略称 騰訊本社所在地 中国広東省深圳市南山区高新科技園北区深圳市騰訊大厦 イギリス ケイマン諸島(登記上の本社)[1]設立 1998年11月11日業種 コングロマリット事業内容 インターネット経由のサービス代表者 馬化騰(主席兼執行長)劉熾平(中国語版)(総裁)売上高 560.118…
United States historic place and State Park in Rutland County, Vermont Gifford Woods State ParkTypeState parkLocation34 Gifford Woods Rd.Killington, VermontCoordinates43°40′34″N 72°48′39″W / 43.6762°N 72.8109°W / 43.6762; -72.8109Area40 acres (16 ha)Created1931 (1931)Operated byVermont Department of Forests, Parks, and RecreationStatusMid May - Mid OctoberWebsitehttps://vtstateparks.com/gifford.html United States historic placeGifford Woods Stat…
Street in Buenos Aires, Argentina Rivadavia Avenue. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Avenida Rivadavia – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Avenida Rivadavia is one of the principal thoroughfares in Buenos Aires, Argenti…
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis This is a list of current and former Roman Catholic churches in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis. The archdiocese covers the city of Indianapolis and the southern half of Indiana. The cathedral church of the archdiocese is Saints Peter and Paul Cathedral in Indianapolis. Indianapolis Name Image Location Description/Notes Holy Rosary 520 Stevens St, Indianapolis Parish formed 1909 to serve Italian community; current church dedicated 1925 …
Israeli electrical engineer and condensed matter physicist Moty Heiblum Mordehai Moty Heiblum (מוטי הייבלום – sometimes called Moti Heiblum, born May 25, 1947, in Holon) is an Israeli electrical engineer and condensed matter physicist, known for his research in mesoscopic physics. Biography Moty Heiblum was born and raised in Holon. His mother was the only Holocaust survivor in her immediate family, and most of his father's family perished in the Holocaust. From 1967 to 1971 Moty He…
1995 novel by Nicola Griffith This article is about the science fiction book. For the record label, see Slow River Records. Slow River Cover of first edition (hardcover)AuthorNicola GriffithCover artistDaniel Furon and Robert OldingCountryUnited KingdomLanguageEnglishGenreScience fictionPublisherDel Rey BooksPublication date1995Media typePrint (Hardcover & Paperback)Pages343ISBN0-345-39165-9OCLC32013101Dewey Decimal813/.54 20LC ClassPS3557.R48935 S58 1995 Slow River is a scien…
South Korean actor In this Korean name, the family name is Seo. Seo Ji-hoonSeo in 2019Born (1997-04-25) April 25, 1997 (age 26)Daegu, South Korea[1]OccupationActorYears active2016–presentAgentManagement Koo[2]Height184 cm (6 ft 0 in)Korean nameHangul서지훈Hanja徐志焄Revised RomanizationSeo Ji-hunMcCune–ReischauerSŏ Chihun Seo Ji-hoon (born April 25, 1997) is a South Korean actor.[2][3] Since his acting debut with Signal in 2016,…
Literature anthology The Norton Anthology of English Literature Cover of eighth editionCountryUnited StatesLanguageEnglishGenreAnthology, English literaturePublished1962PublisherW. W. Norton & Company The Norton Anthology of English Literature is an anthology of English literature published by W. W. Norton & Company, one of several such compendiums. First published in 1962, it has gone through ten editions; as of 2006 there are over eight million copies in print, making it the publisher'…
هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (أكتوبر 2020) ألاعيب الشيطانSatansbraten (بالألمانية) ملصق الفيلممعلومات عامةالصنف الفني فيلم كوميدي[1] — فيلم دراما[1] تاريخ الصدور 1976 مدة العرض 112 دقيقة اللغة الأصلية ا…
American politician Omar FatehFateh in the Minnesota Senate chambers in 2021Member of the Minnesota Senatefrom the 62nd districtIncumbentAssumed office January 5, 2021Preceded byJeff Hayden Personal detailsBorn (1990-04-19) April 19, 1990 (age 33)Washington, D.C.Political partyDemocratic (DFL)ResidenceMinneapolis, MinnesotaAlma materGeorge Mason UniversityOccupationLegislator Omar Mahmood Fateh (/ˈfɑːteɪ/ FAH-tay; Somali: Cumar Faatax), is a Minnesota politician and a member of the …
Coterminous town/village in New York, United StatesHarrisonCoterminous town/villageManhattanville College in Purchase, a hamlet of Harrison FlagSealLocation of Harrison, New YorkCoordinates: 41°0′25″N 73°43′5″W / 41.00694°N 73.71806°W / 41.00694; -73.71806CountryUnited StatesStateNew YorkCountyWestchesterFounded1696TownMarch 7, 1788Town/village1975Named forJohn HarrisonGovernment • TypeMayor–council government • Supervisor/MayorRich D…
Battle of GrahamstownPart of the Fifth Xhosa WarThis painting depicts the nine Xhosa Wars between the Xhosa and European settlers (1779-1)Date22 April 1819LocationMakhanda, Eastern Cape, South Africa33°18′36″S 26°31′36″E / 33.31000°S 26.52667°E / -33.31000; 26.52667Result British victoryBelligerents British Empire Xhosa KingdomCommanders and leaders Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Willshire Nxele Mdushane ka NdlambeStrength Approx. 350 British Army troops plus 130 K…
Illustration from Al-Fārābī (about 870-950): Kitāb al-mūsīqī al kabīr Drawing of a musical instrument, called Shahrud Kitab al-Musiqa al-Kabir (Arabic: كتاب الموسيقى الكبير, English: the Great Book of Music) is a treatise on music in Arabic by the Islamic Golden Era philosopher al-Farabi (872-950/951). The work prescribes different aspects of music such as maqamat, and is believed to be influenced by the Pythagorean theory of harmonic ratios. The book was translated int…
This article is about the Marvel Animation DTV series. For the TV series, see Super 4 (2014 TV series). For the TV special, see Ben 10/Generator Rex: Heroes United. Heroes United is a series of direct-to-video animated superhero films from Marvel Animation. They are the first full-length direct-to-video CG animated features created by the animation studio.[1] Both films are available to stream on Disney+.[2] Iron Man and Hulk 2013 American filmIron Man and Hulk: Heroes UnitedDire…
Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.116.19.75