R v Peacock

R v Peacock
Michael Peacock celebrating his victory outside Southwark Crown Court.
CourtSouthwark Crown Court
Full case name R v Michael Peacock
Decided6 January 2012

R v Peacock was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959.[1] In December 2009, the defendant, a male escort named Michael Peacock, had been charged by the Metropolitan Police for selling hardcore gay pornography that the police believed had the ability to "deprave or corrupt" the viewer, which was illegal under the Obscene Publications Act. He was subsequently acquitted through a trial by jury in January 2012.

At the time, Peacock was the only individual to have successfully pleaded 'not guilty' under the Act in a case involving the kind of gay BDSM pornography which he published.[1] Legal experts said that, following the case, the Obscene Publications Act now "made no sense".[2] It was also notable as one of the early cases in the English courts where live tweeting was a significant source of reporting and publicising the deliberations of the case following the 14 December 2011 guidance from the Lord Chief Justice which allowed tweeting in English Courts.

Details of the case

Arrest and charge

The man at the centre of the trial was Michael Peacock (born 6 September 1958), an independent male escort who had been operating in the profession since November 2004. A former railway worker, Peacock decided to enter the sex industry in his mid-40s. At the time of the police investigation, Peacock advertised his services on his own personal website, entitled "Sleazy Michael", and also advertised hardcore pornographic DVDs for sale on the Craigslist website.[3][4] Some of these DVDs included films which featured extreme sexual acts between men, such as BDSM (whipping, staged kidnapping and rape play), fisting and urolagnia.[4][5][6][7]

While these acts were themselves not illegal in the United Kingdom at the time, the Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command of the Metropolitan Police considered such DVDs illegal under the Obscene Publications Act of 1959, which prohibited the sale of materials that could "deprave and corrupt" the viewer. In January 2009 they sent an undercover police officer to purchase some of these DVDs from Peacock at his home in Finsbury Park, North London.[2][4][5][8] On 14 December 2009, the Metropolitan Police charged Peacock with six counts under the Obscene Publications Act 1959.[4][5][6][7] If found guilty he could have faced a five-year prison sentence.[2]

Trial

"Perhaps illogically, of these sexual acts, fisting and urination are completely legal to perform in real life; and thus it is only the representation of these acts on film which may be considered obscene and therefore attract criminal liability. Consequently many pornographic film producers operate a "four finger rule" to avoid the risk of criminal prosecution. This means that in such films only four fingers are inserted into the performers' vagina or anus, rather than the entire fist. It could be argued that this is an entirely arbitrary distinction as the act of fisting itself is not illegal. However, many pornographic film producers remain risk-averse and therefore the presumption that urination and fisting are obscene has endured as it seems that no previous defendant has been prepared to test the law in this area by electing jury trial."

Myles Jackman, defence solicitor.[6]

After being postponed twice, the trial began on 2 January 2012, at Southwark Crown Court in South London. The prosecution claimed that several of the scenes featured in the pornographic DVDs which Peacock sold had the ability to "deprave and corrupt" the viewer and as such were illegal. They suggested that the customers purchasing the DVDs had not been aware of their extreme content, a claim Peacock denied, asserting that those purchasing the pornography "asked me for specific titles or niches, and knew exactly what they were getting".[2]

Peacock's defence was conducted by the law firm Hodge Jones & Allen.[6] His defence solicitor Nigel Richardson described his client as being a well-known member of the London gay community,[5] and remarked that "The whole idea of something being depraved or corrupt is outdated."[5] Another of the advocates for the defence, Myles Jackman, tweeted throughout the trial, using the hashtag of #obscenitytrial,[3][9] and through Twitter helped to build up an online support base for Peacock. Jackman recognised it as having important implications for UK law, noting that the verdict would "ultimately clarify the law on the representation" of specialist sexual acts such as BDSM and urolagnia.[3] During the trial, the defence called for expert evidence from academics studying sex and the media.[6]

