The following are lists of extremes among the known exoplanets. The properties listed here are those for which values are known reliably. The study of exoplanets is one of the most dynamic emerging fields of science, and these values may change wildly as new discoveries are made.
Assuming the largest distance from the microlensing light-curve, the planet OGLE-2017-BLG-0364Lb might be more distant, at around 32 600 light-years (10 000 pc).[2]
The most distant potentially habitable planet confirmed is Kepler-1606b, at 2870 light-years distant,[3] although the unconfirmed planet KOI-5889.01 is over 5000 light-years distant.
Proxima Centauri b is the closest potentially habitable exoplanet known. As Proxima Centauri is the closest star to the Sun (and will stay so for the next 25 000 years), this is an absolute record.
Alpha Centauri A (apparent magnitude 0.01) has a directly imaged candidate planet.[7] The evidence of planets around Vega with an apparent magnitude of 0.03 is strongly suggested by circumstellar disks surrounding it.[8] As of 2021[update], a candidate planet around Vega has been detected.[9]
Aldebaran (apparent magnitude varies between 0.75 and 0.95) was suspected to have a candidate planet, however later studies found the existence of the planet inconclusive.[10]Pollux (apparent magnitude 1.14[11]) has a reported planet (Thestias), but the existence of this planet has been questioned.[12][13] Mirfak (α Per, apparent magnitude 1.806) was claimed to have an orbiting planet, whose existence has likewise been disputed.[14]
A 2023 study detected 10 luminous point sources around the primary star of Fomalhaut system (apparent magnitude = 1.16), of which the last source may be either an unrelated background object or a planetary-mass companion.[15]
Star with the faintest apparent magnitude with a planet
Derived from its separation of 0.00269 AU and its distance of ~26 000 light-years (8000 pc).[20]
Planetary characteristics
Title
Planet
Star
Data
Notes
Most massive
The most massive planet is difficult to define due to the blurry line between planets and brown dwarfs. If the borderline is defined as the deuterium fusion threshold (roughly 13MJ at solar metallicity[21][b]), the most massive planets are those with true mass closest to that cutoff; if planets and brown dwarfs are differentiated based on formation, their mass ranges overlap.[22][23]: 62 A candidate for the most massive object that formed in a protoplanetary disk is HD 206893 b, at about 28MJ. Both this object and its 13MJ sibling HD 206893 c fuse deuterium.[24][25]
According to the IAU working definition of exoplanets GP Comae Berenices b, being 10 times more massive than Jupiter, is a planet, despite that it might have formed as a white dwarf that was stripped down to a planetary-mass object. For reference, it is a lot denser than osmium at 293 K, the densest naturally occurring stable element on Earth. It is suspected that GP Comae Berenices b might be composed of strange matter based on its density. [32]
TOI-4603 b is the densest planet which orbits a normal star and is not a potential brown dwarf, with 14.1+1.7 −1.6 g/cm3.[33]
The candidate planet KOI-2093.03 is hotter, at 6,285 K.[38]
Kepler-70b and Kepler-70c are often described as the hottest known exoplanets, both at >6800 K (assuming an albedo of 0.1 for both),[39] but their existence are highly doubtful.[40][41]
The free-floating planet or sub-brown dwarf Proplyd 133-353 is younger, at 0.5 Myr.[29][48] However, as a free-floating planet, it does not meet the IAU's working definition of a planet.[49]
2MASS J04414489+2301513 b is listed as the youngest planet in the NASA Exoplanet Archive, at an age of 1 Myr,[1] but fails the mass ratio criterion of the IAU working definition of an exoplanet; the mass ratio with the primary is larger than the L4/L5 limit of stability ≈ 1/25[49] and 'more likely to have been produced by cloud core fragmentation' (like a star).[50]
UCAC4 328-061594 b has an even larger orbital separation (19 000 AU), although its mass (21 MJ)[1][62] is higher than the deuterium burning limit (13 MJ).
Another candidate around BD+29 5007 has an even larger orbit of about 22 100 AU. There is no consensus about its age and resulting mass, and it could be a field brown dwarf.
The companion of ASASSN-21js has an orbit of 13 000 AU, but it is unknown if it is a brown dwarf or a planet due to its unknown mass.[63]
UCAC4 328-061594 b has an even larger orbital separation (19,000 AU), although its mass (21MJ)[1][62] is higher than the deuterium burning limit (13MJ).
