This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Occupation of the Falkland Islands, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
I think we already talked this before, if wee are using "Liberation" then Establishment would be "Recovery" --Jor70 (talk) 19:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-08T19:33:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-03-08T19:33:00.000Z-Terms_used","replies":["c-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T08:12:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-03-08T19:33:00.000Z"]}}-->
This page is about the Argentina administration during the Falklands war. Before the invasion, Argentina claimed the islands were part of Tierra del Fuego and governed by that administration. The direct Argentine administration of the islands was only established after the invasion. So to say "Recovery" would be incorrect. If you look at the Spanish version of the page, it does not say "Recovery". --Philip Stevens (talk) 08:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-09T08:12:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T08:12:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-03-08T19:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jor70-2010-03-09T10:46:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T08:12:00.000Z"]}}-->
If this article is really about the Argentine Administration as the infobox shows, then the article name should be "Malvinas, South GeorgiaS and the South Sandwich Islands Military governorship", you need to respect the original name. The current title reflects other story. Then, if again, we are talking about the government, was not liberation at all, would be more clearly called "FALL". And as you mention the spanish wiki, does not say liberation either--Jor70 (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-09T10:46:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-03-09T10:46:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T08:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T11:18:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-03-09T10:46:00.000Z"]}}-->
I named the article based on WP:NAME which says titles should conform to the "names and terms most commonly used in reliable sources, and so most likely to be recognised, for the topic of the article." Most English speakers refer to the Argentine rule of the islands in 1982 as the 'Occupation of the Falkland Islands'. If you disagree with this rationale, you are more than welcome to request a move to the title you suggested. I'd accept 'Fall' over 'Liberation' if it would keep the article's topic more consistent. --Philip Stevens (talk) 11:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-09T11:18:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T11:18:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-03-09T10:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jor70-2010-03-09T11:32:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T11:18:00.000Z"]}}-->
Occupation is clearly biased and reflects one side point of view, we should use something neutral such as 1982 Argentine Falklands Government. --Jor70 (talk) 11:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-09T11:32:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-03-09T11:32:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-03-09T11:18:00.000Z","replies":["c-LRT24-2011-04-08T20:54:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-03-09T11:32:00.000Z"]}}-->
So should we change the name of German occupation of France during World War II as well? Occupation is the right term for what happened, don't try to soften it just to push the Argentine POV.LRT24 (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-08T20:54:00.000Z","author":"LRT24","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-LRT24-2011-04-08T20:54:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-03-09T11:32:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The military occupation lasted Argentina in the Falklands between April 2, 1982 and June 14, 1982. The military government is something else, was established on April 3, 1982 and abolished in 1985. Remove interwiki generated confusion and attempts to modify the tab for the wiki article in Spanish addressing the government and not the occupation. Greetings.--Cêsar (talk) 00:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-08-08T00:07:00.000Z","author":"C\u00easar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-C\u00easar-2010-08-08T00:07:00.000Z-Interwiki","replies":["c-Philip_Stevens-2010-08-08T18:14:00.000Z-C\u00easar-2010-08-08T00:07:00.000Z"]}}-->
Perhaps you could create a page on the Spanish Wikipedia documenting the Argentine occcupation. --Philip Stevens (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-08-08T18:14:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-08-08T18:14:00.000Z-C\u00easar-2010-08-08T00:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. It's clear to me that there is no consensus to move the article to the suggested title although there does appear to be an emerging consensus to move it to something different. However this discussion has now had no input for a week so it seems sensible to close it. I'd suggest that interested parties agree a new title between them and then start a new requested move to that title. Dpmuk (talk) 10:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-14T10:02:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2010-12-14T10:02:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":[]}}-->
Occupation of the Falkland Islands → Argentine occupation of the Falkland Islands — There have been more than one occupation, see "Re-establishment of British rule on the Falkland Islands". Relisted. Jafeluv (talk) 01:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Dentren | Talk16:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","author":"Jafeluv","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":["c-Pfainuk-2010-11-28T16:40:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","c-Philip_Stevens-2010-11-28T16:59:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-11-28T20:11:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","c-Dondegroovily-2010-12-01T06:05:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","c-Innotata-2010-12-02T18:04:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","c-Jor70-2010-12-02T22:08:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z"]}}-->