The jury, of both men and women, were shown several hours of footage from Peacock's DVDs – including images on BDSM, urolagnia and a man being punched in the testicles – in an attempt to decide whether they could "deprave or corrupt" the viewer. Richardson later related that although "they were quite shocked initially, they started to look quite bored very quickly".[3][5] During the trial, the court had repeatedly warned the jury not to convict on any "impulse of homophobic disgust" that they might have regarding the acts taking place in the DVDs.[1]

After four days, the trial came to an end on 6 January 2012.[3][7] In summing up the case, the Recorder James Dingemans QC stated that the jury must decide whether the pornography did breach the Act, and noted that "in a civilised society, lines must be drawn".[4] It subsequently took the jury two hours to come to a verdict of "not guilty", deciding that the scenes depicted in the DVDs were unable to deprave or corrupt any viewer watching them.[2] Nigel Richardson later told the press that the jury had recognised that the pornography found in the DVDs would only be seen by "gay men specifically asking for this type of material" and not by the general public.[5]

Aftermath

Legal experts said that officers from SCD9, the specialist team within the Metropolitan Police, would be meeting with the Crown Prosecution Service (the prosecuting legal authority in England) and the British Board of Film Classification (responsible for film and DVD control and censorship) to review their guidelines following the jury's decision.[2][4][5][8] Specialist lawyers said the ruling may change the material that adult film producers will make and supply.[6] Sex worker turned writer Brooke Magnanti said the publishing industry would be relieved by the outcome of the case.[10]

When asked if he felt he had suffered any homophobia during the experience, Peacock denied it, stating that "Personally, I didn't feel there was any homophobic angle to the questioning, either by the arresting officers or in court. And full credit to the jury. I noticed a distinct change in their reactions over the course of the trial."[7]

Defense solicitor Myles Jackman claimed that the verdict had been "a significant victory for common sense".[2] He considered the trial to be the "most significant in a decade", believing that it "could be the final nail in the coffin for the Obscene Publications Act in the digital age because the jury's verdict shows that normal people view consensual adult pornography as a part of everyday life and are no longer shocked, depraved or corrupted by it".[5] Jackman had been responsible for maintaining the Twitter account devoted to the trial, and following the verdict, a flurry of Twitter users tweeted in support of Peacock, many criticising the fact that the case ever came to court in the first place.[9]

Various experts in the field of sex and pornography claimed that the trial was significant because it reflected that the general British public understood sexuality in a new way, something that the law at the time didn't take into account.[2] The academic sexologist Feona Attwood of Sheffield Hallam University, who herself had attended the trial, claimed that "I think the law does not make sense. All the evidence that was heard was about whether the material had the ability to harm and corrupt. The question now is, what does that actually mean? What is significant is that the jury understood [the issues at stake]."[2]

The conservative pressure group Mediawatch-uk argued that the trial reflected a need to make the Obscene Publications Act more specific; the group's director Vivienne Pattison claimed that the R v Peacock case "illustrates the problem" with the law as it stood, noting that "There is not a list which says what is obscene and what is not. It makes it incredibly difficult to get a conviction on that". In response to the events of the trial she argued that while "As a society we are moving to a place where porn is considered as kind of fun between consenting adults," she felt that this was problematic because in her opinion "porn is damaging."[5]

Media response

Writing for The Guardian, Nichi Hodgson proclaimed that the verdict represented "a great day for English sexual liberties", proceeding to state "Thank god the jury had sense to see that in 2012, telling others what is depraved – and prosecuting them for "debasing" your mind if they publish material featuring it and you are privy to it, is as absurd as it is anachronistic."[1]

Further reading

  • Siry, Lawrence (Fall 2012). "Extreme pornography regulation in the UK: recent developments". Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology. 6 (2). Czech Republic: Masaryk University: 283–297. PDF. Also available through Heinonline.
  • Antoniou, Alex (February 2013). "R v Peacock: landmark trial redefines obscenity law". Graduate Journal of Social Science. 10 (1): 85–103. PDF.
  • Beresford, Sarah (October 2014). "Obscene performative pornography: R v Peacock (2012) and the legal construction of same-sex and gendered identities in the United Kingdom". Porn Studies. 1 (4): 378–390. doi:10.1080/23268743.2014.958384.

