Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This was wrong. San Bernardino is the largest county in California and also in the United States. Binksternet (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's really semantic. In urban contexts, "largest" usually refers to "most populous," but I'm glad you deleted this ambiguous parameter altogether. Castncoot (talk) 04:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wall Street West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterfront.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Francisco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doom loop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Attention: specifically Nikkimaria: I politely ask, can you please leave this section alone, which perhaps of all sections defines NYC's very identity? Kindly I beg you to let Chronus and me deal with this section. We both compromised to leave as is. Do you even realize that you wiped out the entire gigantic Latin American presence from this section? I have zero confidence in your ability to edit this critical section. My sincere apologies" is a very condescending edit summary, highly suggestive of WP:OWNERSHIP. Please familiarise yourself with the policy. Seasider53 (talk) 06:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A second and final warning, in particular for the personal attack here: Special:MobileDiff/1190477111 Seasider53 (talk) 12:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seasider53, this uncooperative behavior has been ongoing for several months. Should I post at WP:ANI about this? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’d recommend it. I believe there was an additional warning on their talk page about this that they removed. Seasider53 (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hate this, but... here it is: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Castncoot. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Castncoot

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Nyfw, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 26 § Nyfw.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have commented why it should be kept, as did another editor before me. Castncoot (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cornfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This WP:POINT violation seems markedly ill-considered given that you have an open discussion at ANI regarding behavioral problems already. Will you self-revert, or should I present it as evidence that your commitment to heed the warning there was disingenuous? VQuakr (talk) 06:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VQuakr: I have no idea what you are talking about? Can you please elaborate? What exactly have I done wrong? (And I'm sorry but I don't remember ever encountering you before.) I have made only gf edits and I certainly don't mean to have done anything wrong. I respectfully disagree with whatever point you are trying to make because my conscience says I'm trying to be constructive. Castncoot (talk)

I linked the diff above, so there can be no doubt what I'm talking about. As a reminder competence is required to edit so if your claim is that nonsense like Am I sensing the beginnings of a breathtaking discussion here between several of us that could be a game changer to alter the face of Wikipedia forever? was done in good faith then we still have issues. I've closed the RFC; it's difficult the overstate the thinness of the ice on which you're skating here. VQuakr (talk) 17:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to engage in a constructive, civil, and friendly discussion here, I'm happy to oblige. Castncoot (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's what we're doing. Maybe not friendly since this is a behavioral intervention, but not unfriendly either. VQuakr (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments above strike me as borderline cruel and threatening. I certainly would have been more tactful on someone else's talk page. Sounds like you might have some issues to work on yourself as well, just like I definitely need to work on my impatience in editing. Nobody's perfect. But I also know that in YOUR mind you think you're doing the right thing to improve the encyclopedia. I get it. I'm sure there was no sinister or conspiratorial motive behind your comments. Similarly, you should understand that in MY mind, I am trying to better the whole project. Different styles for different folks. Castncoot (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely nothing wrong in bringing up an RfC on a Talk page, even it might be to revisit an old issue that may have potentially been hashed in the past under different circumstances. Who keeps track of everything? There's a process in Wikipedia that we all rely upon that generally works well. I question your decision to have closed the RfC prematurely when there may have emerged new, fresh comments along the same vein that have now been silenced. But you closed it, and that's that. Castncoot (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia can find a fault with any statement or non-statement or action or non-action. Sometimes to the point of absurdity. The vast majority of edits are made on a whim, mine certainly are. Some people really need to lighten up. Castncoot (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And finally, regarding my competence, I've been editing the project for over a decade and with over 50K edits and have been thanked for many of my edits. So I must be doing something right. Enjoy your weekend. Castncoot (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And you're absolutely right: I've seen it changed to "material" in other places. Mason.Jones (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words about the articles for New York City and Manhattan. I know that you have done a tremendous amount of work on these articles and I would greatly appreciate discussing further opportunities for improvement. Please feel free to reach me via email if you have any ideas. Alansohn (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chinese people in New York City

added a link pointing to The Knot

New Yorkers in journalism

added a link pointing to The Knot

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍🏻 daruda (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Just curious, are you a new editor here? You seem like someone with much more editing experience than someone who's only been editing Wikipedia as a registered user for less than one one month. Welcome anyway. Castncoot (talk) 23:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm a new editor. I just made a strong effort to peruse the rules of wikipedia and I tend to see the page histories (and the edit summaries) before making my edits because they give me an idea regarding any prior edit wars on that page. daruda (talk) 09:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Castncoot (talk) 15:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As in this edit, it truly strains credulity that readers need to know where Edison, New Jersey, is located in the North American continent and that the map of the United States is insufficient. It is very hard to believe that any reader would need to know where the township is located on the planet Earth or that any editor would think that they would need this information, let alone to do so without laughing out loud.

If you seriously believe that the continent or planet should be included in articles, please start an RfC and obtain broader consensus for this nationwide, rather than doing this piecemeal, article by article, for places in New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 04:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Conversation referred back to your talk page, so that the conversation is not split. Castncoot (talk) 04:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I started a discussion on this topic at WT:USCITY to try to gain broader consensus on this issue. Please share your take. Alansohn (talk) 14:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Will join there, thank you. Castncoot (talk) 00:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese people in the New York City metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suffolk County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madonna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartwheel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on LI,NY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philadelphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transatlantic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European people.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boutique, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifestyle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago Tribune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcript.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Baba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Oc county has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12 § Oc county until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cow neck has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12 § Cow neck until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect U.S. Mahayana has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 18 § U.S. Mahayana until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect US Mahayana has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 18 § US Mahayana until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 00:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest Hindu temples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I don't understand why you moved Dunellen station. The previous name is unambiguous and in line with WP:USSTATIONS. Mackensen (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to move it back, I thought it was an improvement being less ambiguous by specifying NJ Transit, but I don't feel strongly either way. Castncoot (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]