I am unclear as to your rationale as that article does not document an occupation - unless you count the few days between Mestevier's arrival and his death in a mutiny (which I wouldn't - and in which case it would mean that your title is no less ambiguous than the current one). Pfainuktalk16:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-28T16:40:00.000Z","author":"Pfainuk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Pfainuk-2010-11-28T16:40:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Oppose, the phrase 'Occupation of the Falkland Islands' is used by the majority of English speakers to refer to the Argentine occupation of 1982. --Philip Stevens (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-28T16:59:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-11-28T16:59:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Oppose This is simply the usual POV push claiming events of 200 years ago are comparable with a 20th Century military conflict. Justintalk20:11, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-28T20:11:00.000Z","author":"Justin A Kuntz","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-11-28T20:11:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Justin"}}-->
Comment You could argue that "Argentine" has no place in article titles, as having a somewhat pro-British bias over the more common Argentinian. But maybe I'm wrong on that account. D O N D E groovilyTalk to me06:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-01T06:05:00.000Z","author":"Dondegroovily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dondegroovily-2010-12-01T06:05:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-02T21:02:00.000Z-Dondegroovily-2010-12-01T06:05:00.000Z"],"displayName":"D\u00a0O\u00a0N\u00a0D\u00a0E\u00a0groovily"}}-->
Sorry yes you are, Argentine is in more common use and confers no bias. Per WP:ENGVAR its use is appropriate here. Justintalk21:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-02T21:02:00.000Z","author":"Justin A Kuntz","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-02T21:02:00.000Z-Dondegroovily-2010-12-01T06:05:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Justin"}}-->
Oppose per above comments. —innotata18:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-02T18:04:00.000Z","author":"Innotata","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Innotata-2010-12-02T18:04:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Comment As I mentioned in my message of last March there is a inconsistency between the title and the article itself. The title refers to occupation that someone could compare with Occupation of Norway by Nazi Germany, where of course, there wasn't nor isn't a territorial dispute recognized by the UN. And then, the lead (obviously without MoS) and infobox is about the Argentine Military Government of the Falklands Islands which I still think it is the most appropriate title due is totally neutral. We could even add a also known as Ocuppation of the Falklands Islands then too . --Jor70 (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-02T22:08:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-02T22:08:00.000Z-Jafeluv-2010-12-06T01:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T07:24:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-02T22:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
Comment. Are you saying the islands weren't occupied in 1982? That's an interesting view of history. According to the Hague Conventions, "territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army" - I hardly think the islanders saw the Argentine military junta as a friendly force. This article documents Argentine rule of the islands in 1982. Most English speakers refer to this as the Occupation of the Falkland Islands, and thus the title conforms to WP:NAME. --Philip Stevens (talk) 07:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T07:24:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T07:24:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-02T22:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jor70-2010-12-03T11:21:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T07:24:00.000Z"]}}-->
Could you please put aside for a minute your British POV and read again my comment with an open mind ? This article do not respects Manual of Style for a WP article. The current title only applies to the section 74 days all the rest is for an Argentine Military Government of the Falklands Islands, doesnt matter if is was legitime for some pleope or not. If you continue with this , I will split it --Jor70 (talk) 11:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T11:21:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-03T11:21:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T07:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T11:35:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-03T11:21:00.000Z"]}}-->
It's not 'British POV'. This article documents Argentine rule on the islands during the Falklands War, most English speakers refer to that time as the Occupation of the Falkland Islands. As I said in March, if you disagree with this rationale, you are more than welcome to request a move to another title (once the current move request has been completed). You are also free to split the article if you want, but I think the scope of resulting pages would significantly overlap. --Philip Stevens (talk) 11:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T11:35:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T11:35:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-03T11:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jor70-2010-12-03T12:58:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T11:35:00.000Z"]}}-->
