Any comments, feature requests, suggestions or questions can be placed here. Thanks – SD0001 (talk) 09:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-09-05T09:43:00.000Z","author":"SD0001","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SD0001-2020-09-05T09:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
thanks for setting up this highly useful page! --Sm8900 (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-06-19T21:16:00.000Z","author":"Sm8900","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sm8900-2020-06-19T21:16:00.000Z-Notes","replies":["c-SD0001-2020-09-28T09:14:00.000Z-Sm8900-2020-06-19T21:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hey,
I just came across User:SDZeroBot/G13 eligible sorting a few days ago and noticed it hadn't updated in a few days. Just thought I'd leave you a note. Liz Read! Talk! 20:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-09-26T20:52:00.000Z","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-2020-09-26T20:52:00.000Z-Your_bot","replies":["c-Liz-2020-09-26T20:54:00.000Z-Liz-2020-09-26T20:52:00.000Z","c-Liz-2020-09-30T00:49:00.000Z-Liz-2020-09-26T20:52:00.000Z"]}}-->
it just updated and posted eligible G13 stale drafts but it includes stale drafts that were "saved" during the day by an editor
Any way, sorry for all of the feedback
Hi, SD0001,
On User:SDZeroBot/G13 soon sorting page, could you make a list for the parent categories like Culture and Geography/Regions like you have for the STEM category (that includes all of the STEM subcategories)? It makes it much easier to browse when there is one large, parent category that contains all of the subcategories in it.
I realize that this is opposite to your original purpose of sorting G13s by topic but I'm using the page to look for expiring stale drafts in a more general way. If you don't want to incorporate this change, I understand. All of the new SDZeroBot pages are something that we are all getting used to. Liz Read! Talk! 16:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-05T16:47:00.000Z","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-2020-10-05T16:47:00.000Z-Suggestion","replies":["c-SD0001-2020-10-15T12:00:00.000Z-Liz-2020-10-05T16:47:00.000Z"]}}-->
Another comment, I'm not sure you'll see, is there is a problem with User:SDZeroBot/G13 Watch. For example, it posts at 00:00 UTC on Oct. 11, drafts that expire on Oct. 11th. But by posting the drafts that expire at the end of the day that they expire, the drafts posted had been deleted when it was posted. So, it just contained a list of links to already deleted drafts.
If you could post, on Oct. 11th, the drafts that are due to expire on Oct. 12th, it would be more useful. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-12T01:09:00.000Z","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-2020-10-12T01:09:00.000Z-Suggestion","replies":["c-SD0001-2020-10-15T12:00:00.000Z-Liz-2020-10-12T01:09:00.000Z"]}}-->
Something going on at Draft:Bamtang Games, the bot has thrice edited the date today. The first and third edits were wrong, as that's the date it was moved from draft to main. The 2nd edit in the middle was correct with the date I moved it from mainspace to draft. -- ferret (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-20T00:20:00.000Z","author":"Ferret","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ferret-2020-10-20T00:20:00.000Z-Repeated_\"draft_moved_from_mainspace\"_edits","replies":["c-SD0001-2020-10-26T06:55:00.000Z-Ferret-2020-10-20T00:20:00.000Z"]}}-->
User:SDZeroBot/G13_soon hasn't been updated in a couple of days. I assume the bot is down. ~Kvng (talk) 16:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-22T16:29:00.000Z","author":"Kvng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kvng-2020-10-22T16:29:00.000Z-User:SDZeroBot\/G13_soon_updates","replies":["c-DGG-2020-10-26T00:58:00.000Z-Kvng-2020-10-22T16:29:00.000Z","c-DGG-2020-10-26T17:47:00.000Z-Kvng-2020-10-22T16:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi, I got notified of an AfD discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Ferguson) in which I was the one who initiated. It's true that I expanded the article before nominating, but it doesn't make much sense to leave a talk page notification for the nominator. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-18T02:21:00.000Z","author":"Eagles247","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Eagles247-2020-11-18T02:21:00.000Z-Notified_of_an_AfD_discussion_that_I_initiated","replies":["c-SD0001-2020-11-18T04:58:00.000Z-Eagles247-2020-11-18T02:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Eagles"}}-->
