Talk:Probabilistic programming

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Statistics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

"Many of these applications use techniques you will learn in this book" Text should not be copied from books!

This is a terrible overview of PP for someone coming to this for the first time and hoping to learn what PP is about Houseofwealth (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In philosophy, probabilisticism is the ontological thesis that "statistically, many things are probabilistic" (even the thesis is probabilistic). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.219.128 (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The list of PPLs seems to me to violate the "Wikipedia is not a directory" (WP:Directory) criteria. Even if someone wants to keep it, I guess it should be removed to a separate page where it's not so tediously exhaustively. I definitely disagree that it's "incomplete" as the page says now. Sanpitch (talk) 00:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I dropped the "incomplete" message, and added an "overly detailed" message. Sanpitch (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is still an issue in 2024. Many of these PPLs are not actively maintained and seem to have never had much of a user base. Should consider removing the list or trimming it down significantly. 216.250.210.180 (talk) 18:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I shortened the list to focus on PPLs that are actively maintained or historically important. Others may want to reduce it further. Grayson642 (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]