And with most English speakers you are referring to this [1] ?? Its obviously biased and not neutral --Jor70 (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T12:58:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-03T12:58:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T11:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dondegroovily-2010-12-03T13:51:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-03T12:58:00.000Z"]}}-->
Perhaps in a future move request, change "Occupation" to "Argentine government". However, despite being long-term disputed territory, the junta's human right's abuses pretty much makes their presence in any disputed territory as an occupation. Had their government been democratic, or at least shown anyone any level of respect, I'm not sure I would go for "Occupation" as the title, but the National Reorganization Process was so abusive as to be an occupation of all of Argentina. D O N D E groovilyTalk to me13:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T13:51:00.000Z","author":"Dondegroovily","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Dondegroovily-2010-12-03T13:51:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-03T12:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jor70-2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z-Dondegroovily-2010-12-03T13:51:00.000Z"],"displayName":"D\u00a0O\u00a0N\u00a0D\u00a0E\u00a0groovily"}}-->
I dont deny the Junta crimes but if you read this article it wasn't this case --Jor70 (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z-Dondegroovily-2010-12-03T13:51:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
In what way are they "obviously biased"? There is page on the English Wikipedia called Re-establishment of British rule on the Falkland Islands, but the equivalent page on the Spanish Wikipedia is called Ocupación británica de las islas Malvinas (British occupation of the Falkland Islands). I don't think either is biased, they are just the most commonly used names in English and Spanish respectively. --Philip Stevens (talk) 14:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T14:55:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T14:55:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":["c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-03T14:59:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T14:55:00.000Z"]}}-->
To correct you slightly, the events of 1833 are usually referred to as the British Return. We carefully avoided any terms that could be claimed as POV. Its frequently denounced as POV but pointedly no one has come up with a better suggestion. Justintalk14:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T14:59:00.000Z","author":"Justin A Kuntz","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-03T14:59:00.000Z-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T14:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T15:18:00.000Z-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-03T14:59:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Justin"}}-->
I don't think calling it an occupation is POV. I've found a few Argentine news sites which refer to it as the "ocupación". --Philip Stevens (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T15:18:00.000Z","author":"Philip Stevens","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Philip_Stevens-2010-12-03T15:18:00.000Z-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-03T14:59:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Nobody has yet answered me the incosistency about the article content (infobox included) and the title, so I think we should go to a split. I still do not understand, because nobody answered me either what wrong with "Argentine military government of Falklands islands" ??? --Jor70 (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":["c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-06T09:14:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z"]}}-->
There is no inconsistency, as Philip notes above it is even referred to as such in Argentine texts. I don't understand the problem here. There has been allegations of bias and POV but on examination they are found to have no substance. This is why I oppose this change and I think you'll agree I have a reputation for even handed treatment of this subject matter. Justintalk09:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-06T09:14:00.000Z","author":"Justin A Kuntz","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-06T09:14:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-03T16:34:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Justin"}}-->
The incosistency is not just about POV ! is about the title and content!, see the infobox!. And the text Phillip show as argentine text referring it as ocupacion is actually describing the Aniversary of the landing (2 de abril!) and not the government! which, again, it is the incosistency here --Jor70 (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-06T22:48:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-06T22:48:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":["c-Pfainuk-2010-12-06T23:27:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-06T22:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
I believe I see the distinction you're drawing. The title is Occupation of the Falkland Islands, which describes a period lasting from 2 April to 14 June 1982. The article has a rather longer remit - covering Argentina's military government of the islands, which lasted all the way from 1976 to 1985 (even if at the end of that period it wasn't actually governing anything).
One might reasonably draw parallels between this government and the Argentine Islas del Atlántico Surdepartment. According to Argentina, this is the official government of the Falklands, SGSSI, South Orkney and South Shetland Islands - but in practice it doesn't do much (it may even only exist on paper) because none of those territories are under Argentine control.
