Hi Mouldyfox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, first can I say thanks for creating the pages for the new Glasgow wards as of 2017.
I was just wondering where you got your data for the area size of those wards ( Partick East/Kelvindale (3.9km²))
Thanks and keep up the good work :) Pingu4581 (talk) 23:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-17T23:26:00.000Z","author":"Pingu4581","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pingu4581-2017-05-17T23:26:00.000Z-Wards_-_May_'17","replies":["c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-18T08:41:00.000Z-Pingu4581-2017-05-17T23:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks, it's been interesting to poke around information and data.

As for the area size, I used the data from MapIt to export kml files and import them into Google Maps as layers. Clicking on a layer automatically gives the area and boundary length. I got round to doing them all except one last night — MapIt has a restriction on downloading kml files, I think it's around 20 but I'm not sure for what time period. The one I don't have data for is Victoria Park. (I'd like to do more for other areas, but unsure how to use API keys and json map data.) — MouldyFox (talk) 08:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-18T08:41:00.000Z","author":"Mouldyfox","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-18T08:41:00.000Z-Pingu4581-2017-05-17T23:26:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks very much for letting me know as I was previously unaware of this 'MapIt' service.
As for API keys and jsons, I'm afaid I can't help you there as I'm also a newbie to that.
I managed to extract the data for Victoria Park and have added it to your table below.
Hope this helps, thanks
Pingu4581 (talk) 09:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-18T09:07:00.000Z","author":"Pingu4581","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pingu4581-2017-05-18T09:07:00.000Z-Wards_-_May_'17","replies":["c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-18T09:31:00.000Z-Pingu4581-2017-05-18T09:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks a lot for adding Vic Park, that small gap was annoying me. I've added the area data to Wards of Glasgow, if I get time later I'll calculate the population density. APIs and json files will have to go onto the bulging pile of "shit I should learn about." — MouldyFox (talk) 09:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-18T09:31:00.000Z","author":"Mouldyfox","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-18T09:31:00.000Z-Pingu4581-2017-05-18T09:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Just finished adding the densities before I saw your message so that's them done :)
Do you think it's worth making similar Wards of... pages and their individual Wards for other council areas.
It will take some time and I doubt that it's economical to do one for each council but maybe just for the cities like the City of Edinburgh?
Also, I worked out how to bypass this limit on the MapIt page. Just use a VPN and you can download another c. 20, after which point just make a new connection.
Thanks Pingu4581 (talk) 10:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-18T10:36:00.000Z","author":"Pingu4581","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pingu4581-2017-05-18T10:36:00.000Z-Wards_-_May_'17","replies":["c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-18T14:32:00.000Z-Pingu4581-2017-05-18T10:36:00.000Z"]}}-->

Aha, thanks for that! Good to know. I definitely think it's good to have this kind of wealth of information about wards, often an overlooked detail concerning local government. I'm wondering whether the information would be better on a council's article rather than an entirely separate page, but either way, I'm all for expanding the information we have on wards, wherever it's hosted. (And pages are easily merged if that's the consensus.)

I've also started a discussion about how Scottish council articles should be organised in general; between Glasgow, Dundee and East Dunbartonshire (for example), there are three different ways of organising information, which I don't think is very useful (or logical). — MouldyFox (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-18T14:32:00.000Z","author":"Mouldyfox","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-18T14:32:00.000Z-Pingu4581-2017-05-18T10:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I must say that I believe it's right to keep seperate ward pages from a council page as they tend to contain large data chunks which could unnecessarily clog up the council page.
It seems to be a trend that I have found for many other cities, that their local government sub-divisions are found on a dedicated page i.e. Paris, Amsterdam and Berlin
I certainly agree that having three different types of pages is very silly. It's just a matter of discussing with the community which type they should all come under :)
Thanks, Pingu4581 (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-20T16:37:00.000Z","author":"Pingu4581","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pingu4581-2017-05-20T16:37:00.000Z-Wards_-_May_'17","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Argyll and Bute Council election, 2017, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-20T14:00:00.000Z","author":"KGirlTrucker81","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KGirlTrucker81-2017-05-20T14:00:00.000Z-May_2017","replies":["c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-20T14:28:00.000Z-KGirlTrucker81-2017-05-20T14:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you for highlighting the lack of a reference, I've added one now. Although the rollback didn't remove the unreferenced information from the article (I didn't add it), it moved it back to its previous position under a different heading. I think a citation needed tag would have been more useful as the pages concerning the 2017 Scottish local elections are still being written and edited into their final forms. — MouldyFox (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-20T14:28:00.000Z","author":"Mouldyfox","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mouldyfox-2017-05-20T14:28:00.000Z-KGirlTrucker81-2017-05-20T14:00:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,

As I see the map in the infobox for United Kingdom local elections, 2014, the areas in grey, including the Kingdom of Scotland, the Principality of Wales and Northern Ireland are within the United Kingdom but outside the Kingdom of England. So (without calling it a reversion, since I hadn't seen the editing history), I reverted your own edit to say that the areas in grey were outside England. Am I missing something? —— Shakescene (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-11T15:32:00.000Z","author":"Shakescene","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shakescene-2017-06-11T15:32:00.000Z-UK_local_elections_2014_infobox_map_caption","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2014\u2014 Shakescene"}}-->

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hello, Mouldyfox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-01-20T19:18:00.000Z","author":"Lmmnhn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lmmnhn-2019-01-20T19:18:00.000Z-An_invitation_to_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:21:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:21:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Uni Glasgow 2017 arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-06-21T17:42:00.000Z","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-2020-06-21T17:42:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Uni_Glasgow_2017_arms.png","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple sources are (generally) required to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miscellaneous centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miscellaneous centre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 (talk) 03:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-07-10T03:02:00.000Z","author":"Zoozaz1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zoozaz1-2020-07-10T03:02:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Miscellaneous_centre_(July_10)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T02:49:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T02:49:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Mouldyfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miscellaneous centre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-06T10:03:00.000Z","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-2021-06-06T10:03:00.000Z-Concern_regarding_Draft:Miscellaneous_centre","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T00:50:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-23T00:50:00.000Z-ArbCom_2021_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->