Hi, it's good to see the wine rating article appear. In my opinion that's a much-needed topic. Until you included that reference to Robert Parker's wine rating methodology, I had no idea how he rated wine.

If you can find sources for other methodologies, it would be good to describe each one briefly in the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-14T19:46:00.000Z","author":"Amatulic","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Amatulic-2010-01-14T19:46:00.000Z-Wine_rating_methodologies","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-01-14T19:57:00.000Z-Amatulic-2010-01-14T19:46:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Amatuli\u0107"}}-->

I'm glad the article is useful, but I've actually only patrolled the article and moved it from the plural title to the singluar title; the actual author is DalekAGB (talk · contribs)- as he/she is a new user, I'm sure he'll be happy to receive constructive criticism. Liqudluck✽talk 19:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-14T19:57:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-01-14T19:57:00.000Z-Amatulic-2010-01-14T19:46:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Liqudluck"}}-->

DEAR LIQUIDLUCK, I NEED YOU TO TAKE THIS REFERECENCE, WHICH HAS AN IMAGE(http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B000LPS3TE/sr=8-12/qid=1263584508/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=229816&s=music&qid=1263584508&sr=8-12} AND MAKE IT AS THE COVER FOR THE CHEETAH GIRLS SONG "The Party's Just Begun". PLEASE DO THIS. KWW WOULDN'T DO IT FOR ME. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE IMAGES ON WIKIPEDIA. FROM DBUNKLEY6 talk.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-16T01:45:00.000Z","author":"SuggestBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuggestBot-2010-01-16T01:45:00.000Z-Articles_you_might_like_to_edit,_from_SuggestBot","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for sorting out that title for Peter Evans. I certainly hadn't intended to create two articles. It was my first attempt at creating an article and I got into a bit of trouble with the template. No idea why. HiLo48 (talk) 06:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-16T06:19:00.000Z","author":"HiLo48","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HiLo48-2010-01-16T06:19:00.000Z-Peter_Evans","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the input. I've changed a few things around on the entry, and hope it's now more suitable as an encyclopedia entry. If you get a chance, can you check it out again and see if there is anything else needing to be changes? Thanks. Emb92 (talk) 22:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-18T22:16:00.000Z","author":"Emb92","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Emb92-2010-01-18T22:16:00.000Z-Chrnoicles_of_the_Nerds","replies":[]}}-->

Well, since they are somewhat new, all of the sources that I listed were really the only ones available. But, can it remain a user page until more credible sources become available? I'm sure this will happen before long. Emb92 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-18T23:50:00.000Z","author":"Emb92","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Emb92-2010-01-18T23:50:00.000Z-Chrnoicles_of_the_Nerds","replies":[]}}-->

Hey Liquidluck, I randomly noticed that you're missing an i in "Liquid" in your signature! : D – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_talk 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-19T00:35:00.000Z","author":"Keraunoscopia","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Keraunoscopia-2010-01-19T00:35:00.000Z-Your_Signature","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-01-19T00:50:00.000Z-Keraunoscopia-2010-01-19T00:35:00.000Z"]}}-->

LOL, that's embarrassing. I've fixed it now, thanks! Liquidluck✽talk 00:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-19T00:50:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-01-19T00:50:00.000Z-Keraunoscopia-2010-01-19T00:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Keraunoscopia-2010-01-19T02:38:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-01-19T00:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

My first star! Thanks a lot, Liquidluck! Your "underlined" i didn't go unnoticed ; ) – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_talk 02:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-19T02:38:00.000Z","author":"Keraunoscopia","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Keraunoscopia-2010-01-19T02:38:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-01-19T00:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

DEAR LIQUIDLUCK. ON FRIDAY (JANUARY 15, 2010) I ASKED YOU TO TAKE THE FAVOR THAT I SEND TO YOU ON THAT DAY. MY FAVOR WAS NEVER DONE AND YOU YOU NEVER RESPONED. PLEASE GO TO YOUR TALK SECTION WITH THE TITLE THE PARTY'S JUST BEGUN. THERE, YOU'LL FIND THAT I ASKED YOU TAKE THE PICTURE FROM THE REFERENCE AND TURN IT INTO THE COVER FOR THE CHEETAH GIRLS SONG "The Party's Just Begun". PLEASE DO THIS FAVOR FO ME. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO UPLOAD A PICTURE FILE. FROM Dbunkley6...talk

Quick question on citing my sources. If there is an article in which I know information from personal experience, or by contact with individuals being represented by the article, how would I go by editing these topics without my information being quickly removed for lack of citation. Keep in mind the information source is myself and there is no previous documentation. Thank you. Antony11031989 (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-21T07:09:00.000Z","author":"Antony11031989","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Antony11031989-2010-01-21T07:09:00.000Z-Citing_Sources","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for the information and your quick response.Antony11031989 (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-22T06:42:00.000Z","author":"Antony11031989","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Antony11031989-2010-01-22T06:42:00.000Z-RE:_Citing_Sources","replies":[]}}-->

Hey Liquid! I'm doing the article for Sounds of the Season: The Taylor Swift Holiday Collection and I desperately need the personnel for the EP. I can't seem to find it or any digital booklet to download on the Internet. Same thing for Beautiful Eyes. Got any clue?? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 06:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-23T06:22:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-23T06:22:00.000Z-Sounds_of_the_Season","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:04:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-23T06:22:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:17:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-23T06:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

