A multiplicative operation is a mapping in which the argument is multiplied.[3] Multiplication originated intuitively in interval expansion, including tone row order number rotation, for example in the music of Béla Bartók and Alban Berg.[4] Pitch number rotation, Fünferreihe or "five-series" and Siebenerreihe or "seven-series", was first described by Ernst Krenek in Über neue Musik.[5][4] Princeton-based theorists, including James K. Randall,[6]Godfrey Winham,[7] and Hubert S. Howe[8] "were the first to discuss and adopt them, not only with regards [sic] to twelve-tone series".[9]
Pitch-class multiplication modulo 12
When dealing with pitch-class sets, multiplication modulo 12 is a common operation. Dealing with all twelve tones, or a tone row, there are only a few numbers which one may multiply a row by and still end up with a set of twelve distinct tones. Taking the prime or unaltered form as P0, multiplication is indicated by Mx, x being the multiplicator:
Mx(y) ≡ xy mod 12
The following table lists all possible multiplications of a chromatic twelve-tone row:
M
M × (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) mod 12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
3
0
3
6
9
0
3
6
9
0
3
6
9
4
0
4
8
0
4
8
0
4
8
0
4
8
5
0
5
10
3
8
1
6
11
4
9
2
7
6
0
6
0
6
0
6
0
6
0
6
0
6
7
0
7
2
9
4
11
6
1
8
3
10
5
8
0
8
4
0
8
4
0
8
4
0
8
4
9
0
9
6
3
0
9
6
3
0
9
6
3
10
0
10
8
6
4
2
0
10
8
6
4
2
11
0
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Note that only M1, M5, M7, and M11 give a one-to-one mapping (a complete set of 12 unique tones). This is because each of these numbers is relatively prime to 12. Also interesting is that the chromatic scale is mapped to the circle of fourths with M5, or fifths with M7, and more generally under M7 all even numbers stay the same while odd numbers are transposed by a tritone. This kind of multiplication is frequently combined with a transposition operation. It was first described in print by Herbert Eimert, under the terms "Quartverwandlung" (fourth transformation) and "Quintverwandlung" (fifth transformation),[10] and has been used by the composers Milton Babbitt,[11][12]Robert Morris,[13] and Charles Wuorinen.[14] This operation also accounts for certain harmonic transformations in jazz.[15]
Thus multiplication by the two meaningful operations (5 & 7) may be designated with M5(a) and M7(a) or M and IM.[4]
M1 = Identity
M5 = Cycle of fourths transform
M7 = Cycle of fifths transform
M11 = Inversion
M11M5 = M7
M7M5 = M11
M5M5 = M1
M7M11M5 = M1
...
Pitch multiplication
Pierre Boulez[16][dubious – discuss] described an operation he called pitch multiplication, which is somewhat akin [clarification needed] to the Cartesian product of pitch-class sets. Given two sets, the result of pitch multiplication will be the set of sums (modulo 12) of all possible pairings of elements between the original two sets. Its definition:
For example, if multiplying a C-major chord with a dyad containing C,D, the result is:
In this example, a set of three pitches multiplied with a set of two pitches gives a new set of 3 × 2 pitches. Given the limited space of modulo 12 arithmetic, when using this procedure very often duplicate tones are produced, which are generally omitted. This technique was used most famously in Boulez's 1955 Le Marteau sans maître, as well as in his Third Piano Sonata, Structures II, "Don" and "Tombeau" from Pli selon pli, Éclat (and Éclat/Multiples), Figures—Doubles—Prismes, Domaines, and Cummings ist der Dichter, as well as the withdrawn choral work, Oubli signal lapidé (1952).[17][18][19] This operation, like arithmetic multiplication and transpositional combination of set classes, is commutative.[20]
Howard Hanson called this operation of commutative mathematical convolution "superposition"[21] or "@-projection" and used the "/" notation interchangeably. Thus "p@m" or "p/m" means "perfect fifth at major third", e.g.: { C E G B }. He specifically noted that two triad forms could be so multiplied, or a triad multiplied by itself, to produce a resultant scale. The latter "squaring" of a triad produces a particular scale highly saturated in instances of the source triad.[22] Thus "pmn", Hanson's name for common the major triad, when squared, is "PMN", e.g.: { C D E G G♯ B }.
Nicolas Slonimsky used this operation, non-generalized, to form 1300 scales by multiplying the symmetrictritones, augmented chords, diminished seventh chords, and wholetone scales by the sum of 3 factors which he called interpolation, infrapolation, and ultrapolation.[23] The combination of interpolation, infrapolation, and ultrapolation, forming obliquely infra-interpolation, infra-ultrapolation, and infra-inter-ultrapolation, additively sums to what is effectively a second sonority. This second sonority, multiplied by the first, gives his formula for generating scales and their harmonizations.
Joseph Schillinger used the idea, undeveloped, to categorize common 19th- and early 20th-century harmonic styles as product of horizontal harmonic root-motion and vertical harmonic structure.[24] Some of the composers' styles which he cites appear in the following multiplication table.
