Murals by Anton Refregier in San Francisco, California
History of San Francisco
Lobbies of the Rincon Annex Post Office (now Rincon Center) with Refregier's History of San Francisco mural series lining the frieze. Top: View northwest in Spear St lobby Bottom: View northeast in Mission St lobby
In 1941, Anton Refregier won the $26,000 commission for the series History of San Francisco, which are a set of 27 murals painted in the lobby of the Rincon Annex Post Office in San Francisco, California. Refregier painted the mural with caseintempera on white gesso over plaster walls, in the social realism style.[4] Work was interrupted by World War II and restarted in 1946; the murals were completed in 1948.
In 1953, U.S. Representative Hubert B. Scudder opened a Congressional hearing to determine whether the murals should be removed for themes "inconsistent with American ideals and principles"; the often contentious proceedings concluded with their retention. The building is now part of Rincon Center, remodeled as shops and residences after the Post Office left in 1979, and was added to the National Register of Historic Places that year.[5] The Rincon Center lobby is publicly accessible, and regular guided tours of the murals are provided by volunteers.
History
You see, along with at about the same time as the WPA was functioning, as a purely relief program, [Franklin] Roosevelt with the encouragement of George Biddle, whose brother was Attorney General, with encouragement of Eleanor Roosevelt, who was a wonderful woman, very aware of the issues, (a former social worker) a person of great human values; and many other people who are under Roosevelt at that time, including Edward Bruce, suggested that here were all the federal buildings going up new Post Offices, Federal money was being spent. The discovery was made, one day, that there was a procedure of allocating one percent of the total cost of the building for fancy door handles, Renaissance ceilings the kind of ceiling you can see in our 34th Street Post Office in New York City. Why not take that money and give it to artists in national open competitions? This, Joe, was a great idea! It worked like magic.
The Section of Painting and Sculpture was created by Treasury SecretaryHenry Morgenthau Jr.'s executive order of October 14, 1934[7]: 74 to award commissions to artists for new federal buildings;[6] once the Rincon Annex Post Office was completed in 1940,[5] the Section announced a competition for artists on April 12, 1941,[8]: 2 drawing attention in the local press. Entries were required to be submitted by October 1 of that year.[9]
Refregier was selected by a four-person jury: the Annex architect, Gilbert Underwood, and three peer artists,[6] consisting of Victor Arnautoff, Arnold Blanch, and Philip Guston. The jury handed down a split decision, with Underwood, Arnautoff, and Blanch voting for Refregier, and Guston against.[8]: 2, 17, 20, 63 His competitors included artists Richard Haines[10] and Wendell C. Jones,[11] whose studies for the project were donated to the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco in 1988;[12] in total, there were 82 entrants for the Rincon Annex commission, including Refregier.[6][8]: 20 The contract was awarded to Refregier on October 21, 1941.[8]: 21
Implementation
History of San Francisco was the largest mural commissioned by the federal government at the time of the award in 1941.[5] The medium was specified in the contract to be tempera on gesso, and the murals were to be completed within three years (1,095 calendar days) of the award of the contract.[8]: 22 Shortly after he was awarded the contract, in 1942 Refregier told the San Francisco Chronicle he wanted paint the past as it had affected the present conditions of depression, strikes, and war.[7]: 75 Painting of the murals began in 1946, and they were completed by fall 1948.[8]: 63
Refregier was required to submit sketches of the planned designs for approval prior to starting work.[8]: 63 The project sponsors requested 92 changes during the design and painting of the murals, ranging from slimming a Spanish priest (#6, "Preaching and Farming at Mission Dolores")[13] to raising picket signs so their pro-union messages could not be read (#14, "Torchlight Procession").[14] An image of Franklin Roosevelt was deleted from the final panel (#27, "War and Peace") because Refregier had based it on a portrait of an aged Roosevelt after the Yalta Conference, which was seen as an "undignified way" to portray him.[15] Refregier was resistant to the removal of Roosevelt, who was to have been in the center of the middle section of the panel, depicting the Four Freedoms: "To omit the portrait of FDR from the final panel dealing with the United Nations meeting in San Francisco, is a concession I cannot make. ... I cannot allow myself to be a victim of propaganda against a very great man."[16]
During the painting of the murals, Refregier would be interrupted by well-meaning Post Office patrons, as he recounted in 1947: "One way I learn [about California history] is from the people who stream through the Post Office and watch me work. They look at my pictures a while, then catch my attention and start telling me exactly what my pictures mean."[17]
Responses
