Talk:Analytic frame

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dmart399. Peer reviewers: C mena15.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm WP:BOLDly redirecting this to analysis. The article as it currently stands is little more than a circular definition - "an analytic frame is a framework for analysis" - that does not benefit or inform the reader. Based on the (few) sources used in the article and a search for WP:SIGCOV, I don't believe that "analytic frame" exists as a concept in and of itself beyond the words "analytic"+"frame"; it is equivalent to "analytic essay" or "methodological frame" in that it's a meaningful descriptive term but is not an encyclopedic concept. GeebaKhap (talk) 15:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]