Research and case studies have shown that lockdowns were generally effective at reducing the spread of COVID-19, therefore flattening the curve.[6][unreliable medical source?][7][contradictory][8] The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended lockdowns to limit contact therefore decreasing transmission of the virus. While in lockdown, local governments were instructed to test their communities for the virus, contact trace, and gather supplies.[9] To achieve a balance between restrictions and normal life, the WHO recommends a response to the pandemic that consists of strict personal hygiene, effective contact tracing, and isolating when ill.[10][better source needed]
In addition to the health effects of lockdown restrictions,[11] researchers have found the lockdowns have reduced crime and violence by armed non-state actors, such as the Islamic State, and other terrorist groups.[12] They have also had profound negative economic impacts, and have been met with protests in some territories.
Efficacy
Lockdowns, implemented in many countries, were effective at reducing COVID-19 mortality.[13]
Voluntary versus mandatory restrictions
One study led by an economist at the University of Chicago found that involuntary lockdowns had little impact, with voluntary distancing making up nearly 90% of the fall in consumer traffic as people feared the virus itself.[14] Similarly, a National Bureau of Economic Research study found stay-at-home orders increased staying at home by just 5–10%.[15] Another study from Yale University found that most social distancing was voluntary, driven primarily by "media coverage of morbidity and mortality".[16]
On the other hand, some studies have argued[17][18] that coercive measures probably decreased interactions, while accepting that most of the reduction may have been voluntary. One of those two studies, by Flaxman et al., has been criticized, among other things for having a country-specific adjustment factor, without which the model would predict a massive number of deaths for Sweden.[19] One widely cited economic simulation asserting that shelter-in-place orders reduced total cases three-fold, however, held voluntary distancing constant.[20] Another study found a 30% difference among border-counties where stay-at-home orders were imposed.[21]
Another study that compared the impact of 'less restrictive interventions' on the spread of COVID-19 in Sweden and South Korea, with mandatory stay-at home orders in 8 other countries, such as France and Spain, did not find evidence for greater disease control in the countries with more restrictions.[22] However, the findings of the study have been questioned due to its numerous limitations, including the small sample size of countries.[23][24]
Some research has also found that an "advisory" approach is not adequate to control COVID-19 outbreaks. An analysis of an outbreak in northern Italy found that an effective reduction in community transmission occurred during a strict national lockdown, and that earlier less stringent measures were ineffective at reducing mobility to a level low enough to reduce the spread of COVID-19.[25]
Since the beginning of the pandemic, Google has consistently collected data on movements, showing rapid declines in public activity long before legal restrictions were imposed.[26] An April 2020 poll found that 93% of Americans voluntarily chose to only leave home when necessary, regardless of legal restrictions.[27]
Reception
A February 2021 review of 348 articles concluded there was acknowledgement of the importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions in controlling the spread of COVID-19.[8] However, later research also acknowledges high societal costs, though in some circumstances less than the costs of allowing the pandemic to spread without mitigation.[7][6][8]
Related to epidemiology
Epidemiological evidence supports generalized non-pharmaceutical interventions to curb the spread of COVID-19.[8][28][29][30]
During the early stages of the pandemic in Europe and the United States, statistical modeling which advised that restrictions were helpful to prevent a large number of deaths were used as the basis for lockdowns.[31] This includes an Imperial College projection, led by epidemiologist Neil Ferguson.[32] Despite some criticisms, academics defended the Imperial projection as fundamentally sound, while admitting the code was "a buggy mess".[33] Retrospective evaluation of lockdowns and computer modeling has verified that they have significantly contributed to reducing mortality and morbidity from COVID-19.[34]
A notable opponent of lockdowns has included Sweden's state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, who has frequently criticised the strategy.[35][36] The Swedish government's approach has included minimal restrictions and has been controversial in part due to the relatively high death toll due to widespread transmission.[37][38] However, the Swedish government began considering enacting a lockdown in early 2021.[39][40]
While arguing in August 2020 for the need for further lockdowns in the United States, physicians Ranu Dhillon and Abraar Karan argued for "smarter lockdowns" that impose restrictions on areas with high levels of transmission, and to increase support to vulnerable populations in these locations to offset the economic costs.[41]
A number of medical experts signed the Great Barrington Declaration in October 2020 which called for "Focused Protection" on high risk groups and minimal restrictions on the general population to achieve herd immunity through COVID-19 infection. However, the majority of medical experts and the WHO have strongly criticised this proposed strategy for its lack of scientific basis and for being unethical.[29][42][43] The declaration has also attracted controversy over its funding and the authenticity of its signatures.[28][44]