References

  1. ^ a b c d Hodgson, Nichi (6 January 2012). "Michael Peacock's acquittal is a victory for sexual freedom". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Beaumont, Peter & Hodgson, Nichi (7 January 2012). "Obscenity law in doubt after jury acquits distributor of gay pornography". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  3. ^ a b c d e "'Sleazy Michael' wins obscenity trial over fisting DVDs". The Week. 6 January 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Jackman, Myles (6 January 2012). "Obscenity trial: the law is not suitable for a digital age". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Not guilty verdict in DVD obscenity trial". BBC. 6 January 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Green, David Allen (5 January 2012). "Fisting on Trial". New Statesman. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  7. ^ a b c d Hodgson, Nichi (9 January 2012). "Obscenity trial shows up outdated law". Law Gazette. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  8. ^ a b "Obscene publication laws guidance to be reviewed". Solicitors Journal. 6 January 2012. Archived from the original on 12 March 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  9. ^ a b "Obscenity trial makes waves in the UK". Storyful. 6 January 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  10. ^ "Obscenity trial ends". 6 January 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.

Read other articles:

No debe confundirse con Estación sencilla Santa Isabel la estación del sistema TransMilenio de Bogotá. Santa Isabel Estación Santa IsabelUbicaciónCoordenadas 33°26′49″S 70°37′50″O / -33.447075, -70.63045Dirección Av. General Bustamante con Avenida Santa IsabelComuna ProvidenciaDatos de la estaciónInauguración 5 de abril de 1997Servicios N.º de andenes 2N.º de vías 2Operador Metro de SantiagoServicios detalladosClasificación Posición SubterráneaColor  ...

 

У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. Клиновидные кости (стопа). Клиновидная кость Каталоги MeSHMeSHGray?FMATA98  Медиафайлы на Викискладе Клинови́дная кость (основна́я кость) (лат. os sphenoidale) — непарная кость, образующая центральный отдел основания черепа. Состо...

 

Former national football association of Brunei Brunei Football AssociationAFCFounded1952; 72 years ago (1952)[1]Folded2008; 16 years ago (2008)HeadquartersBandar Seri BegawanFIFA affiliation1969; 55 years ago (1969)[1]AFC affiliation1970; 54 years ago (1970)[1]AFF affiliation1984; 40 years ago (1984)[1]PresidentHussain YussoffVice-PresidentHassan Abas The Brunei Football A...

Artikel ini mungkin terdampak dengan peristiwa terkini: Invasi Rusia ke Ukraina 2022. Informasi di halaman ini bisa berubah setiap saat. Peta Krimea. Referendum mengenai status Krimea diadakan pada tanggal 16 Maret 2014 oleh parlemen Krimea dan pemerintah Sevastopol, yang merupakan subdivisi Ukraina. Parlemen Krimea dan dewan kota Sevastopol menganggap penjatuhan Presiden Ukraina Viktor Yanukovych selama revolusi Ukraina 2014 sebagai sebuah kudeta dan menganggap pemerintahan baru di Ukraina t...

 

هذه المقالة تحتاج للمزيد من الوصلات للمقالات الأخرى للمساعدة في ترابط مقالات الموسوعة. فضلًا ساعد في تحسين هذه المقالة بإضافة وصلات إلى المقالات المتعلقة بها الموجودة في النص الحالي. (مارس 2018)   لمعانٍ أخرى، طالع مقاطعة ليبيرتي (توضيح). مقاطعة ليبيرتي     الإحداثي�...

 

Disambiguazione – Se stai cercando l'area di Baghdad, vedi Zona verde. Green ZoneMatt Damon in una scena del filmTitolo originaleGreen Zone Lingua originaleInglese Paese di produzioneStati Uniti d'America Anno2010 Durata115 min Rapporto2,35:1 Genereazione, thriller RegiaPaul Greengrass SoggettoRajiv Chandrasekaran (libro Imperial Life in the Emerald City) SceneggiaturaBrian Helgeland ProduttoreTim Bevan, Eric Fellner, Lloyd Levin, Paul Greengrass Produttore esecutivoDebra Hayward, Liza...