O.K. Thanks -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-25T22:04:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:04:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-23T06:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I think that "Crazier" is still open. I have not seen anything for "7 Things". I saw "Butterfly Fly Away" but had not got around to doing the review. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-25T22:17:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:17:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-23T06:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:23:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yeah... I have it almost finished. I'm missing like one comment which we're discussing. I'll wrap it up in a few minutes. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-25T22:23:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:23:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:37:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

I just looked and You'll Always has a review started. I'll do that. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-25T22:37:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:37:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-01-25T22:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Extremely sorry, got hold up. Will do it today for sure. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-25T04:01:00.000Z","author":"Legolas2186","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Legolas2186-2010-01-25T04:01:00.000Z-7_things_GAN","replies":[],"displayName":"--Legolas"}}-->

The New York times article talks about what is "assumed" to have happened. Due to confidentiality and employee rights, the Lab refused to make any public statements confirming or denying the rumor. Leaves a whole lots of ambiguity for the person attacked, but that is what it is. I am not personally involved with NIF in any way! I just want to have this good person's name cleared up and reading it here in wikipedia seems unfair when there is no way to refute the claim. the references to the GAO report are not complete and Campbell's rebuttal to the claim is not stated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsure (talk • contribs) 20:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-25T20:17:00.000Z","author":"Bsure","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bsure-2010-01-25T20:17:00.000Z-National_Ignition_Facility","replies":[]}}-->

It's been about a month since we worked on an article together. I'm currently working on Taylor Swift's debut album on User:Ipodnano05/Sandbox4. Wanna join? Of course, if your not busy. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-31T19:50:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-01-31T19:50:00.000Z-New_Article","replies":[]}}-->

Replied at the GA page. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-01T05:26:00.000Z","author":"Legolas2186","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Legolas2186-2010-02-01T05:26:00.000Z-7_Things_again","replies":[],"displayName":"--Legolas"}}-->

I am not sure if you are watching her talk or not, but I replied.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-01T07:31:00.000Z","author":"TonyTheTiger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyTheTiger-2010-02-01T07:31:00.000Z-Jessica_Alba_archives","replies":[]}}-->

I logged on today and noticed many articles created for non-notable songs and others which just cannot warrant an article. We should nominate them for deletion. I don't know how to, though. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-04T22:23:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-04T22:23:00.000Z-New_Miley_Cyrus_articles","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-06T04:42:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-04T22:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm concerned about "Dream", "Wake Up America", and "I Thought I Lost You". -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 04:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-06T04:42:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-06T04:42:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-04T22:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-07T05:41:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-06T04:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

CAn you take care of the music and lyrics section of Taylor Swift. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-07T05:41:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-07T05:41:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-06T04:42:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, I only just started the article. It's coming along, all this stuff will be added, with lots more printed sources, but I accidentally pressed the save button too early.

She was a contemporary dancer/expressionist.

Best LebendeGestalt (talk) 22:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-06T22:47:00.000Z","author":"LebendeGestalt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LebendeGestalt-2010-02-06T22:47:00.000Z-Lilian_Harmel","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I think you may be interested in joining the discussion HERE. Thank You.—Iknow23 (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-08T11:04:00.000Z","author":"Iknow23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Iknow23-2010-02-08T11:04:00.000Z-Please_add_your_input_at_Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#Singles_release_date_i","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Liquidluck. You have new messages at Ipodnano05's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I proposed the project we've been talking about for so long at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Miley Cyrus. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-15T20:07:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-15T20:07:00.000Z-Miley_Cyrus_WikiProject","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, whats your source for the "When I Look at You" single cover? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z-When_I_Look_at_You","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","c-Liquidluck-2010-02-21T06:37:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","c-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:00:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","c-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:48:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z"]}}-->

How funny, I was just about to leave you a message about the TS album (I'm working on it right now). We discussed the cover a bit on Talk:When I Look at You. I found the flat image here on the website for the radio station KDND. I also figured out where the other cover came from- some jerk is calling himself "Miles Cyrus" and uploading fake instrumental versions of Miley Cyrus songs to iTunes to trick people into buying his songs. He created that cover for one of his instrumental versions.Liquidluck✽talk 22:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:16:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

O.K. But there is one things that looks kind of weird and that is why does it say coming to theaters on April 2 when it comes out on March 31? But it's definitely reliable. Also, what about the Taylor Swift album? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T22:16:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:16:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Did that person hack into iTunes or something? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:36:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:41:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:45:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

It was probably printed before the date change. There's also a new poster I want to switch to (no real reason other than me liking it more), but I figured it was pointless until they print one with the right date.

I don't think he hacked, he just set up under "Miles Cyrus" and since that's only one letter off of Miley a lot of people bought his by accident. He uses the same song names, so it is hard to tell on iTunes. It must have been illegal though, since both Amazon and iTunes took all of his off (but you can still see the stuff on Amazon in the Google cache.) Liquidluck✽talk 22:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T22:36:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-20T22:36:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Haha O.K. What were you going to tell me about the Taylor Swift album?? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T22:41:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:41:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Do you think we should remove the release history from album too? I was going to but WP:ALBUM still has it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-20T22:45:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:45:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T22:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I don't know about release history. I've never found it useful (who ever went, "I wonder what day this album was released in New Zealand?" ?!) but I guess if MOS has it, we should have it. About the album, I think we should restructure the article. Part of the reason I'm having trouble with the lyrics and music section is that the lyrics are all directly connected to the development, because the lyrics describe her own experience and the experience is what caused her to write the lyrics.

