The Bulletin called it "lively" with "a high standard of acting, diction, and intelligence".[6]
The Sydney Morning Herald wrote there was "some gracious acting" but added "regrets remain for the inadequate way in which everything else was presented".[7]
References
^"Television". The Canberra Times. Vol. 41, no. 11, 506. 12 October 1966. p. 25. Retrieved 23 March 2017 – via Trove, National Library of Australia.