SR 12 c has a mass of 0.013±0.007 M☉.[72] DT Virginis c, also known as Ross 458 c, at a projected separation of ≈1200 AU, with several mass estimates below the deuterium burning limit, has a latest mass determination of 27±4MJ.[73]
Largest orbit around a single star in a multiple star system
SR 12 c has a mass of 0.013±0.007 M☉ at a projected separation of ≈1100 AU.[72] FW Tauri b orbits at a projected separation of 330±30 AU around a ≈11 AU separated binary.[75] It was shown to be more likely a 0.1 M☉ star surrounded by a protoplanetary disk than a planetary-mass companion.[76]
BD+20°2457 may be the lowest-metallicity planet host ([Fe/H]=−1.00); however, the proposed planetary system is dynamically unstable.[80]
Planets were announced around even the extremely low-metallicity stars HIP 13044 and HIP 11952; however, these claims have since been disproven.[57]
A brown dwarf or massive planetary companion was announced around the population II star HE 1523-0901, whose metallicity is −2.65±0.22 dex.[81] While the inclination of the companion is not known, if its orbit is nearly face-on, it would be sufficiently massive to become a red dwarf instead.[82]
A disputed substellar companion, possibly a Jovian planet, was announced to orbit[83] the B-type subdwarf star HD 149382 with a metallicity of -1.30 dex.[84]
The subgiant star Pipirima has a higher mass of 9.1±0.3 M☉,[85] but its planet candidate Mu2 Scorpii b is most likely a brown dwarf having 14.4 ± 0.8 MJ.
The candidate planet M51-ULS-1b and the candidate planemo IGR J12580+0134 b might be the blanets, whose hosts have masses of ≫10 and 9 150 000 Solar masses, respectively.[86][87]
This is the most luminous star to host a planet that is not a potential brown dwarf.[67]
The star Mirfak, whose luminosity is 3780 L☉,[104] was claimed to have an orbiting planet with a minimum mass of 6.6 ± 0.2 Jupiter masses. However, the existence of the planet is doubtful.[14]
R Leonis (at 3537 L☉)[91] has a candidate planet. R Fornacis (at 5800 L☉)[93] also has a candidate planet. The bright giant BD+20°2457 (at 1479 L☉[105]) was believed to have two planetary-mass companions orbiting although the claimed system configuration is dynamically unstable.[80]
The stars R126 and R66 in the Large Magellanic Cloud have luminosities of 1400000L☉ and 320000L☉[97] and have dust discs but no planets have been detected yet.
A gas giant planet was found orbiting TVLM 513-46546,[113] which is an ultracool star (2242 K) located very close to the brown dwarf/star mass boundary.[114]
Tau Ceti currently has no confirmed planetary companion, although it has been proposed that the number of orbiting planets may be 8, 9 or even 10.[115] The four planets Tau Ceti e, f, g and h are considered as strong candidates.[116]
HD 10180 has six confirmed planets and potentially three more planets.[117]
30 Arietis Bb was believed to be either brown dwarf or a massive gas giant in a quadruple star system until later studies revealed a true mass well above 80 MJup.[119]
The quintuple star system GG Tauri has several protoplanetary disks but no planets have been detected yet.[120] Similarly, the star β3 Tucanae A, located in a sextuple system, was suggested to have a debris disk with no planets having been found.[121]
Multiplanetary system with smallest mean semi-major axis (planets are nearest to their star)
Kepler-429 b, c and d have a semi-major axis of only 0.0116, 0.006 and 0.0154 AU, respectively. The separation between closest and furthest is only 0.0094 AU.
Kepler-70 b, c and d (all unconfirmed and disputed) have a semi-major axis of only 0.006, 0.0076 and ~0.0065 AU, respectively. The separation between closest and furthest is only 0.0016 AU (239,356 km).
Multiplanetary system with largest range of semi-major axis (largest difference between the star's nearest planet and its farthest planet)
The planets in the Kepler-444 system have radii of 0.4, 0.497, 0.53, 0.546 and 0.741 Earth radii, respectively. Due to their size and proximity to Kepler-444, these must be rocky planets, with masses close to that of Mars. For comparison, Mars has a mass of 0.105 Earth masses and a radius of 0.53 Earth radii.
Four planets having > 5 Jupiter masses each. Nu Ophiuchi b and c have minimum masses of 22.206 and 24.662 Jupiter masses, respectively.[1] They are likely brown dwarfs.
Multiplanetary system with smallest mean planetary mass
The planets in the Kepler-444 system have radii of 0.4, 0.497, 0.53, 0.546 and 0.741 Earth radii, respectively. Due to their size and proximity to Kepler-444, these must be rocky planets, with masses close to that of Mars. For comparison, Mars has a mass of 0.105 Earth masses and a radius of 0.53 Earth radii.
Multiplanetary system with largest mean planetary mass
Four planets having > 5 Jupiter masses each. Nu Ophiuchi b and c have minimum masses of 22.206 and 24.662 Jupiter masses, respectively.[1] They are likely brown dwarfs.
Exo-multiplanetary system with smallest range in planetary mass, log scale (smallest proportional difference between the most and least massive planets)
Mercury and Jupiter have a mass ratio of 5750 to 1. Kepler-37 d and b may have a mass ratio between 500 and 1000, and Gliese 676 c and d have a mass ratio of 491.
^Ducati, J. R. (2002), "VizieR Online Data Catalog: Catalogue of Stellar Photometry in Johnson's 11-color system", CDS/ADC Collection of Electronic Catalogues, 2237: 0, Bibcode:2002yCat.2237....0D, doi:10.26093/cds/vizier, VizieR Cat. II/237/colors.