Delighted to learn that SDZeroBot has won the m:Coolest Tool Award in the Newcomer tools category! I don't know much about how this award is organised or decided, but thanks to everyone who recommended it or voted for it. – SD0001 (talk) 09:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-12-12T09:32:00.000Z","author":"SD0001","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SD0001-2020-12-12T09:32:00.000Z-Coolest_Tool_Award!","replies":["c-\u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627-2020-12-17T14:53:00.000Z-SD0001-2020-12-12T09:32:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi, this edit posted to a redirect. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-02-06T15:06:00.000Z","author":"Redrose64","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Redrose64-2021-02-06T15:06:00.000Z-Redirected_user_talk_page","replies":["c-SD0001-2021-02-06T20:47:00.000Z-Redrose64-2021-02-06T15:06:00.000Z"]}}-->
SD0001, could you remove User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/log from Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls? it looks like the problem is {{history|1=German exonyms (Transylvania)|List of German exonyms for places in Transylvania|2=h}} which has two |1= parameters (one named and one unnamed). thank you. Frietjes (talk) 19:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-18T19:22:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Frietjes-2021-06-18T19:22:00.000Z-Pages_using_duplicate_arguments_in_template_calls","replies":[]}}-->
{{history|1=German exonyms (Transylvania)|List of German exonyms for places in Transylvania|2=h}}
|1=
Having a sort category for Culture/Food and drink lets me find AfCs that are right in my wheelhouse, that I can often assess almost from my own knowledge base. Thanks for this! —valereee (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-17T16:09:00.000Z","author":"Valereee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Valereee-2021-08-17T16:09:00.000Z-Such_a_great_tool!","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2014valereee"}}-->
SDZeroBot's task "AfD notifications" failed to run per the configuration specified at Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 24 hours, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the activity configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 01:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-24T01:20:00.000Z","author":"SDZeroBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SDZeroBot-2021-08-24T01:20:00.000Z-SDZeroBot:_AfD_notifications_failure_-_fixed","replies":["c-SD0001-2021-08-25T16:07:00.000Z-SDZeroBot-2021-08-24T01:20:00.000Z"]}}-->
|notify=
{{/task}}
Hello, SD0001,
Once again, SDZeroBot has a hard time handling months that have a different number of days. Tonight, User:SDZeroBot/G13 eligible, which usually has 0 titles listed, has over 400 drafts it identifies as "eligible" for deletion. Except that they are not eligible, they'll be eligible on September 1st or September 2nd. But SDZeroBot thinks that every month has the same number of days. Because February had 28 days but August has 31 days, it is identifying drafts as being eligible before they are because, I guess, it thinks that August 30 is actually September 2.
This is less of a problem now than it is in February when there are fewer days and the bot just skips daily reports for three days in order to catch up. Then, DGG, who regularly scans the report to rescue promising drafts, is frustrated because SDZeroBot just jumps three days ahead and omits those days so he misses three days worth of draft reports and the drafts are simply deleted by patrolling admins.
This is a regular problem and has been since the bot's operation started a year ago. Since most months have 30 or 31 days, editors and admins who work with the G13 Eligible Soon list just adjust to the bot's quirks. But when there is a three day difference, this becomes a larger problem. I hate to nag you about this, because I'm so grateful for the work that the bot does, but you really need to find a way to fix this aberration, maybe by asking other technically-minded editors and admins who work with bots. If any of them have this talk page on their Watchlist and have any ideas for solutions, it would be greatly appreciated before we get to the end of September and this happens again. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-31T01:18:00.000Z","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-2021-08-31T01:18:00.000Z-SDZeroBot_glitches","replies":["c-SD0001-2021-08-31T11:17:00.000Z-Liz-2021-08-31T01:18:00.000Z"]}}-->
new Morebits.date()
new Morebits.date().subtract(6, 'months')
SELECT NOW()
SELECT NOW() - INTERVAL 6 MONTH
We already had a G13 Soon report for March 9th and then it started up today with a report for March 7th
Should we use the latest one because you say the dates were off by a day?
