Article at the time I tagged it for speedy copyvio:
"It is only described from two specimen collected in the Misuku Hills of northern Malawi. It is much larger and brownish then Zanzibar Galago (which it was first identified with), with a dark brown tail tip and notably short ears. Recorded vocalizations from Kalwe are distinctive and merit further study."
Source[21]:
"Finally, the “Kalwe Small Dwarf Galago ,” which is known from two specimens collected in the Misuku Hills of northern Malawi, may also be G. granti . It is much larger and brownish, with a dark brown tail tip and notably short ears. Recorded vocalizations from Kalwe are distinctive and merit further study"
"This criterion applies only in unequivocal cases, where there is no free-content material on the page worth saving and no later edits requiring attribution."
Here is the copyright notice at the page you cite:
"No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation."
No, but giving a good explanation of why you reject a csd is mire helpful than your terse edit summary. Anyway, thank you for taking an interest in my and only my afds, in one case your comments were even relevant. Fram (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)`[reply]
Blueprints at Addison Circle journal article link
You recently added a link to an article in Sculpture to the Blueprints at Addison Circle Wiki page. The link takes me to the EBSCO login screen; I have access to some EBSCO resources through my local public library, but it won't pull the article up. Presumably the library isn't subscribed to the correct collection, and I suspect that many readers will have this same problem or won't be able to access EBSCO at all. Can you permalink the magazine article, or use a different link to a more accessible web archive? Carguychris (talk) 21:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chris, I'm not sure I can produce a link that gives others free access to EBSCO; I've tried without luck but that doesn't mean it's not doable. In the meantime, I've emailed you a copy of the Sculpture article text. --A. B.(talk • contribs • global count)21:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you removed the PROD I placed on this article, with an explanation that there are news articles about it. I didn't tag it for lack of news articles; they just do not suffice for the subject of the article to meet the General Notability Guidelines WP:GNG. You've also not mentioned them. While a PROD can be removed for any reason, a good reason is always helpful, especially when disputing the content of the nomination. Best
Megan B....It’s all coming to me till the end of time15:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"remove PROD tag. There are additional news articles out there - possibly notable. At the same time, nominator's concerns about reliable sources seriously considered - recommend AfD”
PROD is for obvious, non-controversial deletions. If in doubt, articles should go to AfD for further discussion. That’s how I see this case.
I just skimmed the second ref. It did not seem egregiously biased like the other ref. Also, judging by the publisher’s other titles (see the book’s back cover), the publisher seemed reputable. My edit should be seen as a deletion of one ref, not a solid validation of the other.
Hi! The meta:Steward request/username change wasn't the right place for this, so I brought you a kitten. I just wanted to let you know that we genuinely appreciate your volunteer efforts. Keep up the awesome work; we see it and value it!
Thank you - this means a lot. I so enjoyed Meta. I returned after a 10-year wiki break and for now I've mostly focused here on under-referenced articles and deletion candidates. I look forward to getting more involved with Meta again soon. —A. B.(talk • contribs • global count)16:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Destination tables
I don't want to step on any toes, but I've asked ScottishFinnishRadish about their RfC close on their talk page here: [22]
Thanks. You're not stepping on my toes at all. I've discouraged some others from barging ahead because I thought they'd demand a review based on "this is a stupid idea" (which it is) rather than grounding it Wikipedia policies and guidelines. SFR acknowledged the pro-table !voters were in the majority but noted they made weak arguments with regards to policies and guidelines (i.e, just a lot of WP:ILIKEIT). Some of the people on the airport talk page are agitated enough to screw it up and get the door shut forever.
SFR just did his job based on what was presented to him. I was unaware of this RfC until after the fact when I was looking at a trip to Las Vegas. Had I commented at the RfC, I would have drilled into exactly what our policies say about primary sources; using airline and airport data was very much allowed in this case. I'd have cited chapter and verse, etc.
I think any appeal needs to be grounded on the primary sources question, not "the-admin-screwed-up".
