Talk:Academic Progress Rate
For my Sports and Society class at Georgetown University, I have decided to work to improve this article. Like I stated previously, it needed a lot of citations, and more information as to what the APR is, and its functions. Also I plan to expand on the punishment the NCAA puts forth and the success of the implementation of the APR. Give a closer look at the sport the APR impacts the most (football, basketball, and baseball). I have come up with a summary of how I plan to edit the article to make it better. My plans are as follows: The NCAA defines The Academic Progress Rate as:
BackgroundThe NCAA established the APR as part of the academic reform package in April, 2004. It was put into place in order to aid in the NCAA's goal for student-athletes to graduate with meaningful degrees preparing them for life. [2] The Principle data collector was Thomas Paskus, the Principal Research Scientist for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).[3] FunctionsThe APR measures how scholarship student-athletes are performing term by term throughout the school year. It is a composite team measurement based upon how individual team members do academically. Teams that don’t make the 925 APR threshold are subject to sanctions. The NCAA works closely with the schools that do not meet the threshold in order to improve.[4] While eligibility requirements make the individual student-athlete accountable, the Academic Progress Rate creates a level of responsibility for the University. [5] How It Is MeasuredTeams that fail to achieve an APR score of 925 - equivalent to a 50% graduation rate - may be penalized. A perfect score is 1000. The scores are calculated as follows:
SanctionsTeams that score below 925 and have a student-athlete who both failed academically and left school can lose scholarships (up to 10 percent of their scholarships each year) under the immediate penalty structure. Teams with Academic Progress Rates below 900 face additional sanctions, increasing in severity for each consecutive year the team fails to meet the standard. Year 1: a public warning letter for poor performance Year 2: restrictions on scholarships and practice time Year 3: loss of postseason competition for the team (such as a bowl game or the men’s basketball tournament) Year 4: restricted membership status for an institution. The school’s entire athletics program is penalized and will not be considered a part of Division I [7] The first penalties under the APR system were scheduled to be announced in December 2005. Starting with the 2008–09 academic year, bans from postseason competition were added to the penalty structure. The most severe penalty available is a one-year suspension of NCAA membership, which has not yet been assessed as of 2010–11.[8] Prior to 2010–11, only four teams had received postseason bans. The results of the NCAA's APR report for that year, which covered 2006–07 through 2009–10, saw eight teams receive that penalty—five in men's basketball and three in football. Most notably, Southern became the first school ever to receive APR-related postseason bans in two sports. The highest-profile penalty in that year's cycle was handed down to defending NCAA men's basketball champion Connecticut. The Huskies lost two scholarships for the 2011–12 season due to APR violations.[8] AdjustmentsThe NCAA does adjust APR, on a student-by-student basis, in two circumstances. Changes have included exceptions for student-athletes in good academic standing who leave school early to pursue a professional career,student-athletes who transfer to another school while meeting minimum academic requirements and student-athletes who return to graduate at a later date. In the 2010–11 cycle, the NCAA granted nearly 700 APR adjustments in the latter category, out of a total of over 6,400 Division I teams. Nearly half of the adjustments were for baseball players. [9] AveragesAverage APRs by Sport for Men’s Teams (Four-Year APR for 2006-07 thru 2009-10 AY) Sport/ # of Teams/ Four-Year APR Average Baseball 298 959 Basketball 344 945 Cross Country 313 970 Fencing 19 964 Football (FBS) 120 949 Football (FCS) 124 943 Golf 298 971 Gymnastics 16 982 Ice Hockey 58 979 Lacrosse 60 971 Rifle (co-ed) 23 966 Skiing 12 972 Soccer 203 967 Swimming 139 972 Tennis 262 970 Track (Indoor) 257 960 Track (Outdoor) 278 962 Volleyball 23 974 Water Polo 22 972 Wrestling 82 958 Average APRs by Sport for Women’s Teams (Four-Year APR for 2006-07 thru 2009-10 AY) Sport/ # of Teams / Four-Year APR Average Basketball 342 968 Bowling 32 952 Crew 86 985 Cross Country 341 977 Fencing 22 975 Field Hockey 79 988 Golf 253 983 Gymnastics 62 988 Ice Hockey 35 986 Lacrosse 90 986 Skiing 13 985 Soccer 321 978 Softball 288 975 Swimming 197 983 Tennis 321 979 Track (Indoor) 311 970 Track (Outdoor) 318 972 Volleyball 327 978 Water Polo 33 976 [10]
References
Akdash09 (talk) 01:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Mfs57I also believe that citations need to be increased in this article because there are various examples that are in fact true, however have no citations to refer to. Overall, knowing this issue in basketball particularly, I believe that this article should be increased in college basketball as well as all of the other collegiate sports. All collegiate sports face this issue to some extent, and there are areas where this article can be expanded, however it is an overall good start. Impact of recent student editsThis article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework. If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted. Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC) CoverageIf I understand this correctly, it only applies to students who get financial aid that in some way is related to their athletic participation. So, a school, or even a sport with-in a school, that does not offer athletic scholarships is completely unaffected by APR (except in that it may hit other schools that it plays), right? also, it would seem that if a program that had one athlete on an athletic scholarship, and that student did not meet the grade, then, even if 32 other athletes were getting straight A's and graduating with-in four years, the program would be sanctioned, right? And conversely, if a program had 1 aided student who got straight A's and graduated after four years and a mass of other, non-aided students who did miserably and never graduated, then there would be no sanctions, right? Kdammers (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||
