Woman in a Dressing Gown

Woman in a Dressing Gown
Woman in a Dressing Gown
	Advertising poster
Directed by	J. Lee Thompson
Written by	Ted Willis
Based on	TV play by Willis
Produced by	Frank Godwin; J. Lee Thompson
Starring	Yvonne Mitchell; Anthony Quayle; Sylvia Syms; Carole Lesley
Cinematography	Gilbert Taylor
Edited by	Richard Best
Music by	Louis Levy
Production; company	Godwin-Willis Productions
Distributed by	Associated British-Pathé
Release date	June 1957;
Running time	93 minutes
Country	United Kingdom
Language	English
Box office	£450,000 (UK); £1 million (total)

Woman in a Dressing Gown is a 1957 British drama film directed by J. Lee Thompson and starring Yvonne Mitchell, Anthony Quayle, Sylvia Syms, and Carole Lesley.^[2]

The screenplay was written by Ted Willis, based on his 1956 ITV Television Playhouse play of the same name. The producer was Frank Godwin.

The film concerns a man who is having an extramarital affair and considers divorce, and his wife's reaction to the affair. Scenes compare and contrast the man's relationship with his wife versus his relationship with his lover. These are not only very different in content, but very different in film style, shots with his lover being in extreme close-up and/or unusually framed shots. Shots of the wife are mainly in wide angle, encompassing the chaotic mess of her house.

The film is considered an example of British social realism, and a prototypical version of Kitchen sink realism. Modern criticism has noted that it was more progressive in the field of gender politics than the British New Wave.

Plot

The Prestons are an apparently happy household made up of wife Amy, husband Jim and teenage son Brian, living in a cramped flat on a London housing estate. On a Sunday morning Amy lovingly prepares Jim's cooked breakfast but he announces he has to work.

However, tensions soon become clear. Although she has a breezy, loving character, Amy is a disorganised housewife. She finds it difficult to concentrate enough to tidy or cook properly. Jim is having an affair with a colleague, Georgie, who threatens to break it off unless Jim divorces his wife and leaves his family. He promises that he will do so, and eventually demands a divorce. Amy is shocked and distraught, but vows to improve herself. She borrows ten shillings from her son (who is in his first job) and pawns her engagement ring for three pounds. She then gets her hair done and buys a half bottle of whisky for Jim. She has phoned Jim at work and told him to bring Georgie home. Her plan is foiled when heavy rain ruins her new hair. She gets home looking worse than ever. She pulls her best dress out of storage but rips it putting it on. Her neighbour arrives and they start drinking the whisky. Amy gets drunk and ruins the table.

Brian finds her drunk and becomes angry with his father when he brings Georgie to the house. Jim slaps Brian, who leaves.

After a confrontation Amy orders Jim and Georgie out of the flat. Jim leaves, but has second thoughts. He tells Georgie it won't work and returns to his wife who is lovingly packing his case. She vows to get rid of her dressing gown.

Cast

Yvonne Mitchell as Amy Preston
Anthony Quayle as Jim Preston
Sylvia Syms as Georgie Harlow
Andrew Ray as Brian Preston
Carole Lesley as Hilda
Michael Ripper as pawnbroker
Nora Gordon as Mrs. Williams
Marianne Stone as hairdresser
Olga Lindo as manageress
Harry Locke as wine merchant
Max Butterfield as Harold
Roberta Woolley as Christine
Melvyn Hayes as newsboy
Cordelia Mitchell as Hilda's baby

Reception

Box Office

The film was one of the most popular at the British box office in 1957.^[3] According to Kinematograph Weekly the film was "in the money" at the British box office in 1957.^[4]

J. Lee Thompson later said the film lost money but was well received by critics.^[5]

Critical

The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote:

A British film which attempts to state a serious human problem, setting it in an authentic lower middle-class milieu, must be saluted for its initiative, even if its impact, already endangered by miscasting, is diluted by indecisive direction. Ted Willis' script – uninspired but unquestionably sincere – is adapted from his own television play; and it is the sort of intimate drama which has been successfully transferred from television to cinema in America. But Willis has not the Chayevsky touch; and he has been, moreover, unlucky in his collaborators. The director was presumably aiming at a mood of tragi-comedy; but continual over-emphasis pushes the comedy close to farce; and, consequently, there is difficulty in establishing the pathetic scenes. Yvonne Mitchell's undisciplined performance adds to the general lack of balance. Foolish, frowzy Amy is quite outside her range, and her fidgety gestures and character "business" cannot conceal her limitations. Even the accent is beyond her; at every dramatic moment she slips from Balham to Belgravia. Only in one or two of the quieter moments does she manage to make the part effective. Anthony Quayle is also cast against type, and it is to his credit that the dilemma of the weak, bewildered husband is transmitted with real compassion. Sylvia Syms and Andrew Ray play with understanding and restraint. The facile ending, with its suggestion of "happy ever after", is in line with the compromising attitude of the film as a whole; and rings entirely false.^[6]

