Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-12-04T18:05:00.000Z","author":"RonBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RonBot-2018-12-04T18:05:00.000Z-File:Newton_Ennis_Morton.jpg","replies":[],"displayName":"User:RonBot"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Hoary-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"did_not_appear_constructive\"-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Hoary-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z-\"did_not_appear_constructive\""],"text":"\"did not appear constructive\"","linkableTitle":"\"did not appear constructive\""}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Hoary-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"did_not_appear_constructive\"-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Hoary-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z-\"did_not_appear_constructive\""],"text":"\"did not appear constructive\"","linkableTitle":"\"did not appear constructive\""}-->
This edit of yours puzzles me. Which edit(s) "did not appear constructive"? -- Hoary (talk) 13:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z","author":"Hoary","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hoary-2018-12-05T13:59:00.000Z-\"did_not_appear_constructive\"","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Headbomb-2019-08-07T17:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Bots_Newsletter,_August_2019-2019-08-07T17:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-Headbomb-2019-08-07T17:24:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_August_2019"],"text":"Bots Newsletter, August 2019","linkableTitle":"Bots Newsletter, August 2019"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Headbomb-2019-08-07T17:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Bots_Newsletter,_August_2019-2019-08-07T17:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-Headbomb-2019-08-07T17:24:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_August_2019"],"text":"Bots Newsletter, August 2019","linkableTitle":"Bots Newsletter, August 2019"}-->
Bots Newsletter, August 2019
Greetings!
Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.
BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.
We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.
Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:18:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:18:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-DPL_bot-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_28-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-DPL_bot-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_28"],"text":"Disambiguation link notification for May 28","linkableTitle":"Disambiguation link notification for May 28"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-DPL_bot-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_28-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-DPL_bot-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_28"],"text":"Disambiguation link notification for May 28","linkableTitle":"Disambiguation link notification for May 28"}-->
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simone Niggli-Luder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burgdorf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2020-05-28T08:35:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_28","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Koavf-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-File:Rick_and_Morty_Pilot.jpg_listed_for_discussion-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Koavf-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z-File:Rick_and_Morty_Pilot.jpg_listed_for_discussion"],"text":"File:Rick and Morty Pilot.jpg listed for discussion","linkableTitle":"File:Rick and Morty Pilot.jpg listed for discussion"}-->
File:Rick and Morty Pilot.jpg listed for discussion
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Koavf-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-File:Rick_and_Morty_Pilot.jpg_listed_for_discussion-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Koavf-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z-File:Rick_and_Morty_Pilot.jpg_listed_for_discussion"],"text":"File:Rick and Morty Pilot.jpg listed for discussion","linkableTitle":"File:Rick and Morty Pilot.jpg listed for discussion"}-->
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rick and Morty Pilot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯08:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z","author":"Koavf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Koavf-2020-05-30T08:15:00.000Z-File:Rick_and_Morty_Pilot.jpg_listed_for_discussion","replies":[],"displayName":"Justin (koavf)"}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T02:44:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T02:44:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JPxG-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Bots_Newsletter,_December_2021-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-JPxG-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_December_2021"],"text":"Bots Newsletter, December 2021","linkableTitle":"Bots Newsletter, December 2021"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JPxG-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Bots_Newsletter,_December_2021-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-JPxG-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_December_2021"],"text":"Bots Newsletter, December 2021","linkableTitle":"Bots Newsletter, December 2021"}-->
Bots Newsletter, December 2021
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
BRFA activity by month
Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.
Our last issue was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.
Overall
Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFAs. Of these, Y 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful (N2 3 denied, ? 3 withdrawn, and 2 expired).
TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput: Beeblebroxnoted that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Wikipedia", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot [...] but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
Curb Safe Charmer adopts reFill: TAnthonypointed out that reFill 2's bug reports were going unanswered; creator Zhaofeng Li had retired from Wikipedia, and a maintainer was needed. As of June 2021, Curb Safe Charmer had taken up the mantle, saying: "Not that I have all the skills needed but better me than nobody! 'Maintainer' might be too strong a term though. Volunteers welcome!"
Python 3.4 deprecation? In my PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!
Signing off... jp×g04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-2021-12-10T04:29:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_December_2021","replies":[],"displayName":"jp"}}-->
(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JPxG-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Bots_Newsletter,_January_2022-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-JPxG-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_January_2022"],"text":"Bots Newsletter, January 2022","linkableTitle":"Bots Newsletter, January 2022"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JPxG-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Bots_Newsletter,_January_2022-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-JPxG-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_January_2022"],"text":"Bots Newsletter, January 2022","linkableTitle":"Bots Newsletter, January 2022"}-->
Bots Newsletter, January 2022
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
BRFA activity by month
Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.
After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.
Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.
Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these, Y 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with N2 8 denied, ? 2 withdrawn, and 2 expired).
January 2020
Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.
A new Pywikibot release dropped support for Python 3.4, and it was expected that support for Python 2.7 would be removed in coming updates. Toolforge itself planned to drop Python 2 support in 2022.
On February 1, some concerns were raised about ListeriaBot performing "nonsense" edits. Semi-active operator Magnus Manske (who originally coded the Phase II software|precursor of MediaWiki) was pinged. Meanwhile, the bot was temporarily blocked for several hours until the issue was diagnosed and resolved.
In March, a long discussion was started at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy by Skdb about the troubling trend of bots "expiring" without explanation after their owners became inactive. This can happen for a variety of reasons -- API changes break code, hosting providers' software updates break code, hosting accounts lapse, software changes make bots' edits unnecessary, and policy changes make bots' edits unwanted. The most promising solution seemed to be Toolforge hosting (although it has some problems of its own, like the occasional necessity of refactoring code).