The panel (#24, "The Waterfront"), as modified following protests by the VFW; the three mourners are at the right side, and the anonymous leader (originally intended to be Harry Bridges) is in the center. The mourner in the tan suit has had his hat removed.[18]
The History of San Francisco murals created a heated debate because they depicted controversial events from California's past, painted in a public building using taxpayer funds. People believed that it "placed disproportionate emphasis on violence, racial hatred, and class struggle."[19] Even before Refregier finished, the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) were protesting the murals in spring 1948, specifically the panel depicting the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike (#24, "The Waterfront"),[7]: 75 as one of the mourners was pictured with a VFW hat; VFW quartermaster adjutant H.M. "Sam" Herman went on to attack Refregier's politics and questioned the significance of the strike: "Surely there was nothing of historical significance in the waterfront riot to warrant its being commemorated as an outstanding event in the history of our city."[18] Refregier originally had intended to depict Harry Bridges as the union leader, but changed the original design to make the leader anonymous.[18] In response, the Public Building Administration ordered that panel covered, a decision that drew protest from the CIO longshoremen[20] and artists' organizations.[21]
As a compromise, Refregier removed the hat altogether, and the panel was allowed to be shown.[13] In his private notes, Refregier despaired: "The stories in the Hearst press brought out gangs of hoodlums who were constantly under my scaffolding and I no longer worked after the sun set."[7]: 75
That fall, Waldo F. Postel and his colleagues in the Native Sons of the Golden West announced they would begin campaigning for the removal of the murals: "Just what sort of paintings are these? The Communist People's World say they constitute 'a monumental series depicting California history.' We believe they constitute a monumental insult to the city, and in some panels, an outrageous attempt to arouse class hatred."[22] Sculptor Haig Patigian called the murals 'debased' while supporting their removal.[23]
I wish to thank you for your letter as to whether anything can be done about the removal of Communist art in [the Rincon Annex Post Office] ... I realize that some objectionable art, of a subversive nature, has been allowed to go into federal buildings in many parts of the country ... At such a time as we may have a change in the Administration and in the majority of Congress, I believe a committee should make a thorough investigation of this type of art in government buildings with the view to obtaining removal of all that is found to be inconsistent with American ideals and principles.
— Congressman Richard Nixon, Letter to C.E. Plant, July 18, 1949[15]
Republican Congressmen Hubert B. Scudder and Richard Nixon were involved in Congressional attempts to have the work removed. They claimed it had a communistic tone and "defamed pioneers and reflected negatively on California's past." Many believed that "no artist, however distinguished, escaped the heavy, if well meaning, hand of federal supervision."[19]
In a letter to the editor in 1952, the President of the College Art Association noted that "the pro-Chinese sentiments of one section of the murals and indication of the then existing wartime alliance with Russia of another section reflected the realities of the time."
1953 Congressional hearing
Congressman Scudder introduced H.J.Res. 211 on March 5, 1953,[15] calling the murals "an insult to the state, an insult to the intelligence of the public, and anti-American", adding "the murals contain subtle ridicule of characters which are supposed to represent the American people."[24]
A hearing on the bill was held on May 1 of that year by the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Grounds of the United States House Committee on Public Works.[8]: 1 Scudder kicked off the meeting by reading a biographical sketch of Refregier into the record, sent from the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) on April 16, and added that opposition to the murals went back as far as 1941; he had been receiving letters opposed to the murals since his first year in Congress, 1949, sent from organizations like the Native Sons of the Golden West and the American Legion, who claimed the murals "do not truly depict the romance and glory of early California history; but on the contrary cast a most derogatory and improper reflection upon the character of the pioneers, and that other murals are definitely subversive and designed to spread communistic propaganda and tend to promote racial hatred and class warfare".[8]: 2–4
#15 "Pioneers Receiving Mail", derided by Congressman Hubert Scudder in 1953 for showing a "moronic assemblage of people".[8]: 29–33