I think we should combine most of development with lyrics for an "Inspirations and writing" section (or "Writing" or "Songs" or some other name). "Music and lyrics" would be just "Music", would say why she wanted to do country, how many ballads there are, instrumentation, etc. If you're not on, I might just go ahead and do it before I go to sleep- it can be undone later if needed. Liquidluck✽talk 06:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-21T06:37:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-21T06:37:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-21T17:26:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-21T06:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

I don't know about that. I think we should just discuss lyrics in the way they are are structured. Like how she says "Drew does this" and "Drew does that". Plus in the development, there's nothing on lyrics, except maybe a little on "Tim McGraw" and "Teardrops on My Guitar" but it doesn't live up to what could be discussed with the lyrics. In lyrics, we use critics and in development we basically write how and why they wrote a song. Does that seem O.K.? And for release history I've been looking and a lot of albums in FA and GA like Thriller (album), Tragic Kingdom, and Confessions on a Dance Floor don't have release histories. So I'm removing it from HMTM and this album. Also, we need the album to put the studios it was recorded in. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 17:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-21T17:26:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-21T17:26:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-21T06:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-21T17:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

Assuming that everyone before me turns in the CD on time, I should get it in three weeks. Three weeks is a long time and I doubt everyone'll be on time, so can you check if your library has it? Also, how should we incorporate the songs on the extended version?

The problem with using critics' interpretations in the music/lyrics section like we do in song composition sections is that since it's the debut of an underestimated teen country singer, there aren't a lot of in depth reviews that actually discuss lyrics. I'll keep working on it as it is, though, and if I still feel iffy about it later I'll make a mock-up what I'm thinking about and we can discuss it.

I've finished Back to Tennessee's review (the last one needed for the GT), so I think we should halt work on the other articles and get The Climb up to standard again (maybe McElderry's even finished and we can nom for FA!), since that'll probably be an issue at GT. Liquidluck✽talk 23:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-21T17:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-22T23:25:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-22T23:27:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

Alright. I think we can give it its own article since We Are the World 25 for Haiti has its own page. But let's bring it up again and see what happens. And sorry but my library doesn't have CDs. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-22T23:25:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-22T23:25:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The songs on the deluxe, if anything is found. We can put it in a new section called "Deluxe edition". -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-22T23:27:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-22T23:27:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-22T23:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Actually, I've kind of become ambivalent on whether they should be separated or not, since I found out splitting depends on readable prose size, not regular KB, and the article is only 21 KB readable prose size. I think keeping McElderry is fine, although I agree it is notable enough for its own page. How about we develop the McElderry cover as it is on the page, and split if necessary afterward? Liquidluck✽talk 00:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-23T00:00:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:00:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

Alright, but I think we should have it before the charts and without an infobox. The infobox is one of the things that bothers me the most. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:29:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:34:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

I don't care about the infobox, but I think we should keep all the covers after the charts since the charts aren't applicable to them, and McElderry has his own charts section so it could get confusing. Liquidluck✽talk 00:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-23T00:29:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:29:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

But I think all the text should be towards the top. I think it should be as a subsection under Cover versions and then we could explain it mainly in text. That way the charts don't get confusing. Succession could be there. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-23T00:34:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:34:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I don't think I explained myself well. I never can. Here it is:

==Cover versions== <br> ===Joe McElderry version=== <br> ====Chart procession and succession====

Okay, I think that could work (though I'm sure someone'll begin a protest ;) ). Liquidluck✽talk 00:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-23T00:48:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:48:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-02-20T21:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:52:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

Haha, I know. People will revolt against even a minor change. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-23T00:52:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-02-23T00:52:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-02-23T00:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

OK, your help was awesome as I completed the page I wrote about but, it really doesn't have the feel and look of other pages on his wiki. Like, there is no album cover artwork on my page yet, which is usually found on the right side of the page. How do I add that?

And once I have edited and It's complete, how do I go back later to update the lines that say: "Take a Bow" is the fourth studio....

There is never an (edit) button there...

Thanks again!!! You have helped tremendously!

Neal Voorde9 (talk) 06:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-21T06:05:00.000Z","author":"Voorde9","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Voorde9-2010-02-21T06:05:00.000Z-Thanks_for_the_help_but...","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there. Thanks for the category correction at 5th African Movie Academy Awards. Amsaim (talk) 07:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-21T07:41:00.000Z","author":"Amsaim","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Amsaim-2010-02-21T07:41:00.000Z-Thnx","replies":[]}}-->

I have promoted the article. I can't help but feel it's hardly perfect, but I appreciate just how minor the topic is- scraping the top 100, not quite getting shortlisted for an award... I don't think it reflects badly on Wikipedia to call it a "good article". J Milburn (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-22T21:10:00.000Z","author":"J Milburn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-J_Milburn-2010-02-22T21:10:00.000Z-Talk:Butterfly_Fly_Away\/GA1","replies":[]}}-->

The first video released for You'll Always Find Your Way Back Home is the from The Miley Sessions. How is it the second video when it was released before the excerpt, which was released after the Miley Sessions video? The Miley Sessions video release: March 2009 Excerpt video release: August 2009 from Dbunkley6....talk.

