For fear of him, the guards shook, and became like dead men.[a]
Analysis
This verse returns to the guards, literally "those keeping [watch]" (Ancient Greek: οἱ τηροῦντες, hoitērountes[1]), who appeared throughout Matthew's crucifixion narrative, but not in the other gospels. The same words are used for the guards as those at the crucifixion introduced at Matthew 27:36.[2] Those guards are also frightened by an earthquake at Matthew 27:54, but in that instance the guards are converted, whereas here these guards are fearful, but give no indication of conversion.[3] In Mark it is the women who are afraid of the angel, but in Matthew, the women were bystanders and the line about fear was transferred from the women to the guards.[2]
For Robert Gundry, the weakness of the guards serves to contrast with the angel's power. That the guards are now as dead, while Jesus is alive, also serves as an ironic reversal.[4] It is also something of a pun to have the guards "shake" ("tremble" or "shaken", from Greek: ἐσείσθησαν, eseisthēsan;[1] a plural equivalent of [the earth was] "shaken" from singular ἐσείσθη, eseisthē, in Matthew 27:51) when confronted with an earthquake, perhaps reflecting the author of Matthew's fondness for wordplay.[2]
Falling "like dead" occurs again in the New Testament at Revelation 1:17, where John did so when presented with his vision of 'the exalted Son of Man'.[2] Similar expressions are also used in contemporary Greco-Roman pagan literature when mortals are confronted by gods.[5] Fear is also the standard reaction in the Bible when confronted by the divine, and this verse is a variation on the expression "fear and trembling" that commonly describes such incidents.[6]
The collapse of the guards removes them from the rest of this section of the narrative. Eduard Schweizer notes that the fainting of the guards and the possible absence of the women at this point indicate that Jesus may have emerged physically from the tomb during the period when no witnesses could have seen him.[7]
^Davies, W.D. and Dale C. Allison, Jr., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Edinburgh : T. & T. Clark, 1988-1997. pg. 541
^Gundry, Robert H., Matthew a Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art, Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982. pg. 588
^Keener, Craig S. The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. pg. 701
^Davies, W.D. and Dale C. Allison, Jr. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Edinburgh : T. & T. Clark, 1988-1997. pg. 541
^Schweizer, Eduard. The Good News According to Matthew, Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1975 pg. 524