Congressman Donald L. Jackson was the next witness to be called. Jackson had replaced Nixon on HUAC after the latter's Senate election, but Jackson claimed he was not officially representing HUAC interests for the subcommittee hearing, despite reading additional details about Refregier's activities both before and after the completion of the murals into the record. Under questioning from Subcommittee Chairman James C. Auchincloss, Jackson admitted he had "seen photographic duplications" but had "not personally seen the murals" before calling them "not truly representative of the history of California", adding "if they were in the Capitol of the United States I would join in protesting them." The HUAC dossiers of Arnautoff and Blanch, the jurors supporting the selection of Refregier, were also read into the record; it was noted that Guston, who had opposed the selection, did not have a HUAC record.[8]: 10–17 Scudder then passed around black-and-white photographs of the murals and provided specific criticism for each one, singling out the depiction of indigenous people ("strong features, muscles, and physique ... [not] a true picture of the aborigines of the West"), Spanish explorers and priests ("big-bellied", "warlike", and "objectionable to people who appreciate ... those who developed California and brought civilization to the west coast"), pioneer settlers ("cadaverous, soulless Americans" and a "moronic assemblage of people"), and gold miners ("depicting the thing which the Communists claim, we are only seeking the golden riches in our mode of life"), among others.[8]: 29–33
I am much distressed about the Bill introduced by Congressman Scudder to authorize the removal of your murals in the Rincon Annex Post Office. This seems to me a highly injurious proposal. It is injurious because it would mean the destruction of what, to judge from my recollection of your sketches and from reproductions of the finished murals, is a remarkable work of art, and an outstanding example of the growing tendency in your country to try to exert political control over freedom of thought and expression, and to impair the liberty of the creative artist ... The lamentable state of biology and philosophy in the U.S.S.R. shows what happens when creative thought and expression is subjected to control on political or ideological grounds. It is most unfortunate that, just when the free world is protesting against this form of tyranny in the Iron Curtain countries, actions like that of Republican Scudder are trying to introduce a similar tyranny in your great country.
In defense of the murals, John F. Shelley and William S. Mailliard, the two congressmen representing San Francisco, questioned the attacks on the historical accuracy of the murals and whether they were truly glorifying subversive themes.[8]: 42–54, 54–60 Questioning the presence of hammer and sickle imagery in the final panel (#27, "War and Peace") Subcommittee Member J. Harry McGregor had a brief exchange with Mailliard:
McGregor: You do not consider that [the USSR is] an Allied Power now? Mailliard: When the paintings were done. McGregor: Times have changed and maybe we should change the paintings. Mailliard: Probably we should destroy the works of Michelangelo and those of a few other people.
Later in the defense, a statement from Warren Howell was read into the record, providing "recognizable sources which are authoritative and authentic" for many of the scenes depicted in the murals.[8]: 63 The murals were also vigorously defended by a group of artists and museum directors, including the directors of three prominent San Francisco art museums wrote statements supporting the artistic merit of the murals: Walter Heil (Director of the de Young Museum), Thomas Carr Howe Jr. (California Palace of the Legion of Honor), and Grace McCann Morley (San Francisco Museum of Art).[8]: 63–64 Howe added that due to the delicate egg tempera technique used, the murals could not be removed without great care and expense.[8]: 68 A list of more than 300 citizens and organizations opposing the removal included support from the Museum of Modern Art (New York), American Federation of Arts, and Artists' Equity.[15] Mailliard said the selection of Refregier was "unfortunate", but added "Many of these arguments for and against removal of the murals seem to me to be without validity. ... Judging either the painter or the style of art used would be putting the Congress in the same position as the totalitarian governments who refuse to allow music to be played if the composer's politics do not suit them."[8]: 54 [25]
Scudder's bill never made it out of committee,[15] despite a vote of support from the California State Senate.[26] A local newspaper, the Sausalito News, chided Scudder to "leave the S.F. Postoffice Murals alone and come back into your own bailiwick".[27] While running for re-election in 1954, Scudder's opponent Max Kortum noted that Scudder was best known for failing to remove the murals,[28] calling him a misguided patriot and comparing him to "a child who marches in a parade holding up the American flag".[29] Scudder won re-election and continued to insist the murals were "very obnoxious to people in the area", claiming that an analysis showed parts of them were "definitely Communist propaganda" in 1957.[30]
Preservation and restoration
All of the mail collected in San Francisco was taken to Rincon Annex for distribution.[31] After the Post Office moved the mail distribution facilities to India Basin, vacating the space in 1979, preservationists including Emmy Lou Packard rallied again to save the murals;[7]: 89 the building was added to the National Register of Historic Places that year.[5][32] San Francisco named added the building to its Designated Landmarks (#107) in 1980.[33] A proposed conversion to what would become the Rincon Center shopping, dining, and residential complex was unveiled in 1983; under the proposal, the building's exterior and interior would be preserved intact while adding two floors and two towers.[34]