I think both can be true - it reads to me like a supervote, since if this were an AfD, I'd go to DRV on the grounds that the admin picked a closing result which was not adequately supported by the discussion. SportingFlyerT·C12:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a review usually gives the benefit of the doubt to the closing admin. It’s probably best to just stick to policy and let others draw their own conclusions.
i think many !votes had underlying ILIKEIT and IDONTLIKEIT vibes likely depending on how much they fly. If the didn’t fly much, this just seemed like “pointless” trainspotting or highway editing. —A. B.(talk • contribs • global count)13:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also happy to help with a draft, though I'm not sure about reopening this can of worms yet since (so far) it's unclear if Sunny or anyone else will be attempting to remove the tables from a greater number of articles. Reywas92Talk02:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's sort of my thought as well - there's trouble as soon as anyone tries to remove them, since they're generally well maintained by users who don't participate in RfCs. SportingFlyerT·C11:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wish to elaborate on my reasons for starting this closure review. I had my own legitimate concerns about the close, which were partly inspired by the points you made about primary sources during dispute resolution. Though I also was aware that you intended to challenge the close, and I wanted to put it on a stronger footing beforehand. I don't think that that is a bad thing, but I wanted to apologize if it seems like I sought to preempt you while you were not ready.
My idea was that I could request closure review regarding the specific changes that I considered necessary, and you could subsequently request your own review centered on your particular concerns. In retrospect, however, I acknowledge that it is rather impractical to have one thorough discussion about the RFC one day, and have another a few months later.
In light of the above, I am willing to withdraw my request for closure review if you desire more time to formulate your arguments in collaboration with other editors. This would leave me in a limbo until you post your challenge: I was apparently the only editor seeking to enforce the RFC consensus, but I no longer feel comfortable defending a major part of the close. We would also certainly repeat ourselves to some degree in a future discussion. Nevertheless, I wonder if it is worth it, in the interest of having a fair debate about this controversial issue. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have never thought you've acted in bad faith. I have not thought you were trying to pre-empt my own request for a review. While I disagree with your editorial views on these tables, I've been impressed with how conscientious and polite you've been in notifying people, dealing with the angry mob on the Las Vegas airport talk page etc.
As for the RfC and now the close review, they've turned into a real muddle.
With regards to formulating my arguments, by now I've pretty much laid them all out there by now. Don't feel you have to withdraw your request.
We'll see what happens. Right now, I suspect those tables, which I look at all the time, are doomed. "You can't win 'em all." I have no hard feelings towards you.
Whoever deletes 1000s of tables needs to have a thick skin. The Las Vegas airport talk page got pretty ugly. Wikipedia has some editors that like a good fight - maybe you can pawn that task off on them.
I shall console myself that Heathrow will still have a section for bike routes.
If that is the case, and given that multiple people have already expounded their arguments, it is probably best to continue with the present review.
By the way, I agree with you about the excessive detail on things like bike routes in certain articles. The Las Vegas airport article used to mention the different parking garages, cellphone lot, and the location of bus stops. I pared down those details recently, though someone added the bus routes back. Sunnya343 (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind the other stuff like bike routes. They're probably useful for some readers and Wikipedia is not paper.
Hi. Following your edit on Bushra Razack, Do you reckon that reliable source(s) as the first one from the GBS Bertha Centre from the University of Cape Town is not good enough? ^ "Bertha Centre". gsbberthacentre.uct.ac.za. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
As well as the one from News 24??Please, go through the links and actually read. Thank you
MollelwaFahaSaBasotho (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think either of those two links will satisfy the two notability guidelines that apply to this article:
"'Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material."
"'Reliable' means that sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability."
"'Sources'" should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability."
"Independent of the subject' excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent."
Note that the gsbberthacentre.uct.ac.za link is reliable, but not independent.
Usually news media such as News 24 are secondary sources but interviews are a special case. (See Wikipedia:Interview). Aside from the significant coverage issue, parts of the News24 article are sort of an interview.