The lockdowns had multiple effects on people's everyday lives. Some of these were direct effects, such as cancelling or postponing a social event, and others had indirect effects, such as losing a sense of identity.[45] For example, teachers often derive meaning and a sense of life purpose from teaching, but the schools were closed, which caused many of them to feel disconnected from their identity as teachers.[45] Many people also felt that they could not trust that the things (e.g., doorknobs) and people around them were safe.[45] People also lost a sense of time, with the feelings of unpredictability developing into the opposite of the normal human ontological security.[45] Instead of knowing what to do, what to trust, and what to expect in the future, people felt disconnected and at a loss.[45] It also made people more aware of the pre-existing problems they were facing, such as abuse, addiction, and racism.[45] The sociologist Ann Swidler compared the social changes to anomie, an absence of social norms that was first described at the end of the Industrial Revolution, as the prior, socially agreed-upon system of interpersonal connections, values, interdependence, and ideas about normal behavior was set aside, and a new system had not yet emerged.[45]
Some researchers have noted that COVID-19 pandemic restrictions have come with mental health costs, compounded by those caused by the COVID-19 pandemic itself.[8][50][51][52][53] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that the COVID-19 lockdowns were associated with increased rates of depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and a decline in health-related quality of life among children and adolescents, largely driven by school closures, social isolation, and disrupted routines.[54] Lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic also led to strained relationships, increased cyberbullying, and physical consequences like abuse, accidental poisonings, and foreign object injuries.[55] Pandemic policies were associated with increased depressive symptoms, decreased physical activity, poorer nutrition, reduced emergency department visits, higher child mortality in Cameroon, a drop in immunizations in Pakistan, and an increase in physical child abuse trauma cases in one U.S. center.[56]
Due to their closure, educational institutions worldwide transitioned to online learning. Teachers and faculty had to learn new ways to engage with students while in a COVID-19 pandemic. Examples of online teaching tools are podcasts, videos, and virtual classrooms.[57][better source needed] Prolonged COVID-19 school closures and the ineffectiveness of remote learning, especially in low- and middle-income countries, exacerbated educational inequities, leading to substantial learning losses that could cost this generation of students $17 trillion in lifetime earnings. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted education for 1.6 billion students at its peak, exacerbating the gender divide with disproportionately greater learning losses among girls and increased risks of child labor, gender-based violence, early marriage, and pregnancy in some countries.[58] School closures during the pandemic resulted in significant learning loss, although some countries managed to limit the impact.[59][60] The closures also led to a significant reduction in child abuse reporting, especially in Florida, where allegations of child abuse and neglect dropped by nearly one-third. This decline has been attributed to the limited access that teachers and school staff had to students, who typically serve as key reporters of child abuse.[61]
UN Women warned in an April 2020 report that COVID-19 pandemic restrictions exacerbate gender inequalities and have led to an increase in domestic violence.[62] Many women were being forced to 'lockdown' at home with their abusers at the same time that services to support survivors are being disrupted or made inaccessible.[63] For instance, in France there was around a 30% spike in cases of violence against women since the lockdown in March 2020.[62]
Telehealth had an important role to allow physicians not to miss the follow-up of patients with different chronic diseases and potentially helped to contain SARS-CoV-2 spreading among both patients and healthcare providers [64] During the COVID-19 pandemic, video-communications became an easy-to-use quick-to-learn tool for many people, and the anxiety to contract COVID-19 could have counterbalanced some patients' low level of trust in technology. For these reasons, most patients accepted to receive a video-consultation in spite of the traditional in-person visit and trusted telemedicine.[65][non-primary source needed][failed verification]
In late 2023, former Director of the National Institutes of HealthFrancis Collins went viral online amongst critics of the lockdown response when he discussed the lack of weight that public health authorities had given to the potential downsides of the lockdown measures when they were formulating the official response to COVID-19.[66]
Related to economic impacts
Some economists supported increased government funding for mitigation efforts, even at the cost of tolerating a very large economic contraction.[67] They agreed that lockdowns should continue until the threat of resurgence has declined, even when considering only the economic impact.[68] There was a general agreement, at least in some economic circles, that "severe lockdowns — including closing non-essential businesses and strict limitations on people's movement — are likely to be better for the economy in the medium term than less aggressive measures".[69]
Both the World Food Programme (WFP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have published statements noting the impact of the lockdowns on livelihoods and food security, and David Nabarro, WHO Special Envoy on COVID-19 stated in October 2020 that "lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer".[70][71][72]
^Restrictions were further eased on the 1st of June 2021, however during the time between then and the 12th of May 2021, "Stay at home orders" were not active and hence this period didn't constitute what is internationally considered a "lockdown".