Not to be confused with Yan'an. County in South Hwanghae Province, North KoreaYŏnan County 연안군CountyKorean transcription(s) • Hanja延安郡 • McCune-ReischauerYŏnan-gun • Revised RomanizationYeonan-gunCountryNorth KoreaProvinceSouth Hwanghae ProvinceArea • Total524.4 km2 (202.5 sq mi)Population (2008[1]) • Total158,845 • Density300/km2 (780/sq mi) Yŏnan County is a county in...

 

Questa voce sugli argomenti allenatori di calcio britannici e calciatori britannici è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Segui i suggerimenti dei progetti di riferimento 1, 2. Dean Saunders Nazionalità  Galles Altezza 173 cm Calcio Ruolo Allenatore (ex attaccante) Termine carriera 2001 - giocatore Carriera Squadre di club1 1982-1985 Swansea City49 (12)1985→  Cardiff City4 (0)1985-1987 Brighton72 (21)1987-1988 Oxf...

 

この記事は検証可能な参考文献や出典が全く示されていないか、不十分です。出典を追加して記事の信頼性向上にご協力ください。(このテンプレートの使い方)出典検索?: コルク – ニュース · 書籍 · スカラー · CiNii · J-STAGE · NDL · dlib.jp · ジャパンサーチ · TWL(2017年4月) コルクを打ち抜いて作った瓶の栓 コルク(木栓、�...

United States Air Force military unit (1943–1965) 724th Strategic Missile SquadronThree Titan I missiles on alert at Watkins, Colorado about 1962Active1943–1945; 1961–1965Country United StatesBranch United States Air ForceRoleIntercontinental ballistic missileEngagementsMediterranean Theater of OperationsDecorationsDistinguished Unit CitationAir Force Outstanding Unit AwardInsignia724th Bombardment Squadron emblem (World War II)[1]Military unit The 724th Strategic Miss...

 

这是马来族人名,“莫哈末·雅辛”是父名,不是姓氏,提及此人时应以其自身的名“慕尤丁”为主。 尊敬的丹斯里拿督哈芝慕尤丁·莫哈末雅辛馬來語:Muhyiddin Mohd YassinMahiaddin bin Md Yasin(注册名)国会议员PSM; SPMJ; SHMS; SPSA; SPMP; SUNS; SPDK; DP; PNBS; SMJ; BSI (I); PIS (I)2021年的慕尤丁 第8任马来西亚首相任期2020年3月1日—2021年8月20日君主國家元首蘇丹阿都拉副职依斯迈沙比里前任马...

 

此條目可能包含不适用或被曲解的引用资料,部分内容的准确性无法被证實。 (2023年1月5日)请协助校核其中的错误以改善这篇条目。详情请参见条目的讨论页。 各国相关 主題列表 索引 国内生产总值 石油储量 国防预算 武装部队(军事) 官方语言 人口統計 人口密度 生育率 出生率 死亡率 自杀率 谋杀率 失业率 储蓄率 识字率 出口额 进口额 煤产量 发电量 监禁率 死刑 国债 ...

2020年夏季奥林匹克运动会波兰代表團波兰国旗IOC編碼POLNOC波蘭奧林匹克委員會網站olimpijski.pl(英文)(波兰文)2020年夏季奥林匹克运动会(東京)2021年7月23日至8月8日(受2019冠状病毒病疫情影响推迟,但仍保留原定名称)運動員206參賽項目24个大项旗手开幕式:帕维尔·科热尼奥夫斯基(游泳)和马娅·沃什乔夫斯卡(自行车)[1]闭幕式:卡罗利娜·纳亚(皮划艇)&#...