There's an additional notability that deals just with people:
I hope this helps. Does Bushra Razack "deserve" an article? Maybe. We'd probably like to have an article about her if we get the right kinds of source material.
Does Ms. Razack get one? Not unless these requirements are met. We don't do this to be hard-nosed; it's just that we can't write very reliable or accurate articles unless our articles meet these rules. These are Wikipedia-specific rules to meet Wikipedia-specific needs; they're different from what many other web sites allow because those other sites have different objectives.
We have almost 7 million articles. Perhaps 1 million are about living people? That's just a guess. The world's got 7 to 8 billion people. That means that maybe only 1 in 7,000 people has a Wikipedia article.
Please don't add additional inadequate citations. That's called "ref-bombing" (WP:REFBOMB and reduces the article's credibility and your own.
You only need one or two good references that meet Wikipedia's notability requirements to make this article "stick". From my own search, I don't think they yet exist for Ms. Razack, but I may be wrong.
If there aren't any, just save your work to your hard drive for future use and drop this article. This will save everybody's time, including your own. Don't embarrass Ms. Razack or yourself. Don't compromise her credibility or your own on Wikipedia. Don't get your account blocked and your other work here questioned.
It's not the end of the world if she doesn't have a Wikipedia article. Give it time; I suspect maybe she'll get the media coverage we need in the not-too-distant future.
We both know, actually everyone knows that "(Remove PROD: 1. - 3 refs in the Ukrainian Wikipedia article. 2. - 50+ Google News articles in last 12 month searching for Badak+gas 3. - over 100 Google Scholar results using Badak+gas)" is a fallacious argument. You know also as well as anyone that not all of those hits are about the subject, and that most of them are trivial mentions. So why embarrass yourself in front of everyone. So I propose you try to embarrass me instead. Those gas fields need to meet WP:GNG or be merged or deleted. So do the work for once and explain how this gas field is notable, and why I'm wrong in thinking it isn't.James.folsom (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
James, I have a life off Wikipedia. I travel. I may deal with that article, I may not. I'm in no rush and I'm certainly not going to do anything because of your insults.
When I review PRODs and references, I'm just looking for the right outcome. There articles that don't appeal to me and some that even make me cringe (porn stars, etc) but I look at them and apply the policies and guidelines that represent the collective opinion and values of the Wikipedia community, whether I personally want them in Wikipedia or not.
This mindset is the same way I worked as an admin in prior years. My actions here are not just about me.
I'm something of a deletionist (or at least a merge/redirect/listmaker) myself. Frankly, though, I've been concerned about what almost seems like a personal crusade for you to delete whole categories of articles you disapprove of - small Georgia communities like Tennga, Georgia, gas fields, sewage treatment plants -- notability and WP:BEFORE be damned.
You've had pushback from other editors, too, with the same concerns. Your responses to them have been gratuitously brusque at times. To some readers, they may even have seemed hostile. Hopefully that's not the way you intended them.
I meant to leave you nice note with some ideas about some gas fields you might want to look at but I can see this is not a good time for this.
Hi A.B. You undid my PROD on 'Chuluncayani Adventist University' and suggested AfD. I am new to editing - so very happy to accept this, since you think there might be relevant information (although I looked and couldn't find any). Do I need to do anything? Should I now suggest AfD? Best wishes - Newhaven Lad
I recommend you take it to AfD. Normally there are reliable refs out there for universities but I couldn’t find any. At AfD, someone will either find some to prove notability or else folks will confirm your belief the article should be deleted. Instructions on how to do this are at WP:AFD. Thanks for your work on under-referenced articles. We need a lot more of this. —A. B.(talk • contribs • global count)19:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
I do have an account there. I don’t believe I’m in cahoots with anyone, though. I haven’t participated in any of the recent threads, but did read them and saw that what was really needed here was some way of cooling the temperature between The Spacebook and JPxG, which is why I closed the two AN and AN/I sections. Unfortunately, it didn’t work, and there’s now an ArbCom case request about it, but I thought (and still think) it was worth a try. 28bytes (talk) 06:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you did the right thing. Unfortunately this turned into ANI whack-a-mole. From what I see, Wikipediocracy seems like a reasonable place with the exception of at most a handful of editors, one in particular. Other than those editors' posts, it appears to serve a useful purpose for Wikipedia even if it may not feel like it to Wikipedians. It certainly looks more civil than ANI.
I was looking at an old AFD you commented in and realized that I hadn't seen your work on the project in a long time. I hope off-wiki life is keeping you busy and engaged. I look forward to whenever you have the interest and time to rejoin us. We could use more thoughtful participants in AFD right now. Hope all is well! LizRead!Talk!05:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Your current IP address is not blocked. I'd be happy to grant IPBE if you still think you need it, though. If so, mind briefly explaining why? If someone else sees your response sooner, note that I've WP:CHECKUSER-cleared this user for IPBE, my only concern is that I don't believe they currently need it. --Yamla (talk) 21:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you plan to come back. I too went inactive in 2014 and came back in 2017. There had been some changes and I needed to relearn some things and I had to redefine how I work on Wikipedia, but I'm glad I came back. best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Deepfriedokra. I was away probably a decade and I had to learn about the subtle changes that had occurred. I'd like to be an admin again but I honestly don't think I'd want to go through an 2024 RfA -- they've become ridiculously grueling since my RfA (86/0/0). Also, I doubt many people are active that remember me as an admin.
Hello. I have that page WP:ARC on my watchlist and saw your self revert. Since you reverted, it doesn't matter now, but just a reminder for the future, you can't make comments/reply in someone else's section. That's all, happy editing! GrayStorm(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.)19:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Joy Chatterjee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
@Jellyfish, Joy Chatterjee is not my article. It was proposed for deletion (BLPPROD). I saw right away that General Chatterjee met our notability guidelines by virtue of his Param Vishisht Seva Medal. A quick search turned up reliable references which I added to the article, further establishing his notability. I removed the BLPPROD tag and moved on. The article meets our minimum requirements for inclusion but needs a lot of work; I'd give it a letter grade of "D" right now.
Hi! Sorry to have sent this to you, then. I saw you made a significant amount of edits on the article but didn't take too detailed of a look at the article's history. I'll be cleaning up and re-organizing the article when I have time! jellyfish✉00:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AN's archiving
Hey, if you don't want the bot to archive that notice at AN again, you might want to consider adding {{subst:Do not archive until}} or making a new comment with a more recent timestamp.
I would have done it, but AN is understandably semi-protected. – 2804:F1...DF:61D4 (::/32) (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Joglo Yusuf SudirmanNama sebagaimana tercantum dalamSistem Registrasi Nasional Cagar Budaya Cagar budaya IndonesiaKategoriBangunanNo. RegnasBelum ada (Pengajuan 4 Oktober 2015)LokasikeberadaanDusun Kunden RT. 05, Kalurahan Jambidan, Kapanéwon Banguntapan, Kabupaten Bantul, Provinsi Daerah Istimewa YogyakartaPemilikKeluarga Yusuf SudirmanPengelolaKeluarga Yusuf Sudirman Rumah Tradisional Yusuf Sudirman atau Joglo Yusuf Sudirman adalah bangunan cagar budaya yang terletak di Dusun Kunden RT. 05...
2020 Hawaii House of Representatives election ← 2018 November 3, 2020 2022 → All 51 seats in the Hawaii House of Representatives26 seats needed for a majority Majority party Minority party Leader Scott Saiki Gene Ward Party Democratic Republican Leader's seat 26th 17th Last election 46 5 Seats before 46 5 Seats won 47 4 Seat change 1 1 Popular vote 240,042 105,475 Percentage 65.8% 28.9% Results: De...
Underground layer of water-bearing permeable rock Schematic of an aquifer showing confined zones, groundwater travel times, a spring and a well An aquifer is an underground layer of water-bearing material, consisting of permeable or fractured rock, or of unconsolidated materials (gravel, sand, or silt). Aquifers vary greatly in their characteristics. The study of water flow in aquifers and the characterization of aquifers is called hydrogeology. Related terms include aquitard, which is a bed ...
Mural in Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S. Black Lives Matter street muralStreet-level view of the mural on August 8, 2020Year2020 (2020)LocationIndianapolis, Indiana, U.S.Coordinates39°46′36″N 86°10′08″W / 39.7768°N 86.1688°W / 39.7768; -86.1688 The Black Lives Matter street mural in Indianapolis is a large, colorful mural reading #BLACKLIVESMATTER, with a raised fist, that 18 artists painted across a downtown roadway in August 2020, as part of the George F...
FA Premier League 1997-1998FA Carling Premiership 1997-1998 Competizione FA Premier League Sport Calcio Edizione 99ª (6ª di Premier League) Organizzatore Federazione calcistica dell'Inghilterra Date dal 9 agosto 1997al 9 maggio 1998 Luogo Inghilterra Partecipanti 20 Risultati Vincitore Arsenal(11º titolo) Retrocessioni BoltonBarnsleyCrystal Palace Statistiche Miglior giocatore Dennis Bergkamp (PFA)[1] Michael Owen (PL) Miglior marcatore Dion Dublin Michael ...
Ini adalah nama Korea; marganya adalah Kang. Young KDAY6 Live & Meet di Taiwan, 21 Juli 2017Nama asal강영현LahirKang Young-hyun19 Desember 1993 (umur 30)Korea SelatanNama lainBrian KangPekerjaanPenyanyipenulis lagurapperKarier musikGenreK-popRockInstrumenVokalRappingBass guitarTahun aktif2015–sekarangLabelJYP EntertainmentArtis terkaitDAY6JYP Nation Kang Young-hyun (Korea:강영현; lahir 19 Desember 1993),[1] lebih dikenal dengan nama panggungnya Young K, adal...
Indian music director of Tamil films Srikanth DevaBorn (1977-07-20) 20 July 1977 (age 46)Chennai, IndiaEducationSt. John's Matriculation Higher Secondary School AlwarthirunagarOccupation(s)Actor, Music Director,composerYears active2000–presentSpouseFebi ManiParentDevaRelativesJai (cousin)Sabesh–Murali (uncles) Srikanth Deva is an Indian music director of Tamil films. He made his debut as music director in the Tamil movie Doubles in 2000. He is the son of composer Deva, nephew of...
Cet article est une ébauche concernant une localité portugaise. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant (comment ?) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Vila Franca de Xira Héraldique Administration Pays Portugal Région Lisbonne Sous-région Grand Lisbonne Ancienne province Ribatejo District District de Lisbonne Code postal 2600 Démographie Population 136 886 hab. (2011[1]) Densité 431 hab./km2 Géographie Coordonnées 38° 53...
Australian rules footballer Australian rules footballer Shane Yarran Yarran at Domain Stadium in August 2016Personal informationNickname(s) YazDate of birth (1989-06-02)2 June 1989Date of death 20 April 2018(2018-04-20) (aged 28)Place of death Seville Grove, Western AustraliaOriginal team(s) Subiaco (WAFL)Draft No. 61, 2015 national draftDebut Round 18, 2016, Fremantle vs. Gold Coast, at Metricon StadiumHeight 186 cm (6 ft 1 in)Weight 76 kg (168 lb)Position(...
1956 UCI Track Cycling World ChampionshipsVenueCopenhagen, Denmark Date(s)27 Augustus - 2 September 1956VelodromeOrdrupbanenEvents5← Milan 1955Rocourt 1957 → The 1956 UCI Track Cycling World Championships were the World Championship for track cycling. They took place in Copenhagen, Denmark from 27 August to 2 September 1956.[1] Five events for men were contested, 3 for professionals and 2 for amateurs. Medal summary Event Gold Silver Bronze Men's Professional Ev...
