Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to MongoDB. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 14:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-20T14:13:00.000Z","author":"MrOllie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MrOllie-2021-12-20T14:13:00.000Z-December_2021","replies":[]}}-->

Hello Ayeshairshad. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ayeshairshad. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ayeshairshad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 14:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-20T14:16:00.000Z","author":"MrOllie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MrOllie-2021-12-20T14:16:00.000Z-December_2021","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabaq Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sabaq Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 12:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-10T12:41:00.000Z","author":"RPSkokie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RPSkokie-2022-02-10T12:41:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Sabaq_Foundation_(February_10)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Ayeshairshad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 12:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-10T12:41:00.000Z","author":"RPSkokie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RPSkokie-2022-02-10T12:41:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Sabaq_Foundation_(February_10)-1","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ayeshairshad (talk) 07:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-11T07:58:00.000Z","author":"Ayeshairshad","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ayeshairshad-2022-02-11T07:58:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I found reviewer's comment that i need to submit more citations. So, i have added 20 more citations. Please review and guide me if need further changes.

Hello, Your article was rejected because of two reasons. Your article's references do not give information in detail. You have now added 20 more references. Hope your article will be accepted this time. And the second reason, your article looks like an advertisement. You should improve it before submitting for review again. Write it in such a way, that it does not look like an advertisement. You should improve it before submitting again. Hope your article get accepted soon! MyNewBall88 (talk) 08:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-11T08:06:00.000Z","author":"MyNewBall88","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MyNewBall88-2022-02-11T08:06:00.000Z-Tips_for_your_article_that_was_rejected","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Sabaq Foundation (Hi-Res Logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-11T18:44:00.000Z","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-2022-02-11T18:44:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Sabaq_Foundation_(Hi-Res_Logo).png","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by RPSkokie were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

RPSkokie (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-12T04:10:00.000Z","author":"RPSkokie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RPSkokie-2022-02-12T04:10:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Sabaq_Foundation_(February_12)","replies":[]}}-->

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ayeshairshad, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ayeshairshad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-12T16:57:00.000Z","author":"Cordless Larry","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cordless_Larry-2022-02-12T16:57:00.000Z-February_2022","replies":[]}}-->

I have added the disclosure on my userpage --Ayeshairshad (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-14T06:26:00.000Z","author":"Ayeshairshad","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ayeshairshad-2022-02-14T06:26:00.000Z-February_2022","replies":[]}}-->

Please guide me what else should i do now to get the page published? Ayeshairshad (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-14T09:29:00.000Z","author":"Ayeshairshad","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ayeshairshad-2022-02-14T09:29:00.000Z-February_2022","replies":[]}}-->

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-15T11:42:00.000Z","author":"Curb Safe Charmer","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Curb_Safe_Charmer-2022-03-15T11:42:00.000Z-March_2022","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources, sponsored content, download sites, directory listings, etc. cannot be used to establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NCache Alachisoft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230331110300","author":"DoubleGrazing","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DoubleGrazing-20230331110300-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_NCache_Alachisoft_(March_31)","replies":[]}}-->

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230331110400","author":"DoubleGrazing","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DoubleGrazing-20230331110400-March_2023","replies":["c-Ayeshairshad-20230401143800-DoubleGrazing-20230331110400"]}}-->

Hi. Actually i am an employee in this company named alachisoft having flagship product NCache. I am new to Wikipedia that's why i don't know much about writing on Wikipedia. I have tried to make the content as much neutral and non advertising as possible. All of our competitors like Redis, Hazelcast have their pages on Wikipedia. We also want to publish our page. Can you please help us? Ayeshairshad (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230401143800","author":"Ayeshairshad","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ayeshairshad-20230401143800-DoubleGrazing-20230331110400","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement still name issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NCache Alachisoft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NP83 (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230428151200","author":"NP83","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-NP83-20230428151200-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_NCache_Alachisoft_(April_28)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Ayeshairshad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NCache Alachisoft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231125144400","author":"Explicit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Explicit-20231125144400-Your_draft_article,_Draft:NCache_Alachisoft","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2717"}}-->