The approximation of the 12 pitches of Western music by modulus-12 math, forming the Circle of Halfsteps, means that musical intervals can also be thought of as angles in a polar coordinate system, stacking of identical intervals as functions of harmonic motion, and transposition as rotation around an axis. Thus, in the multiplication example above from Hanson, "p@m" or "p/m" ("perfect 5th at major 3rd", e.g.: { C E G B }) also means "perfect fifth, superimposed upon perfect fifth rotated 1/3 of the circumference of the Circle of Halfsteps". A conversion table of intervals to angular measure (taken as negative numbers for clockwise rotation) follows:
This angular interpretation of intervals is helpful to visualize a very practical example of multiplication in music: Euler-Fokker genera used in describing the Just intonationtuning of keyboard instruments.[25] Each genus represents an harmonic function such as "3 perfect fifths stacked" or other sonority such as { C G D F♯ }, which, when multiplied by the correct angle(s) of copy, approximately fills the 12TETcircumferential space of the Circle of fifths. It would be possible, though not musically pretty, to tune an augmented triad of two perfect non-beating major thirds, then (multiplying) tune two tempered fifths above and 1 below each note of the augmented chord; this is Euler-Fokker genus [555]. A different result is obtained by starting with the "3 perfect fifths stacked", and from these non-beating notes tuning a tempered major third above and below; this is Euler-Fokker genus [333].
Time multiplication
Joseph Schillinger described an operation of "polynomial time multiplication" (polynomial refers to any rhythm consisting of more than one duration) corresponding roughly to that of Pitch multiplication above.[26] A theme, reduced to a consistent series of integers representing the quarter, 8th-, or 16th-note duration of each of the notes of the theme, could be multiplied by itself or the series of another theme to produce a coherent and related variation. Especially, a theme's series could be squared or cubed or taken to higher powers to produce a saturation of related material.
Herbert Eimert described what he called the "eight modes" of the twelve-tone series, all mirror forms of one another. The inverse is obtained through a horizontal mirror, the retrograde through a vertical mirror, the retrograde-inverse through both a horizontal and a vertical mirror, and the "cycle-of-fourths-transform" or Quartverwandlung and "cycle-of-fifths-transform" or Quintverwandlung obtained through a slanting mirror.[28] With the retrogrades of these transforms and the prime, there are eight permutations.
Furthermore, one can sort of move the mirror at an angle, that is the 'angle' of a fourth or fifth, so that the chromatic row is reflected in both cycles. ... In this way, one obtains the cycle-of-fourths transform and the cycle-of-fifths transform of the row.<ref>Eimert 1950, 29, translated in Schuijer 2008, 81
Some Z-related chords are connected by M or IM (multiplication by 5 or multiplication by 7), due to identical entries for 1 and 5 on the APIC vector.[31]
Antokoletz, Elliott. 1993. "Middle Period String Quartets". In The Bartok Companion, edited by Malcolm Gillies, 257–277. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN0-571-15330-5 (cased); ISBN0-571-15331-3 (pbk).
Hanson, Howard. 1960. Harmonic Materials of Modern Music. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Heinemann, Stephen. 1993. Pitch-Class Set Multiplication in Boulez's Le Marteau sans maître. D.M.A. diss., University of Washington.
Heinemann, Stephen. 1998. "Pitch-Class Set Multiplication in Theory and Practice." Music Theory Spectrum 20, no. 1 (Spring): 72–96.
Hibbard, William. 1969. "Charles Wuorinen: The Politics of Harmony". Perspectives of New Music 7, no. 2 (Spring-Summer): 155–166.
Howe, Hubert S. 1965. "Some Combinational Properties of Pitch Structures." Perspectives of New Music 4, no. 1 (Fall-Winter): 45–61.
Koblyakov, Lev. 1990. Pierre Boulez: A World of Harmony. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers. ISBN3-7186-0422-1.
Krenek, Ernst. 1937. Über neue Musik: Sechs Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die theoretischen Grundlagen. Vienna: Ringbuchhandlung.
Morris, Robert D. 1982. Review: "John Rahn, Basic Atonal Theory. New York: Longman, 1980". Music Theory Spectrum 4:138–154.
Morris, Robert D. 1997. "Some Remarks on Odds and Ends". Perspectives of New Music 35, no. 2 (Summer): 237–256.
Rahn, John. 1980. Basic Atonal Theory. Longman Music Series. New York and London: Longman. Reprinted, New York: Schirmer Books; London: Collier Macmillan, 1987.
Schuijer, Michiel. 2008. Analyzing Atonal Music: Pitch-Class Set Theory and Its Contexts. Eastman Studies in Music 60. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press. ISBN978-1-58046-270-9.
Losada, Catherine C. 2014. "Complex Multiplication, Structure, and Process: Harmony and Form in Boulez’s Structures II". Music Theory Spectrum 36, no. 1 (Spring): 86–120.
Morris, Robert D. 1977. "On the Generation of Multiple-Order-Function Twelve-Tone Rows". Journal of Music Theory 21, no. 2 (Autumn): 238–262.