PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Wikipedia:WikiProject Technology/sources

Custom search engine: https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=f35933ba261974a60

This tech-focused search engine is limited to 50 sites, of which you can also search in just the 'Top 20', 'Next 20', etc. to get more comprehensive results of those sources. A major goal is to show how much better search can be...

Top 50 'Generally Reliable' Tech sites
Site RSP WikiSignals Notes CSE TWL? Discussions
Ars Technica Generally reliable Top 20 WP:ARSTECHNICA
Bellingcat Generally reliable Top 20 WP:BELLINGCAT
Bleeping Computer 0.90 Top 20
Digital Trends Generally reliable Top 20 WP:DIGITALTRENDS
DigiTimes unrated Top 20
Engadget Generally reliable Top 20
Fast Company 0.88 Tech-focused enough? Top 20
IEEE Spectrum 0.60 Top 20 Y
MIT Technology Review FOSS 0.98 Top 20 Y*
PCMag Sggst Top 20
Sifted.eu unrated FT-backed Top 20
TechRadar unrated Top 20
The Conversation Generally reliable Top 20 WP:THECONVERSATION
The Information 0.80 Top 20
The Markup 0.90 Top 20
The Register Generally reliable Top 20
The Verge Generally reliable Top 20 WP:THEVERGE
Wired Generally reliable Top 20
404 Media 0.80 Next 20
Australian Financial Review 0.91 Tech only Next 20 N
Bloomberg Línea unrated Tech only Next 20
Computer Weekly unrated Next 20
Dark Reading unrated Next 20
Euractiv 0.87 Next 20
Gizmodo Generally reliable Next 20 WP:GIZMODO
Lifehacker 0.80 Next 20
MediaNama unrated Next 20
Nikkei Asia 0.72 Next 20 N
Platformer n/a Next 20
Rappler Generally reliable Tech only Next 20 WP:RAPPLER
Rest of World 0.50 Next 20
Security Week unrated Next 20
Semafor 0.90 New/broad? Next 20
Techspot 0.82 Next 20
The Record unrated Next 20
TorrentFreak Generally reliable Next 20
Computerworld FOSS unrated Next 10
InfoWorld FOSS unrated Next 10
InnovationAus unrated Next 10
Linux Journal FOSS unrated Next 10
LWN.net Generally reliable Forums... Next 10
Make (magazine) unrated Next 10
MyBroadband Next 10
PC World FOSS unrated Next 10
Tech.eu unrated Next 10
TechCabal unrated Next 10
TechCentral Next 10
Techdirt 0.89 Comments... Next 10
Wired.me unrated Next 10

Manual search options

Hoping to build a tool to combine search results from the CSE above and these search results below into one feed in the near future

Site RSP WikiSignals Add to search terms (for Google search) CSE TWL? Discussions
CNET (pre-October 2020) Generally reliable 0.91 site:cnet.com before:2020-10-01 N
ZDNET (pre-October 2020) Generally reliableFOSS 0.89 site:zdnet.com before:2020-10-01 N
BGR (pre-October 2025?) 0.88 site:bgr.com before:2025-10-01 N
How-To Geek (pre-July 2023) 0.98 site:howtogeek.com before:2023-07-01 N WP:VALNET
Tech In Asia (pre-Jan. 2024) unrated site:techinasia.com before:2024-01-01 N

Under consideration

Site RSP WikiSignals Notes CSE TWL? Discussions
Quality concerns
Contxto Too niche, little editorial oversight? N
TechRepublic unrated N
Too difficult to focus Google search
Association for Computing Machinery Sggst Journals Next 10 Y
Association for Computing Machinery Sggst Magazines Next 10 Y
Too niche/too little content?
EU-startups.com unrated N
DealStreetAsia.com Too niche? N
Krebsonsecurity unrated Posts weekly...may not be enough N
Too Broad?
Al-Monitor 0.88 Not enough tech focus N
Buzzfeed News Generally reliable Until 2023. Archives online. N WP:BUZZFEEDNEWS
Bloomberg News Generally reliable Not enough tech focus N WP:BLOOMBERG
Coda Media Generally reliable Not enough tech focus N WP:CODA
The Intercept Generally reliable Not enough tech focus N
New York Times Generally reliable Not enough tech focus N WP:NYT
Wall Street Journal Generally reliable Not enough tech focus N Y WP:WSJ
IEEE 0.98 Too broad? Would replace Spectrum? N Y
Quartz No way to filter by tech - not tech-focused enough
Quanta Magazine 0.98 Too broad? N
Scientific American 0.89 Too broad? N Y

Excluded sites

Marginally reliable

Name RSP WikiSignals Notes CSE Discussions
TechCrunch No consensus WP:TECHCRUNCH
CNET (Oct. 2020 – Oct. 2022) No consensus
Business Insider No consensus WP:BUSINESSINSIDER
The Next Web No consensus 0.80
VentureBeat No consensus 0.55 WP:VENTUREBEAT
Popular Mechanics No consensus
Entrepreneur No consensus
Boing Boing No consensus
Vice Media No consensus WP:VICE

Generally unreliable

Name RSP WikiSignals Notes CSE Discussions
ZDNET (Oct. 2020-present) Generally unreliable
CNET (Oct. 2022-present) Generally unreliable
YouTube Generally unreliable WP:RSPYT
X Generally unreliable WP:RSPX
Reddit Generally unreliable WP:RSREDDIT

FAQs

  • Why is there an 'Edit Using Visual Editor' link at the top of the page? The Wikipedia namespace does not support visual editor on its own, and requires this workaround. Visual Editor is especially helpful for editing tables.

See also

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.