Hello, Liquidluck. You have new messages at Hamtechperson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

another new message Hamtechperson 19:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-28T19:57:00.000Z","author":"Hamtechperson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hamtechperson-2010-02-28T19:57:00.000Z-Talkback","replies":[],"displayName":"Ham"}}-->

Thanks for your comments. I think you make a good point about the limited number of critical reviews presented in the article. I would appreciate it if you also examined my other criticisms of the lead, and let me know if you think I'm over-applying the rules about leads, or if I'm on the right track. I'm fairly confident about the rest of the article being acceptable, but if you feel like giving it a quick once over, I wouldn't object to that either. Again, thanks! Torchiest (talk) 00:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-05T00:40:00.000Z","author":"Torchiest","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Torchiest-2010-03-05T00:40:00.000Z-Right_Round_GA_review","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks, for your help on my article. I moved it to the "live" section.

Kyman1959 (talk) 21:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC

Kyman1959 (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-06T02:38:00.000Z","author":"Kyman1959","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kyman1959-2010-03-06T02:38:00.000Z-Hurricane_Hall","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, I really want for the album to be finished soon. Can you please hurry? Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z-Taylor_Swift","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:45:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:55:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:59:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T20:33:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry to bother. I see took out the underconstruction template out. Does that mean you are done? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-13T18:45:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:45:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-03-13T18:51:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

Oh, no bother. Yes, I think I'm done; Since it was the debut of an underestimated country singer there isn't a lot of reviews discussing the songs/lyrics. According to a recent FAC, musicnotes can't be cited for instrumentation so I didn't use it but I think I've hit everything else. Do you think there's info missing? liquidluck✽talk 18:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-13T18:51:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-03-13T18:51:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:45:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

O.K. The only that doesn't click to me is the development section now. Maybe we should should merge both sections into "Development and music". -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-13T18:55:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:55:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Also, on the link dump section you have a link and I'm not exactly sure what you want to do with it. And for "7 Things" and "The Climb" and "Party in the U.S.A.", we need to add Year-end charts. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-13T18:59:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T18:59:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I've added Year-end charts for "7 Things" and "The Climb". We'll add for "See You Again" and "Party in the U.S.A." when we do the articles. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-13T20:33:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T20:33:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-07T18:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T21:07:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T20:33:00.000Z"]}}-->

I divided the information into two sections: "Themes and inspiration" and "Development and music". Quite frankly, there is probably too much detail for some songs like "Tim McGraw", "Picture to Burn", and "Our Song". If you could lower the amount of detail to two or three sentences at most per song. Its a little too specific for an album article and if they are singles then we could add all of that to the actual song article. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-13T21:07:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T21:07:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T20:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-15T05:54:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T21:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Never mind that. If anyone in GA or FA says it's too long, we'll reduce it then. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-15T05:54:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-15T05:54:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-13T21:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you Liquidluck for your response. Maulana Karenga is not Dr. Karenga's birth name; it is his legal name and the name he has used exclusively for decades. As a matter of fact, all his literature, his many books and articles since 1979, have only used "Maulana Karenga" as his name. Also, in all his public and media appearances, he was and is always known and presented as "Maulana Karenga". You would have to go further back in history to find "Ron" used to identify Dr. Karenga, for again, for over three decades he has exclusively used "Maulana Karenga". In fact, it is the current page name that introduced his former name, "Ron", as the name that people should know him by rather than accepting his real, exclusive and most commonly used name "Maulana Karenga as the evidence indicates. And just as a note, even in the 60's, his full name was "Maulana Ron Karenga". So that "Maulana" has always been a part of his name and those who knew him, knew that, and it was also how he introduced himself and was advertised. Therefore, if we accept the standard of the most common name and base it on the evidence, then it's clear that "Maulana Karenga" should be the title of the page.

Ginadumas (talk) 04:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-10T04:35:00.000Z","author":"Ginadumas","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ginadumas-2010-03-10T04:35:00.000Z-Page_Name_Change_-_Maulana_Karenga","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Georginasparks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-14T19:42:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2010-03-14T19:42:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Georginasparks.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-15T20:03:00.000Z","author":"SuggestBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuggestBot-2010-03-15T20:03:00.000Z-Articles_you_might_like_to_edit,_from_SuggestBot_2","replies":[]}}-->

Just an fyi for you. During the discussion on filmography tables on WT:ACTOR, I copied your comments on the table heading from Talk:Miley Cyrus where you endorsed the color filmography table heading here. I thought it would helpful for you to know that Jack Merridew responded by saying that the IP I mentioned was blocked for personal attacks (which has since expired) and dismissed your valid comment as meatpuppetry, saying "The others you quote were set-up by the troll." If you care to respond, the comment is there. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-18T01:38:00.000Z","author":"Wildhartlivie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Wildhartlivie-2010-03-18T01:38:00.000Z-FYI","replies":["c-Jack_Merridew-2010-03-18T01:55:00.000Z-Wildhartlivie-2010-03-18T01:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

I consider the above to be canvassing and a bad faith mischaracterization of what I said; I in no way implied that you were a meatpupet, only that the troll-IP misled you; i.e. that the troll was engaging in improper behavior. Cheers, Jack Merridew 01:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-18T01:55:00.000Z","author":"Jack Merridew","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jack_Merridew-2010-03-18T01:55:00.000Z-Wildhartlivie-2010-03-18T01:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, I am having troubles finding reviews for "Composition" and "Critical reception" and was wonder if you find some please leave the links on User:Ipodnano05/Sandbox. Thank you so much. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-18T23:40:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-18T23:40:00.000Z-You_Belong_with_Me","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-03-20T02:24:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-18T23:40:00.000Z"]}}-->