^ abStage 3 lockdown imposed on 8 July; Stage 4 lockdown imposed on 2 August 2020
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^All of Victoria except Melbourne, Greater Shepparton, Ballarat, Greater Geelong, Surf Coast Shire and Mitchell Shire
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^Applies for all others Regional NSW outside Greater Sydney, Hunter Region, Dubbo, Central West, South Coast, Goulburn, Queanbeyan-Palerang and Snowy Monaro
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^End-date of lockdown is subject to the vaccine rollout or 0 cases for 14 days. Restrictions are set to be eased when 70% of the eligible population has been vaccinated
^Initially to last until 13 April 2020, included closures of universities, schools, restaurants and other establishments, a ban on mass gatherings, suspension of sports competitions for more than two months, certain temporary restrictions on the free movement of citizens, but no strict "Stay at home order".[198] A number of lockdown measures were already eased or lifted in April[199] and May 2020.[200]
^Depending on the strictness of the definition for a lockdown; some sources such as Politico Europe consider it to have ended by 9 May, with a total duration of 57 days.[203]
^Closures of all educational institutions, restaurants and other establishments, a ban on most cultural events, all excursions and forms of group tourism, children forbidden to participate in organized sports events, no "Stay at home order", described as a "soft" or "partial" lockdown and officially entered into force at 23:30 on 27 November.[206]
^The lockdown was initially to end on 21 December 2020, but was subsequently extended until 31 January 2021, though with a few of the restrictions relaxed, such as children in kindergartens and in grades 1-4 being able to attend in-person classes from January 2021.
^Preceded by some measures on the regional level, no "Stay at home order".[209]
^A full third lockdown was declared from 30 December and was repeatedly extended.
^Lockdown was first started in Northern Italy on 8 March 2020, then expanded to the rest of Italy the following day
^The lockdown was suspended on 28, 29, 30 December 2020 and 4 January 2021
^Lockdown was started in the regions of Erongo and Khomas but effectively enforced countrywide. On 14 April the lockdown was extended to 4 May and to all of Namibia.
^Except in Cebu City only where it was extended to 16 days
^ abLockdown was extended to areas under high risk COVID-19 zones
^Lockdown was started in Metro Manila, but expanded to the rest of Luzon two days later, 17 March 2020
^In most Luzon areas only, except Metro Manila and selected areas of Luzon are on high risk COVID-19 zones
^Lockdown was extended to Metro Manila and remaining areas of Luzon
^Applies for mandatory holidays and further measures in each Russian region
^England has followed an incremental easing of restrictions since 8 March 2021. Most lockdown restrictions were lifted between March and June, July 19 is the date set for the expiry of most legal restrictions in England. Although some sources describe this date as the "end" of lockdown, March 28 was the date in which the "stay at home orders" were ended. This fits the most internationally accepted definition of what constitutes a lockdown.
^Most lockdown restrictions were lifted between March and June. March 13 was the date in which the "stay at home orders" were ended. This fits the most internationally accepted definition of what constitutes a lockdown.
