User talk:Jx242
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221129012700","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221129012700-ArbCom_2022_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
An article you recently created, The Georgetown Chimes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft: " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230226120200","author":"Onel5969","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Onel5969-20230226120200-The_Georgetown_Chimes_moved_to_draftspace","replies":[]}}-->
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lawrence, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lawrence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230316010100","author":"SDZeroBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SDZeroBot-20230316010100-Nomination_of_The_Lawrence_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->
In reviewing your edits to the Stewards Society page, I cannot seem to find where in the sources, this claim is properly supported:
- "A version of what the Stewards Society would become was first organized by students in the early 1800s as a component of Georgetown University's first student organization, a religious devotional society known as the Sodality of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The latter existed until 1970. In the late 1800s, alumnus John Agar, from Georgetown College's class of 1876, organized Steward alumni to buttress Georgetown University's precarious economic situation. As a result, soon after Georgetown's iconic Healy Hall was completed, its Alumni Association was founded, and an independent Board of Regents took on fund raising."
Can you please provide further details on where this info is located, I will having to cut it otherwise since I can't verify it's accuracy and I am currently preparing this article for WP:GA. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 23:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230920231800","author":"Etriusus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Etriusus-20230920231800-Stewards_Society_edits","replies":[],"displayName":"Etrius"}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231128004400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231128004400-ArbCom_2023_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stewards Society. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Next time we take it to WP:ANI 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 19:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241208191100","author":"Etriusus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Etriusus-20241208191100-December_2024","replies":["c-Etriusus-20241208192100-Etriusus-20241208191100"],"displayName":"Etrius"}}-->
- Comment: Unless you can provide the specific passage you've cited in the article's talk page, I am very skeptical in its veracity. Seeing how last time you cited a bogus article with the same thing. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 19:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241208192100","author":"Etriusus","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Etriusus-20241208192100-Etriusus-20241208191100","replies":[],"displayName":"Etrius"}}-->
|
|