Technique to find asymptotic expansions
In asymptotic analysis, the method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell is a technique to find asymptotic expansions for contour integrals. It was developed as an extension of the steepest descent method for getting uniform asymptotic expansions in the case of coalescing saddle points.[1] The method was published in 1957 by Clive R. Chester, Bernard Friedman and Fritz Ursell.[2]
Method
Setting
We study integrals of the form

where
is a contour and
are two analytic functions in the complex variable
and continuous in
.
is a large number.
Suppose we have two saddle points
of
with multiplicity
that depend on a parameter
. If now an
exists, such that both saddle points coalescent to a new saddle point
with multiplicity
, then the steepest descent method no longer gives uniform asymptotic expansions.
Procedure
Suppose there are two simple saddle points
and
of
and suppose that they coalescent in the point
.
We start with the cubic transformation
of
, this means we introduce a new complex variable
and write

where the coefficients
and
will be determined later.
We have

so the cubic transformation will be analytic and injective only if
and
are neither
nor
. Therefore
and
must correspond to the zeros of
, i.e. with
and
. This gives the following system of equations

we have to solve to determine
and
. A theorem by Chester–Friedman–Ursell (see below) says now, that the cubic transform is analytic and injective in a local neighbourhood around the critical point
.
After the transformation the integral becomes

where
is the new contour for
and

The function
is analytic at
for
and also at the coalescing point
for
. Here ends the method and one can see the integral representation of the complex Airy function.
Chester–Friedman–Ursell note to write
not as a single power series but instead as

to really get asymptotic expansions.
Theorem by Chester–Friedman–Ursell
Let
and
be as above. The cubic transformation

with the above derived values for
and
, such that
corresponds to
, has only one branch point
, so that for all
in a local neighborhood of
the transformation is analytic and injective.
Literature
References