Open reading frame found in the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus
Protein family
ORF10 is an open reading frame (ORF) found in the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus . It is 38 codons long.[ 1] It is not conserved in all Sarbecoviruses (including SARS-CoV ). In studies prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic , ORF10 attracted research interest as one of two viral accessory protein genes not conserved between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2[ 2] and was initially described as a protein-coding gene likely under positive selection .[ 3] However, although it is sometimes included in lists of SARS-CoV-2 accessory genes, experimental and bioinformatics evidence suggests ORF10 is likely not a functional protein-coding gene.[ 4]
Properties
ORF10 is located downstream of the N gene, which encodes coronavirus nucleocapsid protein . It is the annotated open reading frame closest to the 3' end of the genome. It encodes a 38-amino acid hypothetical protein.[ 1]
Expression and function
It is unlikely that ORF10 is translated under natural conditions, since subgenomic RNA containing the ORF10 region is not detected, though there is some ribosome footprinting signal.[ 5] When experimentally overexpressed , the ORF10 protein has been reported to interact with ZYG11B and its cullin-RING ligase protein complex .[ 6] However, this interaction has been shown to be dispensable in in vitro studies of the viral life cycle .[ 7]
Evolution
Some studies of SARS-CoV-2 genomes have described ORF10 as likely to be functional and under positive selection .[ 3] However, premature stop codons have been identified in SARS-CoV-2 variants [ 8] and in many Sarbecovirus sequences, suggesting that the putative protein product is not essential for viral replication .[ 4] Loss of ORF10 has also shown no effect on replication under experimental conditions in vitro .[ 8] It has been suggested through bioinformatics analysis that apparent sequence conservation in SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 may not be due to a protein-coding function, but instead due to conserved RNA secondary structure in the region.[ 4] The conserved region, which extends beyond ORF10 itself, overlaps with the coronavirus 3' UTR pseudoknot region, a secondary structure known to be involved in genome replication.[ 4]
References
^ a b Redondo N, Zaldívar-López S, Garrido JJ, Montoya M (7 July 2021). "SARS-CoV-2 Accessory Proteins in Viral Pathogenesis: Knowns and Unknowns" . Frontiers in Immunology . 12 : 708264. doi :10.3389/fimmu.2021.708264 . PMC 8293742 . PMID 34305949 . {{cite journal }}
: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link )
^ Xu J, Zhao S, Teng T, Abdalla AE, Zhu W, Xie L, et al. (February 2020). "Systematic Comparison of Two Animal-to-Human Transmitted Human Coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV" . Viruses . 12 (2): 244. doi :10.3390/v12020244 . PMC 7077191 . PMID 32098422 .
^ a b Cagliani R, Forni D, Clerici M, Sironi M (September 2020). "Coding potential and sequence conservation of SARS-CoV-2 and related animal viruses" . Infection, Genetics and Evolution . 83 : 104353. Bibcode :2020InfGE..8304353C . doi :10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104353 . PMC 7199688 . PMID 32387562 . {{cite journal }}
: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link )
^ a b c d Jungreis I, Sealfon R, Kellis M (May 2021). "SARS-CoV-2 gene content and COVID-19 mutation impact by comparing 44 Sarbecovirus genomes" . Nature Communications . 12 (1): 2642. Bibcode :2021NatCo..12.2642J . doi :10.1038/s41467-021-22905-7 . PMC 8113528 . PMID 33976134 .
^ Finkel Y, Mizrahi O, Nachshon A, Weingarten-Gabbay S, Morgenstern D, Yahalom-Ronen Y, et al. (January 2021). "The coding capacity of SARS-CoV-2" . Nature . 589 (7840): 125– 130. Bibcode :2021Natur.589..125F . doi :10.1038/s41586-020-2739-1 . PMID 32906143 . S2CID 221624633 .
^ Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. (July 2020). "A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing" . Nature . 583 (7816): 459– 468. Bibcode :2020Natur.583..459G . doi :10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9 . PMC 7431030 . PMID 32353859 .
^ Mena EL, Donahue CJ, Vaites LP, Li J, Rona G, O'Leary C, et al. (April 2021). "ORF10-Cullin-2-ZYG11B complex is not required for SARS-CoV-2 infection" . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 118 (17): e2023157118. Bibcode :2021PNAS..11823157M . doi :10.1073/pnas.2023157118 . PMC 8092598 . PMID 33827988 . {{cite journal }}
: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link )
^ a b Pancer K, Milewska A, Owczarek K, Dabrowska A, Kowalski M, Łabaj PP, et al. (December 2020). "The SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 is not essential in vitro or in vivo in humans" . PLOS Pathogens . 16 (12): e1008959. doi :10.1371/journal.ppat.1008959 . PMC 7755277 . PMID 33301543 . {{cite journal }}
: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link )