How do we determine what is put in this template? Hyacinth 22:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-08-22T22:38:00.000Z","author":"Hyacinth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hyacinth-2007-08-22T22:38:00.000Z-Editing","replies":["c-Cosprings-2007-10-06T21:09:00.000Z-Hyacinth-2007-08-22T22:38:00.000Z"]}}-->
The result of the move request was: Moved -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-18T09:23:00.000Z","author":"Phantomsteve","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Phantomsteve-2010-03-18T09:23:00.000Z-Editing","replies":[]}}-->
Template:Music portal → Template:Music topics — "Music portal" is an unintuitive name for this template. I propose moving it to "Music topics", which is more intuitive and in line with similar templates. Waldir talk 12:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-11T12:05:00.000Z","author":"Waldir","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Waldir-2010-03-11T12:05:00.000Z-Move","replies":["c-Quiddity-2010-03-11T19:39:00.000Z-Waldir-2010-03-11T12:05:00.000Z","c-Munci-2010-03-12T18:10:00.000Z-Waldir-2010-03-11T12:05:00.000Z","c-70.29.210.242-2010-03-15T03:50:00.000Z-Waldir-2010-03-11T12:05:00.000Z"]}}-->
Does anyone think that adding every country in the world that has a Wiki music article onto this template is making it too large? Would it not be better for these articles to have a separate template all to themselves, which could be placed as desired at the bottom of any "by country" music article? The main Music template could have a link to that separate template. Some articles would have both templates at the bottom.
What do you think? Softlavender (talk) 05:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-02-09T05:45:00.000Z","author":"Softlavender","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Softlavender-2012-02-09T05:45:00.000Z-\"Music_by_country\"_getting_too_large_for_this_template?","replies":[]}}-->
Update: I have removed the overlarge by country section, and have placed it at that linked subpage for the time being. It's a good thing to have, but is so large it needs to be its own template. I tried to make a template out of it, but since I've never made a template before I was unable to. Could someone familiar with creating templates create a "Music by Country" template, and add that material to it? (A link to the template can then be placed on this main Music template.) Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-02-16T01:28:00.000Z","author":"Softlavender","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Softlavender-2012-02-16T01:28:00.000Z-\"Music_by_country\"_getting_too_large_for_this_template?","replies":["c-Michael_Bednarek-2012-02-16T04:25:00.000Z-Softlavender-2012-02-16T01:28:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thanks. Yes, I'll mark that page for deletion once it seems the conversation and consensus is complete. I do have a couple of questions for everyone though: Adding the subtemplate seems to mean that the Music navbox itself always stays collapsed on a page unless clicked. Is that what we want? How can we avoid that? Also, I'd like to revisit Moxy's point that categories should not be linked on a navbox. It does seem rather odd to have them on the navbox; also, now that we've got the "by country" subtemplate, that makes the categories redundant (because the categories are lists of music articles by country). Perhaps if we are adding the "by country" subtemplate, we should delete the categories, but leave the links to the articles on continents and regions? Softlavender (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-02-21T11:24:00.000Z","author":"Softlavender","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Softlavender-2012-02-21T11:24:00.000Z-Always_collapsed","replies":["c-Michael_Bednarek-2012-02-21T13:06:00.000Z-Softlavender-2012-02-21T11:24:00.000Z"]}}-->
uncollapsed
|state=collapsed
Please indent indent Music by Country into continent sub-brackets? --173.51.29.188 (talk) 04:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-10T04:38:00.000Z","author":"173.51.29.188","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-173.51.29.188-2014-01-10T04:38:00.000Z-Continents","replies":["c-Michael_Bednarek-2014-01-11T08:43:00.000Z-173.51.29.188-2014-01-10T04:38:00.000Z"]}}-->
The inclusion of Impressionism, makes no sense, as I said in my edit summary:
"Impressionism in music" was perhaps a 50 year "movement", not era – which both Debussy and Ravel denied even being part of. It is not significant when compared to its "counterpart" in painting and to the other Western Classical movements: Medieval (900 years), Renaissance (200 years), Baroque (~300 years), Classical (~80 years) Romantic (~110 years) etc.
Cote d'Azur insists on its inclusion and says "Impressionism in music is important" when... it is not (compared to the others on this list). I would like to see this user explain how it could stand up to the other eras here. Aza24 (talk) 09:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-08-26T09:16:00.000Z","author":"Aza24","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aza24-2020-08-26T09:16:00.000Z-Impressionism_included_in_this_template","replies":["c-Aza24-2020-08-26T09:35:00.000Z-Aza24-2020-08-26T09:16:00.000Z","c-Softlavender-2020-08-26T10:15:00.000Z-Aza24-2020-08-26T09:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.15.26.1