On January 2, 2003, LMDC and Port Authority announced that a series of public meetings would take place to discuss a future World Trade Center Site Memorial.
The Selection Jury for the World Trade Center Site Memorial Competition were announced on April 10. The Competition began on April 28, when the Guidelines were released, Registration was opened. The LMDC accepted questions from competitors between April 28 and May 18, which were answered on its website on May 23 and removed at the end of the competition. Potential entrants were given until May 29 to register for the stated purpose of gauging the volume of entries. On May 15, the LMDC announced that it had received registrants from all 50 US states and 70 other nations; on May 30, the LMDC announced that 13,683 competitors had registered from 94 nations.
Submissions were accepted from registered entrants between June 9 and 30. On July 17, the LMDC announced that 5,201 submissions had been received, representing competitors from 49 U.S. states and 63 nations. The LMDC displayed the 8 finalists in the Winter Garden on November 19.
On February 19, 2004, all 5,201 entries on its website were made available on the LMDC's website. On April 8, the LMDC announced the creation of an Advisory Committee to ensure that the Competition Guidelines are incorporated into the final design, which had undergone revision since January 14. On April 13, the LMDC announced that associate architect Davis Brody Bond would assist Arad and Walker with their final design.
The online searchable archive of entries still exists [1], now under the auspices of the Memorial/Museum. The archive has only been reviewed in its entirety once for research [911memorialvisions.com].
Recognize each individual who was a victim of the September 11, 2001 and February 26, 1993 attacks
Provide an area for quiet visitation and contemplation
Provide an area for the families and loved ones of victims
Provide a separate accessible space to serve as the final resting-place for the unidentified remains from the World Trade Center Site
Make visible the footprints of the original World Trade Center Towers
In addition, entrants were expected to conform to the following "guiding principles":
Embody the goals and spirit of the mission statement
Convey the magnitude of personal and physical loss at this location
Acknowledge all those who aided in rescue, recovery, and healing
Respect and enhance the sacred quality of the overall site and the space designed for the memorial
Encourage reflection and contemplation
Evoke the historical significance of the worldwide impact of September 11, 2001
Create an original and powerful statement of enduring and universal symbolism
Inspire and engage people to learn more about the events and impact of September 11, 2001 and February 26, 1993
Evolve over time
Entries were examined by "LMDC staff" prior to jury review to determine whether they met the competition requirements. Although the Jury was allowed to review the list of ineligible submissions, the LMDC itself was to make the final determination.
Selection jury
The jury was selected by the LMDC in consultation with the mayor and governor. It consisted mostly of architects and artists but also individuals with other affiliations:[3]
Michael Arad and Peter Walker's Reflecting Absence consists of a field of trees interrupted by two large voids containing recessed pools, marking the footprints of the Twin Towers. The deciduous trees (swamp white oaks[5]) are arranged in rows, forming informal clusters, clearings and groves. The park is at street level, sitting above the Memorial Museum.[6] The World Trade Center site is a bathtub, as the area was excavated to construct the original World Trade Center and the earth was used to build Battery Park City, a neighboring residential community.
A portion of the slurry wall (approximately half of what Daniel Libeskind originally wanted to preserve[9]), originally designed to hold back the Hudson River, will be maintained in the Museum.
Greenspan, Elizabeth (2003). "Spontaneous Memorials, Museums, and Public History: Memorialization of September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon". Public Historian. 25 (2): 129–132. doi:10.1525/tph.2003.25.2.129.
Low, Setha M. (2004). "The Memorialization of September 11: Dominant and local discourses on the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site". American Ethnologist. 31 (3): 326–339. doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.326.
Rybczynski, Witold (2004). "Less is Less: Was minimalism the proper design response to commemorate September 11?". Landscape Architecture. 94 (3): 20–23.
Sturken, Marita (2004). "The aesthetics of absence: Rebuilding Ground Zero". American Ethnologist. 31 (3): 311–325. doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.311.
Levine, Lester (2016). "911 Memorial Visions: Innovative Concepts from the 2003 World Trade Center Site Memorial Competition"