These are two distinct concepts, but there is considerable overlap. It makes sense for them to go in the same article, but if we're to do that it equally makes sense that we use a term that is more encompassing: that covers the entire period covered by the article - 1976-85 - and not just two months part-way through. As such, I personally would not object to a move to Argentine military government of the Falkland Islands, or something similar. Pfainuktalk23:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-06T23:27:00.000Z","author":"Pfainuk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Pfainuk-2010-12-06T23:27:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-06T22:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jor70-2010-12-07T02:54:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2010-12-06T23:27:00.000Z"]}}-->
That is exactly what I trying to say since March! The current title only apply to the section 74 days. --Jor70 (talk) 02:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-07T02:54:00.000Z","author":"Jor70","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Jor70-2010-12-07T02:54:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2010-12-06T23:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-07T09:17:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-07T02:54:00.000Z"]}}-->
Lightbulb! That title suggestion isn't the best one, since this includes South Georgia the South Sandwich Islands. That could make for a long title though. Would support a name change to something more suitable on that basis. Justintalk09:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-07T09:17:00.000Z","author":"Justin A Kuntz","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Justin_A_Kuntz-2010-12-07T09:17:00.000Z-Jor70-2010-12-07T02:54:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Justin"}}-->
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to moveGraeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-16T09:32:00.000Z","author":"Graeme Bartlett","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Graeme_Bartlett-2011-04-16T09:32:00.000Z-Requested_move_II","replies":[]}}-->
I am open to shorter or otherwise more appropriate suggestions if they are available, but feel that a move to a name that better reflects the article's contents is desirable even if the name chosen is still not perfect. Note that the name I have suggested is an English translation of the official Spanish name for the body created by the Argentine junta to govern the Falklands in 1982 (and dissolved by the post-military government in 1985), Gobernación Militar de las Islas Malvinas, Georgias del Sur y Sandwich del Sur. Pfainuktalk17:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","author":"Pfainuk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z-Requested_move_II","replies":["c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-03-06T20:04:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","c-Hohum-2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","c-SilkTork-2011-04-08T22:53:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","c-SilkTork-2011-04-08T23:01:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","c-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T00:48:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","c-Purplebackpack89-2011-04-11T17:58:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","c-Andrewa-2011-04-13T11:32:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z"]}}-->
Support Happy to consider alternatives as well but a move from this confusing name is overdue. Wee Curry Monstertalk20:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-06T20:04:00.000Z","author":"Wee Curry Monster","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-03-06T20:04:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Support "administration" probably shouldn't be capitalised. Is there a catch-all term for the Falklands, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands? (Hohum@) 00:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z","author":"Hohum","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Hohum-2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-03-07T12:38:00.000Z-Hohum-2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z","c-Pfainuk-2011-03-07T18:15:00.000Z-Hohum-2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z"]}}-->
Regretably not since the FI were split into a separate BOT. Previously the term Falkland Island Dependencies would have been applicable. Either way I rather suspect the use of British nomenclature would be problematic here. Wee Curry Monstertalk12:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-07T12:38:00.000Z","author":"Wee Curry Monster","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-03-07T12:38:00.000Z-Hohum-2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Modern Argentina uses the term Islas del Atlántico Sur (South Atlantic Islands) as the name of the department that comprises these islands (according to the Argentine POV), but I believe its use here would be anachronistic and may not be understood by Anglophone audiences. For the record, I do not object to the change in capitalisation. Pfainuktalk18:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-07T18:15:00.000Z","author":"Pfainuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Pfainuk-2011-03-07T18:15:00.000Z-Hohum-2011-03-07T00:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
There is support for this move in this discussion; however I note the comments in the previous discussion in which it is argued that Occupation of the Falkland Islands is how the topic is commonly known in English. Google web and Google Books searches do support Occupation of the Falkland Islands. There is little for Military administration of the Falkland Islands. As the topic is known by the name Occupation of the Falkland Islands, and the proposed title is not used in English, I am not clear on the reasons for requesting the change. The stated reason is that the article covers more than the period of the occupation, yet the article clearly states that it is about the 74 days of the occupation, and then goes on to describe those 74 days. It does give some contextual background detail, though that is quite normal, and it is clear that the background detail is not the topic itself. I think a little more explanation would be worthwhile, and it would be useful to hear from some more people, especially some more of those who took part in the previous discussion. SilkTork *YES!22:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-08T22:53:00.000Z","author":"SilkTork","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-SilkTork-2011-04-08T22:53:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Have I missed something? I'm not understanding the rationale behind the proposed change in title. SilkTork *YES!23:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-08T23:01:00.000Z","author":"SilkTork","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-SilkTork-2011-04-08T23:01:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-04-08T23:12:00.000Z-SilkTork-2011-04-08T23:01:00.000Z"]}}-->