Honestly, how many awards does one have to win before a reviewer will write a complete review? Searching ;). liquidluck✽talk 02:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-20T02:24:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-03-20T02:24:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-18T23:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-30T21:52:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-03-20T02:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

I know, it's really dumb. Actually, I found what I needed for "Critical reception" but barely anything for "Composition". Especially, nothing concerning music or instrumentation. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-30T21:52:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-30T21:52:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-03-20T02:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

you cover national news leaving national nothing to cover. im one who do not live on the net, you short talk a subject then say go to .com for the story . i watch the news when cooking, i hope to hear the complt story, not head lines. at 5.30 pm national news comes on to cover national news your station has all ready coverd, so sad.roger trevion columbus ky. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.63.93.218 (talk) 14:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-23T14:43:00.000Z","author":"67.63.93.218","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-67.63.93.218-2010-03-23T14:43:00.000Z-kfvs_should_cover_local_news,_not_national_news_._on_the_cw_same_old_news._yuck!","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-03-25T01:29:00.000Z-67.63.93.218-2010-03-23T14:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hello. I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our roughly three million articles, and thought that we were directly affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is a user talk page used to contact a single Wikipedia user (namely, me). Thus, we have no inside track on the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the left hand side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. liquidluck✽talk 01:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-25T01:29:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-03-25T01:29:00.000Z-67.63.93.218-2010-03-23T14:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Liquidluck! I have posted a photo I took of Adam Barnett and Melissa Ordway talking to the media at the World Premiere of the last Song. It's called "Adam Barnett and Melissa Ordway Speak to the media at The Last Song World Premiere.JPG" Hope you can use it. Fluxions1643 (talk) 09:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-27T09:45:00.000Z","author":"Fluxions1643","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fluxions1643-2010-03-27T09:45:00.000Z-Last_Song_World_Premier_Photo","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, I think we have enough supporters for a Miley Cyrus WikiProject. I have no idea how to do any of this. Have you seen any guidelines? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:06, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-30T19:06:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-03-30T19:06:00.000Z-Miley_Cyrus_WikiProject_2","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-03T17:25:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-30T19:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Guide/WikiProject#Create_a_project_page. liquidluck✽talk 17:25, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-03T17:25:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-03T17:25:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-03-30T19:06:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Taylor Swift songs. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taylor Swift songs. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-02T01:12:00.000Z","author":"Erwin85Bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Erwin85Bot-2010-04-02T01:12:00.000Z-AfD_nomination_of_List_of_Taylor_Swift_songs","replies":[]}}-->

The primary function of both a man and a woman is to protect a child; all other aspects are cultural.

Source? Viriditas (talk) 02:18, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-03T02:18:00.000Z","author":"Viriditas","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Viriditas-2010-04-03T02:18:00.000Z-Re:_Women","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-03T03:26:00.000Z-Viriditas-2010-04-03T02:18:00.000Z","c-Liquidluck-2010-04-04T17:29:00.000Z-Viriditas-2010-04-03T02:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've replied on the talk page, but I'm referring to the biological purpose of humans and all animals- to pass on their genes in order to perpetuate the species. liquidluck✽talk 03:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-03T03:26:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-03T03:26:00.000Z-Viriditas-2010-04-03T02:18:00.000Z","replies":["c-Viriditas-2010-04-03T10:12:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-03T03:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

Perpetuate which species and why? What's the point? 10% of your dry weight is composed of microbes, including 90 percent of your cells - 100 trillion microbes. They even carry more genes than you do. Have you considered that human beings are only a substrate for the survival of microbial life, which in planetary terms, equals the entire biomass of the animal kingdom? Are you an individual perpetuating a single human being or a bacterial colony that inhabits your body? Viriditas (talk) 10:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-03T10:12:00.000Z","author":"Viriditas","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Viriditas-2010-04-03T10:12:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-03T03:26:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

No, I confess I haven't thought of it that way. Interesting idea. liquidluck✽talk 17:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-04T17:29:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-04T17:29:00.000Z-Viriditas-2010-04-03T02:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. Thankyou for making the time to review the article. I've gone through all the points you made on improving the article. Most were easy to correct. One issue with the character not attending university I adressed over at Talk:Loretta Jones/GA1, but I thought I'd come straight to you to tell you to get explain a little more. Also the reception section, I've added it, it's actually quite limited to discussing the character's appearance and status as a blonde bombshell as the media have dubbed her, any serious deep analysis of the character is pretty much non-existant to be honest, as Hollyoaks is often considered the lesser of the five British Soap Operas.. so it rarely gets much in terms of big news outlets repeatdly talking about it, the characters being discussed is even more rare. So I did what I could for that point. I did however notice some new sources crop up on a google search, so I added some more characterisation points to a quote box, added a few more lines to the child murder section, updated the lead a little. The issue with you not understanding why Dom had the issue with Loretta being a dancer was my fault as I did not explain it enough, I've included now how she lied to him twice about quiiting the job. Look foward to hearing your views. Hopefully I've done enough. Then it's just the prose and grammar.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 04:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-03T04:04:00.000Z","author":"Raintheone","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Raintheone-2010-04-03T04:04:00.000Z-Loretta_Jones_GAN","replies":[],"displayName":"RAIN the ONE"}}-->