FYI, some of the extracts placed on NPP sorting subpages, like User:SDZeroBot/NPP sorting/Culture/Biography causes them to be placed in Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. —andrybak (talk) 13:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-11T13:09:00.000Z","author":"Andrybak","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andrybak-2021-10-11T13:09:00.000Z-NPP_sorting_extracts_issue","replies":[]}}-->
Userfied to User:SDZeroBot/Database report with its associated category Category:SDZeroBot database report subscriptions userfied to user:SDZeroBot/Category:SDZeroBot database report subscriptions
Template:Database report has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-19T03:14:00.000Z","author":"65.92.246.142","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-65.92.246.142-2021-12-19T03:14:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Database_report","replies":[]}}-->
It is extremely misleading for a bot to rate an article GA (even though such ratings are inadmissible), when that is a rating always decided by the community at the GAN process. I suggest it be removed entirely, possibly replaced by A class ratings. Aza24 (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-28T05:11:00.000Z","author":"Aza24","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aza24-2021-12-28T05:11:00.000Z-GA_ratings","replies":["c-Aza24-2021-12-28T05:12:00.000Z-Aza24-2021-12-28T05:11:00.000Z","c-SD0001-2022-01-10T10:54:00.000Z-Aza24-2021-12-28T05:11:00.000Z"]}}-->
In this edit made by your bot, the {{bots}} template was already placed with |deny=all set. I don't know if this has been fixed in future versions of the code. Both {{nobots}} and {{bots}} are templates which are to say to a bot whether to not or to edit a page. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:44, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-05T00:44:00.000Z","author":"Dreamy Jazz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dreamy_Jazz-2022-01-05T00:44:00.000Z-Nobots_all_missed_by_the_AfD_notifier_task","replies":["c-SD0001-2022-01-10T10:53:00.000Z-Dreamy_Jazz-2022-01-05T00:44:00.000Z"]}}-->
|deny=all
I don't know how common my approach is, but when I send something to AfD, I would use the standard template notice only for relatively new editors. If it's a regular with experience in the area, I'd just leave a short note about the AfD, I reckon that's less impersonal. Even with new editors, it's sometimes better to go for a handwritten note, like here, where the AfD is not about deletion at all, but about redirecting or merging. Well, it turns out that instead of making things a little bit better, my approach makes them worse, because the bot will invariably come along and slap on the template anyway. – Uanfala (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-10T01:41:00.000Z","author":"Uanfala","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Uanfala-2022-01-10T01:41:00.000Z-AfD_notices_when_editor_already_notified","replies":["c-SD0001-2022-01-10T11:00:00.000Z-Uanfala-2022-01-10T01:41:00.000Z"]}}-->
<!-- ==Nomination of [[Languages of the Indian subcontinent]] for deletion== -->
Hello. According to the QPQ check, I have 24 DYKs. However, according to your DYK nominations count link, I only have 21. I was wondering why this was miscounting as I am sure the 24 count is correct. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-25T17:55:00.000Z","author":"MrLinkinPark333","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MrLinkinPark333-2022-05-25T17:55:00.000Z-DYK_miscount","replies":["c-TSventon-2022-05-26T06:42:00.000Z-MrLinkinPark333-2022-05-25T17:55:00.000Z","c-TSventon-2022-05-26T06:54:00.000Z-MrLinkinPark333-2022-05-25T17:55:00.000Z"]}}-->
Just checking to see if User:FunnyKills Bot is you. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-11T11:29:00.000Z","author":"CambridgeBayWeather","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CambridgeBayWeather-2022-06-11T11:29:00.000Z-User:FunnyKills_Bot","replies":["c-SD0001-2022-06-11T12:28:00.000Z-CambridgeBayWeather-2022-06-11T11:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi it looks like the bot hasn’t updated the NPP sort since 8 June. Mccapra (talk) 16:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-12T16:14:00.000Z","author":"Mccapra","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mccapra-2022-06-12T16:14:00.000Z-NPP_Sorting_not_updated_since_8_June","replies":["c-Redrose64-2022-06-12T22:37:00.000Z-Mccapra-2022-06-12T16:14:00.000Z"]}}-->
SDZeroBot's task "AfD notifications" failed to run per the configuration specified at Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 24 hours, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-17T01:20:00.000Z","author":"SDZeroBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SDZeroBot-2022-06-17T01:20:00.000Z-SDZeroBot:_AfD_notifications_failure","replies":[]}}-->
Wouldn't it make more sense to have the Good Article counter list the count in reverse count. In my case I have 218 Good Articles from GANs, so it would be more logical to list 218 on top of the list with the most recent Good Article received, for example John Johnson (inventor) (2022-06-17). The first Good Article I received of Conclusion of the American Civil War (2009-03-08) should be as number 1 (not # 218). Can the counter be programmed to facilitate this counter number in a reverse numbering? Number 1 logically should be at the bottom and the highest number (i.e. #218) at the top of the list with the most recent Good Article received. How does that sound? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-24T17:46:00.000Z","author":"Doug Coldwell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Doug_Coldwell-2022-06-24T17:46:00.000Z-Good_Article_counter_order","replies":["c-SD0001-2022-06-25T09:03:00.000Z-Doug_Coldwell-2022-06-24T17:46:00.000Z"]}}-->