Yes I believe you did its actual content is wider, covering the nine years between the Argentine landing on Southern Thule in 1976 and the dissolution of the military administration by President Alfonsín in 1985. It is not an article about the 74 day administration of the FI. Wee Curry Monstertalk23:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-08T23:12:00.000Z","author":"Wee Curry Monster","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-04-08T23:12:00.000Z-SilkTork-2011-04-08T23:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Oppose. Am I reading the same article as the one discussed in the nomination? There is one sentence mentioning "the nine years between the Argentine landing on Southern Thule in 1976 and the dissolution of the military administration by President Alfonsín in 1985". The vast majority of the article is about the 74 days, perfectly described by the current title. Why throw out the common name for an OR behemoth? — AjaxSmack00:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-11T00:48:00.000Z","author":"AjaxSmack","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T00:48:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Pfainuk-2011-04-11T18:05:00.000Z-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T00:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
It isn't OR - it's a direct translation of the official Argentine name for their government on the islands. Pfainuktalk18:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-11T18:05:00.000Z","author":"Pfainuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Pfainuk-2011-04-11T18:05:00.000Z-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T00:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T22:30:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-04-11T18:05:00.000Z"]}}-->
A translation by whom? Used where? — AjaxSmack22:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-11T22:30:00.000Z","author":"AjaxSmack","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T22:30:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-04-11T18:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-Pfainuk-2011-04-12T20:05:00.000Z-AjaxSmack-2011-04-11T22:30:00.000Z"]}}-->
Split topic: Keep the Occupation of the Malvinas where it is, move the other stuff to another page Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈17:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-11T17:58:00.000Z","author":"Purplebackpack89","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Purplebackpack89-2011-04-11T17:58:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"pack"}}-->
Oppose. The current title describes a good topic, accurately describes the current content, and in every other way conforms to Wikipedia article naming policy. Minor concerns about the content are better dealt with by improving the article. Andrewa (talk) 11:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-13T11:32:00.000Z","author":"Andrewa","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Andrewa-2011-04-13T11:32:00.000Z-Pfainuk-2011-03-06T17:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Speculation_on_how_the_Argentine_military_might_have_behaved_differently-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z-Speculation_on_how_the_Argentine_military_might_have_behaved_differently"],"text":"Speculation on how the Argentine military might have behaved differently","linkableTitle":"Speculation on how the Argentine military might have behaved differently"}-->
Speculation on how the Argentine military might have behaved differently
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Speculation_on_how_the_Argentine_military_might_have_behaved_differently-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z-Speculation_on_how_the_Argentine_military_might_have_behaved_differently"],"text":"Speculation on how the Argentine military might have behaved differently","linkableTitle":"Speculation on how the Argentine military might have behaved differently"}-->
"No wholesale confiscation of private property occurred during the occupation (all goods obtained from the Islanders were paid for), but had the Islanders refused to sell, the goods in question would have been taken anyway, as is normal in military situations." Since when is such speculation, especially when reported as a fact, encyclopedic material? --Argymeg (talk) 09:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z","author":"Argymeg","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z-Speculation_on_how_the_Argentine_military_might_have_behaved_differently","replies":["c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-12-24T12:48:00.000Z-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
Probably because when some islanders refused to sell, the response was to point out that they would be taken anyway. Its not speculation reported as fact, happens to be a fact - it happened. Wee Curry Monstertalk12:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-24T12:48:00.000Z","author":"Wee Curry Monster","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-12-24T12:48:00.000Z-Argymeg-2011-12-24T09:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Argymeg-2011-12-25T01:28:00.000Z-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-12-24T12:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
But it specifically says it didn't happen... --Argymeg (talk) 01:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-25T01:28:00.000Z","author":"Argymeg","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Argymeg-2011-12-25T01:28:00.000Z-Wee_Curry_Monster-2011-12-24T12:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mishka_Shaw-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_words_seem_a_bit...weighted.-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mishka_Shaw-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z-Some_words_seem_a_bit...weighted."],"text":"Some words seem a bit...weighted.","linkableTitle":"Some words seem a bit...weighted."}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mishka_Shaw-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_words_seem_a_bit...weighted.-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mishka_Shaw-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z-Some_words_seem_a_bit...weighted."],"text":"Some words seem a bit...weighted.","linkableTitle":"Some words seem a bit...weighted."}-->
Okay I am having some trouble gaugeing this article as reliable simply due to the way it is worded. I mean every now and than something is written which seems a bit weighted to one PoV or another.
Example:
"Despite their political differences, the humanity and moral courage of both men earned them the enduring respect and even friendship of many islanders"
Humanity and moral courage? That does not seem very neutral or at least encyclopedic. Another example.
