PROFILPELAJAR.COM
Privacy Policy
My Blog
New Profil
Kampus
Prov. Aceh
Prov. Bali
Prov. Bangka Belitung
Prov. Banten
Prov. Bengkulu
Prov. D.I. Yogyakarta
Prov. D.K.I. Jakarta
Prov. Gorontalo
Prov. Jambi
Prov. Jawa Barat
Prov. Jawa Tengah
Prov. Jawa Timur
Prov. Kalimantan Barat
Prov. Kalimantan Selatan
Prov. Kalimantan Tengah
Prov. Kalimantan Timur
Prov. Kalimantan Utara
Prov. Kepulauan Riau
Prov. Lampung
Prov. Maluku
Prov. Maluku Utara
Prov. Nusa Tenggara Barat
Prov. Nusa Tenggara Timur
Prov. Papua
Prov. Papua Barat
Prov. Riau
Prov. Sulawesi Barat
Prov. Sulawesi Selatan
Prov. Sulawesi Tengah
Prov. Sulawesi Tenggara
Prov. Sulawesi Utara
Prov. Sumatera Barat
Prov. Sumatera Selatan
Prov. Sumatera Utara
Partner
Ensiklopedia Dunia
Artikel Digital
Literasi Digital
Jurnal Publikasi
Kumpulan Artikel
Profil Sekolah - Kampus
Dokumen 123
Comparison of backup software
This article
needs additional citations for
verification
.
Please help
improve this article
by
adding citations to reliable sources
. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources:
"Comparison of backup software"
–
news
·
newspapers
·
books
·
scholar
·
JSTOR
(
October 2022
)
(
Learn how and when to remove this message
)
Feature
comparison of backup software
. For a more general comparison see
List of backup software
.
List
Package
Network optimized (rsync)
Versioning (diff, chunk, hardlink)
Full client side
Encryption
Error Detection
Simple server
Distributed partials
Renames optimized
Web interface
Webmin
module
AMANDA
?
?
Optional (separate download + cost)
Areca Backup
?
?
No
Attic
Yes
Yes;
Buzhash
chunking
[
1
]
Yes;
AES
,
SHA256
HMAC
with
PBKDF2
encrypted keyfiles
[
1
]
Yes; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext
No
No
Yes; through deduplication
No
No
BackupPC
Yes
Yes;
hard-links
No; but can be achieved via pluggable transfer mechanism
No
Yes; through deduplication
Yes
No
Bacula
Yes
Yes;
Incremental
Yes
Yes; Silent error detection (MD5 or SHA1). Backup certification Verify Job
Yes; *For Linux
Yes; Deduplication optimized storage driver
Yes
Yes
Back In Time
Yes
Yes;
hard-links
Yes;
EncFS
No
No
BitTorrent
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
?
Borg
(fork of Attic)
Yes
Yes;
Buzhash
chunking
[
1
]
Yes;
AES
,
SHA256
HMAC
with
PBKDF2
encrypted keyfiles
[
1
]
Yes; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext
No
No
Yes; through deduplication
(in development)
No
Box Backup
?
No
No
Bup
Yes
Yes, chunk deduplication
No
Yes (
Par2
)
Yes
?
Yes, through deduplication
Yes
No
cpio
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
?
Optional (separate download)
Cobian Backup (v11)
?
No
?
Cwrsync
- Rsync for Windows
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
DirSync Pro
No
No
No
DAR
Yes
Yes;
Incremental
;
chunking
;
Yes
Yes
?
?
?
?
dcfldd
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
dd
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
dump
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
duplicity
Yes
Yes;
Incremental
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Duplicati
Yes
Yes;
Incremental
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
FlyBack
No
?
No
git
Yes
Yes; snapshot
Yes (via
git-remote-gcrypt
)
Yes
No
No
Yes
?
?
git-annex
Yes
No
Partial (with remote block device)
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
luckyBackup
No
No
No
Mondo Rescue
Yes
Yes;
Incremental
No
Yes
?
No
Redo Backup and Recovery
No
No
No
rdiff-backup
Yes
Yes;
reverse incremental
No
No
No
No
Yes; via Third-party
Yes
rsync
Yes
Yes;
hard-links
(--link-dest)
No
No
No
No
No
?
Optional (separate downloads)
star
/gtar
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
?
?
zsync
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
zpaq
Yes
Yes;
Incremental
Yes;
AES-256/CTR
Yes;
SHA-1
No
No
Yes; through deduplication
No
No
References
^
a
b
c
d
anarcat.
"document internals better"
.
Github pull requests
. Retrieved
29 January
2015
.