Thanks for your review of Lecture Circuit. I've responded to your comments. Much appreciated! — Hunter Kahn 02:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-04T02:03:00.000Z","author":"Hunter Kahn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hunter_Kahn-2010-04-04T02:03:00.000Z-Lecture_Circuit","replies":[],"displayName":"Hun"}}-->

Hey, don't mean to bother you or anything but, I was just wondering if you could upload an audio sample of the song "Speed Demon" for Speed Demon (song); the lack of a audio sample is the only thing holding the song back from passing it's GA review. Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 23:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-04T23:52:00.000Z","author":"Crystal Clear x3","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Crystal_Clear_x3-2010-04-04T23:52:00.000Z-Can_you_upload_an_audio_sample_for_Speed_Demon_(song)?","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-05T00:16:00.000Z-Crystal_Clear_x3-2010-04-04T23:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm sorry, I don't own the song. User:TehRandomPerson used to add song samples for me and Ipodnano05, but he hasn't edited in 2 months. Try asking User:Pyrrhus16 (he/she often writes about Michael Jackson) or request a sample at Talk:Michael Jackson- someone there might own the song. Still, samples (like images) aren't required for GA, so don't worry about it if you can't find a sample. liquidluck✽talk 00:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-05T00:16:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-05T00:16:00.000Z-Crystal_Clear_x3-2010-04-04T23:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Crystal_Clear_x3-2010-04-05T00:35:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-05T00:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for responding to my message; I've prior to this asked Pyrrhus16 if they could upload an audio sample but they're computer speakers do not work and no one usually responds to messages at the MJ WikiProject talk page. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 00:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-05T00:35:00.000Z","author":"Crystal Clear x3","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Crystal_Clear_x3-2010-04-05T00:35:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-05T00:16:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Liquidluck. You have new messages at Ipodnano05's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for the review. I've responded to your comments. Cheers, The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 18:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-08T18:51:00.000Z","author":"SuperFlash101","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuperFlash101-2010-04-08T18:51:00.000Z-Judaism_in_Rugrats","replies":["c-SuperFlash101-2010-04-09T00:30:00.000Z-SuperFlash101-2010-04-08T18:51:00.000Z"],"displayName":"The Flash"}}-->

And last bit done! :D The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 00:30, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-09T00:30:00.000Z","author":"SuperFlash101","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-SuperFlash101-2010-04-09T00:30:00.000Z-SuperFlash101-2010-04-08T18:51:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"The Flash"}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Kissin U sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-11T00:36:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2010-04-11T00:36:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Kissin_U_sample.ogg","replies":[]}}-->

For right now, we will stick with Texas. Aceshowbiz.com says that she is born in Texas. People.com as well. Let's keep it at Texas for now, until we find further information.(Movieguruman (talk) 04:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-11T04:07:00.000Z","author":"Movieguruman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Movieguruman-2010-04-11T04:07:00.000Z-Selena_Gomez","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-11T04:43:00.000Z-Movieguruman-2010-04-11T04:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

I don't mean to be rude, but Aceshowbiz and IMDB are considered unreliable (Aceshowbiz has been off and on the WP:BLACKLIST and IMDB is very often wrong (facts from Wikipedia sometimes show up on it and WP:RSN generally rules against it, especially for BLPs and bios (some examples are here, here, and here. I tried for recent examples.). I'd say US Weekly has the same amount of credibility as People, and the MTV one was hosting the Allmusic bio- which I believe is more credible than any of the other sites. Since she moved to Texas soon after she was born, it would be very easy for People to be mistaken. I'm going to move the discussion to the talk page so that more people have access to it. liquidluck✽talk 04:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-11T04:43:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-11T04:43:00.000Z-Movieguruman-2010-04-11T04:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the help in reverting vandalism on my user page! Mcrfobrockr (talk) 01:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-14T01:54:00.000Z","author":"Mcrfobrockr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mcrfobrockr-2010-04-14T01:54:00.000Z-Thanks!!","replies":["c-Nmajdan-2010-04-14T12:05:00.000Z-Mcrfobrockr-2010-04-14T01:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

Same here. Thanks. It most assuredly was not me while logged out.—NMajdan•talk 12:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-14T12:05:00.000Z","author":"Nmajdan","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Nmajdan-2010-04-14T12:05:00.000Z-Mcrfobrockr-2010-04-14T01:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-15T00:07:00.000Z-Nmajdan-2010-04-14T12:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm glad I was helpful! liquidluck✽talk 00:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-15T00:07:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-15T00:07:00.000Z-Nmajdan-2010-04-14T12:05:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I think the one reason why their is so much confusion concerning the premieres. Is because Nickelodeon does a horrible job with their promotion "titles". Big Time Rush premiered back in November as a "sneak preview" with 3.5 million viewers, following iCarly. Then the show returned in January with Nickelodeon promoting that as its "premiere" with 6.8 million viewers. But when Nickelodeon premiered Victorious as a "sneak preview" after this year's KCA's it earned 5.7 million viewers that's obviously more than BTR "sneak preview". And even though iCarly is the highest-rated show on the network, I don't believe their ratings are big enough to exceed the KCA's. In other words, The KCA's is a bigger lead-in which is why Victorious received the ratings it received more than BTR, regardless of the shows officially premiering as "sneak previews". QuasyBoy 14:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-16T14:15:00.000Z","author":"QuasyBoy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-QuasyBoy-2010-04-16T14:15:00.000Z-Victorious_and_Big_Time_Rush_premieres","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-17T02:10:00.000Z-QuasyBoy-2010-04-16T14:15:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Quasy"}}-->