هذه المقالة تحتاج للمزيد من الوصلات للمقالات الأخرى للمساعدة في ترابط مقالات الموسوعة. فضلًا ساعد في تحسين هذه المقالة بإضافة وصلات إلى المقالات المتعلقة بها الموجودة في النص الحالي. (يونيو 2023)Learn how and when to remove this message مجلس نواب بلجيكا التأسيس 1831 البلد بلجيكا جزء من بر...
South African politician This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Lourens Muller – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message) Lourens MullerMinister of TransportIn office29 April 1974 – February 1979Prime MinisterJohn VorsterP. W. ...
The Homs revolts of 854–855 were a series of armed uprisings that took place in Homs in northern Syria. During the autumns of both 854 and 855 the city's inhabitants attempted to rebel against local government officials, resulting in both instances in several fatalities and necessitating the intervention of the Abbasid central government in response. The second revolt also resulted in the promulgation of a number of anti-Christian edicts due to the participation of a portion of the city's C...
Parliamentary democracy Politics of Nova ScotiaCoat of arms of Nova ScotiaPolity typeProvince within a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchyConstitutionConstitution of CanadaLegislative branchNameGeneral Assembly House of AssemblyTypeUnicameralMeeting placeProvince House, HalifaxPresiding officerSpeaker of the House of AssemblyExecutive branchHead of StateCurrentlyKing Charles IIIrepresented by Arthur LeBlanc, Lieutenant GovernorHead of GovernmentCurrentlyPremierTim HoustonAppointerLi...
Common soil bacterium and the causative agent of tetanus Clostridium tetani Clostridium tetani forming spores Scientific classification Domain: Bacteria Phylum: Bacillota Class: Clostridia Order: Eubacteriales Family: Lachnospiraceae Genus: Clostridium Species: C. tetani Binomial name Clostridium tetaniFlügge, 1881 Clostridium tetani is a common soil bacterium and the causative agent of tetanus. Vegetative cells of Clostridium tetani are usually rod-shaped and up to 2.5 μm long, but th...
This article is about the 1966 Major League Baseball season only. For information on all of baseball, see 1966 in baseball. Sports season1966 MLB seasonLeagueMajor League BaseballSportBaseballDurationApril 11 – October 9, 1966Number of games162Number of teams20TV partner(s)NBCDraftTop draft pickSteve ChilcottPicked byNew York MetsRegular seasonSeason MVPAL: Frank Robinson (BAL)NL: Roberto Clemente (PIT)AL championsBaltimore Orioles AL runners-upMinnesota TwinsNL championsLos Ang...
منتخب المالديف لكرة القدم (بالديفهي: ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭ ގައުމީ ފުޓްބޯލް ޓީމް) معلومات عامة بلد الرياضة جزر المالديف الفئة كرة القدم للرجال رمز الفيفا MDV الاتحاد اتحاد مالديف لكرة القدم كونفدرالية آفك (آسيا) كونفدرالية فرعية ساف (جنوب آسيا) الملعب الرئيسي استاد كر�...
Pour les articles homonymes, voir Flandin. Pierre-Étienne Flandin Pierre-Étienne Flandin(photographie à la une du Time, 4 février 1935). Fonctions Vice-président du Conseil des ministres(Vichy)et ministre des Affaires étrangères 14 décembre 1940 – 10 février 1941(1 mois et 27 jours) Chef de l'État Philippe Pétain Gouvernement Flandin II Prédécesseur Pierre Laval Successeur François Darlan Président du Conseil des ministres français 8 novembre 1934 – 1er juin 193...
هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (مارس 2019) سنا مرسني معلومات شخصية الميلاد 1 ديسمبر 1984 (40 سنة) جندوبة مواطنة تونس مناصب عضو مجلس نواب الشعب[1] عضوة خلال الفترة2 ديسمبر 2014 – 13 نوفمبر 201...
