Delete becuase there is only one article with useful information (European witchcraft) — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-05-09T01:01:00.000Z","author":"Stevey7788","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stevey7788-2005-05-09T01:01:00.000Z-Delete","replies":["c-Dbachmann-2007-07-26T08:51:00.000Z-Stevey7788-2005-05-09T01:01:00.000Z"]}}-->
What is the rationale for including Chronicles of Narnia here? It doesn't seem to me that the series deals with witchcraft in a manner that is significantly different from many other fantasy series. If it were up to me, I would include only works for which witchcraft is a central theme. I'm not sure that's the case for Narnia, certainly not to the degree of the other works listed. My concerns are that (1) the article doesn't need a navbox with mostly unrelated topics, and (2) this navbox doesn't need links to articles that don't really benefit the subject. I titled this section generically because I expected to find other works that might not belong, and even though the rest of the current list have much stronger cases for inclusion, there ought to be a line drawn somewhere in general.
Actually, now that I look at WP:NAV, I would say that most if not all of the fictional works should be removed. They're not really part of any coherent group that a reader would generally want to navigate through. A category would serve the intent far better (and the category could certainly be included in the navbox). Thoughts?
--Fru1tbat (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-02T15:06:00.000Z","author":"Fru1tbat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fru1tbat-2011-06-02T15:06:00.000Z-Criteria_for_inclusion","replies":["c-Oknazevad-2011-06-02T16:48:00.000Z-Fru1tbat-2011-06-02T15:06:00.000Z","c-Bakkster_Man-2011-06-02T17:45:00.000Z-Fru1tbat-2011-06-02T15:06:00.000Z","c-Jake_Fuersturm-2011-06-02T19:27:00.000Z-Fru1tbat-2011-06-02T15:06:00.000Z"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.147.242.19