Thanks for the explanation. I've altered the viewership section to add the info you told me; does it look alright (feel free to change it if it doesn't)? liquidluck✽talk 02:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-17T02:10:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-17T02:10:00.000Z-QuasyBoy-2010-04-16T14:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-QuasyBoy-2010-04-17T14:31:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-17T02:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

I dig it. :) Thanks for understanding. QuasyBoy 14:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-17T14:31:00.000Z","author":"QuasyBoy","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-QuasyBoy-2010-04-17T14:31:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-17T02:10:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Quasy"}}-->

Hello! Your submission of Good Luck Charlie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Sorry it's taken so long to get reviewed, a severe lack of reviewers just now. Mikenorton (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-17T14:55:00.000Z","author":"Mikenorton","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mikenorton-2010-04-17T14:55:00.000Z-DYK_nomination_for_Good_Luck_Charlie","replies":[]}}-->

Sorry, but have you found anything that can help with instrumentation of "You Belong with Me". It's pretty much all I need to finish. I need to elaborate on the music part of Composition. I think the lyrics part is suitable. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-18T21:52:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-04-18T21:52:00.000Z-Sorry_but...","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-18T22:49:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-04-18T21:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

I think it looks great, you don't need a lot more. Still, here's a few links about writing/structure from Slant Magazine (1, 2). BBC doesn't have a review, which sucks since they usually have the most thorough ones. Also, here's another video review from Daily Telegraph. I haven't edited it, so tell me when you put it up for GAN and I'll review it. liquidluck✽talk 22:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-18T22:49:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-18T22:49:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-04-18T21:52:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

On April 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Good Luck Charlie, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-19T12:25:00.000Z","author":"Materialscientist","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Materialscientist-2010-04-19T12:25:00.000Z-DYK_for_Good_Luck_Charlie","replies":[]}}-->

First off, on behalf of myself and my co-coordinator Wizardman, I would like to thank you for the efforts that you have made so far in this GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a success, and that is thanks to you. See this Signpost article about what this drive has achieved so far. We're currently heading into the final week of the drive. At this time, if you have any GANs on review or on hold, you should be finishing off those reviews. Right now, we have more GANs on review or on hold than we do unreviewed. If you're going to start a GA review, please do so now so you can complete it by the end of the month and so that the nominator has a full 7-day window to address any concerns. See you at the finish!

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-22T16:19:00.000Z","author":"MuZebot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MuZebot-2010-04-22T16:19:00.000Z-GAN_backlog_elimination_drive_-_1_week_to_go","replies":[]}}-->

I believe it is Claire according to the closing credits of this Wizards episode: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVrJu1xJdsg. Just letting ya know. QuasyBoy 20:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-24T20:36:00.000Z","author":"QuasyBoy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-QuasyBoy-2010-04-24T20:36:00.000Z-Bridgit_Mendler's_middle_name","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-24T20:48:00.000Z-QuasyBoy-2010-04-24T20:36:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Quasy"}}-->

Thanks! I've added it to the article. liquidluck✽talk 20:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-24T20:48:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-24T20:48:00.000Z-QuasyBoy-2010-04-24T20:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Sorry this has taken so long; real life kept intruding. The last issues now are a few of the references. The ryanseacrest.com reference (#31) is a blog and so cannot be used in a Good Article without a special reason (fortunately it does not seem to be crucial to the article). The Star Magazine links (#11 and #22) do not work for me regardless of when or from where I try to access them. The entire website appears to be constantly down for some reason. I can see a version of the page cached at Google, however, and Star is a print magazine, so the references are fine but the links are dead. With these issues solved, the rest of the article looks fine. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 17:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-26T17:31:00.000Z","author":"AdamBMorgan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AdamBMorgan-2010-04-26T17:31:00.000Z-GA_review_of_Valley_Girls_(Gossip_Girl)","replies":[]}}-->

The article Valley Girls (Gossip Girl) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Valley Girls (Gossip Girl) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! AdamBMorgan (talk) 11:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-27T11:41:00.000Z","author":"AdamBMorgan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AdamBMorgan-2010-04-27T11:41:00.000Z-Your_GA_nomination_of_Valley_Girls_(Gossip_Girl)","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, just to let you know, I've informally (but hopefully sufficiently sternly) warned JB Ferri ‎for edit warring. I'm off to bed in a minute, but I just wanted to let you know- I suggest you take it to WP:ANEW if it continues before you stumble over the 3RR yourself. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-28T01:56:00.000Z","author":"HJ Mitchell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-04-28T01:56:00.000Z-Miley_reversions","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-04-28T02:00:00.000Z-HJ_Mitchell-2010-04-28T01:56:00.000Z"],"displayName":"HJ\u00a0Mitchell"}}-->

Thanks and good night! liquidluck✽talk 02:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-28T02:00:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-04-28T02:00:00.000Z-HJ_Mitchell-2010-04-28T01:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-04-28T02:06:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-28T02:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

No worries. Always a pleasure to help you out :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:06, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-28T02:06:00.000Z","author":"HJ Mitchell","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-04-28T02:06:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-04-28T02:00:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"HJ\u00a0Mitchell"}}-->