A discussion on the bot noticeboard, "Re-examination of ListeriaBot", was started by Barkeep49, who pointed out repeated operation outside the scope of its BRFA (i.e. editing pages in mainspace, and adding non-free images to others). Some said it was doing good work, and others said it was operating beyond its remit. It was blocked on April 10; the next day it was unblocked, reblocked from article space, reblocked "for specified non-editing actions", unblocked, and indeffed. The next week, several safeguards were implemented in its code by Magnus; the bot was allowed to roam free once more on April 18.
Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Wikipedia. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Wikipedia could also be acceptable [...] External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.
MajavahBot 3, an impressively meta bot task, was approved this month for maintaining a list of bots running on the English Wikipedia. The page, located at User:MajavahBot/Bot status report, is updated every 24 hours; it contains a list of all accounts with the bot flag, as well as their operator, edit count, last activity date, last edit date, last logged action date, user groups and block status.
In July 2017, Headbomb made a proposal that a section of the Wikipedia:Dashboard be devoted to bots and technical issues. In November 2019, Lua code was written superseding Legobot's tasks on that page, and operator Legoktm was asked to stop them so that the new code could be deployed. After no response to pings, a partial-block of Legobot for the dashboard was proposed. Some months later, on June 16, Headbomb said: "A full block serves nothing. A partial block solves all current issues [...] Just fucking do it. It's been 3 years now." The next day, however, Legoktm disabled the task, and the dashboard was successfully refactored.
On June 7, RexxS blocked Citation bot for disruptive editing, saying it was "still removing links after request to stop". A couple weeks later, a discussion on the bots noticeboard was opened, saying "it is a widely-used and useful bot, but it has one of the longest block logs for any recently-operating bot on Wikipedia". While its last BRFA approval was in 2011, its code and functionality had changed dramatically since then, and AntiCompositeNumber requested that BAG require a new BRFA. Maintainer AManWithNoPlan responded that most blocks were from years ago (when it lacked a proper test suite), and problems since then had mostly been one-off errors (like a June 2019 incident in which a LTA had "weaponized" the bot to harass editors).
David Tornheim opened a discussion about whether bots based on closed-source code should be permitted, and proposed that they not. He cited a recent case in which a maintainer had said "I can only suppose that the code that is available on GitHub is not the actual code that was running on [the bot]". Some disagreed: Naypta said that "I like free software as much as the next person, and I strongly believe that bot operators should make their bot code public, but I don't think it should be that they must do so".
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!
Signing off... jp×g23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-2022-01-31T23:22:00.000Z-Bots_Newsletter,_January_2022","replies":[],"displayName":"jp"}}-->
(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Frietjes-20230109165900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Veliko_Tarnovo_University-20230109165900","replies":["c-Frietjes-20230109165900-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Veliko_Tarnovo_University"],"text":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Veliko Tarnovo University","linkableTitle":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Veliko Tarnovo University"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Frietjes-20230109165900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Veliko_Tarnovo_University-20230109165900","replies":["c-Frietjes-20230109165900-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Veliko_Tarnovo_University"],"text":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Veliko Tarnovo University","linkableTitle":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Veliko Tarnovo University"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SDZeroBot-20230222010100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Nomination_of_The_Glacier_Trust_for_deletion-20230222010100","replies":["c-SDZeroBot-20230222010100-Nomination_of_The_Glacier_Trust_for_deletion"],"text":"Nomination of The Glacier Trust for deletion","linkableTitle":"Nomination of The Glacier Trust for deletion"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SDZeroBot-20230222010100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Nomination_of_The_Glacier_Trust_for_deletion-20230222010100","replies":["c-SDZeroBot-20230222010100-Nomination_of_The_Glacier_Trust_for_deletion"],"text":"Nomination of The Glacier Trust for deletion","linkableTitle":"Nomination of The Glacier Trust for deletion"}-->
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Glacier Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230222010100","author":"SDZeroBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SDZeroBot-20230222010100-Nomination_of_The_Glacier_Trust_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-B-bot-20230304034300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:The_Glacier_Trust_Logo_1.png-20230304034300","replies":["c-B-bot-20230304034300-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:The_Glacier_Trust_Logo_1.png"],"text":"Orphaned non-free image File:The Glacier Trust Logo 1.png","linkableTitle":"Orphaned non-free image File:The Glacier Trust Logo 1.png"}-->
Orphaned non-free image File:The Glacier Trust Logo 1.png
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-B-bot-20230304034300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:The_Glacier_Trust_Logo_1.png-20230304034300","replies":["c-B-bot-20230304034300-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:The_Glacier_Trust_Logo_1.png"],"text":"Orphaned non-free image File:The Glacier Trust Logo 1.png","linkableTitle":"Orphaned non-free image File:The Glacier Trust Logo 1.png"}-->
Thanks for uploading File:The Glacier Trust Logo 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230304034300","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-20230304034300-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:The_Glacier_Trust_Logo_1.png","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Utopes-20240120013200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Career_Day_(That_'70s_Show_Episode\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-20240120013200","replies":["c-Utopes-20240120013200-\"Career_Day_(That_'70s_Show_Episode\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"\"Career Day (That '70s Show Episode\" listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"\"Career Day (That '70s Show Episode\" listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Utopes-20240120013200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Career_Day_(That_'70s_Show_Episode\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-20240120013200","replies":["c-Utopes-20240120013200-\"Career_Day_(That_'70s_Show_Episode\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"\"Career Day (That '70s Show Episode\" listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"\"Career Day (That '70s Show Episode\" listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->