Any measures which are voluntary rather than enforceable by law
The pandemic resulted in the largest number of shutdowns worldwide at the same time in history.[511]
By 26 March, 1.7 billion people worldwide were under some form of lockdown,[512] which increased to 3.9 billion people by the first week of April – more than half of the world's population.[513][514] Lockdowns affected 93% of workers worldwide. 30% lived in nations with complete workplace closures, save for critical businesses, and 42% in countries with partial closures. Nearly 20% lived in nations with recommended but not compulsory workplace shutdown.[515]
Major restrictions first began in China,[516] with other countries in East Asia like Vietnam soon implementing widespread containment measures. Much of Europe, North America and Africa took much longer to bring in tough measures. Restrictions on travel between and activity within nations were of varying stringency.[517]
By mid April, nearly 300 million people, or about 90% of the population, were under some form of lockdown in the United States,[518] with around 100 million in the Philippines[519] and about 59 million in South Africa,[520] while around 1.3 billion were under lockdown in India, which was the largest of all lockdowns.[521][522]
By the end of April, around 300 million people were under lockdown in various countries of Europe, including but not limited to Italy, Spain, France, and the United Kingdom; while around 200 million people were under lockdown in Latin America.[519] In Germany, 35% of workers worked from home in addition to their regular on-site duties, while 26% worked from home exclusively.[523]
Countries and territories around the world enforced lockdowns of varying stringency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Some included total movement control while others enforced restrictions based on time. In many cases, only essential businesses were allowed to remain open. Schools, universities and colleges closed either on a nationwide or local basis in 63 countries, affecting approximately 47 percent of the world's student population.[524][525]
Beginning with the first lockdown in China's Hubei province[526] and nationwide in Italy in March 2020, lockdowns continued to be implemented in many countries throughout 2020 and 2021. On 24 March 2020, the entire 1.3 billion population of India was ordered to stay at home during its lockdown, making it the largest of the pandemic.[527] The world's longest continuous lockdown lasting 234 days took place in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 2020. As of October 2021, the city of Melbourne, Australia, and certain cities in Peru and Chile spent the most cumulative days in lockdown over separate periods, although measures varied between these countries.[528][529]
^Cite error: The named reference Adam2020 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^Ferguson NM, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, Bhatia S, Boonyasiri A, Cucunubá Z, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Dighe A, Dorigatti I, Fu H, Gaythorpe K, Green W, Hamlet A, Hinsley W, Okell LC, van Elsland S, Thompson H, Verity R, Volz E, Wang H, Wang Y, Walker PG, Walters C, Winskill P, Whittaker C, Donnelly CA, Riley S, Ghani AC (16 March 2020). "Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand"(PDF). Archived(PDF) from the original on 16 March 2020.
^Bialy L, Elliott SA, Melton A (2024). "Consequences of the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on child and adolescent mental, psychosocial, and physical health: A scoping review and interactive evidence map". Journal of Child Health Care. doi:10.1177/13674935241238794. PMID38503453.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Fages VM (29 May 2020). "Here are 4 ways Viet Nam has managed to control COVID-19". World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020. Vietnam relied on four relatively cost-effective solutions to combat the virus, including strategic testing, contact tracing through apps and effective public communication campaigns. As well as these, it implemented a national lockdown between 1st and 22nd April.
PemberitahuanTemplat ini mendeteksi bahwa artikel bahasa ini masih belum dinilai kualitasnya oleh ProyekWiki Bahasa dan ProyekWiki terkait dengan subjek. Perhatian: untuk penilai, halaman pembicaraan artikel ini telah diisi sehingga penilaian akan berkonflik dengan isi sebelumnya. Harap salin kode dibawah ini sebelum menilai. {{PW Bahasa|importance=|class=}} Terjadi [[false positive]]? Silakan laporkan kesalahan ini. 04.59, Sabtu, 30 Maret, 2024 (UTC) • hapus singgahan Seban...
