Wheels replace the usual division as a binary operation with multiplication, with a unary operation applied to one argument similar (but not identical) to the multiplicative inverse, such that becomes shorthand for , but neither nor in general, and modifies the rules of algebra such that
where the negation is defined by and if there is an element such that (thus in the general case ).
However, for values of satisfying and , we get the usual
If negation can be defined as above then the subset is a commutative ring, and every commutative ring is such a subset of a wheel. If is an invertible element of the commutative ring then . Thus, whenever makes sense, it is equal to , but the latter is always defined, even when .[1]
Define the wheel of fractions of with respect to as the quotient (and denoting the equivalence class containing as ) with the operations
(additive identity)
(multiplicative identity)
(reciprocal operation)
(addition operation)
(multiplication operation)
In general, this structure is not a ring unless it is trivial, as in the usual sense - here with we get , although that implies that is an improper relation on our wheel .
This follows from the fact that , which is also not true in general.[1]
Projective line and Riemann sphere
The special case of the above starting with a field produces a projective line extended to a wheel by adjoining a bottom element noted ⊥, where . The projective line is itself an extension of the original field by an element , where for any element in the field. However, is still undefined on the projective line, but is defined in its extension to a wheel.
Starting with the real numbers, the corresponding projective "line" is geometrically a circle, and then the extra point gives the shape that is the source of the term "wheel". Or starting with the complex numbers instead, the corresponding projective "line" is a sphere (the Riemann sphere), and then the extra point gives a 3-dimensional version of a wheel.