where is the Levi-Civita symbol,
are Dirac matrices (with ) and ,
is the mass,
,
and is a vector-valued spinor with additional components compared to the four component spinor in the Dirac equation. It corresponds to the (1/2, 1/2) ⊗ ((1/2, 0) ⊕ (0, 1/2))representation of the Lorentz group, or rather, its (1, 1/2) ⊕ (1/2, 1) part.[2]
This equation controls the propagation of the wave function of composite objects such as the delta baryons ( Δ ) or for the conjectural gravitino. So far, no elementary particle with spin 3/2 has been found experimentally.
The massless Rarita–Schwinger equation has a fermionic gauge symmetry: is invariant under the gauge transformation , where is an arbitrary spinor field. This is simply the local supersymmetry of supergravity, and the field must be a gravitino.
"Weyl" and "Majorana" versions of the Rarita–Schwinger equation also exist.
Equations of motion in the massless case
Consider a massless Rarita–Schwinger field described by the Lagrangian density
where the sum over spin indices is implicit, are Majorana spinors, and
To obtain the equations of motion we vary the Lagrangian with respect to the fields , obtaining:
using the Majorana flip properties[4]
we see that the second and first terms on the RHS are equal, concluding that
plus unimportant boundary terms.
Imposing we thus see that the equation of motion for a massless Majorana Rarita–Schwinger spinor reads:
The gauge symmetry of the massless Rarita-Schwinger equation allows the choice of the gauge , reducing the equations to:
where is the spatial Laplacian, is doubly transverse,[6] carrying spin 3/2, and satisfies the massless Dirac equation, therefore carrying spin 1/2.
Drawbacks of the equation
The current description of massive, higher spin fields through either Rarita–Schwinger or Fierz–Pauli formalisms is afflicted with several maladies.
Superluminal propagation
As in the case of the Dirac equation, electromagnetic interaction can be added by promoting the partial derivative to gauge covariant derivative:
.
In 1969, Velo and Zwanziger showed that the Rarita–Schwinger Lagrangian coupled to electromagnetism leads to equation with solutions representing wavefronts, some of which propagate faster than light. In other words,
the field then suffers from acausal, superluminal propagation; consequently, the quantization in interaction with electromagnetism is essentially flawed[why?]. In extended supergravity, though, Das and Freedman[7] have shown that local supersymmetry solves this problem[how?].
References
^S. Weinberg, "The quantum theory of fields", Vol. 3, Cambridge p. 335
^S. Weinberg, "The quantum theory of fields", Vol. 1, Cambridge p. 232
^S. Weinberg, "The quantum theory of fields", Vol. 3, Cambridge p. 335
^Pierre Ramond - Field theory, a Modern Primer - p.40
Collins P.D.B., Martin A.D., Squires E.J., Particle physics and cosmology (1989) Wiley, Section 1.6.
Velo, Giorgio; Zwanziger, Daniel (1969-10-25). "Propagation and Quantization of Rarita-Schwinger Waves in an External Electromagnetic Potential". Physical Review. 186 (5). American Physical Society (APS): 1337–1341. Bibcode:1969PhRv..186.1337V. doi:10.1103/physrev.186.1337. ISSN0031-899X.
Velo, Giorgio; Zwanzinger, Daniel (1969-12-25). "Noncausality and Other Defects of Interaction Lagrangians for Particles with Spin One and Higher". Physical Review. 188 (5). American Physical Society (APS): 2218–2222. Bibcode:1969PhRv..188.2218V. doi:10.1103/physrev.188.2218. ISSN0031-899X.