GAN backlog elimination drives chart up to 1 May On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, I'd like to especially thank you for your efforts over this past month's GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a complete success, which hopefully results in more expedient good article reviews, increasing users' confidence in the good article nomination processes. Even if you made just a small contribution, it still helped contribute to the success of this drive. Here is what we have accomplished this last month in this drive. 661 total nominations were reviewed. 541 of them passed (~81.8%), 97 (~14.7%) failed, and 23 (~3.5%) ended on hold. The WP:GAN page started at 110,126 bytes length on 1 April and ended at 43,387 bytes length at the end of 30 April (a 66,739 byte reduction in the page, about 60.6% less). Excluding extremes, the longest wait for someone's GAN to be review was about 11.5 weeks at the beginning. (I mistook the figure when I reported to the Signpost that it was 13.) At the end, with the exception of one that was relisted, the longest wait is now at 10 days. 63 different users participated, each having completed at least one GAN, with others also having helped out behind-the-scenes in making the drive a success. The drive started with 463 GA nominations remaining and 388 unreviewed. At the end of the month, we ended with 89 remaining (374 or about 80.8% less) and 47 unreviewed (341 or about 87.9% less). For those who have accomplished certain objectives in the drive, awards will be coming shortly. Again, thank you for your help in the drive, and I hope you continue to help review GA nominations and overall improve the quality of articles here on Wikipedia.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-01T17:44:00.000Z","author":"MuZebot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MuZebot-2010-05-01T17:44:00.000Z-Thank_you_for_your_participation_in_the_April_2010_GAN_backlog_elimination_drive","replies":[]}}-->

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

For reviewing 5 good article nominations during the April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive, I hereby present you The Working Man's Barnstar. Nice job! –MuZemike 23:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-05T23:18:00.000Z","author":"MuZemike","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MuZemike-2010-05-05T23:18:00.000Z-GAN_backlog_elimination_drive_award","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Victor Victori. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Victori. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-06T01:07:00.000Z","author":"Erwin85Bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Erwin85Bot-2010-05-06T01:07:00.000Z-AfD_nomination_of_Victor_Victori","replies":[]}}-->

You added source to the video summary for "Can't Be Tamed". Is it really needed? Because our GAs have made its statuses without them and that means adding sources for "7 Things", "The Climb", "You Belong with Me", and any other song article we are planning to take to FA. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-06T19:45:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-06T19:45:00.000Z-Sources_for_video_summary","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-05-06T19:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hi, Ipod! In this case, I think references are preferred but not necessary unless there's a quote or something potentially controversial; they really are just plot summaries. "Can't Be Tamed" needs references to support the quote and "provocative dances", but other than that I think its basically preferred. liquidluck✽talk 21:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-05-06T19:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-06T21:26:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z","c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-07T02:37:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hey!! We haven't spoken in the longest time. How are you? What have you been up to in Wikipedia? And I see your point, I was going to use the word grind to make it less controversial but did not know how to use it. It's fine the way it is now and thanks. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-06T21:26:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-06T21:26:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Sorry to bother, but can you the information from Cyrus' recent interview with MTV News. Particularly the info about the bird-inspired choreography, how the costume was pulled at the last minute, and the provocative dancing that she called free-styling. I'm asking you because I have no idea how to word it or where to place it. You don't have to format the citation or anything or any of them for that matter; that's the least I can do. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-07T02:37:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-07T02:37:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-06T21:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-05-07T02:54:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-05-07T02:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

I haven't been doing much, just random edits without any goal. Nice work on You Belong With Me! I'll work on adding the MTV stuff, but it'll probably be later tonight or tomorrow before I get to it- I'm starving right now =]. liquidluck✽talk 02:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-07T02:54:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-05-07T02:54:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-05-07T02:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-07T03:02:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-07T02:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ufff, me too (about the food thing). And thank you, I'm currently working on Breakout in User:Ipodnano05/Sandbox4. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 03:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-07T03:02:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-07T03:02:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-07T02:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Can you please join the conversation held at Talk:Hannah Montana 2/Meet Miley Cyrus#Soundtrack or studio album?. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 03:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-11T03:17:00.000Z","author":"Ipodnano05","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ipodnano05-2010-05-11T03:17:00.000Z-Can_you_please_join_the_conversation?","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-05-11T03:23:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-05-11T03:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Just posted. Thanks for the notice! liquidluck✽talk 03:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-11T03:23:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-05-11T03:23:00.000Z-Ipodnano05-2010-05-11T03:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

...I just wondered if you'd ever considered requesting admiship? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-12T05:46:00.000Z","author":"HJ Mitchell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:46:00.000Z-This_is_incredibly_random,_I_know,_but...","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-05-12T05:53:00.000Z-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:46:00.000Z"],"displayName":"HJ\u00a0Mitchell"}}-->

I've thought about it, but I don't think I'm ready yet. I also don't really have a pressing need for the tools. Maybe in a few months. liquidluck✽talk 05:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-12T05:53:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-05-12T05:53:00.000Z-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:55:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-12T05:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

Good answer. Let me know if you ever think you're ready- I'd be happy to nominate you! Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-12T05:55:00.000Z","author":"HJ Mitchell","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:55:00.000Z-Liquidluck-2010-05-12T05:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Liquidluck-2010-05-12T06:01:00.000Z-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:55:00.000Z"],"displayName":"HJ\u00a0Mitchell"}}-->

Thanks for the offer! liquidluck✽talk 06:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-05-12T06:01:00.000Z","author":"Liquidluck","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Liquidluck-2010-05-12T06:01:00.000Z-HJ_Mitchell-2010-05-12T05:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->