During the conversion, Thomas Portué restored the murals in 1987.[7]: 89 Portué again restored the murals in 2014,[1] alongside his daughter Nicole,[35] and is the ongoing custodian of the murals.[36]
Design
Diagram of mural locations
The mural consists of 27 panels, totaling 400 feet (120 m) long by 6 feet 9 inches (2.06 m) high, completely covering the frieze of the L-shaped lobby. The lobby consists of two hallways set at right angles to each other; the longer hallway, 208-foot (63 m) long, is parallel to Mission Street, and the shorter hallway is parallel to Spear.[5] The ceiling height is 25 feet (7.6 m).[33] The commission of US$26,000 (equivalent to $539,000 in 2023) was based on the standard rate of ten dollars per square foot.[5]
Refregier used these topics, including the tragedies, as inspiration. Refregier "believed that art must address itself to contemporary issues and that a mural painting in particular must not be 'banal, decorative embellishment', but a 'meaningful, significant, powerful plastic statement based on the history and lives of the people'".[19] As Brian N. Wallis noted in a 1977 catalog of Refregier's work, "Refregier had recourse to two interpretations of California history, these being the glorious, romantic vision of folk tales, or the realistic depiction of the hardships and struggles of the early settlers. Refregier selected the realistic representation as being more interesting and more dramatic. This deviation from the accepted, or preferred, view of history was the source of much of the dispute over the murals".[33] Some suspected Refregier of being a communist because of his Russian–USSR background, and his mural topics about social issues.[19]
Titles and subjects of the History of San Francisco murals
^Numbered consecutively from left to right, starting from the panel to the right of the corner between the northeast and southeast walls of the Mission Street lobby.
^Images for Panels #4–10;12–17;18–22;24;25;27: Photographed by Carol M. Highsmith in 2012.
^Height of each mural was 6 ft 9 in (2.06 m).[8]: 22
^Themes incorporated into Panel #16, "Building the Railroad".
^Panel #16, "Building the Railroad" is on the southeast wall of the Spear Street lobby. The narrow width originally allotted to #16 was used in "Building the Railroad", which wraps around to the adjacent northeast and southwest walls.
^The planned position for this panel was moved up to Panel #16.
^Panel #17 "Vigilante Days" is on the southwest wall of the Spear Street lobby.
^Panel #19, "Beating the Chinese" is on the northwest wall of the Mission Street lobby, occupying the narrower space originally intended for #21.
^Panel #20, "San Francisco as a Cultural Center" is on the northwest wall of the Mission Street Lobby, occupying the wider space originally intended for #22.
^Panel #21, "Earthquake and Fire of 1906" occupies part of the very wide space originally intended for #23.
^Burbank is now depicted in Panel #20, "San Francisco as a Cultural Center"
^Panel #22, "Reconstruction After the Fire" occupies part of the very wide space originally intended for #23.
^Themes and the space from the original design were reused in #21 and #22.
The style of this historic mural had many of Refregier's key characteristics. The palette was composed of yellows, browns, and grays, punctuated by red in certain areas to evoke emotion. Earthy tones and the lack of bright colors remind viewers of the struggles and hardships he is depicting. Refregier also uses white to represent virtue in those inspired by a cause. His style is very flat and one-dimensional. He uses solid blocks of color to denote shadows, along with depth and shade. His painting style appears to be very rudimentary and simple, but complex because of the way he uses color to evoke emotion and powerful images to tell a story.[4]
In other media
The cover art for In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism (by John Ahlquist and Margaret Levi, 2013) is derived from Panel #24 ("The Waterfront"),[38] via a simplified silkscreen print prepared c.1949,[39] itself notable as the most widely reproduced print of the mural set.[4]
^ abcdMathews, Jane de Hart (1976). "Art and Politics in Cold War America". The American Historical Review. 81 (4). American Historical Association: 762–787. doi:10.2307/1864779. JSTOR1864779. 0002-8762.
"Anton Refregier's Murals in the Rincon Post Office Annex, San Francisco: A Marxist History of California", by Darren Paul Trebel, A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia, McIntire Department of Art History, University of Virginia, May 1992.
Kunkel, Gladys M. (1969). The mural paintings by Anton Refregier in the Rincon Annex of the San Francisco Post Office, San Francisco, California (M.A. thesis). Arizona State University.
Gelber, Steven M. (1979). "Working to Prosperity: California's New Deal Murals". California History. 58 (2). California Historical Society: 98–127. doi:10.2307/25157905. JSTOR25157905.
Brechin, Gray (1996). "Politics and Modernism: The Trial of the Rincon Annex Murals". In Karlstrom, Paul J. (ed.). On the Edge of America: California Modernist Art, 1900–1950. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp. 68–89. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
Air Terjun GemawangAir terjun Gemawang memiliki dua undakan air terjunLokasiDesa Candirenggo, Kecamatan Ayah, Kabupaten Kebumen, Provinsi Jawa TengahPeta7°41′59″S 109°24′16″E / 7.699647°S 109.404439°E / -7.699647; 109.404439lbs Air Terjun Gemawang adalah air terjun atau curug yang berada di Kabupaten Kebumen, Jawa Tengah. Air terjun Gemawang terdiri atas tiga undakan dengan ketinggian mencapai 25 meter lebih. Air Terjun ini berada tak jauh dari Objek Wisata...
2012 2022 Élections législatives de 2017 dans l'Indre 2 sièges de députés à l'Assemblée nationale 11 et 18 juin 2017 Type d’élection Élections législatives Campagne 22 mai au 10 juin12 juin au 16 juin Corps électoral et résultats Inscrits 170 593 Votants au 1er tour 88 454 51,85 % 8,7 Votes exprimés au 1er tour 85 995 Votes blancs au 1er tour 1 704 Votes nuls au 1er tour 755 Votants au 2d tour 79 460 46,58 % Votes...
English mathematician and astronomer Thomas DiggesBornc. 1546Wootton, Kent, EnglandDied(1595-08-24)24 August 1595London, EnglandNationalityEnglishKnown forProposing that the universe is infinite in extentScientific careerFieldsAstronomer and mathematicianAcademic advisorsJohn Dee NotesSon of Leonard Digges, and father of Dudley Digges and Leonard Digges (II) Thomas Digges (/dɪɡz/; c. 1546 – 24 August 1595) was an English mathematician and astronomer. He was the first to expound the C...
LGBT rights in AustraliaLocation of AustraliaStatusAlways legal for women; legal for men in all states and territories since 1997. Equal age of consent in all states and territories since 2016Gender identityChange of sex recognised in all jurisdictions (NSW requires sexual reassignment surgery since 1996)[1]MilitaryLGBT personnel allowed to serve openlyDiscrimination protectionsFederal protections for sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status since 2013; LGBT protection...
Questa voce sull'argomento nobili francesi è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Claudina di BrosseDuchessa consorte di Savoia In carica16 aprile 1496 –7 novembre 1497 PredecessoreBianca di Monferrato SuccessoreIolanda di Savoia NascitaBretagna, 1450 Morte1513 Luogo di sepolturaCastello di Chambéry Casa realeBrosse per nascitaSavoia per matrimonio PadreGiovanni II di Brosse MadreNicoletta di Châtillon ConsorteFilippo II di Sav...
American actor (1940–2010) George DiCenzoDiCenzo in 2007BornGeorge Ralph DiCenzo(1940-04-21)April 21, 1940New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.DiedAugust 9, 2010 (aged 70)Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania, U.S.OccupationsActoracting teacherproducerYears active1970–2006Spouse Donna Artz-DiCenzo (m. 1999) George Ralph DiCenzo (April 21, 1940 – August 9, 2010) was an American actor, and one-time associate producer for Dark Shadows. He was in the show busines...
American politician This article is about the U.S. Representative from Louisiana. For the American ethnologist, anthropologist and writer, see Lewis H. Morgan. Lewis Lovering MorganMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom Louisiana's 6th districtIn officeNovember 5, 1912 – March 3, 1917Preceded byRobert C. WickliffeSucceeded byJared Y. Sanders, Sr.Louisiana State Representative for St. Tammany ParishIn office1908–1909Preceded byFritz SalmanSucceeded byJoseph B....
Event-based Linux init daemon UpstartOriginal author(s)Scott James RemnantDeveloper(s)Canonical Ltd.Initial releaseAugust 24, 2006; 17 years ago (2006-08-24)Final release1.13.2[1] / September 4, 2014; 9 years ago (2014-09-04) Repositorycode.launchpad.net/upstart Written inCOperating systemLinuxTypeInit daemonLicenseGPLv2Websiteupstart.ubuntu.com Upstart is a discontinued event-based replacement for the traditional init daemon—the method by which s...
Medical school of Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of MedicineTypePublicEstablished2011DeanJulie G. Pilitsis[1]Academic staff202StudentsMedicine: 256LocationBoca Raton, Florida, USAWebsitewww.fau.edu/medicine/ The Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine is the medical school of Florida Atlantic University located in Boca Raton, Florida. The college offers the degrees of Doctor of Medicine (M.D.), Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), and a master's in biomedical science.&...
مبنى المتحف البريطاني، من أبرز الأمثلة على الإحياء الإغريقي. الإحياء اليوناني هو حركة معمارية نشأت في أواخر القرن الثامن عشر وأوائل القرن التاسع عشر، في شمال أوروبا والولايات المتحدة غالبًا، وقد أعادت هذه الحركة إحياء طراز العمارة اليونانية القديمة، والمعبد اليوناني با�...
Marcus Fernaldi GideonInformasi pribadiKebangsaanIndonesiaLahir9 Maret 1991 (umur 33)Jakarta, IndonesiaTinggi168 cm (5 ft 6 in)PeganganKananPelatihHerry Iman PierngadiAryono MiranatPasanganAgnes Amelinda Mulyadi (m. 2018)[1]Ganda PutraPeringkat tertinggi1 (bersama Kevin Sanjaya Sukamuljo) (28 September 2017)Peringkat saat ini23 (bersama Kevin Sanjaya Sukamuljo) (27 Desember 2022[2])Profil di BWF Marcus Fernal...
Armenian Oriental Orthodox church Catholicosateof the Great House of CiliciaHoly See of CiliciaClassificationOriental OrthodoxPrimateCatholicos Aram IHeadquartersAntelias, LebanonPreviously Sis, TurkeyTerritoryCiliciaPossessionsMiddle East, Europe, North America, South America, Oceania, and Africa.FounderThe Apostles Bartholomew and ThaddeusIndependenceApostolic EraRecognitionby Armenian Apostolic Church as an autocephalous churchMembers300,000[1]Official websiteArmenian Catholicosate...
Not to be confused with Hayes, Bromley. Bulls Bridge redirects here. For the covered bridge in Connecticut, see Bull's Bridge. Human settlement in EnglandHayesFormer EMI headquarters, HayesHayesLocation within Greater LondonPopulation93,928 (2021 Census)[1]OS grid referenceTQ095805• Charing Cross13 mi (21 km) ELondon boroughHillingdonCeremonial countyGreater LondonRegionLondonCountryEnglandSovereign stateUnited KingdomPost townHAYESP...
French painter (1860–1931) The Chapel of Lanriot by Moonlight Émile Jourdan (30 July 1860, in Vannes – 29 December 1931, in Quimperlé) was a French painter who became one of the artists who gathered in the village of Pont-Aven in Brittany. Early life Son of Prosper Jourdan, a ranking customs officer, and his wife Aline Paturel, he enjoyed a happy childhood in Vannes in the south of Brittany. He started painting at the age of 16. In 1880, he attended the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris wh...
Bretagne Breizhcode: br is deprecated (Breton)Bertaèyn/Bertègncode: mis is deprecated (Gallo)Provinsi historis BenderaLambang kebesaranMotto: Tidak ada (de jure)Historis: Kentoc'h mervel eget bezañ saotretLebih baik mati daripada tidak terhormat (de facto)Himne daerah: Bro Gozh ma ZadoùKoordinat: 48°00′N 3°00′W / 48.000°N 3.000°W / 48.000; -3.000NegaraPrancisPermukiman besar Daftar NantesRennesBrestSaint-NazaireQuimperLorientVannesSaint-Mal...
Motion picture camera stabilizer mounts This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) SteadicamA camera operator using the Steadicam in front of an audience.Product typeCamera stabilizerOwnerTiffenCountryUnited StatesIntroduced1975; 49 years ...
Square dance caller organization CallerlabFounded1974TypeSquare Dance Callers AssociationPurposeTo recruit, promote, and maintain the square dance activity.HeadquartersGreenwood, IndianaWebsitecallerlab.orgSee also: American Callers Association CALLERLAB is the international association of square dance callers, and is the largest square dance association in the United States. CALLERLAB provides guidance and education, certifying caller coaches, maintaining standardized lists of calls and defi...
Moondog Información personalNombre de nacimiento Louis Thomas HardinNombre en inglés Louis Hardin Nacimiento 26 de mayo de 1916Marysville, Kansas, Estados UnidosFallecimiento 8 de septiembre de 1999 (83 años)Münster, AlemaniaSepultura Zentralfriedhof Münster Nacionalidad EstadounidenseEducaciónEducado en Hurley High School Información profesionalOcupación Músico, compositor, poeta, inventorAños activo 1932-1972Seudónimo Moondog Géneros Avant-garde jazz, música minimalista y outsi...
_-_05.JPG)
.jpg)