I suspect this is a case of not recognizing an alternative AFD notification template. Editor is notified via Template:AfD-notice-NPF which is used from page curation and generates different text than Template:Afd notice. Bot notice was delivered a short while later. Whpq (talk) 03:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220829031500","author":"Whpq","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Whpq-20220829031500-AFD_Notification_sent_to_editor_who_was_already_notified","replies":[]}}-->
Is it possible to have WP:WBGAN include all promotions, instead of cutting off at 14, as it currently does? This would be helpful in assessing user reviews vs. nominations. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220927234500","author":"Mike Christie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mike_Christie-20220927234500-WP:WBGAN","replies":["c-Mike_Christie-20221003132500-Mike_Christie-20220927234500"]}}-->
s54328__goodarticles_p
Why my pages were nominated for deletation? জাবিরটটক (talk) 08:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221104080800","author":"\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995-20221104080800-Query","replies":[]}}-->
How Can I avoid this nomination of deletation? জাবিরটটক (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221105073300","author":"\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995-20221105073300-Query","replies":[]}}-->
Why "Translation of Quran into Hebrew Language" was nominated for deletation process? জাবিরটটক (talk) 07:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221105072800","author":"\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995-20221105072800-Query","replies":["c-SD0001-20221105111900-\u099c\u09be\u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u099f\u099f\u0995-20221105072800"]}}-->
Hi -- I'm working on a replacement for the GAN functions of Legobot (BRFA here) and I just noticed this page. Do you construct it by scanning the GA nominee category, or by reading WP:GAN? If the latter, would you be able to test if it works with User:ChristieBot/GAN existing format, which, if the bot is approved, will be the new contents of GAN? It's very similar to the existing format but it's not quite identical and I wanted to check that the change, if it happens, wouldn't break your code. If you build it by scanning the category, there's nothing to worry about, of course. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221104140700","author":"Mike Christie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mike_Christie-20221104140700-User:SDZeroBot\/GAN_sorting","replies":["c-SD0001-20221104185800-Mike_Christie-20221104140700"]}}-->
Thank you for the very useful {{Database report}}. I'm working through my old Quarry queries which detect various anti-patterns in Wikipedia pages, and setting up those which are still relevant to run weekly. Everything is running smoothly and I've already fixed plenty of articles as a result. One suggestion: would it be sensible and easy to add a little technical information such as query duration? I'll be using this to tweak the run frequency (e.g. change quick jobs to daily and expensive ones to monthly). I can get a good estimate from Quarry, but it might highlight SQL inefficiencies for everyone's benefit. The time of last run (as in date+UTC rather than duration) might also be convenient, though it's easily obtained from page history. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 12:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221119120400","author":"Certes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Certes-20221119120400-Database_report","replies":["c-SD0001-20221120055300-Certes-20221119120400"]}}-->
@SD0001: This is something I have craved for a while. I am so glad you've made it! It works even better than if I'd made it myself. A couple questions:
|interval=7
|cron=*/7 * *
Hello! There's currently 3 nominations at User:SDZeroBot/GAN sorting that are listed as [failed to parse]: Walter Nash, Polson Logging Co. 2 and Cross Island MRT line. These are not the ones hidden in the Additional nominations collapsible sections, so I'm not sure why they are tagged this way. Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230311211100","author":"MrLinkinPark333","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MrLinkinPark333-20230311211100-Failed_to_parse","replies":["c-SD0001-20230312064600-MrLinkinPark333-20230311211100"]}}-->
Personally, I don't think this page should be deleted. The subject has a relatively large internet presence and has millions of streams on some of his songs. While not all of his projects are particularly notable, I think it is important that this page remain entact. SaltieChips (talk) 13:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230331133500","author":"SaltieChips","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SaltieChips-20230331133500-Nomation_of_Abhi_the_Nomad_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->
