In continuum mechanics, Whitham's averaged Lagrangian method – or in short Whitham's method – is used to study the Lagrangian dynamics of slowly-varyingwave trains in an inhomogeneous (moving) medium.
The method is applicable to both linear and non-linear systems. As a direct consequence of the averaging used in the method, wave action is a conserved property of the wave motion. In contrast, the wave energy is not necessarily conserved, due to the exchange of energy with the mean motion. However the total energy, the sum of the energies in the wave motion and the mean motion, will be conserved for a time-invariant Lagrangian. Further, the averaged Lagrangian has a strong relation to the dispersion relation of the system.
In case a Lagrangian formulation of a continuum mechanics system is available, the averaged Lagrangian methodology can be used to find approximations for the average dynamics of wave motion – and (eventually) for the interaction between the wave motion and the mean motion – assuming the envelope dynamics of the carrier waves is slowly varying. Phase averaging of the Lagrangian results in an averaged Lagrangian, which is always independent of the wave phase itself (but depends on slowly varying wave quantities like wave amplitude, frequency and wavenumber). By Noether's theorem, variation of the averaged Lagrangian with respect to the invariant wave phase then gives rise to a conservation law:[5]
(1)
This equation states the conservation of wave action – a generalization of the concept of an adiabatic invariant to continuum mechanics – with[6]
and both are assumed to be slowly varying. Due to this definition, and have to satisfy the consistency relations:
and (3)
The first consistency equation is known as the conservation of wave crests, and the second states that the wavenumber field is irrotational (i.e. has zero curl).
Method
The averaged Lagrangian approach applies to wave motion – possibly superposed on a mean motion – that can be described in a Lagrangian formulation. Using an ansatz on the form of the wave part of the motion, the Lagrangian is phaseaveraged. Since the Lagrangian is associated with the kinetic energy and potential energy of the motion, the oscillations contribute to the Lagrangian, although the mean value of the wave's oscillatory excursion is zero (or very small).
which is the second-order partial differential equation describing the dynamics of Higher-order partial differential equations require the inclusion of higher than first-order derivatives in the Lagrangian.[14]
This Euler–Lagrange equation emerges from the Lagrangian density:[15]
5
The small-amplitude approximation for the Sine–Gordon equation corresponds with the value [16] For the system is linear and the classical one-dimensional Klein–Gordon equation is obtained.
Slowly-varying waves
Slowly-varying linear waves
Whitham developed several approaches to obtain an averaged Lagrangian method.[14][17] The simplest one is for slowly-varyinglinearwavetrains, which method will be applied here.[14]
The slowly-varying wavetrain –without mean motion– in a linear dispersive system is described as:[18]
As a consequence, and have to satisfy the consistency relations:
and
These two consistency relations denote the "conservation of wave crests", and the irrotationality of the wavenumber field.
Because of the assumption of slow variations in the wave train – as well as in a possible inhomogeneous medium and mean motion – the quantities and all vary slowly in space and time – but the wave phase itself does not vary slowly. Consequently, derivatives of and are neglected in the determination of the derivatives of for use in the averaged Lagrangian:[14]
and
Next these assumptions on and its derivatives are applied to the Lagrangian density
Slowly-varying non-linear waves
Several approaches to slowly-varying non-linear wavetrains are possible. One is by the use of Stokes expansions,[19] used by Whitham to analyse slowly-varying Stokes waves.[20] A Stokes expansion of the field can be written as:[19]
where the amplitudes etc. are slowly varying, as are the phases etc. As for the linear wave case, in lowest order (as far as modulational effects are concerned) derivatives of amplitudes and phases are neglected, except for derivatives and of the fast phase :
and
These approximations are to be applied in the Lagrangian density , and its phase average
Averaged Lagrangian for slowly-varying waves
For pure wave motion the Lagrangian is expressed in terms of the field and its derivatives.[14][17] In the averaged Lagrangian method, the above-given assumptions on the field –and its derivatives– are applied to calculate the Lagrangian. The Lagrangian is thereafter averaged over the wave phase :[14]
As a last step, this averaging result can be expressed as the averaged Lagrangian density – which is a function of the slowly varying parameters and and independent of the wave phase itself.[14]
The averaged Lagrangian density is now proposed by Whitham to follow the average variational principle:[14]
From the variations of follow the dynamical equations for the slowly-varying wave properties.
Example
Continuing on the example of the nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation, see equations 4 and 5, and applying the above approximations for and (for this 1D example) in the Lagrangian density, the result after averaging over is:
where it has been assumed that, in big-O notation, and . Variation of with respect to leads to So the averaged Lagrangian is:
6
For linear wave motion the averaged Lagrangian is obtained by setting equal to zero.
Set of equations emerging from the averaged Lagrangian
Applying the averaged Lagrangian principle, variation with respect to the wave phase leads to the conservation of wave action:
since and while the wave phase does not appear in the averaged Lagrangian density due to the phase averaging.
Defining the wave action as and the wave action flux as the result is:
The wave action equation is accompanied with the consistency equations for and which are:
Continuing with the nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation, using the average variational principle on equation 6, the wave action equation becomes by variation with respect to the wave phase
and the nonlinear dispersion relation follows from variation with respect to the amplitude
So the wave action is and the wave action flux The group velocity is
Mean motion and pseudo-phase
This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (April 2015)
Conservation of wave action
The averaged Lagrangian is obtained by integration of the Lagrangian over the wave phase. As a result, the averaged Lagrangian only contains the derivatives of the wave phase (these derivatives being, by definition, the angular frequency and wavenumber) and does not depend on the wave phase itself. So the solutions will be independent of the choice of the zero level for the wave phase. Consequently – by Noether's theorem – variation of the averaged Lagrangian with respect to the wave phase results in a conservation law:
Note that in general the energy of the wave motion does not need to be conserved, since there can be an energy exchange with a mean flow. The total energy – the sum of the energies of the wave motion and the mean flow – is conserved (when there is no work by external forces and no energy dissipation).
Conservation of wave action is also found by applying the generalized Lagrangian mean (GLM) method to the equations of the combined flow of waves and mean motion, using Newtonian mechanics instead of a variational approach.[21]
Conservation of energy and momentum
This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (April 2015)
Connection to the dispersion relation
Pure wave motion by linear models always leads to an averaged Lagrangian density of the form:[14]
Consequently, the variation with respect to amplitude: gives
So this turns out to be the dispersion relation for the linear waves, and the averaged Lagrangian for linear waves is always the dispersion function times the amplitude squared.
More generally, for weakly nonlinear and slowly modulated waves propagating in one space dimension and including higher-order dispersion effects – not neglecting the time and space derivatives and of the amplitude when taking derivatives, where is a small modulation parameter – the averaged Lagrangian density is of the form:[22]
with the slow variables and
—— (1967b), "Variational methods and applications to water waves", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 299 (1456): 6–25, Bibcode:1967RSPSA.299....6W, doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0119
Jimenez, J.; Whitham, G.B. (1976), "An averaged Lagrangian method for dissipative wavetrains", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 349 (1658): 277–287, Bibcode:1976RSPSA.349..277J, doi:10.1098/rspa.1976.0073
Badin, G.; Crisciani, F. (2018). Variational Formulation of Fluid and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics - Mechanics, Symmetries and Conservation Laws -. Springer. p. 218. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59695-2. ISBN978-3-319-59694-5.
Hayes, W.D. (1970), "Conservation of action and modal wave action", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 320 (1541): 187–208, Bibcode:1970RSPSA.320..187H, doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0205
Hayes, W.D. (1973), "Group velocity and nonlinear dispersive wave propagation", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 332 (1589): 199–221, Bibcode:1973RSPSA.332..199H, doi:10.1098/rspa.1973.0021
Janssen, P.A.E.M. (2004), The Interaction of Ocean Waves and Wind, Cambridge University Press, ISBN9780521465403
Radder, A.C. (1999), "Hamiltonian dynamics of water waves", in Liu, P.L.-F. (ed.), Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering, vol. 4, World Scientific, pp. 21–59, ISBN9789810233105
Sedletsky, Y.V. (2012), "Addition of dispersive terms to the method of averaged Lagrangian", Physics of Fluids, 24 (6): 062105 (15 pp.), Bibcode:2012PhFl...24f2105S, doi:10.1063/1.4729612
Simmons, W.F. (1969), "A variational method for weak resonant wave interactions", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 309 (1499): 551–577, Bibcode:1969RSPSA.309..551S, doi:10.1098/rspa.1969.0056