Bank BSG PT Bank Pembangunan DaerahSulawesi Utara dan GorontaloLogoNama dagangBank BSGJenisBadan Usaha Milik DaerahIndustriPerbankanDidirikan3 Juni 1961 (umur 62)Kantorpusat Manado, Sulawesi UtaraWilayah operasiSeluruh Sulawesi UtaraGorontalo dan sekitarnyaTokohkunciJeffry A.M Dendeng (Direktur Utama), Sanny J. Parengkuan (Komisaris Utama)Total asetRp. 14.429.286.687.344 (2018)PemilikPemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi UtaraPemerintah Provinsi GorontaloKaryawan1.910 (2018)Situs webBank BSGBank BSG a...
WW2 Royal Italian Army formation 2nd Infantry Division Sforzesca2nd Infantry Division Sforzesca insigniaActive1940 - 1943Disbanded1943Country Kingdom of ItalyBranch Royal Italian ArmyRoleInfantrySizeDivisionGarrison/HQNovara, ItalyEngagementsWorld War II Battle of France Greco-Italian War Eastern Front Yugoslav Front InsigniaIdentificationsymbol Sforzesca Division gorget patchesMilitary unit The 2nd Infantry Division Sforzesca (Italian: 2ª Divisione di fanteria Sforzesca) was a inf...
Afro-Jamaican religion ConvinceClassificationAfro-JamaicanTheologyMyalOriginPost-Abolition era JamaicaSeparated fromNative Baptism Convince, also known as Bongo or Flenke, is a religion from eastern Jamaica. It has roots in Kumina and Jamaican Maroon religion.[1] History According to research by J. W. Pullis the religion originated in the Portland Parish in Jamaica in the mid or late 1800s.[1] It is believed to have a Central African origin in its beliefs and practices.[2&...
Suburb of Shire of Barcoo, Queensland, AustraliaFarrars CreekQueenslandSunset from Davenport Road, Farrars Creek, 2015Farrars CreekCoordinates25°14′31″S 141°32′08″E / 25.2419°S 141.5355°E / -25.2419; 141.5355 (Farrars Creek (centre of locality))Population16 (SAL 2021)[1]Postcode(s)4481Area13,431.4 km2 (5,185.9 sq mi)Time zoneAEST (UTC+10:00)Location 164 km (102 mi) WNW of Windorah 261 km (162 mi) W of Jund...
iPrice Group Sdn BhdJenisPerseroan terbatas swastaIndustriPerdagangan elektronikDidirikan2014KantorpusatKuala Lumpur, MalaysiaTokohkunci1. David Chmelař (CEO) 2. Heinrich Wendel (CTO) 3. Paul Brown-Kenyon (COO)Situs webhttps://ipricegroup.com/iPrice Group Sdn Bhd adalah sebuah situs web pembanding harga belanja daring yang berbasis di Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.[1] iPrice mendapat investasi dari Asia Venture Group dan beroperasi di tujuh negara Asia; yakni Hongkong, Singapura, Indonesia,...
Panicum hirticaule Klasifikasi ilmiah Kerajaan: Plantae (tanpa takson): Tracheophyta (tanpa takson): Angiospermae (tanpa takson): Monokotil (tanpa takson): Commelinids Ordo: Poales Famili: Poaceae Genus: Panicum Spesies: Panicum hirticaule Nama binomial Panicum hirticauleJ.Presl Panicum hirticaule adalah spesies tumbuhan yang tergolong ke dalam famili Poaceae. Spesies ini juga merupakan bagian dari ordo Poales. Spesies Panicum hirticaule sendiri merupakan bagian dari genus Panicum.[1]...
Map of the island of Bermuda Bermuda was first documented by a European in 1503 by Spanish explorer Juan de Bermúdez. In 1609, the English Virginia Company, which had established Jamestown in Virginia two years earlier, permanently settled Bermuda in the aftermath of a hurricane, when the crew and passengers of Sea Venture steered the ship onto the surrounding reef to prevent it from sinking, then landed ashore. Bermuda's first capital, St. George's, was established in 1612.[1]...
French historian, archivist and writer You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (December 2009) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the French article. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine...
