PROFILPELAJAR.COM

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaohsiung Metro article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Romanization

I'm not too sure about the romanization of some of the station names, if anyone could help there I'd be grateful, thanks! :Loren 02:31, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation

The route descriptions are taken from [1]. KRTC is a semi-governmental corporation, but I don't know if Taiwanese law makes governmental works noncopyrightable in any case. Anyone with information one way or the other, please delete if copyvio or attribute (and note that it's not copyvio) if not. --Nlu (talk) 22:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Future lines map hard to read

The map shown in the Future lines section is hard to read due to the use of low contrast to indicate future lines. It would be better to use full contrast and dotted lines to indicate future service. Please see the map under Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)#Network for an example where this is used. Thisisnotatest (talk) 22:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101130123753/http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=36181&ctNode=919 to http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=36181&ctNode=919

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915145810/http://mtbu.kcg.gov.tw/english/index-e.php to http://mtbu.kcg.gov.tw/english/index-e.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kaohsiung Rapid Transit System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Taoyuan Metro logo seal only.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

New Taipei Metro (Logo Only).svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translation for the 'stations' (車站)

I think that the stations should not be titled as " xxxx metro station". The reason I feel this way is that the terminology 'metro station' doesn't appear on the English language version of the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit website. I would recommend " xxxx (Kaohsiung MRT)" instead. Keeps us honest. The form " xxxx station" (no 'metro') seems a little too unclear to me. (This situation was brought up at [2]). There may be some kind of standard practice for English language articles that document metro stations, but to use terminology not used by the local area seems untoward. Different places are different and require different approaches and the explicit lack of the terminology 'metro station' on their website means they didn't choose to use those words. Let's just use the words they are using. Geographyinitiative (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Taoyuan Metro logo seal only.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaohsiung Rapid Transit → Kaohsiung Metro – Kaohsiung Metro is a more common name WP:COMMONNAME. English Google (USA) results returned 1M for Kaohsiung Metro vs. 100K for Kaohsiung Rapid Transit (likewise for Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit). The official website also uses 'Metro' throughout its site. Twoggo (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Colonestarrice (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support The proposed title is the common name. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 18:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The target page history shows a sequence of moves

11:11, 28 August 2018 EmausBot talk contribs block m  53 bytes −7  Bot: Fixing double redirect to Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Tag: Redirect target changed
18:48, 19 December 2017 Xqbot talk contribs block m  60 bytes +2  Bot: Fixing double redirect to Kaohsiung Rapid Transit System Tag: Redirect target changed
03:09, 3 July 2016 Satellizer talk contribs block  58 bytes +58  Satellizer moved page Kaohsiung Metro to Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit over redirect: both WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIALNAME, previous move undiscussed

and this RM would complete the circle! But hopefully will also bring some stability. Andrewa (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Twoggo seems to have not used quotations marks in their google search. If we search with quotation marks, "Kaohsiung Metro" gives 14,700 hits, while "Kaohsiung Rapid Transit" gives 23,400.VR _talk 13:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Proper methodology is needed when handling search engine hits. Here's my own comparison:

Google News - 51 hits for Kaohsiung Metro v. 38 for Kaohsiung Rapid Transit.
Internet archive - 19 for Kaohsiung Metro v. 22 sources for Kaohsiung Rapid Transit.

I don't see an overwhelming case for movement based on the above, but YMMV. FOARP (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Thanks for the link! I was not aware of that search engine guide. Looking at the two results that returned for "Kaohsiung Rapid Transit" above, it seems like they are returning results for the company name "Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corporation" (KRTC) instead of the train system itself. Do they count as valid results for the KRT name or should they be discounted? Twoggo (talk) 02:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The corporation is obviously linked to the system itself, same topic ultimately. What I'm seeing here is that Kaohsiung's metro/transit system most likely does not actually have a very, very common name in English, which is not surprising as it is a metro/transit system in a medium-sized city in a non-English-speaking country and unlikely to be regularly talked about in English. As another test I searched the Taipei Times website as a proxy for how this is referred to in English in EN-language news sources that focus on Taiwan (nb., TT, which a friend of mine who used to work there described as "Typo Times", is not included in Google News). "Kaohsiung Rapid Transit" gave 140 hits, whilst "Kaohsiung Metro" gave 18 hits. As a further check I did the same check for the Taiwan News website and got 94 hits for "Kaohsiung Rapid Transit" versus 67 hits for Kaohsiung Metro. Again, I don't see a strong case to move based on WP:COMMONNAME though arguably some of the criteria under WP:CRITERIA favour the name "Metro" because, e.g., it's shorter. There's also a slight question mark in my mind whether these names necessarily are the same thing - the Kaohsiung MRT has both an above-ground light rail system and an underground subway system, so are these both "metro"?

The whole topic of the Kaoshiung metro/transit system is interesting as, although I live for more than a year in Taiwan and visited it many times, the one time in my life I've been to Kaohsiung was in 2005 as it was still being built, so I didn't ride it. FOARP (talk) 10:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that COMMONNAME might not be a good reason for moving. Using the criteria, both the 'Kaohsiung Metro' and 'Kaohsiung Rapid Transit' are recognizable, natural, and precise. Like you mentioned, the shorter name favors the Metro name for Concision. The Metro name is also favored for Consistency as the other MRT systems in Taiwan are all named "city name Metro". Perhaps these two criteria would warrant the move to the 'Metro' name?

As for the metro vs light rail system concern, New Taipei Metro has only the light rail line in operation but it still uses the name 'Metro' as opposed to 'Rapid Transit'. The 'Metro' name seems to have become a catch-all term for all rapid transit systems rather than only for heavy rail. Even the article for metro/rapid transit lists or mentions light rail systems as examples. Twoggo (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (mostly to help the closer close the discussion) - I'm not seeing a case to move based on the above discussion. FOARP (talk) 10:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I appreciate the vote even though it is against my proposal. One thing that I'd to mention is by looking at the web archive of Transit Bureau's site that is linked in the main article, the name 'Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit' is clearly displayed as the name back in 2008. Now, looking at the stilled maintained Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corporation (KRTC)'s site, the 'Kaohsiung Metro' name is displayed in the MRT name's place with the KRTC is also merchandising under the metro name. This may be potentially interpreted as a rebranding effort by the KRTC, which may let this RM fall under the WP:NAMECHANGES naming policy. However, the KRTC's seeming name change reason is undisclosed so we may never know if it is an official name change. In the end, while it may not seem like a strong move case now (only concise and consistent) in this RM and may fail the move, this article's name may one day eventually changed to the Metro name regardless. After checking the move histories of the other rapid transits in Taiwan, most of their articles' names were originally started as a variation of "<city> Mass Rapid Transit System" before being moved to "<city> Metro" and have stuck since after. Twoggo (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - "Metro" seems to be a more commonly understood term for this type of railway. Little else in it otherwise. A slightly higher hit rate on Google for the current title is probably representative of things copying Wikipedia. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 14:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. It does seem to be the more common name now, and also seeing it capitalised thus in sources. — Amakuru (talk) 11:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.