Talk:Doedicurus

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Doedicurus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

1. Prose On hold

2. Verifiability On hold

3. Depth of Coverage  Pass

4. Neutral  Pass

5. Stable  Pass

6. Illustrations  Pass

7. Miscellaneous  Pass

Comments

1.

  • Link carapace in the lead, as well as the first mention in the prose. It's not that common of a term, at least for readers without a robust biology background (currently linked at the second point in the prose)
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Link Smilodon at the first instance, rather than the second
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Camels is a duplink
fixed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

2.

  • Note a should probably have a citation directly attached to it, as it's making a statement that an assumption is incorrect. Even if it's from the same source as where the information in the sentence the note accompanies comes from, it should have a citation to make it clear where the information is coming from.
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Spot check on the refs should all checked instances supported by the reference and all linked refs tests working.

3.

4.

5.

6.

  • Image licensing looks good. Consider adding alt text, but that's not a GA requirement

7.

Placing on hold, just a little tightening up to do here. Good work. Hog Farm (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.