 

A Woman's FoolPoster filmSutradaraJohn FordDitulis olehGeorge Hively (skenario)BerdasarkanLin McLeanoleh Owen WisterPemeranHarry CareySinematograferBen F. ReynoldsDistributorUniversal Film Manufacturing CompanyTanggal rilis 15 Agustus 1918 (1918-08-15) Durasi50 menitNegaraAmerika SerikatBahasaBisu (intertitel Inggris) A Woman's Fool adalah sebuah film koboi Amerika Serikat tahun 1918 garapan John Ford dan menampilkan Harry Carey. Film tersebut dianggap menjadi film hilang.[1] Ref...

 

American college football season 1961 Illinois Fighting Illini footballConferenceBig Ten ConferenceRecord0–9 (0–7 Big Ten)Head coachPete Elliott (2nd season)MVPTony ParrilliCaptainGary BrownHome stadiumMemorial StadiumSeasons← 19601962 → 1961 Big Ten Conference football standings vte Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T No. 2 Ohio State $ 6 – 0 – 0 8 – 0 – 1 No. 6 Minnesota 6 – 1 – 0 8 – 2 ̵...

EredivisieBadan yang mengaturKNVBNegara BelandaKonfederasiUEFADibentuk1888; 135 tahun lalu (1888)Jumlah tim18Tingkat pada piramida1Degradasi keEerste DivisiePiala domestikPiala KNVBPiala Johan CruijffPiala internasionalLiga Champions UEFALiga Eropa UEFALiga Konferensi Eropa UEFAJuara bertahan ligaFeyenoord (gelar ke-16) (2022–2023)Klub tersuksesAjax (36 gelar)Penampilan terbanyakWilly van der Kuijlen (538)Pencetak gol terbanyakJohan Cruyff (321)Televisi penyiarNOS (cuplikan)iNews ...

 

American lawyer and politician For the British politician, see James Seddon (British politician). For the footballer, see Jimmy Seddon. James Seddon4th Confederate States Secretary of WarIn officeNovember 21, 1862 – February 5, 1865PresidentJefferson DavisPreceded byGeorge RandolphSucceeded byJohn BreckinridgeMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom Virginia's 6th districtIn officeMarch 4, 1849 – March 3, 1851Preceded byJohn BottsSucceeded byJohn Caski...

 

County in Georgia, United States County in GeorgiaBerrien CountyCountyBerrien County courthouse in Nashville SealLocation within the U.S. state of GeorgiaGeorgia's location within the U.S.Coordinates: 31°16′N 83°14′W / 31.27°N 83.23°W / 31.27; -83.23Country United StatesState GeorgiaFounded1856; 168 years ago (1856)Named forJohn M. BerrienSeatNashvilleLargest cityNashvilleArea • Total458 sq mi (1,190 km2)&#...

  关于2019年同名電影,请见「愛爾蘭人 (2019年電影)」。 爱尔兰人 Éireannaigh迈克尔·柯林斯詹姆斯·康诺利博诺乔伊斯布莱恩·奥德里斯科尔丹尼尔·欧康诺圣高隆邦布伦丹玛丽·罗宾逊安妮·伯尼爱留根纳恩雅约瑟琳·贝尔·伯奈尔理查德·坎蒂隆玛琳·奥哈拉约翰·托兰德威廉·塞西尔·坎贝尔威廉·达根约翰·L·辛格约翰·肯尼迪總人口估計8000萬人有愛爾蘭血統[1]�...

 

2019 song by Chris Brown UndecidedSingle by Chris Brownfrom the album Indigo ReleasedJanuary 4, 2019RecordedAugust 2018StudioCBE (Tarzana, Los Angeles)Genre R&B pop Length3:08LabelRCASongwriter(s) Chris Brown Scott Storch Vincent Van den Ende Antonio Stith Patrizio Pigliapoco Felicia Ferraro Jarvis Barker Sylvester Jackson Shanice Wilson-Knox Narada Walden Lyricist(s) Chris Brown Antonio Stith Felicia Ferraro Producer(s)Scott StorchAvedon (co-producer)Chris Brown singles chronology Buss I...