Erich Ludendorff Primo quartiermastro generale dello stato maggiore generaleDurata mandato29 agosto 1916 –26 ottobre 1918 ContitolarePaul von Hindenburg (come capo dello stato generale tedesco) MonarcaGuglielmo II PredecessoreHugo von Freytag-Loringhoven SuccessoreWilhelm Groener Dati generaliPartito politicoPartito Popolare Tedesco della Libertà, Partito Nazionalsocialista per la Libertà e Partito Nazionalsocialista Tedesco dei Lavoratori ProfessioneMilitare Firma Eric...
Zhang LiyinZhang Liyin dalam konser SMTOWN Live di BangkokNama Tionghoa張力尹 (Tradisional)Nama Tionghoa张力尹 (Sederhana)PinyinZhāng Lìyǐn (Mandarin)JyutpingJeung1 Lik6wan5 (Kanton)Nama LahirZhang LiyinAsalSeoul, Korea SelatanNama LainJang Ri-in (장리인)PekerjaanPenyanyiGenreK-PopPop MandarinR&BInstrumenVokalBiolapianoTipe suaraMezzo-sopranKontraltoLabelSM EntertainmentAvex AsiaTahun aktif2006-sekarangHubungan peranSMTownSitus webwww.zhangliyin.com Penghargaan Lagu populer S...
City in Washington, United States City in Washington, United StatesPascoCityPasco City HallLocation of Pasco, WashingtonCoordinates: 46°14′19″N 119°6′31″W / 46.23861°N 119.10861°W / 46.23861; -119.10861CountryUnited StatesStateWashingtonCountyFranklinFounded1891IncorporatedSeptember 3, 1891Government • TypeCouncil–manager • MayorPete Serrano[1] • City managerAdam Lincoln[2]Area[3] • C...
8th quadrennial U.S. presidential election 1816 United States presidential election ← 1812 November 1 – December 4, 1816 1820 → 217 members of the Electoral College109 electoral votes needed to winTurnout16.9%[1] 23.5 pp Nominee James Monroe Rufus King Party Democratic-Republican Federalist Home state Virginia New York Running mate Daniel D. Tompkins John E. Howard Electoral vote 183 34 States carried 16 3 Popular vote 93,871 16,...
2012 film by Jean-Claude Brisseau The Girl from NowhereTheatrical release posterFrenchLa Fille de nulle part Directed byJean-Claude BrisseauWritten byJean-Claude BrisseauProduced byJean-Claude BrisseauStarring Virginie Legeay Claude Morel Jean-Claude Brisseau Lise Bellynck Sébastien Bailly Anne Berry Emmanuel Noblet CinematographyDavid ChambilleEdited byMaría Luisa GarcíaProductioncompanyLa Sorcière RougeDistributed byLes AcaciasRelease dates 8 August 2012 (2012-08-08) ...
Peta menunjukkan lokasi Teresa Data sensus penduduk di Teresa Tahun Populasi Persentase 199523.906—200029.7454.80%200744.4365.69% Teresa adalah munisipalitas yang terletak di provinsi Rizal, Filipina. Pada tahun 2010, munisipalitas ini memiliki populasi sebesar 44.436 jiwa dan 7.406 rumah tangga. Pembagian wilayah Secara administratif Teresa terbagi menjadi 9 barangay, yaitu: Bagumbayan Dalig Dulumbayan May-Iba Poblacion Prinza San Gabriel San Roque Calumpang Santo Cristo Pranala luar Phili...
Пример кадра, полученного в результате некорректного деинтерлейсинга чересстрочного видео. Современные устройства отображения используют прогрессивную развёртку и чересстрочный сигнал ТВ обязательно подвергается в них деинтерлейсингу. 2008 год. 1080i — чересстрочная ра...
For a list, see List of governors of New York. The governor of New York is the head of government of the U.S. state of New York. The governor is the head of the executive branch of New York's state government and the commander-in-chief of the state's military forces. The governor has a duty to enforce state laws and the power to either approve or veto bills passed by the New York Legislature, to convene the legislature and grant pardons, except in cases of impeachment and treason. The governo...