FAC discussion relevant to editors here[1], and perhaps the MOS for images should have a note on how to deal with palaeoart once consensus emerges. FunkMonk (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240411134500","author":"FunkMonk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FunkMonk-20240411134500-Discussion_on_use_of_palaeoart_in_FACs","replies":[]}}-->
I've added a merge proposal to Talk:Caenagnathoidea to merge it with Oviraptorosauria for the following reasons:
Thank you for your time. --A Cynical Idealist (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240422193200","author":"A Cynical Idealist","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A_Cynical_Idealist-20240422193200-Merge_proposal_for_Caenagnathoidea_into_Oviraptorosauria","replies":[]}}-->
A collective merge discussion on a number of potentially redundant clade-level articles has been opened at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dinosaurs#Mass_merge_proposal_for_redundant_clade_pages and may be of interest to this WikiProject. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 21:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240422215600","author":"LittleLazyLass","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LittleLazyLass-20240422215600-Mass_merge_discussion_notice","replies":[]}}-->
User:Mannlegur is changing a large number of fossil age ranges, as at Fish, without checking to see if these contradict cited descriptions in the bodies of the affected articles, as they did in Fish's case. Sometimes they replace names like "Silurian" with numeric ranges, which may convey spurious accuracy: that too can be misleading. I've posted a note on their talk page, but the project may need to check all the edits for appropriateness. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240519064100","author":"Chiswick Chap","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chiswick_Chap-20240519064100-Editor_altering_fossil_age_ranges,_introducing_contradictions_and_spurious_accur","replies":["c-The_Morrison_Man-20240519220100-Chiswick_Chap-20240519064100"]}}-->
https://mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5450.1.1 Is a new article on Devonian Harpetida from Morocco.
Now, from the abstract (the only section I have access to) they basically:
This could lead to conflict, as in the Order page Helioharpes is listed as a synonym of Harpes, Fritchaspis as a synonym of Lioharpes, and Globoharpes seperate from Eskoharpes.
I don't know what to add, but I will keep this in here for further discussion.
Abdullah raji (talk) 09:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240601095500","author":"Abdullah raji","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Abdullah_raji-20240601095500-Harpetida","replies":["c-Lythronaxargestes-20240602211400-Abdullah_raji-20240601095500"]}}-->
Hi, I've proposed to merge Neodiapsida into Diapsida, since the two are largely synonymous. Discussion can be found here. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 13:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240606134500","author":"Trilletrollet","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trilletrollet-20240606134500-Proposal_to_merge_Neodiapsida_into_Diapsida","replies":[]}}-->
In light of a new ornithischian phylogeny published today and a number of results from recent years, should we update the status of Silesaurids to fall under Dinosauria/Ornithischia? The position seems to have been recovered more often during recent years, and to me at least it feels appropriate to change this now. The Morrison Man (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240621221300","author":"The Morrison Man","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300-Ornithischian_Silesauridae?","replies":["c-Lythronaxargestes-20240621223200-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300","c-A_Cynical_Idealist-20240621230800-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300","c-SlvrHwk-20240621235400-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300","c-FunkMonk-20240624141200-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300","c-Miracusaurs-20240625115300-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300","c-Miracusaurs-20240706060100-The_Morrison_Man-20240621221300"]}}-->
Recently IJReid changed the taxoboxes for these two taxa to place them in Archosauromorpha and Eutriconodonta, respectively, following Fonseca et al. 2024. However, this may be problematic for two reasons: 1) the study just came out, so no consensus could develop of these results, and 2) their username matches the initials of one of the paper’s authors, which could fall afoul of WP:Conflict of interest guidelines. In light of this, what should be done about these changes? Miracusaurs (talk) 10:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240625104300","author":"Miracusaurs","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Miracusaurs-20240625104300-Lusitanosaurus_and_Taveirosaurus","replies":["c-Lythronaxargestes-20240625220100-Miracusaurs-20240625104300","c-LittleLazyLass-20240626073800-Miracusaurs-20240625104300"]}}-->
Two discussions that might be of interest to the project: Wikipedia talk:Notability#Biology and Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Species notability. The Morrison Man (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240626122400","author":"The Morrison Man","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Morrison_Man-20240626122400-Notability_discussions","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, I am working on a Moroccan palaeontology article about the Tata Group, and I am trying to access the following work by Pierre Hupé:
Does anyone know where I could find digital access to the publication? I understand it went unpublished, but it is referenced in a few articles and it would be good to review.
Thank you in advance! --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply to me here, please ping me. 03:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240701030500","author":"Classicwiki","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Classicwiki-20240701030500-Pierre_Hup\u00e9_book\/thesis","replies":[]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.21.100.233