I prefer to keep all discussions together on the same page. If I left you a message, go ahead and reply on your talk page, then just drop me a link here.
Hello to all! I do not intend to write a regular peer review newsletter but there does occasionally come a time when those interested in contributing to peer review should be contacted, and now is one. I've mailed this out to everyone on the peer review volunteers list, and some editors that have contributed to past discussions. Apologies if I've left you off or contacted you and you didn't want it. Next time there is a newsletter / mass message it will be opt in (here), I'll talk about this below - but first:
THANK YOU! I want to thank you for your contributions and for volunteering on the list to help out at peer review. Thank you!
Peer review is useful! It's good to have an active peer review process. This is often the way that we help new or developing editors understand our ways, and improve the quality of their editing - so it fills an important and necessary gap between the teahouse (kindly introduction to our Wikiways) and GA and FA reviews (specific standards uphelp according to a set of quality criteria). And we should try and improve this process where possible (automate, simplify) so it can be used and maintained easily.
Updates
It can get quite lonely tinkering with peer review...
With a bit of effort we can renovate the place to look like this!
Update #1: the peer review volunteers list is changing
The list is here in case you've forgotten: WP:PRV. Kadane has kindly offered to create a bot that will ping editors on the volunteers list with unanswered reviews in their chosen subject areas every so often. You can choose the time interval by changing the "contact" parameter. Options are "never", "monthly", "quarterly", "halfyearly", and "annually". For example:
{{PRV|JohnSmith|History of engineering|contact=monthly}} - if placed in the "History" section, JohnSmith will receive an automatic update every month about unanswered peer reviews relating to history.
{{PRV|JaneSmith|Mesopotamian geography, Norwegian fjords|contact=annually}} - if placed in the "Geography" section, JaneSmith will receive an automatic update every yearly about unanswered peer reviews in the geography area.
We can at this stage only use the broad peer review section titles to guide what reviews you'd like, but that's better than nothing! You can also set an interest in multiple separate subject areas that will be updated at different times.
Update #2: a (lean) WikiProject Peer review
I don't think we need a WikiProject with a giant bureaucracy nor all sorts of whiz-bang features. However over the last few years I've found there are times when it would have been useful to have a list of editors that would like to contribute to discussions about the peer review process (e.g. instructions, layout, automation, simplification etc.). Also, it can get kind of lonely on the talk page as I am (correct me if I'm wrong) the only regular contributor, with most editors moving on after 6 - 12 months.
So, I've decided to create "WikiProject Peer review". If you'd like to contribute to the WikiProject, or make yourself available for future newsletters or contact, please add yourself to the list of members.
Update #3: advertising
We plan to do some advertising of peer review, to let editors know about it and how to volunteer to help, at a couple of different venues (Signpost, Village pump, Teahouse etc.) - but have been waiting until we get this bot + WikiProject set up so we have a way to help interested editors make more enduring contributions. So consider yourself forewarned!
And... that's it!
I wish you all well on your Wikivoyages, Tom (LT) (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-08-11T00:31:00.000Z","author":"Tom (LT)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tom_(LT)-2018-08-11T00:31:00.000Z-Update_#3:_advertising","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20240115202900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-FAR_for_Emmy_Noether-20240115202900","replies":["c-Z1720-20240115202900-FAR_for_Emmy_Noether"],"text":"FAR for Emmy Noether","linkableTitle":"FAR for Emmy Noether"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20240115202900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-FAR_for_Emmy_Noether-20240115202900","replies":["c-Z1720-20240115202900-FAR_for_Emmy_Noether"],"text":"FAR for Emmy Noether","linkableTitle":"FAR for Emmy Noether"}-->
I have nominated Emmy Noether for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115202900","author":"Z1720","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Z1720-20240115202900-FAR_for_Emmy_Noether","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241023192600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Invitation_to_participate_in_a_research-20241023192600","replies":["c-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241023192600-Invitation_to_participate_in_a_research"],"text":"Invitation to participate in a research","linkableTitle":"Invitation to participate in a research"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241023192600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Invitation_to_participate_in_a_research-20241023192600","replies":["c-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241023192600-Invitation_to_participate_in_a_research"],"text":"Invitation to participate in a research","linkableTitle":"Invitation to participate in a research"}-->
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241023192600","author":"BGerdemann (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241023192600-Invitation_to_participate_in_a_research","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241113003900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Reminder_to_participate_in_Wikipedia_research-20241113003900","replies":["c-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241113003900-Reminder_to_participate_in_Wikipedia_research"],"text":"Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research","linkableTitle":"Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241113003900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Reminder_to_participate_in_Wikipedia_research-20241113003900","replies":["c-BGerdemann_(WMF)-20241113003900-Reminder_to_participate_in_Wikipedia_research"],"text":"Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research","linkableTitle":"Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research"}-->
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
.jpg)
,_160906,_ako.jpg)