Talk:Adaptive reuse

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

as far as i can tell, the link to the 'Institute for Adaptive Reuse' at the bottom of the page only takes you to what seems to be a useless (advertising) website?

Grammatically speaking, adaptive reuse is redundant. Adaptive use is the correct term, at least as the professionals and academics use it. Admittedly, many people slip into the incorrect wording, however. Tous ensemble 22:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, there is need for an emphatic reminder because a major part of our population has been educated to fear handling anything old or previously used.Tokerdesigner (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Adaptive reuse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130702042001/http://www.epl.ca/photo-collections?collection=Buildings to http://www.epl.ca/photo-collections?collection=Buildings
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151103233744/http://the/ to http://www.RiAus@The
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206090839/http://www.robertwilson.com:80/watermill/watermill.htm to http://www.robertwilson.com/watermill/watermill.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051226133720/http://www.rics.org:80/Environmentalandlandconsultancy/Environmentalmanagement/Val_1005.html to http://www.rics.org/Environmentalandlandconsultancy/Environmentalmanagement/Val_1005.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adaptive reuse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131211012140/http://mikebloomberg.com/index.cfm?objectid=E99DF405-C29C-7CA2-F6F4E9B623E06B15 to http://mikebloomberg.com/index.cfm?objectid=E99DF405-C29C-7CA2-F6F4E9B623E06B15
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206090839/http://www.robertwilson.com/watermill/watermill.htm to http://www.robertwilson.com/watermill/watermill.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rics.org/Environmentalandlandconsultancy/Environmentalmanagement/Val_1005.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]