This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of the Dialect (computing)Dialect (computing) page was merged into Programming language on 7 February 2018, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history.

Which of these would be considered dialects of each other?

My opinion: only ActionScript/JavaScript/ECMAScript are dialects of each other. The others are all well defined languages in their own right. --IanOsgood 21:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

168.209.98.35 10:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I noticed in the last part of the (actually quite short) article there is the use of the word newbie to define those individuals who are new to programming. Is this word really appropriate?

These are both stub articles with no references. It would appear that they could be merged with no loss of content. Peter Flass (talk) 11:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

This doesn't mean that they are different languages.

Furthermore, single language (say, C++11). Can be implemented (in GCC and LLVM) completely not how was described in the specification.

This term (Dialect) is absolutely useless and will be never sourced. One paragraph on Programming language will be enough to describe what's going on (this topic is not covered here AFAIK). Ushkin N (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

This article is trying to discuss 2 concepts:

• One is the programming language concept of a variation of a language, which may evolve to become a new version of the language, or a new language itself with a different name.
• The other is the meta-programming concept of creating domain specific languages for a particular purpose (usually a subset of the original) also sometimes called dialecting.

The second is not so common, and is mostly present in languages with free-from syntax such as Lisp and Rebol (and their 'dialects' ;D ) and maybe Forth? This is a different approach to the meta-programming concept of macros. In other words, dialecting is the ability of a programming language to readily create DSLs. I fear putting this in the page of Domain-specific language would create a similar situation as here. That is, it will create confusion with the mixing of concepts, and the removal of contect

In short, I'm fine with putting language dialect under Programming language. But please don't delete the separate concept of dialecting or put it under dsl. Perhaps that could be put in the page of Dialecting, with the sign put on the page "not to be confused with dialects" redirecting to your proposed paragraph on Programming language — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.195.222.234 (talk) 09:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply