Talk:Seagull intersection

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology Civil engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This really needs a diagram.--Bedford (talk) 03:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how to make one, or get one? Laydan Mortensen (talk) 23:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are crating a diagram, an example of a segull intersection can be found at co-ordinates 41°08′42.5″S 174°59′46.8″E / 41.145139°S 174.996333°E / -41.145139; 174.996333. Laydan Mortensen (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from User talk:Chaswmsday#3-way junction:

... And I would like you to know, I am completing samples and references on the article seagull is. Here's a German version in my user space: w:de:Benutzer:Hans Haase/Seagull Intersection. --Hans Haase (talk) 11:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

End copy. --Chaswmsday (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, Hans! Where did you find all of the new examples? I see that you've found some more on your test page. The Bing Translator actually did a good job allowing me to understand your German user page. I think I have a few other source pages to cite, but I'm not sure when I'll get back to this page for that level of work... Otherwise, I'm just going to make a few formatting additions now. This is fun! (Otherwise, I'm anticipating dissension over a different page I've edited. Wish me luck!) :( --Chaswmsday (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did some research in map material. More effective was the text search by combining names and sources for references. Maryland University has the ATTAP, providing excellent infomation. --Hans Haase (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Continuous-flow intersection#CFI / Continuous Green T hybrid in Accokeek, Maryland. --Chaswmsday (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is this meant to be a complete list? Because there are five of them in Saskatoon, Canada (continuous street is bolded):

1. College Drive and Central Avenue
2. Circle Drive and Airport Drive
3. Circle Drive and Laurier Drive
4. Circle Drive and Clancy Drive
5. 22nd Street and Hart Road

Some of the maps may be misleading, but one can easily verify through street view that these are all indeed seagull intersections. 174.2.168.156 (talk) 08:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this contribution. Regarding WP:NPOV it is recomended not to link directly to map material of one provider. When posting a link, right click in the map, choose "What's here?", copy the coordinates from the search text, and paste them into the text here:

• Pasted: 52.128542,-106.59906
• modified: {{coord|52.128542|N|-106.59906|W|}} For west, remove the - for east, use |E|, instead of |W| (N/S, also).
• results: 52°07′43″N 106°35′57″W / 52.128542°N 106.59906°W / 52.128542; -106.59906. This provides an exact link to most known maps providers.

For more information, see Template:coord. Thank you. --Hans Haase (talk) 22:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed and part of the article now. --Hans Haase (talk) 22:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this bit of uncited prose, so I removed it. It may require further discussion.

In the early 1980s Florida already opend some Florida-T-intersections. Some of them were returned to the conventional T design. Not every of that Florida-T-intersections used separated slip roads for the on-traffic, allowing drivers to change right into an other lane when ignoring the pavement markings.

--Chaswmsday (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]