"Argentine officers did expropriate civilian property at Goose Green"
which is than followed by
"There was no widespread abuse of the population; indeed after the war it was found that even the Islanders' personal food supplies and stocks of alcohol were untouched"
The two lines contradict each other.
Last of all "the goods in question would have been taken anyway, as is normal in military situations." The goods were not taken away however, so this line is completely pointless and just seems like point scoring. Mishka Shaw (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z","author":"Mishka Shaw","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mishka_Shaw-2012-12-05T13:04:00.000Z-Some_words_seem_a_bit...weighted.","replies":[]}}-->
I have just added archive links to one external link on Occupation of the Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online15:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-30T15:05:00.000Z","author":"Cyberbot II","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cyberbot_II-2016-01-30T15:05:00.000Z-External_links_modified","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Roger_8_Roger-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_in_title_-_Falklands..Malvinas-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Roger_8_Roger-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z-Name_in_title_-_Falklands..Malvinas"],"text":"Name in title - Falklands..Malvinas","linkableTitle":"Name in title - Falklands..Malvinas"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Roger_8_Roger-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_in_title_-_Falklands..Malvinas-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Roger_8_Roger-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z-Name_in_title_-_Falklands..Malvinas"],"text":"Name in title - Falklands..Malvinas","linkableTitle":"Name in title - Falklands..Malvinas"}-->
About an edit today - Falklands/Malvinas. This has come up before elsewhere, but I'll mention it again here. These names are usually treated as translations of each other, which they are not. Some English language souces use "The Malvinas" as an English word, which it is. There is a Spanish word which is a translation of The Falklands into Spanish, which I think is also sometimes used by Spanish speakers. I do not think todays addition that I reversed relates directly to this but it is connected in some way. So, do we use the term Falklands, not because it is the English language term, but because it is the majority English language term, based on weighting? IMO a minor but important difference. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z","author":"Roger 8 Roger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Roger_8_Roger-2021-01-16T18:43:00.000Z-Name_in_title_-_Falklands..Malvinas","replies":[]}}-->
The current short description is three times longer than the guidance of 40 characters. Long shortdescs tend to be truncated for mobile users, losing the addition detail. I trimmed it from:
"Argentine government of the Falklands, Georgias and Sandwich Islands during 1982 occupation, formally dissolved in 1985" to "Argentine government during 1982, formally dissolved 1985".
Since the short description works in conjunction with the article title, I thought this a useful compromise.
Possibly less likely to be confusing would be "under Argentine governance during 1982, formally dissolved 1985" (Hohum@) 09:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-10T09:08:00.000Z","author":"Hohum","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hohum-2021-03-10T09:08:00.000Z-Short_description","replies":["c-Hohum-2021-03-13T01:23:00.000Z-Hohum-2021-03-10T09:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Wee Curry Monster: (Hohum@) 01:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-13T01:23:00.000Z","author":"Hohum","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Hohum-2021-03-13T01:23:00.000Z-Hohum-2021-03-10T09:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2021-03-13T02:24:00.000Z-Hohum-2021-03-13T01:23:00.000Z"]}}-->
How about "Argentine administration during the Falklands War, formally dissolved 1985". I did note your attempt was in good faith but it proved to be rather misleading when I looked at it. WCMemail02:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-13T02:24:00.000Z","author":"Wee Curry Monster","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Wee_Curry_Monster-2021-03-13T02:24:00.000Z-Hohum-2021-03-13T01:23:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"W"}}-->
Hello, I would like to expand the description in this article, for example: “The beginning of the war marked a historic moment in which British forces were able to reclaim the islands after a fierce battle against Argentinian forces. The war was a major turning point in modern British military history, as it demonstrated the country's ability to fight effectively against a foreign aggressor. The conflict also reinforced the United Kingdom's claim to the islands, which had been a source of contention for many years. In the end, the Falkland Islands remained under British control, and the war came to an end on 14 June 1982.” Please correct anything if not correct, Thanks! SingusTheTexan (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230820203800","author":"SingusTheTexan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SingusTheTexan-20230820203800-Description_expanding_request","replies":["c-Roger_8_Roger-20230820213200-SingusTheTexan-20230820203800"]}}-->
I don't think your suggestion adds anything of relevance. See wp:notability and wp:OR. You must supply references for your additions, otherwise it is just your opinion, which can, and usually should, be reversed. For example, who said there was a 'fierce battle'? I suggest you take your time looking around wikipedia to see how it operates. See the links on your talk page as well. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 21:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230820213200","author":"Roger 8 Roger","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Roger_8_Roger-20230820213200-SingusTheTexan-20230820203800","replies":[]}}-->
SD Negeri Mekar Jaya 5InformasiDidirikan01 Januari 1979JenisNegeriAkreditasiANomor Statistik Sekolah101026606005Nomor Pokok Sekolah Nasional20228820Kepala SekolahSutirah S.PdRentang kelasI, II, III, IV, V, VIKurikulumKurikulum 2013StatusSekolah Standar NasionalAlamatLokasiJalan Serimpi Raya №12, Mekarjaya, Kec. Sukmajaya, Depok, Jawa Barat, IndonesiaTel./Faks.(021) 7725373Situs webSitus [email protected] SD Negeri Mekar Jaya 5 adalah sebuah sekolah dasar neg...
