This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shouldn't Enigmosaurus be spelled Enigmasaurus? Crimsonraptor (talk) 22:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just noticed this is one of the only dinosaur articles without any citations at all. What's up with that? For all we know, it could be called Enigmasaurus. FunkMonk (talk) 22:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's a gender agreement thing, I think. It would be either Enigmasaura or Enigmosaurus. Abyssal (talk) 02:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're right, there aren't any citations or references anywhere. Keeping that in mind, a search found these sites here and here. The latter has no more information than the Wikipedia article does, but at least it gives us a source for it. The former gives a little extra on why the pelvis was so peculiar. Crimsonraptor (talk) 14:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gender agreement is only between the generic name and the specific name. The connecting vowel in Greek words is normally "o", irrespective of gender (and besides, ainigma is not an adjective but a neuter substantive and saura is not the feminine of sauros). According to the describers the name was derived from Greek αἴνιγμα but this should have resulted in an "Enigmatosaurus". The name is thus actually derived from the related form αἰνιγμός, which also means "riddle" :o).--MWAK (talk) 08:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I suppose that could be the case, thanks for the clarification :)

Alternatively, it could just be a misspelled name that took precedence, like what happened with Ambystoma/Amblystoma. Crimsonraptor • (Contact me) Dumpster dive if you must 22:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Or just a mis-spelled name period. Nothing against those in the ICZN (see also Futalognkosaurus, Richardoestesia, Caudipteridae, etc.) It's on the author to spell/form the name correctly. If they don't, there's no corrective process--we're stuck with it (except, as noted, in cases of gender agreement between genus and species. Sinornithosaurus haoiana is incorrect for example, and as soon as somebody mentions this and spells it as s. haoianus in print, the name will have been corrected officially). MMartyniuk (talk) 12:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply