South Korea has a long military alliance with the United States, aiding the U.S. in every war since the Vietnam War, including the Iraq War.[1] At the 2009 G20 London summit, then-U.S. President Barack Obama called South Korea "one of America's closest allies and greatest friends."[2] In 1987, South Korea was among the first batch of countries to be designated as a major non-NATO ally.[3][4] In June 2023, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol said that he had upgraded the country's alliance with the United States to one that is "nuclear-based" in the face of North Korea's growing military threat.[5]
In 2023, President Yoon said that "Korea's experience shows us just how important it is for democracies to uphold solidarity. Korea will stand in solidarity with the free world. We will actively work to safeguard the freedom of the people of Ukraine and support their efforts in reconstruction" in a speech to the United States Congress.[6]
By 2024, several security factors were shaping the alliance:
South Korea is currently one of the most pro-American countries in the world. According to a 2018 Pew survey, 77% of South Koreans had a favorable view of the United States, while 21% had a negative view.[11] According to a 2018 Gallup poll, 77% of Americans had a favorable view of South Koreans, while 22% had a negative view.[12]
Country comparison
Leaders of South Korea and the United States from 1950
History
Background
The Old Korean Legation Museum in Washington, D.C. is where the Korean legation was housed from 1889 to 1905.
In 1945, at the end of World War II, Japan surrendered to the Allies. The United States proposed to the USSR that they could share responsibility of the Korean peninsula, dividing the Korean peninsula at the 38th parallel into two occupation zones, with the United States in the South and the Soviet Union in the North. This was intended to be a temporary measure.[15]
Each half was polarized politically: the USSR-backed North was led by the Communist Party, while U.S General John Hodge handpicked far-right Syngman Rhee to lead the South.[15] Initial talks in 1945–6 to achieve a unified, independent Korea were not successful.[citation needed] The U.S. petitioned the United Nations to find a resolution, and the UN concluded that elections should be held.[15] In reality, only the South held an election, as the North refused to allow UN officials entry to supervise the election. Syngman Rhee was officially elected after ruling the South for several years already, and in turn the USSR appointed Communist Kim Il-Sung without an election.[16]
In 1948, two separate nations were established: the Republic of Korea (ROK) in the South, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in the North. On January 1, 1949, the United States officially recognized the Republic of Korea as the sole legitimate government of Korea and established diplomatic relations on March 25 of that year.[14][17]
Cross-border skirmishes and raids at the 38th Parallel escalated into open warfare when the North Korean forces invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950.[18] In response, 16 member countries of the United Nations, including the United States, came to the defense of South Korea. It was the first significant armed conflict of the Cold War with extensive deployment of U.S. and other troops.[19]
… About 37,000 Americans lost their lives. They fought for the freedom of Koreans they did not even know, and thanks to their sacrifices, the peace and democracy of the republic were protected. … On this significant occasion, all Koreans pay tribute to the heroes fallen in defense of freedom and democracy. I firmly believe that future generations in both countries will further advance the strong Republic of Korea–U.S. alliance into one befitting the spirit of the new age.[20]
In 1953, following the end of the Korean War, the United States established a bilaterial alliance pact with South Korea.[15]
Moreover, the "U.S. alliance with South Korea would consequently have three functions. First, it would serve as part of a network of alliances and military installations designed to ring the Soviet threat in the Pacific. Second, it would deter a second North Korean attack, with U.S. ground troops serving as the 'tripwire' guaranteeing U.S. involvement. Third, it would restrain the South from engaging in adventurism".[21]
The United States and South Korea are allies under the 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty. Under the agreement, U.S. military personnel have maintained a continuous presence on the Korean peninsula.
In 1953, at the end of the Korean War, the number of prostitutes in South Korea was estimated as about 350,000, with about 60 percent working near U.S. military camps.[22] In the post-Korean War period, the U.S. military continued to contribute significantly to the South Korean economy, providing an estimated 1 percent of the South Korean GNP in 1991, including the sex industry.[23] Despite the world-wide growth of women's human rights advocacy since the 1990s, and the shift towards foreign workers providing sex services for U.S. troops, (particularly women trafficked from the Philippines and the former Soviet Union), prostitution via "juicy bars" remains an issue near U.S. bases in South Korea.[24][25]
In 1992, Yun Geum-i, a 26-year-old woman, was brutally killed by a U.S. serviceman, Private Kenneth L. Markle, in Dongducheon.[26][27] In August 1993, the U.S. government compensated the victim's family with a payment of about US$72,000.[28] Markle was sentenced by a South Korean court to life imprisonment, later reduced to 15 years. Professor Katharine Moon notes that the murder was not unique, and did not spark a national debate about the presence of U.S. forces. However, it did become a "call to action" for some Koreans, and led to the establishment of the "National Campaign for the Eradication of Crimes by U.S. troops."
Environmental degradation
In July 2000, the Eighth U.S. Army apologized for an incident where formaldehyde, a toxic fluid, was released into the Han River in February of that year.[29] In a report released in 2017 detailing spill incidents from 1995 to 2015 at the US garrison in Yongsan, South Korean environmentalist groups expressed concern about the lack of transparency and the possibility of continued water contamination, as well as who would take responsibility for cleanup of the site.[30]
On 13 June 2002, two 14-year-old South Korean schoolgirls were crushed to death by a 50-ton United States Army vehicle in Yangju. Anti-Americanism was pervasive after the driver and the navigator of the vehicle were both acquitted in U.S. courts-martial on charges of negligent homicide. There was resentment from protesters towards the U.S.–South Korea Status of Forces Agreement, which restricted South Korea from having jurisdiction over alleged crimes that occurred when American soldiers were on official duty. South Korean presidential candidate Lee Hoi-chang called on United States President George W. Bush to "apologize to soothe the pain of the Korean people and to prevent any escalation in anti-American sentiment". American ambassador to South KoreaThomas C. Hubbard apologized on behalf of Bush.[31]
The Government of South Korea banned imports of U.S. beef in 2003 in response to a case of mad cow disease in Washington state. In 2008, protests were held against U.S. beef that were reminiscent of the student "pro-democracy" movements of the 1980s. Nevertheless, by 2010, South Korea had become the world's third largest U.S. beef importer. With its strong import growth, South Korea surpassed Japan for the first time to become the largest market for U.S. beef in Asia; in 2016, U.S. beef imports in Korea reached a value of $1 billion.[32][33]
2015 attack on the United States Ambassador
At around 7:40 a.m. on March 5, 2015, United States Ambassador to South KoreaMark Lippert was attacked by a knife-wielding man at a restaurant attached to Sejong Center in downtown Seoul, where he was scheduled to give a speech at a meeting of the Korean Council for Reconciliation and Cooperation.[34] The assailant, Kim Ki-jong, is a member of Uri Madang, a progressive cultural organization opposed to the Korean War.[35] He inflicted wounds on Lippert's left arm as well as a four-inch cut on the right side of the ambassador's face, requiring 80 stitches.[34] Lippert underwent surgery at Yonsei University's Severance Hospital in Seoul. While his injuries were not life-threatening, doctors stated that it would take several months for Lippert to regain use of his fingers.[34] A police official said that the knife used in the attack was 10 inches (25 cm) long[34] and Lippert later reported that the blade penetrated to within 2 cm of his carotid artery.[36] ABC News summarized the immediate aftermath of the attack as follows: "Ambassador Lippert, an Iraq war veteran, defended himself from the attack. Lippert was rushed to a hospital where he was treated for deep cuts to his face, his arm, and his hand. ... [He] kept his cool throughout the incident."[37]
During the attack and while being subdued by security, Kim screamed that the rival Koreas should be unified and told reporters that he had attacked Lippert to protest the annual United States–South Korean joint military exercises.[34] Kim has a record of militant Korean nationalist activism; he attacked the Japanese ambassador to South Korea in 2010 and was sentenced to a three-year suspended prison term.[38][39][40][41] On September 11, 2015, Kim was sentenced to twelve years in prison for the attack.[42]
The rollout of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) has been met with domestic opposition in South Korea. The opposition has been on the grounds that the North Korean threat has gone, and on environmental grounds.[43][44][45][46] THAAD was deployed under the administration of ROK President Park Geun-hye. Her opponents accused her of "bow[ing] too readily to America's requests."[46] According to South China Morning Post, when Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn visited Seongju to appease the local backlash against THAAD, demonstrators blocked Hwang's buses and pelted him with eggs and water bottles. The progressive People's Party also opposes the deployment.[46]
South Korea and the United States agreed to a military alliance in 1953.[47] They called it "the relationship forged in blood".[48] In addition, roughly 29,000 United States Forces Korea troops are stationed in South Korea. In 2009, South Korea and the United States pledged to develop the alliance's vision for future defense cooperation.[49] Currently, South Korean forces would fall under United States control should the war resume. As of September 2023, the transfer of this war time control to South Korea is on an indefinite “conditions-based” timeline.[50]
Since 2009, air forces of South Korea and the U.S.A. have conducted annual joint exercises under the name "Max Thunder". In 2018, the drills began on May 11 and continued until May 17.[51]
At a Cabinet meeting in Seoul on 10 July 2018, the government decided not to hold that year's Ulchi drill, scheduled for June 2018. The Government said the decision was made in line with recent political and security improvements on the peninsula and the suspension of South Korea-U.S. joint military exercises.[52]
Former South Korean President Moon Jae-in, elected in May 2017, has said he supports the continuation of sanctions against North Korea if it is aimed at bringing North Korea out of its state of isolation and to the negotiating table. He also argued, at the same time, that he was against a "sanctions-only" approach toward North Korea.[53] His approach to North Korea is similar to Kim Dae-jung's Sunshine Policy, which only continued up to the Roh Mu-hyun's administration.[citation needed]
In 2018, there were several rounds of talks regarding sharing the cost of U.S. forces in South Korea. These reflect Washington's desire for South Korea to share a "greater burden" of the costs of the military deployment.[54]
The U.S. Ambassador to South Korea, Harry B. Harris Jr., arrived in Seoul on July 7, 2018. The post had been vacant since President Donald Trump took office in January 2017. Harris, a former head of the U.S. military's Pacific Command, has expressed his resolve to work as an ambassador to strengthen the alliance between the United States and South Korea.[56]
On February 10, 2019, South Korea and the United States confirmed that a year long deal for keeping American troops, numbering 28,500, in South Korea had been made. This was in exchange for South Korea paying 925 million dollars to the United States.[57]
In terms of American leadership, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both emphasized the Middle East over North Korea. Clinton had deep emotional ties with Israel but neglected North Korea issues and never built strong personal relations with South Korean leaders. Bush, whose religious fundamentalism led him to divide the world into good and evil, had a personalized hatred for North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, but he also had frosty relations with South Korean leaders.[58]
In his 2021 New Year's press conference on January 18, President Moon Jae-in stated that the two Koreas might be able to discuss the U.S.-South Korea military drills through a joint inter-Korean military committee. However, U.S. officials expressed that it is not a topic to be decided by Pyongyang, and that scaling down the exercises was not desirable.[59]
President Joe Biden greets President Yoon Suk Yeol, U.S. Army Commander Gen. Paul LaCamera and Lieutenant General Sung Chun Choi at the Air Operations Center of Osan Air Base in Seoul, South Korea on 22 May 2022
In May 2022, President Joe Biden and President Yoon Suk Yeol agreed in talks to begin discussions on restarting and potentially expanding joint military training on and around the Korean Peninsula. The move was a signal that
Biden was changing course from former President Donald Trump's positions in Asia.[60]
In April 2023 a visit by Yoon to Washington produced a nuclear deterrence plan aimed at North Korea. Joe Biden said the deal allowed nuclear submarines to dock in South Korea. This capability had not been seen since 1991. Biden said: "A nuclear attack by North Korea against the United States or its allies and partners is unacceptable, and will result in the end of whatever regime were to take such an action." The so-called Washington Declaration came after nearly 50 years had passed since Korea signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and gave up its nuclear ambitions.[61][62][63]
In August 2024 The US and South Korea South Korea initiated military exercises, to boost their joint readiness to fend off North Korea's weapons and cyber threats.[64]
On 9 October 2024, South Korean Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun called for enhanced joint military drills with the U.S. to ensure a strong defence against North Korean threats. In talks with U.S. Admiral Samuel Paparo, they agreed to hold a second "Freedom Edge" exercise and expressed concerns about the security risks posed by North Korea-Russia military collaboration.[65]
On November 6 2024, South Korea's presidential office said on Wednesday that it will build a "perfect" security partnership with a new U.S. administration. Seoul is a strong U.S. ally in the region, with around 28,500 American troops stationed in South Korea.[66]
Between 1958 and 1991, the United States based a variety of nuclear weapons in South Korea. The number reached a peak of 950 warheads in 1967. Since 1991, when President George H. W. Bush announced the withdrawal of all tactical nuclear weapons based abroad, the Korean peninsula has seen ongoing efforts by the U.S. to negotiate an end to North Korea's own nuclear and missile development. These efforts have been characterized by "stalemates, crises and tentative progress." Despite the ongoing tensions, the U.S. has not redeployed nuclear weapons, although one recent press report suggests a majority of South Koreans are in favor of developing their own nuclear weapons. South Korea announced the deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-ballistic missile defense system at the end of 2017.[67]
Opinion polls
According to Pew Research Center, 84% of South Koreans have a favorable view towards the United States and Americans (ranked within top 4 among the countries in the world).[68][69] Also, according to a Gallup Korea poll, South Korea views the U.S. as the most favorable country in the world.[70] On the political side, the United States supported South Korea after 1945 as a "staunch bastion against communism", even when the ROK itself was ruled by a US-backed dictatorship.[71] In a March 2011 Gallup Poll, 74% of South Koreans said that they believe that the U.S. influence in the world is favorable,[72] and in a November 2011 Gallup Poll, 57% of South Koreans approved of U.S. leadership, with 22% disapproving.[73] In a 2011 Gallup poll, a 65% favorability rating, the highest rating to date.[72]
According to a 2014 BBC World Service Poll, 58% of South Koreans view U.S. influence positively, the highest rating for any surveyed Asian country.[74]
As relations with Korea waxed hot and cold under President Donald Trump, American public opinion regarding North Korea likewise fluctuated sharply, and no clear picture emerges.[75]
South Korea's export-driven economy and competition with domestic U.S. producers in certain fields of products have led to some trade friction with the United States. For example, imports of certain steel and non-steel products have been subject to U.S. anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations. A total of 29 U.S. imports from South Korea have been assessed.[77]
Trade volume
U.S. trade deficit (in billions, goods only) by country in 2014
South Korea Exports to United States was US$110.17 Billion during 2022, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. In 2022, South Korea mainly exported Vehicles other than railway and tramway to the United States.[78]
US-South Korea goods trade in millions of U.S. dollars (1985−2023)[79]
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2023
US exports to South Korea
6.0
14.4
25.4
27.8
27.6
38.8
43.5
51.0
65.1
US imports from South Korea
10.0
18.5
24.2
40.3
43.8
48.9
71.8
76.0
116.1
Trade balance
−4.0
−4.1
1.2
−12.5
−16.2
−10.1
−28.3
−25.0
−51.0
Direct investment
The U.S. (US $8.73 billion) is one of the top destinations for Korean FDI.[80]
The two countries are deepening space cooperation by signing a bilateral space agreement in 2016.[81] In April 2023, President Yoon visited the Goddard Space Flight Center with U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, and agreed to work to strengthen the space alliance between South Korea and the United States.[82] In July 2024, Pamela Melroy, Deputy Administrator of the NASA, visited South Korea to discuss space cooperation.[81]
K-pop and Korean cultural festivals are held in the U.S. regularly across different regions. KCON, the world’s largest Hallyu (Korean Wave) festival (organized by CJ ENM), surpassed 1.5 million cumulative on-site visitors by the 18th edition. The achievement came 11 years after its first event in Irvine, California in 2012 and just 4 years after it reached the milestone of 1 million attendees in 2019.[84]
As of 2023, The U.S. is one of the top three countries for K-pop albums.[85]
Korean language is one of the only three in the U.S. university foreign language enrollment rate to rise from 2016 to 2021. The number of Korean language learners increased from 13,900 in 2016 to 19,300 in 2021.[86]
^Devine, Robert A.; Breen, T. H.; Frederickson, George M.; Williams, R. Hal; Gross, Adriela J.; Brands, H.W. (2007). America Past and Present 8th Ed. Volume II: Since 1865. Pearson Longman. pp. 819–821. ISBN978-0-321-44661-9.
^Speeches of U.S. Ambassador, March 20, 2009Archived May 28, 2010, at the Wayback Machine … One of the first phrases I learned in Korean, I heard in Korean, when people talked about the US-Korea relationship, was 혈맹관계, "the relationship forged in blood." I remember how moved I was by that, by the passion which people used in talking about it. Our relationship, as you all well know, goes further back even than that … (March 20, 2009, U.S. Ambassador in the Republic of Korea)
^Mikyoung Kim "Ethos and Contingencies: A Comparative Analysis of the Clinton and Bush Administrations' North Korea Policy." Korea and World affairs 31.2 (2007): 172–203.
^""한국에 긍정적 영향을 미친 국가는 미국 " 80.7%" ["The country that has had a positive influence on Korea is the United States" 80.7%]. 조선일보 (in Korean). August 5, 2020. Archived from the original on December 24, 2011.
^Alida R. Haworth, Scott D. Sagan, and Benjamin A. Valentino. "What do Americans really think about conflict with nuclear North Korea? The answer is both reassuring and disturbing." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75.4 (2019): 179–186.
Baldwin, Frank, ed. Without Parallel: The American-Korean Relationship since 1945 (1973).
Berger, Carl. The Korean Knot: A Military-Political History (U of Pennsylvania Press, 1964).
Chay, Jongsuk. Diplomacy of Asymmetry: Korea-American Relations to 1910 (U of Hawaii Press, 1990).
Chung, Jae Ho. Between Ally and Partner: Korea-China Relations and the United States (2008) excerpt and text search
Cumings, Bruce. The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945–1947 (Princeton UP, 1981).
Cumings, Bruce. ed. Child of Conflict: The Korean-American Relationship, 1943–1953 (U of Washington Press, 1983).
Dennett, Tyler. "Early American Policy in Korea, 1883-7." Political Science Quarterly 38.1 (1923): 82–103. in JSTOR
Denett, Tyler. Americans in East Asia: A Critical Study of the Policy of the United States with References to China, Japan, and Korea in the Nineteenth Century. (1922) online free
Duk-Soo, Ambassador Han, and Anthony Badami. “Pursuing Free Trade: The Korean-American Economic Relationship.” The Brown Journal of World Affairs 17#1 (2010), pp. 215–20. online
Griffin, George G.B. "Korean-American Economic Relations." Doing Business in Korea (Routledge, 2019) pp. 100–109.
Han, Jongwoo. The Metamorphosis of U.S.-Korea Relations: The Korean Question Revisited (2022) excerpt
Harrington, Fred Harvey. God, Mammon, and the Japanese: Dr. Horace N. Allen and Korean- American Relations, 1884–1905. (U of Wisconsin Press, 1944).
Heo, Uk and Terence Roehrig. 2018. The Evolution of the South Korea-United States Alliance. Cambridge University Press.
Hong, Hyun Woong. "American Foreign Policy Toward Korea, 1945–1950" (PhD dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 2007) onlineArchived 2017-10-25 at the Wayback Machine bibliography pp 256–72.
Kim, Byung-Kook; Vogel, Ezra F. The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea (Harvard UP, 2011).
Kim, Mikyoung. "Ethos and Contingencies: A Comparative Analysis of the Clinton and Bush Administrations' North Korea Policy." Korea and World affairs 31.2 (2007): 172–203.
Kim, Seung-young, ed. American Diplomacy and Strategy toward Korea and Northeast Asia, 1882 – 1950 and After (2009) online
Lee, Yur-Bok and Wayne Patterson. One Hundred Years of Korean-American Relations, 1882–1982 (1986)
Matray, James I. ed. East Asia and the United States: An Encyclopedia of relations since 1784 (2 vol. Greenwood, 2002). excerpt v 2
Matray, James I. “Irreconcilable Differences? Realism and Idealism in Cold War Korean-American Relations.” Journal of American-East Asian Relations 19#1 (2012), pp. 1–26. online
Park, Edward JW. "A Divergent Path: Korean American Politics in an Age of Globalization." Journal of Global and Area Studies (2020). online
Ryu, Dae Young. "An Odd Relationship: The State Department, Its Representatives, and American Protestant Missionaries in Korea, 1882—1905." Journal of American-East Asian Relations 6.4 (1997): 261–287.
Yuh, Leighanne. "The Historiography of Korea in the United States". International Journal of Korean History (2010). 15#2: 127–144. online[permanent dead link]
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