Hello - I find the "SDZeroBot/G13 soon sorting" information quite helpful, but the information has not been updated since 27 March 2023. I checked the 'err' link, but it is blank. Is there a way to start this service running again? Thanks. DaffodilOcean (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230409162700","author":"DaffodilOcean","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DaffodilOcean-20230409162700-G13_soon_sorting_not_running?","replies":["c-SD0001-20230410125500-DaffodilOcean-20230409162700"]}}-->
There seems to be a problem with several bots today and that includes SDZeroBot. Is this a system issue? I also ran into this with HaleBot. Thanks for any help you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230419013200","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20230419013200-Problem_with_bots_today","replies":["c-Liz-20230419040500-Liz-20230419013200"]}}-->
Last edit to User:SDZeroBot/NPP sorting is April 18. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230421150500","author":"Pppery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pppery-20230421150500-NPP_sorting_down?","replies":["c-SD0001-20230421175200-Pppery-20230421150500"],"displayName":"* Pppery *"}}-->
For some reason, SDZeroBot didn't issue its 00:00 UTC CSD G13 reports tonight. The ones I look at are User:SDZeroBot/G13 eligible and User:SDZeroBot/G13 soon. It's been active today. so the bot isn't down, it just seems to be having some issues with expiring draft reports. Thanks in advance for any solutions you can offer! Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230507002000","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20230507002000-CSD_G13_reports","replies":["c-Liz-20230517014300-Liz-20230507002000","c-Liz-20230522021700-Liz-20230507002000","c-Liz-20230602001800-Liz-20230507002000"]}}-->
I want this for use in fawiki where can i copy Wikipedia:Database reports/Drafts with categories Baratiiman (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230507120000","author":"Baratiiman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Baratiiman-20230507120000-Query_2","replies":["c-SD0001-20230523133500-Baratiiman-20230507120000"]}}-->
Was making use of Wikipedia:Database reports/Long pages/Talk to find long Talk pages that might benefit from archiving, but I had limited success because the report includes subpages, which may include existing archives, RfCs, etc.. Could we get a second, similar report that includes only Talk pages that are top level, not subpages? Thanks. -- Netoholic @ 06:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230708062400","author":"Netoholic","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Netoholic-20230708062400-Long_Talk_pages_(not_subpages)","replies":["c-SD0001-20230708085600-Netoholic-20230708062400"]}}-->
Would it be possible to add the section name to the edit summary while updating a database report? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230721101800","author":"MPGuy2824","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MPGuy2824-20230721101800-Database_report_task_-_add_more_information_to_edit_summary","replies":["c-SD0001-20230728101700-MPGuy2824-20230721101800"]}}-->
Hey, the bot hasn't updated WP:AFDSORT in a while. It looks like it's trying to fill it up with more than 2MiB of data. My guess is an AfD nom is causing a problem (maybe Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air Nippon destinations?). Could you look into this please? SWinxy (talk) 22:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230824223800","author":"SWinxy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SWinxy-20230824223800-AfD_sorter_hasn't_been_updated_in_2_days","replies":["c-SD0001-20230825183800-SWinxy-20230824223800"]}}-->
@SD0001, AfD notifier doesn't seem to recognize {{AfD-notice-NPF}}, resulting in the bot giving notifications to people who have already been notified. See example at User talk:RockyMasum#Deletion discussion about Zubaida Rahman. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 16:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230902162200","author":"ClydeFranklin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClydeFranklin-20230902162200-AfD_notifier_not_recognizing_Page_Curation_AfD_notice","replies":["c-SD0001-20230903063100-ClydeFranklin-20230902162200"],"displayName":"CLYDE"}}-->
FYI @SD0001, User:SDZeroBot/NPP sorting has not updated for a week now. This is a bit unfortunate as the NPP backlog drive has just started. Can this possibly be updated? Thanks a lot, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231001133800","author":"Schminnte","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Schminnte-20231001133800-User:SDZeroBot\/NPP_sorting","replies":["c-SD0001-20231003071400-Schminnte-20231001133800"]}}-->
@SD0001: For NPP sorting pages (such as this), would it be possible to separate the creator and creator edit counts into two separate columns, so that reviewers can more easily sort to find more or less experienced authors (which should nominally correlate with more or less challenging reviews)? Thanks, I love your tool(s)! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231015170500","author":"Iazyges","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Iazyges-20231015170500-NPP_Sorting_Request","replies":["c-SD0001-20231015181800-Iazyges-20231015170500"]}}-->
Hello SD0001,
When checking Pending AfC submissions and the draft I'm working on, Draft:V (programming language), I noticed it took a large dramatic drop. There were no edits of the draft, so the change seems likely the result of the algorithms used by the bot. The days in question are 27 September 2023 to 28 September 2023. I'm curious as to what could be the reasons or if it's anything to be concerned about.
Additionally, and this might not be under your area, but the "Prior AfD" listed is not to the present V language. What's linked to, is to a different programming language, from 2008. The present one in the draft is from 2019. These different languages, though sharing the same letter, need to be disconnected from each other. Thanks for your work and consideration in advance.Wukuendo (talk) 04:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231101040800","author":"Wukuendo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Wukuendo-20231101040800-SDZeroBot_irregularities","replies":[]}}-->
Hi, I just stumbled over your GAN-counting tool and noticed that, at least for my results, the entry for Serious Sam: The First Encounter shows it as having passed GA on 1970-01-01 (0 epoch time) instead of 2023-10-30. I assume that the incorrect date is stored in some database, but I couldn't immediately find the origin. Curiously, I couldn't find comparable entries on the spot-checked results of a few other users. IceWelder [✉] 15:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240204153300","author":"IceWelder","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-IceWelder-20240204153300-GANs_tool:_Epoch_fail","replies":["c-SD0001-20240204165900-IceWelder-20240204153300"]}}-->
As far as I can tell the GA counts don't work for users with apostrophes in their usernames. This retrieves nothing, for example. Looking in the database it appears that the nominator for this record is stored as 'Tim O&'. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240414103700","author":"Mike Christie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mike_Christie-20240414103700-GA_counts_for_users_with_apostrophes","replies":["c-SD0001-20240414135600-Mike_Christie-20240414103700"]}}-->
User:Tim O'Doherty
#
I'm not sure what happened here. None of the drafts on this page showed up on the relevant User:SDZeroBot/G13 soon page for the day they should have. Things are a little off for the past few days as the editors who regularly deal with G13 drafts, me, Explicit and Hey man im josh, have not been available as much as usual. My mom is on hospice care so I work on Wikipedia when she is sleeping, Explicit, for some reason, has been absent from the project and Hey man im josh doesn't edit on the weekends. So, there has been a bit of a backlog on dealing with expiring drafts. But that's okay, they aren't urgent. But I still don't know why these drafts from Nov. 2/3 didn't show up on G13 soon page. Any ideas why they were "hidden" from us until the day after they expired?
There has been a trend though of a declining number of expiring drafts on the daily G13 soon lists (usually about ~150 drafts) but that has boomeranged in May 2024 because of a AFC backlog drive that occurred in Novembere 2023. So we are seeing higher numbers that we were a few weeks ago.
I hope you are having a good weekend. Liz Read! Talk! 03:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240505033600","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20240505033600-User:SDZeroBot\/G13_eligible","replies":["c-Liz-20240505050000-Liz-20240505033600","c-SD0001-20240508132300-Liz-20240505033600"]}}-->
If you ignore all of the "road" articles, which are restored drafts, all of the 20+ drafts should have appeared on a User:SDZeroBot/G13 soon list for 6/3 but for some reason, didn't show up on the daily list. I've looked over all of these drafts and they don't seem to have much in common. Do you know what SDZeroBot would leave these drafts off of the G13 soon list? Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240604013600","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20240604013600-User:SDZeroBot\/G13_eligible,_again","replies":["c-Novem_Linguae-20240604072100-Liz-20240604013600"]}}-->
Please see this error message, which started appearing every once in a while a couple of weeks ago. It was happening all the time for a day or so, and then it mostly fixed itself. Is it possible for the bot to avoid updating the page when it encounters this timeout? It is better to have an old report than a completely missing one. Thanks for anything you can do. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240704022900","author":"Jonesey95","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jonesey95-20240704022900-Is_it_possible_to_avoid_this_error_message_when_updating_a_report?","replies":["c-Zinnober9-20240714042400-Jonesey95-20240704022900","c-Cryptic-20240723184000-Jonesey95-20240704022900"]}}-->
@SD0001: FYI, four of the last five updates to Wikipedia:Database reports/Uncategorized templates by SDZeroBot (either periodic or web triggered) timed out. DH85868993 (talk) 04:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240809042800","author":"DH85868993","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DH85868993-20240809042800-Is_it_possible_to_avoid_this_error_message_when_updating_a_report?","replies":[]}}-->
While pondering some arcane issues, it occurred to me that it might be possible and/or desirable to use database report templates for heavy lifting (e.g. as a foundation for other bots, or even for webapps elsewhere). This raises some vague security issues, e.g. if the page is vandalized the whole thing goes kablooey. Luckily, being a genius, I realized that this is precisely why WP:TPE exists. Would it be possible to give this bot TPE perms such that sensitive DBR pages could be TE-protected and the bot could roam happily? jp×g🗯️ 01:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240707011400","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-20240707011400-TPE?","replies":["c-SD0001-20240707080000-JPxG-20240707011400"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.118.227.16