Genre of alternative rock music ShoegazeStylistic origins Indie rock[1] alternative rock[2] noise pop[3][4] dream pop[5][6] psychedelia[6] neo-psychedelia[6] post-punk[5] ethereal wave[7] garage rock[6] space rock[8] Cultural originsLate 1980s, Ireland and United KingdomDerivative forms Chillwave[9] nu gaze Fusion genresBlackgazeOther topics Ambient ethereal wave list of musicians noise roc...
Bài viết này cần thêm chú thích nguồn gốc để kiểm chứng thông tin. Mời bạn giúp hoàn thiện bài viết này bằng cách bổ sung chú thích tới các nguồn đáng tin cậy. Các nội dung không có nguồn có thể bị nghi ngờ và xóa bỏ.Thị trường tài chính Thị trường đại chúng Sàn giao dịch Chứng khoán Thị trường trái phiếu Định giá trái phiếu Trái phiếu doanh nghiệp Thu nhập cố định Trái phiếu...
1998 studio album by Margaret BeckerFalling ForwardStudio album by Margaret BeckerReleased1998StudioOctober Studios, Nashville, TennesseeThe White House, Nashville, TennesseeAntenna Studios, Franklin, TennesseeGenreChristian rockLabelSparrowProducerTedd T, Robbie Nevil, Monroe JonesMargaret Becker chronology Grace(1995) Falling Forward(1998) What Kind of Love(1999) Falling Forward is an album by Christian rock musician Margaret Becker, released in 1998 by Sparrow Records. Release and ...
لمعانٍ أخرى، طالع عنتر (توضيح). هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (أكتوبر 2018) عنتر (مجلة)معلومات عامةالشعار التَّرويجيّ السلسلة التاريخية المصورة للكبار والصغاربلد المنشأ لبنانأول نشر 1977مالقط
American politician and lobbyist (born 1943) This article is about the politician. For the Texas musician, see Bob Livingston (musician). For other people with the same name, see Robert Livingston (disambiguation). Bob LivingstonChair of the House Appropriations CommitteeIn officeJanuary 4, 1995 – January 3, 1999Preceded byDave ObeySucceeded byBill YoungMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom Louisiana's 1st districtIn officeAugust 27, 1977 – March 1,...
American politician Kim Driscoll73rd Lieutenant Governor of MassachusettsIncumbentAssumed office January 5, 2023GovernorMaura HealeyPreceded byKaryn Polito50th Mayor of SalemIn officeJanuary 2, 2006 – January 4, 2023Preceded byStanley UsoviczSucceeded byBob McCarthy Personal detailsBorn (1966-08-12) August 12, 1966 (age 57)Hawaii, U.S.Political partyDemocraticSpouseNick DriscollChildren3EducationSalem State University (BA)Massachusetts School of Law (JD) Kimberley Lord Dri...
Musafir ibn Ibrahim II (died 1062) was the last Sallarid ruler of Dailam (1050–1062). He was the son of Ibrahim II ibn Marzuban II, and brother of his predecessor Justan II ibn Ibrahim II. Not much is known about him. In 1062, the Seljuq ruler Tughril marched towards Musafir's capital Tarom, where he made Musafir acknowledge his authority and pay him 100,000 dinars in tribute. Shortly afterwards, the Ismailis seized Tarom and killed Musafir, putting an end to the Sallarid dynasty. Sourc...