^Aurière, Michel; Konstantinova-Antova, Renada; et al. (August 2014). "Pollux: a stable weak dipolar magnetic field but no planet?". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. Magnetic Fields throughout Stellar Evolution. Vol. 302. pp. 359–362. arXiv:1310.6907. Bibcode:2014IAUS..302..359A. doi:10.1017/S1743921314002476.
^Morris, Evan C.; Wang, Jason J.; Hsu, Chih-Chun; Ruffio, Jean-Baptiste; Xuan, Jerry W.; Delorme, Jacques-Robert; Hood, Callie; Bryan, Marta L.; Martin, Emily C. (May 2024), kappa And b is a fast rotator from KPIC High Resolution Spectroscopy, arXiv:2405.13125
^Hoyer, S.; Jenkins, J. S.; Parmentier, V.; Deleuil, M.; Scandariato, G.; Wilson, T. G.; Díaz, M. R.; Crossfield, I. J. M.; Dragomir, D.; Kataria, T.; Lendl, M.; Ramirez, R.; Peña Rojas, P. A.; Vinés, J. I. (10 July 2023). "The extremely high albedo of LTT 9779 b revealed by CHEOPS". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 675: A81. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346117. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
^Kraus, Adam; J. Ireland, Michael; A. Cieza, Lucas; Hinkley, Sasha; J. Dupuy, Trent; P. Bowler, Brendan; C. Liu, Michael (2 January 2014). "Three Wide Planetary-Mass Companions to FW Tau, ROXs 12, and ROXs 42B". The Astrophysical Journal. 781 (1): 1311. arXiv:1311.7664. Bibcode:2014ApJ...781...20K. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/20. S2CID41086512.
^Hansen, T. T.; Andersen, J.; Nordström, B.; Beers, T. C.; Yoon, J.; Buchhave, L. A. (2015), "The role of binaries in the enrichment of the early Galactic halo. I. r-process-enhanced metal-poor stars", Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583: A49, arXiv:1509.05344, Bibcode:2015A&A...583A..49H, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526812
^van Belle, G. T.; Thompson, R. R.; Creech-Eakman, M. J. (September 2002). "Angular Size Measurements Of Mira Variable Stars At 2.2 Microns. II". The Astronomical Journal. 124 (3): 1706–1715. arXiv:astro-ph/0210167. Bibcode:2002AJ....124.1706V. doi:10.1086/342282.
^Kervella, P.; Homan, W.; Richards, A. M. S.; Decin, L.; McDonald, I.; Montargès, M.; Ohnaka, K. (2016). "ALMA observations of the nearby AGB star L2 Puppis - I. Mass of the central star and detection of a candidate planet". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 596: A92. arXiv:1611.06231. Bibcode:2016A&A...596A..92K. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629877. S2CID55298073.
^Agol, Eric; Dorn, Caroline; Grimm, Simon L.; Turbet, Martin; Ducrot, Elsa; Delrez, Laetitia; Gillon, Michael; Demory, Brice-Olivier; Burdanov, Artem (14 January 2021), "Refining the transit timing and photometric analysis of TRAPPIST-1: Masses, radii, densities, dynamics, and ephemerides", The Planetary Science Journal, 2 (1): 1, arXiv:2010.01074, Bibcode:2021PSJ.....2....1A, doi:10.3847/PSJ/abd022
^Linsky, Jeffrey L.; Wood, Brian E.; Brown, Alexander; Giampapa, Mark S.; Ambruster, Carol (December 1995). "Stellar Activity at the End of the Main Sequence: GHRS Observations of the M8 Ve Star VB 10". The Astrophysical Journal. 455: 670. Bibcode:1995ApJ...455..670L. doi:10.1086/176614. hdl:2060/19970022983. ISSN0004-637X.
^Filippazzo, Joseph C.; Rice, Emily L.; Faherty, Jacqueline; Cruz, Kelle L.; Van Gordon, Mollie M.; Looper, Dagny L. (September 2015). "Fundamental Parameters and Spectral Energy Distributions of Young and Field Age Objects with Masses Spanning the Stellar to Planetary Regime". The Astrophysical Journal. 810 (2): 158. arXiv:1508.01767. Bibcode:2015ApJ...810..158F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/158. ISSN1538-4357.
^Donaldson, J. K.; Roberge, A.; Chen, C. H.; Augereau, J.-C.; Dent, W. R. F.; Eiroa, C.; Krivov, A. V.; Mathews, G. S.; Meeus, G.; Ménard, F.; Riviere-Marichalar, P.; Sandell, G. (2012). "Herschelpacs Observations and Modeling of Debris Disks in the Tucana-Horologium Association". The Astrophysical Journal. 753 (2): 147. arXiv:1206.6358. Bibcode:2012ApJ...753..147D. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/147. hdl:10486/662289.
^Algieba is mentioned to have a slightly higher magnitude (1.99), but it is the combined magnitude of the system and not of the planet-hosting star. The true apparent magnitude is 2.37.
^The deuterium burning limit also depends on the metallicity and abundance of helium. Metal-rich planets, for example, need a lower mass to fuse deuterium.
^Based on the estimated temperature and luminosity.