Variety said the film "had good b.o. possibilities."^[7]

The New York Times said "Paddy Chayefsky would love it."^[8]

Jean-Luc Godard wrote "One really has to rack one’s brains to find anything to say about a British film. One wonders why. But that’s the way it is. And there isn’t even an exception to prove the rule. Especially not Woman in a Dressing-gown anyhow, in spite of its acting prize? at the recent Berlin Festival. That just goes to show that the Germans have no idea either... From beginning to end the film is an incredible debauch of camera movements as complex as they are silly and meaningless."^[9]^{[dead link]}

On the film's re-release on in 2012, Peter Bradshaw, in a five star review for The Guardian wrote that the film's "proto-kitchen-sink drama goes all the way where Brief Encounter loitered hesitantly ... and unlike David Lean's film, this one shows people saying the relevant things out loud. An unmissable rerelease."^[10]

Melanie Williams for the BFI Screenonline noted "an important reminder that postwar British realism did not begin with the New Wave, and that the 1950s were not devoid of socially engaged cinema, as is sometimes suggested. Indeed, in the field of gender politics, one could argue that this film is considerably more progressive than the New Wave that superseded it, in its focus on the travails of a middle-aged housewife rather than those of a virile young man."^[11]

Leslie Halliwell said: "Classic British TV play adequately filmed but now rather dated and irritating."^[12]

In British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928 as 1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "very good", writing: "Superior kitchen-sink soaper whose power overcomes even the casting of upper-class stars in working-class roles."^[13]

The Radio Times Guide to Films gave the film 4/5 stars, writing: "This painfully honest drama, based on a play by Ted Willis, was light years ahead of its time in its treatment of women and their place in marriage. Yvonne Mitchell stars in a role that should have seen her showered in awards. Her portrayal of clinical depression is stunning in its depth and understanding, and director J Lee Thompson pulls no punches in his exploration of a partnership gone sour with the intrusion of a younger woman. In many ways this movie heralded a new dawn in gritty British film-making which culminated in the "kitchen sink" social dramas of the 1960s"^[14]

Awards

The film won four awards at the 7th Berlin International Film Festival including the first ever FIPRESCI Prize and a special mention for "Best Foreign Film".^[15] Mitchell won the Silver Bear for Best Actress.^[16] The film also won the 1958 Golden Globe Award for Best English-Language Foreign Film.^[17]

Stage play

Willis later adapted the script into a successful stage play.^[18]

References

^ Harper, Sue; Porter, Vincent (29 July 2003). British Cinema of the 1950s: The Decline of Deference. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198159346 – via Google Books.
^ "Woman in a Dressing Gown". British Film Institute Collections Search. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
^ Thumim, Janet. "The popular cash and culture in the postwar British cinema industry". Screen. Vol. 32, no. 3. p. 259.
^ Billings, Josh (12 December 1957). "Others in the money". Kinematograph Weekly. p. 7.
^ J. LEE THOMPSON DISCUSSES CAREER: 'GUNS OF NAVARONE' DIRECTOR TOOK DEVIOUS PATH TO FILMS By MURRAY SCHUMACH Special to The New York Times25 July 1961: 18.
^ "Woman in a Dressing Gown". The Monthly Film Bulletin. 24 (276): 137. 1 January 1957 – via ProQuest.
^ Review of film at Variety
^ Screen: British Import: 'Woman in a Dressing Gown' at Victoria By BOSLEY GROWTHER. New York Times 13 Sep 1957: 15.
^ Godard, Jean-Luc. Godard on Godard. pp. 85–86.
^ "Woman in a Dressing Gown – review". the Guardian. 26 July 2012.
^ "BFI Screenonline: Woman in a Dressing Gown (1957)". www.screenonline.org.uk.
^ Halliwell, Leslie (1989). Halliwell's Film Guide (7th ed.). London: Paladin. p. 1126. ISBN 0586088946.
^ Quinlan, David (1984). British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd. p. 401. ISBN 0-7134-1874-5.
^ Radio Times Guide to Films (18th ed.). London: Immediate Media Company. 2017. p. 1036. ISBN 9780992936440.
^ Higson, Andrew (ed.); Ashby, Justine (ed.); Porter, Vincent (2000). British Cinema: Past and Present: "Outsiders in England: the films of the Associated British Picture Corporation, 1949-1958". Routledge. p. 162. ISBN 9780415220620. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)
^ "Berlinale 1957: Prize Winners". berlinale.de. Archived from the original on 4 April 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
^ "Woman In A Dressing Gown". www.goldenglobes.com.
^ "Production of Woman in a Dressing Gown | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com.