Legal identification of specific objects and materials Forensic identification is the application of forensic science, or forensics, and technology to identify specific objects from the trace evidence they leave, often at a crime scene or the scene of an accident. Forensic means for the courts. Human identification Droplets of human blood. In addition to analyzing for DNA, the droplets are round and show no spattering, indicating they impacted at a relatively slow velocity, in this case from ...
Low-cost airline of Vietnam This article is about the current Vietnamese airline. For the defunct United States airline, see Pacific Air Lines. Not to be confused with Pan Pacific Airlines. Pacific Airlines IATA ICAO Callsign BL PIC PACIFIC FoundedDecember 1990; 33 years ago (1990-12)Commenced operationsApril 1991; 32 years ago (1991-04)Operating basesHanoiHo Chi Minh CityFleet size15Destinations22Parent companyVietnam Airlines (98%)HeadquartersHo...
1971 American filmThey Call It MurderDirected byWalter GraumanWritten bySam RolfeBased onThe D.A. Draws a Circle (novel) and charactersby Erle Stanley GardnerStarringJim HuttonLeslie NielsenEd AsnerJessica WalterJo Ann PflugMíriam ColónRobert J. WilkeWilliam ElliottCarmen MathewsProductioncompaniesPaisano Productions in association with 20th Century Fox TelevisionDistributed byNBCRelease dateDecember 17, 1971CountryUnited StatesLanguageEnglish They Call It Murder is a 1971 American televisi...
Painting attributed to Pisanello Portrait of Sigismund of LuxemburgArtistPisanelloYear1432–1433MediumTempera on panelDimensions58.5 cm × 42 cm (23.0 in × 17 in)LocationKunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna The Portrait of Sigismund of Luxembourg (Italian: Ritratto di Sigismondo di Lussemburgo) is a tempera on panel painting attributed to the Italian Late-Gothic master Pisanello and probably executed between 1432 and 1433. It is on display at the Kunsth...
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous.Find sources: Natalie Westbrook – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) American mul...
British composer Ella Spira at the Grammy Awards 2016 Ella Spira MBE is a Grammy-nominated composer, visual artist and an award-winning theatre producer based in London, England.[1] Spira co-founded the production company Sisters Grimm alongside ex Royal Ballet ballerina Pietra De Mello-Pittman in 2009.[2] Spira writes and composes music for ballet and film, and works as an arranger making dance remixes for popular UK artists, but her main focus remains Sisters Grimm productio...
American politician John Durant AshmoreMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom South Carolina's 5th districtIn officeMarch 4, 1859 – December 21, 1860Preceded byJames L. OrrSucceeded byDistrict eliminated (Robert Smalls after district re-established in 1875)13th Comptroller General of South CarolinaIn office1853 – 1857GovernorJohn Lawrence ManningJames Hopkins AdamsRobert F.W. AllstonMember of the South Carolina House of RepresentativesIn office1848 –...
Gennaro D'Amato o Amato (Napoli, 1º aprile 1857 – Pieve Ligure, 18 novembre 1947) è stato un illustratore, pittore e saggista italiano tra i principali illustratori dei romanzi e dei racconti di Emilio Salgari, autore dell'immagine di Sandokan; della sua opera pittorica si ricordano soprattutto due grandi dipinti raffiguranti il Giubileo della regina Vittoria e numerosi ritratti.[1][2][3][4][5] Indice 1 Biografia 2 Opere 3 Note 4 Altri progetti 5 Co...
First Suriname Prime Minister (1936–2000) Not to be confused with Hank Aaron. Henck ArronHenck Arron in 19881st Vice President of Suriname[1]In office25 January 1988 – 24 December 1990PresidentRamsewak ShankarPreceded byOffice EstablishedSucceeded byJules WijdenboschPrime Minister of SurinameIn office24 December 1973 – 25 February 1980MonarchQueen Juliana (1973–1975)PresidentJohan Ferrier (1975–1980)Governor GeneralJohan Ferrier (1973–1975)Preceded byJule...
.svg)
